skip to main content
10.1145/3543434.3543586acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Does web page loading speed matter? An analysis in the Brazilian Public Service Portals

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Anyone who browses the internet expects to get information quickly and securely, so the time it takes to load a website can be decisive for user loyalty. On non-governmental websites, users who access these websites on smartphones will abandon them if it takes more than three seconds to load. As public services have no competition, that is, the citizen will not have the option of obtaining the service elsewhere, he will not abandon it. But this experience will have a negative impact on the citizen. The objective of this work is to present research on the loading speed of Public Service Portals (PSC) in Brazilian states and the Federal District, to emphasize that this is a relevant attribute in the quality of public services, especially in countries that face great challenges. with the internet infrastructure. It was carried out a load test on the PSC of the 26 states and the Brazilian Federal District, comparing them with each other and with some international PSCs. Data were collected using the Testmysite tool (Google), using 4G internet. The results indicate that the loading speed of service portals is an important attribute that should be considered when developing or when improving high-quality public services, but only one than 27 PSC from Brazilian states presented a fast performance.

References

  1. Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Nripendra P. Rana, Marijn Janssen, Banita Lal, Michael D. Williams, and Marc Clement. 2017. An empirical validation of a unified model of electronic government adoption (UMEGA). Government Information Quarterly 34, 2 (April 2017), 211–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Khaled A. Alshare and Peggy L. Lane. 2011. Predicting Student-Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in ERP Courses: An Empirical Investigation. CAIS 28, (2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02834Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang E. Koh, Victor R. Prybutok, Sherry D. Ryan, and Yu “Andy” Wu. 2010. A Model for Mandatory Use of Software Technologies: An Integrative Approach by Applying Multiple Levels of Abstraction of Informing Science. InformingSciJ 13, (2010), 177–203. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28945/1326Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Héctor San Martín and Ángel Herrero. 2012. Influence of the user's psychological factors on the online purchase intention in rural tourism: Integrating innovativeness to the UTAUT framework. Tourism Management 33, 2 (April 2012), 341–350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.04.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bram Pynoo, Pieter Devolder, Jo Tondeur, Johan van Braak, Wouter Duyck, and Philippe Duyck. 2011. Predicting secondary school teachers’ acceptance and use of a digital learning environment: A cross-sectional study. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1 (January 2011), 568–575. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Thomas Kohlborn. 2014. Quality assessment of service bundles for governmental one-stop portals: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly 31, 2 (April 2014), 221–228. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J.Joseph Cronin, Michael K Brady, and G.Tomas M Hult. 2000. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing 76, 2 (June 2000), 193–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. OECD. 2018. Digital Government Review of Brazil: Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector. Retrieved January 20, 2022 from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government-review-of-brazil-9789264307636-en.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Noe Elisa. 2020. Usability, Accessibility and Web Security Assessment of E-government Websites in Tanzania. arXiv:2006.14245 [cs] (June 2020). Retrieved January 30, 2022 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14245Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Norman E. Youngblood and Susan A. Youngblood. 2013. User Experience and Accessibility: An Analysis of County Web Portals. J. Usability Studies 9, 1 (November 2013), 25–41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas Kohlborn, Axel Korthaus, Christoph Peters, and Erwin Fielt. 2013. A Comparative Study of Governmental One-Stop Portals for Public Service Delivery: International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies 9, 3 (July 2013), 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4018/jiit.2013070101Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Anamarija Leben, Mateja Kunstelj, Marko Bohanec, and Mirko Vintar. 2006. Evaluating public administration e-portals. Information Polity 11, 3–4 (2006), 207–225. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2006-0098[13] Regina Connolly, Frank Bannister, and Aideen Kearney. 2010. Government website service quality: a study of the Irish revenue online service. European Journal of Information Systems 19, 6 (December 2010), 649–667. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.45Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Sulaiman Ainin, Shamshul Bahri, and Asri Ahmad. 2012. Evaluating portal performance: A study of the National Higher Education Fund Corporation (PTPTN) portal. Telematics and Informatics 29, 3 (August 2012), 314–323. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2011.11.004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Google. 2022. Compare your mobile site speed. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/feature/testmysite/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel An. 2017. Como acompanhar os novos benchmarks da sua indústria para velocidade de páginas mobile. Think with Google. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/pt-br/estrategias-de-marketing/apps-e-mobile/como-acompanhar-os-novos-benchmarks-da-sua-ind%C3%BAstria-para-velocidade-de-p%C3%A1ginas-mobile/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. CETIC.BR. 2021. Resumo Executivo - Pesquisa sobre o uso das Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação nos domicílios brasileiros - TIC Domicílios 2020. Cetic.br - Centro Regional para o Desenvolvimento da Sociedade da Informação. Retrieved January 30, 2022 from https://cetic.br/publicacao/resumo-executivo-pesquisa-sobre-o-uso-das-tecnologias-de-informacao-e-comunicacao-nos-domicilios-brasileiros-tic-domicilios-2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Maria Wimmer and Efthimios Tambouris. 2002. One-Stop Government A working framework and requirements.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Antonio Carlos Gil and Aline Crespo dos Reis Neto. 2021. Survey de Experiência como Pesquisa Qualitativa Básica em Administração. R. Ci. Adm. 22, 56 (February 2021), 125–137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2020.e74026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Google. 2022. Recursos dos PageSpeed Insights|Google Developers. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/rules?hl=pt-brGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Google. 2022. Compare a velocidade do seu site mobile. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/pt-br/feature/testmysite/faq/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Does web page loading speed matter? An analysis in the Brazilian Public Service Portals
            Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              dg.o 2022: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
              June 2022
              499 pages
              ISBN:9781450397490
              DOI:10.1145/3543434

              Copyright © 2022 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 14 September 2022

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article
              • Research
              • Refereed limited

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%
            • Article Metrics

              • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
              • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

              Other Metrics

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader