skip to main content
10.1145/3543434.3543441acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conceptual challenges of researching Artificial Intelligence in public administrations

Published:14 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research has been advancing on the development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in public administrations. However, there is limited consensus and agreement on what is considered Artificial Intelligence, as different understandings and approaches in research and practice exist. This paper explores and compares the varying ways AI has been described and understood in previous Information Systems and eGovernment research. Following, a survey amongst Belgium civil servants is analysed to assess what they associate with the term Artificial Intelligence. The findings show that many civil servants tend to associate AI with being able to conduct intelligent tasks, have certain capabilities or are specific applications they are familiar with. Specific algorithms or learning methods, often included in research papers, are not associated with the term AI. These results show that researchers and policymakers may have opposite or even paradoxical views on what is or is not AI, which could have significant consequences for researching the adoption of AI in government, as well as comparing different research findings. In this respect, the paper proposes to use an integrative lens to study AI in government, by including different dimensions and understandings.

References

  1. Perrault, R., Shoham, Y., Brynjolfsson, E., Clark, J., Etchemendy, J., Grosz Harvard, B., Lyons, T., Manyika, J., Carlos Niebles, J., Mishra, S.: Artificial Intelligence Index 2019 Annual Report. , Stanford (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexopoulos, C., Lachana, Z., Androutsopoulou, A., Diamantopoulou, V., Charalabidis, Y., Loutsaris, M.A.: How Machine Learning is Changing e-Government. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance - ICEGOV2019. pp. 354–363. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326412.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bannister, F., Connolly, R.: The future ain't what it used to be: Forecasting the impact of ICT on the public sphere. Gov. Inf. Q. 37, 101410 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Schank, R.C.: The Current State of AI: One Man's Opinion. Artif. Intell. 4, 1, 1–8 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1609/AIMAG.V4I1.382.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Barth, T.J., Arnold, E.: Artificial Intelligence and Administrative Discretion: Implications for Public Administration. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 29, 332–351 (1999).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Krafft, P.M., Young, M., Katell, M., Huang, K., Bugingo, G.: Defining AI in Policy versus Practice. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davison, J.: No, Machine Learning is not just glorified statistics, https://towardsdatascience.com/no-machine-learning-is-not-just-glorified-statistics-26d3952234e3, last accessed 2020/02/13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Vetrò, A., Santangelo, A., Beretta, E., De Martin, J.C.: AI: from rational agents to socially responsible agents. Digit. Policy, Regul. Gov. . 21, 291–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-08-2018-0049.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. OECD: Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and its use in the Public Sector. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1787/726fd39d-en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Craglia, M., Annoni, A., Benczur, P., Bertoldi, P., Delipetrev, P., De Prato, G., Feijoo, C., Fernandez-Macias, E., Gomez, E., Iglesias, M., Junklewitz, H., M, L.-C., Martens, B., Nascimento, S., Nativi, S., Polvora, A., Sanchez, I., Tolan, S., Tuomi, I., Fernandez Macias, E., Gomez, E., Iglesias, M., Junklewitz, H., López Cobo, M., Martens, B., Nascimento, S., Nativi, S., Polvora, A., Sanchez, I., Tolan, S., Tuomi, I., Vesnic Alujevic, L.: Artificial Intelligence - A European perspective. Publications Office, Luxembourg (2018). https://doi.org/10.2760/11251.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Preece, A., Ashelford, R., Armstrong, H., Braines, D.: Hows and Whys of Artificial Intelligence for Public Sector Decisions: Explanation and Evaluation. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Misuraca, G., van Noordt, C., Boukli, A.: The use of AI in public services. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance. pp. 90–99. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3428502.3428513.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Wirtz, B.W., Weyerer, J.C., Geyer, C.: Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges. Int. J. Public Adm. 42, 596–615 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sousa, W.G. de, Melo, E.R.P. de, Bermejo, P.H.D.S., Farias, R.A.S., Gomes, A.O.: How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Gov. Inf. Q. 101392 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang, B., Dafoe, A.: Artificial Intelligence: American Attitudes and Trends. , Oxford (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrasco, M., Mills, S., Whybrew, A., Jura, A.: The Citizens Perspective on the Use of AI in Government. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Medaglia, R., Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A.: Artificial Intelligence in Government: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 089443932110340 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393211034087.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y., Salem, F.: Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Gov. Inf. Q. 101577 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Nemitz, P.: Constitutional democracy and technology in the age of artificial intelligence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 376, 20180089 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0089.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L., Wachter, S., Taddeo, M., Mittelstadt, B., Cath, C.: Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 24, 505–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Valle-Cruz, D., Criado, J.I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E.A.: Assessing the public policy-cycle framework in the age of artificial intelligence: From agenda-setting to policy evaluation. Gov. Inf. Q. 37, 101509 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sun, T.Q., Medaglia, R.: Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Gov. Inf. Q. 36, 368–383 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Torraco, R.J.: Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 15, 404–428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Collins, C., Dennehy, D., Conboy, K., Mikalef, P.: Artificial intelligence in information systems research: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 60, 102383 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Russel, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence - A modern approach. Pearson (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Müller, V.C., Bostrom, N.: Future progress in artificial intelligence. AI Matters. 1, 9–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2639475.2639478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Harrison, T.M., Luna-Reyes, L.F.: Cultivating Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Digital Government. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 089443932098012 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Wirtz, B.W., Weyerer, J.C., Geyer, C.: Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges, (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Valle-Cruz, D., Alejandro Ruvalcaba-Gomez, E., Sandoval-Almazan, R., Ignacio Criado, J.: A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Government and its Potential from a Public Policy Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. pp. 91–99. