skip to main content
10.1145/3543507.3583404acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access
Artifacts Available / v1.1

Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming?

Published:30 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

InterPlanetary File System (IPFS) is a peer-to-peer protocol for decentralized content storage and retrieval. The IPFS platform has the potential to help users evade censorship and avoid a central point of failure. IPFS is seeing increasing adoption for distributing various kinds of files, including video. However, the performance of video streaming on IPFS has not been well-studied. We conduct a measurement study with over 28,000 videos hosted on the IPFS network and find that video streaming experiences high stall rates due to relatively high Round Trip Times (RTT). Further, videos are encoded using a single static quality, because of which streaming cannot adapt to different network conditions.

A natural approach is to use adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms for streaming, which encode videos in multiple qualities and streams according to the throughput available. However, traditional ABR algorithms perform poorly on IPFS because the throughput cannot be estimated correctly. The main problem is that video segments can be retrieved from multiple sources, making it difficult to estimate the throughput. To overcome this issue, we have designed Telescope, an IPFS-aware ABR system. We conduct experiments on the IPFS network, where IPFS video providers are geographically distributed across the globe. Our results show that Telescope significantly improves the Quality of Experience (QoE) of videos, for a diverse set of network and cache conditions, compared to traditional ABR.

References

  1. [1] 2015. http://www.ppstream.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] 2018. https://github.com/Dash-Industry-Forum/dash.js/wiki/ABR-LogicGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2021. DTube coin (DTC) presentation. https://token.d.tube/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2022. DTube. https://d.tube/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2022. HTTP RPC API reference. https://docs.ipfs.io/reference/http/api/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2022. PPTV. https://pptv.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Adobe. 2022. Adobe HTTP Dynamic Streaming. http://www.adobe.com/products/hds-dynamic-streaming.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Saamer Akhshabi, Ali C. Begen, and Constantine Dovrolis. 2011. An Experimental Evaluation of Rate-Adaptation Algorithms in Adaptive Streaming over HTTP. In Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia Systems (San Jose, CA, USA) (MMSys ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1145/1943552.1943574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zahaib Akhtar, Yun Seong Nam, Ramesh Govindan, Sanjay Rao, Jessica Chen, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Bruno Ribeiro, Jibin Zhan, and Hui Zhang. 2018. Oboe: Auto-tuning Video ABR Algorithms to Network Conditions. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication. Budapest, Hungary, 44–58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fasiha Ashraf, Ateeqa Naseer, and Shaukat Iqbal. 2019. Comparative analysis of unstructured P2P file sharing networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Information System and Data Mining. 148–153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Susie Batt. 2021. Your Files for Keeps Forever with IPFS. https://blogs.opera.com/tips-and-tricks/2021/02/opera-crypto-files-for-keeps-ipfs-unstoppable-domains/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Juan Benet. 2014. IPFS - Content Addressed, Versioned, P2P File System. CoRR abs/1407.3561 (2014). arXiv:1407.3561http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3561Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Brian Bondy. 2021. IPFS Support in Brave. https://brave.com/ipfs-support/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloudflare. 2021. What is MPEG-DASH¿https://www.cloudflare.com/learning/video/what-is-mpeg-dash/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Bram Cohen. 2003. Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. In Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer systems, Vol. 6. Berkeley, CA, USA, 68–72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dash-Industry-Forum. 2021. Dash.js Github. https://github.com/Dash-Industry-Forum/dash.js.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Edgar Lee Dirk McCormick. 2020. New improvements to IPFS Bitswap for faster container image distribution. https://blog.ipfs.io/2020-02-14-improved-bitswap-for-container-distribution/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Trinh Viet Doan, Tat Dat Pham, Markus Oberprieler, and Vaibhav Bajpai. 2020. Measuring Decentralized Video Streaming: A Case Study of DTube. In 2020 IFIP Networking Conference, Networking 2020, Paris, France, June 22-26, 2020. IEEE, 118–126. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9142739Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gin-Gonic. 2021. Gin Web Framework Github. https://github.com/gin-gonic/gin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. golang.org. 2021. The Go Programming Language. https://golang.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Barbara Guidi, Andrea Michienzi, and Laura Ricci. 2020. Steem Blockchain: Mining the Inner Structure of the Graph. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 210251–210266. