Wenrui Zuo
ABSTRACT
There has been growing interest in the so-called “Web3” movement. This loosely refers to a mix of decentralized technologies, often underpinned by blockchain technologies. Among these, Web3 social media platforms have begun to emerge. These store all social interaction data (e.g., posts) on a public ledger, removing the need for centralized data ownership and management. But this comes at a cost, which some argue is prohibitively expensive. As an exemplar within this growing ecosytem, we explore memo.cash, a microblogging service built on the Bitcoin Cash (BCH) blockchain. We gather data for 24K users, 317K posts, 2.57M user actions, which have facilitated $6.75M worth of transactions. A particularly unique feature is that users must pay BCH tokens for each interaction (e.g., posting, following). We study how this may impact the social makeup of the platform. We therefore study memo.cash as both a social network and a transaction platform.
Supplemental Material
- 2022. SocialX Whitepaper. https://socialx.network/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Whitepaper-SocialX-v1.2.pdfGoogle Scholar
- 2022. Steemit. https://steemit.com/Google Scholar
- Yong-Yeol Ahn, Seungyeop Han, Haewoon Kwak, Sue Moon, and Hawoong Jeong. 2007. Analysis of topological characteristics of huge online social networking services. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web. 835–844.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Md Arquam, Anurag Singh, and Rajesh Sharma. 2021. A blockchain-based secured and trusted framework for information propagation on online social networks. Social Network Analysis and Mining 11, 1 (2021), 1–16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Haris Bin Zia, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Ishaku Hassan Anaobi, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2022. Toxicity in the Decentralized Web and the Potential for Model Sharing. Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems 6, 2 (2022), 1–25.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefano Bortoli, Themis Palpanas, and Paolo Bouquet. 2011. Decentralised social network management. International Journal of Web Based Communities 7, 3 (2011), 276–297.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dongmei Cao, Maureen Meadows, Donna Wong, and Senmao Xia. 2021. Understanding consumers’ social media engagement behaviour: An examination of the moderation effect of social media context. Journal of Business Research 122 (2021), 835–846.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Abdelberi Chaabane, Yuan Ding, Ratan Dey, Mohamed Ali Kaafar, and Keith W Ross. 2014. A closer look at third-party OSN applications: are they leaking your personal information¿. In International conference on passive and active network measurement. Springer, 235–246.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xu Cheng, Cameron Dale, and Jiangchuan Liu. 2008. Statistics and social network of youtube videos. In 2008 16th Interntional Workshop on Quality of Service. IEEE, 229–238.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bakkiam David Deebak and AL-Turjman Fadi. 2021. Privacy-preserving in smart contracts using blockchain and artificial intelligence for cyber risk measurements. Journal of Information Security and Applications 58 (2021), 102749.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Trinh Viet Doan, Tat Dat Pham, Markus Oberprieler, and Vaibhav Bajpai. 2020. Measuring Decentralized Video Streaming: A Case Study of DTube. In 2020 IFIP Networking Conference (Networking). IEEE, 118–126.Google Scholar
- Eli Raymond Fisher, Sriram Karthik Badam, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2014. Designing peer-to-peer distributed user interfaces: Case studies on building distributed applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 1 (2014), 100–110.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bharath Ganesh and Jonathan Bright. 2020. Countering extremists on social media: Challenges for strategic communication and content moderation., 6–19 pages.Google Scholar
- R Stuart Geiger. 2016. Bot-based collective blocklists in Twitter: the counterpublic moderation of harassment in a networked public space. Information, Communication & Society 19, 6 (2016), 787–803.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tarleton Gillespie. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Barbara Guidi. 2020. When blockchain meets online social networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 62 (2020), 101131.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Guidi, Andrea Michienzi, and Laura Ricci. 2020. A graph-based socioeconomic analysis of steemit. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 8, 2 (2020), 365–376.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara Guidi, Andrea Michienzi, and Laura Ricci. 2020. Steem blockchain: Mining the inner structure of the graph. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 210251–210266.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliver L Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, and Andrea Wegner. 2021. Disproportionate removals and differing content moderation experiences for conservative, transgender, and black social media users: Marginalization and moderation gray areas. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yohan Han, Byungjun Park, and Jongpil Jeong. 2019. A novel architecture of air pollution measurement platform using 5G and blockchain for industrial IoT applications. Procedia Computer Science 155 (2019), 728–733.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Adil Hassan. 2017. Replication and availability in decentralised online social networks. (2017).Google Scholar
- Anaobi Ishaku Hassan, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, and Gareth Tyson. 2021. The impact of Capitol Hill on Pleroma: the case for decentralised moderation. In Proceedings of the CoNEXT Student Workshop. 1–2.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anaobi Ishaku Hassan, Aravindh Raman, Ignacio Castro, Haris Bin Zia, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2021. Exploring content moderation in the decentralised web: The pleroma case. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies. 328–335.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robby Houben, Alexander Snyers, 2018. Cryptocurrencies and blockchain. Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion (2018), 1–86.Google Scholar