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Cabrera-Sánchez, J.-P., Villarejo-Ramos, Á.F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Shaikh, A.A.: Identifying relevant segments of AI applications adopters – Expanding the UTAUT2’s variables. Telemat. Informatics. 58, 101529 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M.: Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Bus. Horiz. 62, 15–25 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Desouza, K.C., Dawson, G.S., Chenok, D.: Designing, developing, and deploying artificial intelligence systems: Lessons from and for the public sector. Bus. Horiz. 63, 205–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., Wang, Y.: Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2, 230–243 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Baruffaldi, S., Van Beuzekom, B., Dernis, H., Harhoff, D., Rao, N., Rosenfeld, D., Squicciarini, M.: Identifying and measuring developments in artificial intelligence: Making the impossible possible. OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Pap. 1–68 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Haenlein, M., Kaplan, A.: A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. Calif. Manage. Rev. 61, 5–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P., Davis, E., Edwards, D.D., Forsyth, D., Hay, N.J., Malik, J.M., Mittal, V., Sahami, M., Thrun, S.: Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach Third Edition. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. van Noordt, C., Misuraca, G.: Exploratory Insights on Artificial Intelligence for Government in Europe. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 089443932098044 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980449.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Scherer, M.U.: Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. Harv. J. Law Technol. 29, 353–400 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Littman, M.L., Ajunwa, I., Berger, G., Boutilier, C.: Gathering Stregth, Gathering Storm: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence (AI100) 2021 Study Panel Report. Stanford Univ. Stanford, CA. (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E.: The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Frankish, K. and Ramsey, W.M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. pp. 316–334. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046855.020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Pennachin, C., Goertzel, B.: Contemporary Approaches to Artificial General Intelligence. In: Goertzel, B. and Pennachin, C. (eds.) Cognitive Technologies. pp. 1–30. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68677-4_1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Gasser, U., Almeida, V.A.F.: A Layered Model for AI Governance. IEEE Internet Comput. 21, 58–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIC.2017.4180835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Raaijmakers, S.: Artificial Intelligence for Law Enforcement: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Secur. Priv. 17, 74–77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2019.2925649.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M.: Rulers of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence. Bus. Horiz. 63, 37–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.09.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Sætra, H.S.: A shallow defence of a technocracy of artificial intelligence: Examining the political harms of algorithmic governance in the domain of government. Technol. Soc. 62, 101283 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Agarwal, P.K.: Public Administration Challenges in the World of AI and Bots. Public Adm. Rev. 78, 917–921 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Rai, A., Constantinides, P., Sarker, S.: Next generation digital platforms: toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Q. 44, iii–ix (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Russel, S.J., Norvig, P. 1956-, Russell, S.J. 1962-, Norvig, P. 1956-, Russel, S.J., Norvig, P. 1956-: Artificial Intelligence - A modern approach. Pearson (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Grosz, B.J., Altman, R., Horvitz, E., Mackworth, A., Mitchell, T., Mulligan, D., Shoham, Y., Brynjolfsson, E., Calo, R., Etzioni, O., Hager, G., Hirschberg, J., Kalyanakrishnan, S., Leyton-Brown, K., Parkes, D., Press, W., Shah, J.: Standing Committee of the One Hundred Year Study of Artificial Intelligence. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Bryman, A.: Social research methods. Oxford university press (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Thiel, V.: Research methods in public administration and public management. An introduction. Routledge (2014).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Green, B.P.: Ethical reflections on artificial intelligence. Sci. Fides. 6, 9–31 (2018). https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2018.015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Makridakis, S.: The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.03.006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Engin, Z., Treleaven, P.: Algorithmic Government: Automating Public Services and Supporting Civil Servants in using Data Science Technologies. Comput. J. 62, 448–460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxy082.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Ojo, A., Mellouli, S., Ahmadi Zeleti, F.: A Realist Perspective on AI-era Public Management*. In: 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research on - dg.o 2019. pp. 159–170. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Misuraca, G., van Noordt, C.: AI Watch - Artificial Intelligence in public services. , Luxembourg (2020). https://doi.org/10.2760/039619.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Renda, A.: Artificial Intelligence Ethics, governance and policy challenges. Report of a CEPS Task Force, February 2019. aei.pitt.edu (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00027-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Eggers, W., Schatsky, D., Viechnicki, P., Eggers, D.W.: AI-augmented government: Using cognitive technologies to redesign public sector work. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. European Commission: European enterprise survey on the use of technologies based on artificial intelligence. (2020). https://doi.org/10.2759/759368.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Dwivedi, Y.K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P.V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A.K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., Medaglia, R., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, K., Le Meunier-FitzHugh, L.C., Misra, S., Mogaji, E., Sharma, S.K., Singh, J.B., Raghavan, V., Raman, R., Rana, N.P., Samothrakis, S., Spencer, J., Tamilmani, K., Tubadji, A., Walton, P., Williams, M.D.: Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 101994 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Meijer, A., Webster, W.: Governing Smart Cities: Why Do Academics Need to Study Trendy Concepts? Inf. Polity. 24, 227–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-190007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Soe, R.M., Schuch de Azambuja, L., Toiskallio, K., Nieminen, M., Batty, M.: Institutionalising smart city research and innovation: from fuzzy definitions to real-life experiments. Urban Res. Pract. 00, 1–43 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2021.1998592.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Conceptual challenges of researching Artificial Intelligence in public administrations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      dg.o 2022: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
      June 2022
      499 pages
      ISBN:9781450397490
      DOI:10.1145/3543434

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 September 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)74
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader