skip to main content
10.1145/3543434.3543655acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Overview of Rede.gov.br as a Federative Mechanism for Digital Government Development in Brazil

Published:14 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Federations form a way of governing nations. The decisions are taken impact all constituent units, where Brazil is among the 28 nations that adopt this model of government. Among the federative relations it presents in the country, actions for the modernization of public management and for Digital Government have been evolving after the Constitutional Amendment 19/1998. In this sense, one of the main current initiatives is the National Digital Government Network - Rede gov.br, which promotes Digital Government initiatives in the Brazilian public sector. The objective of this article was to present the current stage of the process of integration of the States and the Federal District (FUs) to the Rede.gov.br. The main results indicate that 73% of the analyzed FUs followed the Rede.gov.br. As a result, the functionalities available on Rede.gov.br are quickly diffused among these entities. Still, among the federative ones that are not yet being implemented as solutions, there will be joining and a good part of the FUs moving in this direction. On the other hand, some FUs still face problems such as the essential need for public services, lack of qualified personnel or infrastructure for implementation as functionalities. From the information identified in these, specific ones can be directed to the federated units to overcome the challenges pointed out and advance the Digital Transformation objectives among the federated actions in Brazil.

References

  1. BRASIL. 2020. Estratégia de Governo Digital 2020-2022. Governo Digital. Retrieved January 26, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/EGD2020/estrategia-de-governo-digital-2020-2022Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Thomas O. Hueglin. 2013. Comparing federalisms: Variations or distinct models? In Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and the Varieties of Federalism, Arthur Benz and Jorg Broschek (eds.). Oxford University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199652990.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. George Anderson. 2009. Federalismo: uma introdução. Editora FGV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. King, Federalism and federation. London: Croom Helm, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Michael Burgess and Alain-G. Gagnon. 1993. Federalism and Federation: A Reapprisal. In Comparative federalism and federation: competing traditions and future directions, Michael Burgess and Alain-G. Gagnon (eds.). University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 3-14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cibele Franzese and Fernando Luiz Abrúcio. 2013. Reciprocal effects between federalism and public policy in Brazil: the case of health care, social assistance and education. In Federalismo e políticas públicas no Brasil.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Editora Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, 361-386.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Herbert Obinger, Francis G. Castles, and Stephan Leibfried. 2005. Federalism and the welfare state. In Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European experiences, Herbert Obinger, Stephan Leibfried and Francis G. Castles (eds.). Cambrigde University Press, New York, 1-46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt. 2000. Collaborative federalism in Germany: keeping the system in the eye of the storm. In Federalism and Political Performance, Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt (ed.). Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hironobu Sano. 2008. Articulação Horizontal no Federalismo Brasileiro: Os Conselhos de Secretários Estaduais. Tese de Doutorado. Fundação Getúlio Vargas - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rodrigo Diniz Lara and Marlusa de Sevilha Gosling. 2016. UM MODELO DE GeSTÃO DO RELACIONAMENTO ENTRE OS CIDADÃOS E A ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA. REAd. Rev. eletrôn. adm. (Porto Alegre) 22, 2 (August 2016), 333-362. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.0522015.59196Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Thiago José Tavares Ávila. 2007. Gerenciamento de Projetos de Governo Eletrônico: Um Estudo de Caso no Estado de Alagoas. Monografia. Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Maceió, Alagoas.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Augusto César Costa Junior. 2004. O Programa Nacional de Apoio à Modernização da gestão e do planejamento dos estados e Distrito Federal (PNAGE) e seus resultados no Estado do Ceará. Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional). Programa de Pós Graduação em Economia, CAEN, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stephen Bent, Kenneth Kernaghan, and D. Brian Marson. 1999. Innovations andgoodpractices in single-window service. Canadian Centre for Management Development, Ottawa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. BRASIL. 1998. Emenda Constitucional No 19, de 04 de junho de 1998. Retrieved January 24, 2022 from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc19.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Denis Renato de Oliveira. 2014. Unidades de Atendimento Integrado (UAI): um estudo de políticas públicas para o fortalecimento da cidadania no estado de Minas Gerais. Doutorado em Administração de Organizações. Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11606/T.96.2014.tde-05032015-164436Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. PNAGE. 2006. Programa Nacional de Apoio à Modernização da Gestão e Planejamento dos Estados e Distrito Federal. Contrato de Empréstimo no 1718/OC-BR entre a República Federativa do Brasil e o Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gustavo Guberman and Glauco Knopp. 2009. MODERNIZANDO A MODERNIZAÇÃO DA GESTÃO: O QUE A EXPERIÊNCIA DO PNAGE NOS ENSINA. In Anais do II Congresso Consad de Gestão Pública (2), Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Administração, Brasília, BrasilGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yiwei Gong, Jun Yang, and Xiaojie Shi. 2020. Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly 37, 3 (July 2020), 101487. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann, and Nathalie Haug. 2019. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly 36, 4 (October 2019), 101385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ines Mergel. 2019. Digital service teams in government. Government Information Quarterly 36, 4 (October 2019), 101389. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jeffrey J. Pittaway and Ali Reza Montazemi. 2020. Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly 37, 4 (October 2020), 101474. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Thiago José Tavares Ávila, Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza, and Daniel De Souza Valotto. 2021. Base Nacional de Serviços Públicos do Brasil: sistematização e interoperabilidade de informações para o Governo Digital. Gestão.org 19, 2 (December 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.51359/1679-1827.2021.252653Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Daniel Carvalho, Gisela Demo, Júlio Medeiros, and Fernanda Scussel. 2021. Citizen Relationship Management (CiRM): the past, present, and future of an emerging concept. Cad. EBAPE.BR 19, 1 (March 2021), 32-44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200057xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. BRASIL. 2021. Lei Federal No 14.129 de 29 de Março de 2021. Retrieved from https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/lei-n-14.129-de-29-de-marco-de-2021-311282132Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. BRASIL. 2011. Lei Federal No 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. Retrieved January 24, 2022 from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. BRASIL. 2017. Lei Federal No 13.460, de 26 de Junho de 2017. Retrieved January 24, 2022 from https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/19141395/do1-2017-06-27-lei-no-13- 460-de-26-de-junho-de-2017-19141216Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleycianne Rodrigues Araujo, Thiago Jose Tavares Avila, and Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza. 2021. Impacts of an articulation group for the development of the Digital Government in the Brazilian Subnational Government. In DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, ACM, Omaha NE USA, 339-350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463680Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. BRASIL. 2022. Rede Nacional de Governo Digital. Governo Digital. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/transformacao-digital/rede-nacional-de-governo-digital/rede-nacional-de- governo-digitalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. BRASIL. 2022. Adesões à Rede Nacional de Governo Digital. Governo Digital. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/transformacao-digital/adesoes-a-rede-nacional-de-governo-digitalGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. John W. Creswell. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2008. Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed.). Pearson.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Laurence Bardin. 1977. Análise de Conteúdo. Presses Universitaires de France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. GTD.GOV. 2022. GTD.GOV - Quem somos. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://gtdgov.org.br/quem-somosGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Piergiorgio Corbetta. 2003. Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209922Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An Overview of Rede.gov.br as a Federative Mechanism for Digital Government Development in Brazil
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            dg.o 2022: DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research
            June 2022
            499 pages
            ISBN:9781450397490
            DOI:10.1145/3543434

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 September 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader