ABSTRACT
Federations form a way of governing nations. The decisions are taken impact all constituent units, where Brazil is among the 28 nations that adopt this model of government. Among the federative relations it presents in the country, actions for the modernization of public management and for Digital Government have been evolving after the Constitutional Amendment 19/1998. In this sense, one of the main current initiatives is the National Digital Government Network - Rede gov.br, which promotes Digital Government initiatives in the Brazilian public sector. The objective of this article was to present the current stage of the process of integration of the States and the Federal District (FUs) to the Rede.gov.br. The main results indicate that 73% of the analyzed FUs followed the Rede.gov.br. As a result, the functionalities available on Rede.gov.br are quickly diffused among these entities. Still, among the federative ones that are not yet being implemented as solutions, there will be joining and a good part of the FUs moving in this direction. On the other hand, some FUs still face problems such as the essential need for public services, lack of qualified personnel or infrastructure for implementation as functionalities. From the information identified in these, specific ones can be directed to the federated units to overcome the challenges pointed out and advance the Digital Transformation objectives among the federated actions in Brazil.
- BRASIL. 2020. Estratégia de Governo Digital 2020-2022. Governo Digital. Retrieved January 26, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/EGD2020/estrategia-de-governo-digital-2020-2022Google Scholar
- Thomas O. Hueglin. 2013. Comparing federalisms: Variations or distinct models? In Federal Dynamics: Continuity, Change, and the Varieties of Federalism, Arthur Benz and Jorg Broschek (eds.). Oxford University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199652990.001.0001Google Scholar
- George Anderson. 2009. Federalismo: uma introdução. Editora FGV.Google Scholar
- P. King, Federalism and federation. London: Croom Helm, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Burgess and Alain-G. Gagnon. 1993. Federalism and Federation: A Reapprisal. In Comparative federalism and federation: competing traditions and future directions, Michael Burgess and Alain-G. Gagnon (eds.). University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 3-14.Google Scholar
- Cibele Franzese and Fernando Luiz Abrúcio. 2013. Reciprocal effects between federalism and public policy in Brazil: the case of health care, social assistance and education. In Federalismo e políticas públicas no Brasil.Google Scholar
- Editora Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, 361-386.Google Scholar
- Herbert Obinger, Francis G. Castles, and Stephan Leibfried. 2005. Federalism and the welfare state. In Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European experiences, Herbert Obinger, Stephan Leibfried and Francis G. Castles (eds.). Cambrigde University Press, New York, 1-46.Google Scholar
- Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt. 2000. Collaborative federalism in Germany: keeping the system in the eye of the storm. In Federalism and Political Performance, Ute Wachendorfer-Schmidt (ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hironobu Sano. 2008. Articulação Horizontal no Federalismo Brasileiro: Os Conselhos de Secretários Estaduais. Tese de Doutorado. Fundação Getúlio Vargas - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, São Paulo.Google Scholar
- Rodrigo Diniz Lara and Marlusa de Sevilha Gosling. 2016. UM MODELO DE GeSTÃO DO RELACIONAMENTO ENTRE OS CIDADÃOS E A ADMINISTRAÇÃO PÚBLICA. REAd. Rev. eletrôn. adm. (Porto Alegre) 22, 2 (August 2016), 333-362. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.0522015.59196Google Scholar
- Thiago José Tavares Ávila. 2007. Gerenciamento de Projetos de Governo Eletrônico: Um Estudo de Caso no Estado de Alagoas. Monografia. Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Maceió, Alagoas.Google Scholar
- Augusto César Costa Junior. 2004. O Programa Nacional de Apoio à Modernização da gestão e do planejamento dos estados e Distrito Federal (PNAGE) e seus resultados no Estado do Ceará. Dissertação (Mestrado Profissional). Programa de Pós Graduação em Economia, CAEN, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará.Google Scholar
- Stephen Bent, Kenneth Kernaghan, and D. Brian Marson. 1999. Innovations andgoodpractices in single-window service. Canadian Centre for Management Development, Ottawa.Google Scholar
- BRASIL. 1998. Emenda Constitucional No 19, de 04 de junho de 1998. Retrieved January 24, 2022 from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc19.htmGoogle Scholar
- Denis Renato de Oliveira. 2014. Unidades de Atendimento Integrado (UAI): um estudo de políticas públicas para o fortalecimento da cidadania no estado de Minas Gerais. Doutorado em Administração de Organizações. Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11606/T.96.2014.tde-05032015-164436Google Scholar
- PNAGE. 2006. Programa Nacional de Apoio à Modernização da Gestão e Planejamento dos Estados e Distrito Federal. Contrato de Empréstimo no 1718/OC-BR entre a República Federativa do Brasil e o Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento.Google Scholar