- Lars Andreassen Jaatun, Anders Ringen, and Martin Gilje Jaatun. 2022. Yet Another Blockchain-based Privacy-friendly Social Network. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom). IEEE, 222–229.Google Scholar
- Le Jiang and Xinglin Zhang. 2019. BCOSN: A blockchain-based decentralized online social network. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 6, 6 (2019), 1454–1466.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristina Kapanova, Barbara Guidi, Andrea Michienzi, and Kevin Koidl. 2020. Evaluating posts on the steemit blockchain: Analysis on topics based on textual cues. In Proceedings of the 6th EAI international conference on smart objects and technologies for social good. 163–168.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kjetil Kjernsmo. 2016. SPARQL on the Open, Decentralised Web. (2016).Google Scholar
- David Koll, Jun Li, Joshua Stein, and Xiaoming Fu. 2014. On the state of OSN-based Sybil defenses. In 2014 IFIP Networking Conference. IEEE, 1–9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lucio La Cava, Sergio Greco, and Andrea Tagarelli. 2021. Understanding the growth of the Fediverse through the lens of Mastodon. Applied Network Science 6, 1 (2021), 1–35.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kyle Langvardt. 2017. Regulating online content moderation. Geo. LJ 106 (2017), 1353.Google Scholar
- Xi Tong Lee, Arijit Khan, Sourav Sen Gupta, Yu Hann Ong, and Xuan Liu. 2020. Measurements, analyses, and insights on the entire ethereum blockchain network. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 155–166.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jure Leskovec and Eric Horvitz. 2008. Planetary-scale views on a large instant-messaging network. In Proceedings of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web. 915–924.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chao Li and Balaji Palanisamy. 2019. Incentivized blockchain-based social media platforms: A case study of steemit. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science. 145–154.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seth A Myers, Aneesh Sharma, Pankaj Gupta, and Jimmy Lin. 2014. Information network or social network¿ The structure of the Twitter follow graph. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. 493–498.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aravindh Raman, Sagar Joglekar, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Nishanth Sastry, and Gareth Tyson. 2019. Challenges in the decentralised web: The mastodon case. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. 217–229.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon Rice, Jo Robinson, Sarah Bendall, Sarah Hetrick, Georgina Cox, Eleanor Bailey, John Gleeson, and Mario Alvarez-Jimenez. 2016. Online and social media suicide prevention interventions for young people: a focus on implementation and moderation. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 25, 2 (2016), 80.Google Scholar
- Lorenz Schwittmann, Christopher Boelmann, Matthäus Wander, and Torben Weis. 2013. SoNet – Privacy and Replication in Federated Online Social Networks. In 2013 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops. 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2013.20Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rajesh Sharma and Anwitaman Datta. 2012. Supernova: Super-peers based architecture for decentralized online social networks. In 2012 fourth international conference on communication systems and networks (COMSNETS 2012). IEEE, 1–10.Google Scholar
- Sanaz Taheri-Boshrooyeh, Alptekin Küpçü, and Öznur Özkasap. 2015. Security and privacy of distributed online social networks. In 2015 IEEE 35th international conference on distributed computing systems workshops. IEEE, 112–119.Google Scholar
- Andreas Veglis. 2014. Moderation techniques for social media content. In International conference on social computing and social media. Springer, 137–148.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Junghoon Woo, Ridah Fatima, Charles J Kibert, Richard E Newman, Yifeng Tian, and Ravi S Srinivasan. 2021. Applying blockchain technology for building energy performance measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) and the carbon credit market: A review of the literature. Building and Environment 205 (2021), 108199.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ting Yu, Zhiwei Lin, and Qingliang Tang. 2018. Blockchain: The introduction and its application in financial accounting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 29, 4 (2018), 37–47.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Javad Zarrin, Hao Wen Phang, Lakshmi Babu Saheer, and Bahram Zarrin. 2021. Blockchain for decentralization of internet: prospects, trends, and challenges. Cluster Computing 24, 4 (2021), 2841–2866.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Set in Stone: Analysis of an Immutable Web3 Social Media Platform
Recommendations
A First Look at User-Controlled Moderation on Web3 Social Media: The Case of Memo.cash
OASIS '23: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Open Challenges in Online Social NetworksWeb3 social media strives to eliminate the need for centralized management by building upon on technologies such public ledgers and smart contracts. This has generated significant hype, but creates many notable challenges, many of which remain ...
Transaction Fees Analysis of Blockchain-based Social Media on Near Protocol Blockchain
CIIS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent SystemsThe affordable transaction fee is crucial in establishing sustainable decentralized social media. Decentralized applications powered by smart contract blockchain rely on nodes (validators) to process transactions. The incentives in terms of fees are ...
Uncover Social Media Interactions On Cryptocurrencies Using Social Set Analysis (SSA)
AbstractCryptocurrencies are decentralized digital currencies that use blockchain technology to create a secure and decentralized environment. In the decade since the inception of social media, it has created revolutions and connected people with ...
Comments