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ragib Hasan, Zahid Anwar, William Yurcik, Larry Brumbaugh, and Roy Campbell. 2005. A survey of peer-to-peer storage techniques for distributed file systems. In International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC’05)-Volume II, Vol. 2. IEEE, 205–213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Hsiao-Shan Huang, Tian-Sheuan Chang, and Jhih-Yi Wu. 2020. A Secure File Sharing System Based on IPFS and Blockchain. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Electronics Communication Conference (Singapore, Singapore) (IECC 2020). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409934.3409948Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ipfs. 2021. IPFs/ipfs-companion: Browser extension that simplifies access to ipfs resources on the web. https://github.com/ipfs/ipfs-companionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ipfs. 2022. InterPlanetary Name System (IPNS). https://docs.ipfs.io/concepts/ipns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. kernel.org. 2021. tc - show / manipulate traffic control settings. https://linux.die.net/man/8/tc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Hongzi Mao, Ravi Netravali, and Mohammad Alizadeh. 2017. Neural Adaptive Video Streaming with Pensieve. In Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication (Los Angeles, CA, USA) (SIGCOMM ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098822.3098843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hongzi Mao, Ravi Netravali, and Mohammad Alizadeh. 2017. Neural Adaptive Video Streaming with Pensieve. In Proceedings of the Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM 2017, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 21-25, 2017. ACM, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/3098822.3098843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Wolfgang Merkle and Frank Stephan. 1996. Trees and Learning. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, COLT 1996, Desenzano del Garda, Italy, June 28-July 1, 1996, Avrim Blum and Michael J. Kearns (Eds.). ACM, 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1145/238061.238118Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Microsoft. 2022. Microsoft Smooth Streaming. http://www.iis.net/downloads/microsoft/smooth-streamingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Naeem Ramzan, Hyunggon Park, and Ebroul Izquierdo. 2012. Video streaming over P2P networks: Challenges and opportunities. Signal Processing: Image Communication 27, 5 (2012), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2012.02.004 ADVANCES IN 2D/3D VIDEO STREAMING OVER P2P NETWORKS.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ton Roosendaal. 2008. Big Buck Bunny. In ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 Computer Animation Festival (Singapore) (SIGGRAPH Asia ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 62. https://doi.org/10.1145/1504271.1504321Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sandvine. 2022. Global internet phenomena. https://www.sandvine.com/phenomenaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Kevin Spiteri, Ramesh Sitaraman, and Daniel Sparacio. 2018. From Theory to Practice: Improving Bitrate Adaptation in the DASH Reference Player. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (MMSys ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204949.3204953Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kevin Spiteri, Rahul Urgaonkar, and Ramesh K. Sitaraman. 2016. BOLA: Near-optimal bitrate adaptation for online videos. In IEEE INFOCOM 2016 - The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2016.7524428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Dennis Trautwein, Aravindh Raman, Gareth Tyson, Ignacio Castro, Will Scott, Moritz Schubotz, Bela Gipp, and Yiannis Psaras. 2022. Design and Evaluation of IPFS: A Storage Layer for the Decentralized Web. In ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference (SIGCOMM ’22). ACM, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544216.3544232 ISBN 978-1-4503-9420-8/22/08.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Long Vu, Indranil Gupta, Jin Liang, and Klara Nahrstedt. 2006. Mapping the PPLive network: Studying the impacts of media streaming on P2P overlays. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Quanqing Xu, Zhiwen Song, Rick Siow Mong Goh, and Yongjun Li. 2018. Building an Ethereum and IPFS-Based Decentralized Social Network System. In 2018 IEEE 24th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/PADSW.2018.8645058Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Xiaoqi Yin, Abhishek Jindal, Vyas Sekar, and Bruno Sinopoli. 2015. A Control-Theoretic Approach for Dynamic Adaptive Video Streaming over HTTP. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication, SIGCOMM 2015, London, United Kingdom, August 17-21, 2015, Steve Uhlig, Olaf Maennel, Brad Karp, and Jitendra Padhye (Eds.). ACM, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1145/2785956.2787486Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Is IPFS Ready for Decentralized Video Streaming?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WWW '23: Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
      April 2023
      4293 pages
      ISBN:9781450394161
      DOI:10.1145/3543507

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 April 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

      Upcoming Conference

      WWW '24
      The ACM Web Conference 2024
      May 13 - 17, 2024
      Singapore , Singapore
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)218
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format