- Gustavo Guberman and Glauco Knopp. 2009. MODERNIZANDO A MODERNIZAÇÃO DA GESTÃO: O QUE A EXPERIÊNCIA DO PNAGE NOS ENSINA. In Anais do II Congresso Consad de Gestão Pública (2), Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Administração, Brasília, BrasilGoogle Scholar
- Yiwei Gong, Jun Yang, and Xiaojie Shi. 2020. Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture. Government Information Quarterly 37, 3 (July 2020), 101487. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann, and Nathalie Haug. 2019. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly 36, 4 (October 2019), 101385. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ines Mergel. 2019. Digital service teams in government. Government Information Quarterly 36, 4 (October 2019), 101389. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.07.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey J. Pittaway and Ali Reza Montazemi. 2020. Know-how to lead digital transformation: The case of local governments. Government Information Quarterly 37, 4 (October 2020), 101474. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101474Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thiago José Tavares Ávila, Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza, and Daniel De Souza Valotto. 2021. Base Nacional de Serviços Públicos do Brasil: sistematização e interoperabilidade de informações para o Governo Digital. Gestão.org 19, 2 (December 2021). DOI:https://doi.org/10.51359/1679-1827.2021.252653Google Scholar
- Daniel Carvalho, Gisela Demo, Júlio Medeiros, and Fernanda Scussel. 2021. Citizen Relationship Management (CiRM): the past, present, and future of an emerging concept. Cad. EBAPE.BR 19, 1 (March 2021), 32-44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395120200057xGoogle Scholar
- BRASIL. 2021. Lei Federal No 14.129 de 29 de Março de 2021. Retrieved from https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/lei-n-14.129-de-29-de-marco-de-2021-311282132Google Scholar
- BRASIL. 2011. Lei Federal No 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. Retrieved January 24, 2022 from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htmGoogle Scholar
- BRASIL. 2017. Lei Federal No 13.460, de 26 de Junho de 2017. Retrieved January 24, 2022 from https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/19141395/do1-2017-06-27-lei-no-13- 460-de-26-de-junho-de-2017-19141216Google Scholar
- Gleycianne Rodrigues Araujo, Thiago Jose Tavares Avila, and Beatriz Barreto Brasileiro Lanza. 2021. Impacts of an articulation group for the development of the Digital Government in the Brazilian Subnational Government. In DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, ACM, Omaha NE USA, 339-350. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3463677.3463680Google ScholarDigital Library
- BRASIL. 2022. Rede Nacional de Governo Digital. Governo Digital. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/transformacao-digital/rede-nacional-de-governo-digital/rede-nacional-de- governo-digitalGoogle Scholar
- BRASIL. 2022. Adesões à Rede Nacional de Governo Digital. Governo Digital. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://www.gov.br/governodigital/pt-br/transformacao-digital/adesoes-a-rede-nacional-de-governo-digitalGoogle Scholar
- John W. Creswell. 2009. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed ed.). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif.Google Scholar
- Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis, and Adrian Thornhill. 2008. Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
- Laurence Bardin. 1977. Análise de Conteúdo. Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
- GTD.GOV. 2022. GTD.GOV - Quem somos. Retrieved January 25, 2022 from https://gtdgov.org.br/quem-somosGoogle Scholar
- Piergiorgio Corbetta. 2003. Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver's Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209922Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- An Overview of Rede.gov.br as a Federative Mechanism for Digital Government Development in Brazil
Recommendations
Impacts of an articulation group for the development of the Digital Government in the Brazilian Subnational Government
DG.O'21: DG.O2021: The 22nd Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchDigital Transformation (DT) has been imperative for governments that want to become more efficient and deliver better services to citizens. This reality is no different in Brazil, which faces substantial challenges to accelerate DT due to its broad ...
Digital Government Initiatives in Balochistan: a case study
ICTD '17: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and DevelopmentThis research study 1 aims to analyse the digital government initiatives in Balochistan. The study finds that there is a lack of e-readiness even if public sector officials are willing to use Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to enhance ...
Financing digital government in municipalities: An economic perspective
dg.o '16: Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government ResearchThe purpose of local governments is to facilitate the well-being of communities and regions. Through the provision of different public goods and services local governments have the mission to provide security and stable conditions for individuals and ...
Comments