Michal Polak
ABSTRACT
With the growing amount of data processed in the virtual environment, many researchers focus their efforts on optimizing the load distribution on data centers according to various criteria. In this article, we propose optimization at the network infrastructure load of the data center. The new heuristic algorithm, based on grouping virtual machines into clusters, was compared with heuristics based on a genetic algorithm. The performed measurements indicate that clustering-based heuristics, although data-dependent, shows promising characteristics with significantly lower computational complexity. The algorithm was tested on a rigorous number of instances, proving its general usability.
- Mohammed Amoon. 2018. A multi criteria-based approach for virtual machines consolidation to save electrical power in Cloud Data Centers. IEEE Access 6(2018), 24110–24117. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2830183Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Tao Chen, Xiaofeng Gao, and Guihai Chen. 2016. Optimized virtual machine placement with traffic-aware balancing in data center networks. Scientific Programming 2016 (2016), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3101658Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moon-Hyun Kim, Jun-Yeong Lee, Syed Asif Raza Shah, Tae-Hyung Kim, and Seo-Young Noh. 2021. Min-max exclusive virtual machine placement in cloud computing for Scientific Data Environment. Journal of Cloud Computing 10, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-020-00221-7Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kangkang Li, Huanyang Zheng, and Jie Wu. 2013. Migration-based virtual machine placement in Cloud Systems. 2013 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet) (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/cloudnet.2013.6710561Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weiwei Lin, Wentai Wu, and Ligang He. 2020. An on-line virtual machine consolidation strategy for dual improvement in performance and energy conservation of server clusters in Cloud Data Centers. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing(2020), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsc.2019.2961082Google Scholar
- Andrea Lodi, Silvano Martello, and Michele Monaci. 2002. Two-dimensional packing problems: A survey. European Journal of Operational Research 141, 2 (2002), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00123-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Madani, A. Lebbat, S. Tallal, and H. Medromi. 2014. Power-aware virtual machines consolidation architecture based on CPU load scheduling. 2014 IEEE/ACS 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/aiccsa.2014.7073221Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiaoqiao Meng, Vasileios Pappas, and Li Zhang. 2010. Improving the scalability of data center networks with traffic-aware virtual machine placement. 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM(2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/infcom.2010.5461930Google Scholar
- Fikru Feleke Moges and Surafel Lemma Abebe. 2019. Energy-aware VM placement algorithms for the OpenStack Neat Consolidation Framework. Journal of Cloud Computing 8, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-019-0126-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Tevfik Yapicioglu and Sema Oktug. 2013. A traffic-aware virtual machine placement method for Cloud Data Centers. 2013 IEEE/ACM 6th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/ucc.2013.62Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maede Yavari, Akbar Ghaffarpour Rahbar, and Mohammad Hadi Fathi. 2019. Temperature and energy-aware consolidation algorithms in cloud computing. Journal of Cloud Computing 8, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13677-019-0136-9Google ScholarDigital Library
- Qinghua Zheng, Jia Li, Bo Dong, Rui Li, Nazaraf Shah, and Feng Tian. 2015. Multi-objective optimization algorithm based on BBO for Virtual Machine Consolidation Problem. 2015 IEEE 21st International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS) (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/icpads.2015.59Google ScholarDigital Library
- Biyu Zhou, Jie Wu, Fa Zhang, and Zhiyong Liu. 2017. Resource optimization for survivable embedding of virtual clusters in cloud data centers. 2017 IEEE 36th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/pccc.2017.8280436Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Cluster-oriented virtual machine low latency consolidation algorithm
Recommendations
Performance Analysis for Pareto-Optimal Green Consolidation Based on Virtual Machines Live Migration
Huge energy requirement of cloud data centers is prime concern. Dynamic Virtual Machine VM consolidation based on VM live migration to switched-off or put some of the under-loaded host Physical Machines PMs into a low power consumption mode can ...
Improving performance by network-aware virtual machine clustering and consolidation
Modern data center consists of thousands of servers, racks and switches. Complicated structure means it requires well-designed algorithms to utilize resources of data centers efficiently. Current virtual machine scheduling algorithms mainly focus on the ...
Live gang migration of virtual machines
HPDC '11: Proceedings of the 20th international symposium on High performance distributed computingThis paper addresses the problem of simultaneously migrating a group of co-located and live virtual machines (VMs), i.e, VMs executing on the same physical machine. We refer to such a mass simultaneous migration of active VMs as "live gang migration". ...
Comments