skip to main content
10.1145/3543758.3543776acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enthusiasts, Pragmatists, and Skeptics: Investigating Users’ Attitudes Towards Emotion- and Personality-Aware Voice Assistants across Cultures

Published:15 September 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Voice Assistants (VAs) are becoming a regular part of our daily life. They are embedded in our smartphones or smart home devices. Just as natural language processing has improved the conversation with VAs, ongoing work in speech emotion recognition also suggests that VAs will soon become emotion- and personality-aware. However, the social implications, ethical borders and the users’ general attitude towards such VAs remain underexplored. In this paper, we investigate users’ attitudes towards and preferences for emotionally aware VAs in three different cultures. We conducted an online questionnaire with N = 364 participants in Germany, China, and Egypt to identify differences and similarities in attitudes. Using a cluster analysis, we identified three different basic user types (Enthusiasts, Pragmatists, and Skeptics), which exist in all cultures. We contribute characteristic properties of these user types and highlight how future VAs should support customizable interactions to enhance user experience across cultures.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Takanori Akiyama, Shinnosuke Takamichi, and Hiroshi Saruwatari. 2018. Prosody-aware subword embedding considering Japanese intonation systems and its application to DNN-based multi-dialect speech synthesis. In 2018 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC). IEEE, IEEE, New York,NY,USA, 659–664. https://doi.org/10.23919/APSIPA.2018.8659465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Isaac Asimov. 1941. Three laws of robotics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Matthew P Aylett, Alessandro Vinciarelli, and Mirjam Wester. 2017. Speech synthesis for the generation of artificial personality. IEEE transactions on affective computing 11, 2 (2017), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAFFC.2017.2763134Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Alice Baird, Shahin Amiriparian, and Björn Schuller. 2019. Can deep generative audio be emotional? Towards an approach for personalised emotional audio generation. In 2019 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP). IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMSP.2019.8901785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Michael Braun, Anja Mainz, Ronee Chadowitz, Bastian Pfleging, and Florian Alt. 2019. At Your Service: Designing Voice Assistant Personalities to Improve Automotive User Interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. SG Brederoo, FG Nadema, FG Goedhart, AE Voppel, JN De Boer, J Wouts, S Koops, and IEC Sommer. 2021. Implementation of automatic speech analysis for early detection of psychiatric symptoms: What do patients want?Journal of psychiatric research 142 (2021), 299–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.08.019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Malika Charrad, Nadia Ghazzali, Véronique Boiteau, and Azam Niknafs. 2014. NbClust: an R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of statistical software 61, 1 (2014), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v061.i06Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Lim Kok Cheng, Ali Selamat, Mohd Hazli Mohamed Zabil, Md Hafiz Selamat, Rose Alinda Alias, Fatimah Puteh, Farhan Mohamed, and Ondrej Krejcar. 2019. Comparing the Accuracy of Hierarchical Agglomerative and K-Means Clustering on Mobile Augmented Reality Usability Metrics. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Big Data and Analytics (ICBDA). IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDA47563.2019.8987044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Leigh Clark, Nadia Pantidi, Orla Cooney, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Justin Edwards, Brendan Spillane, Emer Gilmartin, Christine Murad, Cosmin Munteanu, Vincent Wade, and Benjamin R. Cowan. 2019. What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300705Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Alan Cooper, Robert Reimann, David Cronin, and Christopher Noessel. 2014. About face: the essentials of interaction design. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Donald L Day. 1998. Shared values and shared interfaces: The role of culture in the globalisation of human-computer systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(97)00025-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Marieke De Mooij and Geert Hofstede. 2011. Cross-cultural consumer behavior: A review of research findings. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 23, 3-4 (2011), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578057Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chris Ding and Xiaofeng He. 2004. K-Means Clustering via Principal Component Analysis. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning (Banff, Alberta, Canada) (ICML ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29. https://doi.org/10.1145/1015330.1015408Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. David Dunning, Chip Heath, and Jerry M Suls. 2004. Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological science in the public interest 5, 3 (2004), 69–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Paul Ekman and Wallace V Friesen. 1971. Constants across cultures in the face and emotion. Journal of personality and social psychology 17, 2(1971), 124. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030377Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Vanessa Evers and Donald Day. 1997. The role of culture in interface acceptance. In Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT’97. Springer, Springer, Boston, MA, 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35175-9_44Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sybil Eysenck and Ahmed Abdel-Khalek. 1989. A Cross-Cultural Study of Personality: Egyptian and English Children. International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie 24 (02 1989), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.1989.10600028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerhard Fischer. 2001. User modeling in human–computer interaction. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 11, 1 (2001), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011145532042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Olaf Frandsen-Thorlacius, Kasper Hornbæk, Morten Hertzum, and Torkil Clemmensen. 2009. Non-universal Usability?: A Survey of How Usability is Understood by Chinese and Danish Users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518708Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Enrique Frias-Martinez, Sherry Y Chen, and Xiaohui Liu. 2006. Survey of data mining approaches to user modeling for adaptive hypermedia. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) 36, 6 (2006), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2006.879391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Zhenye Gan, Rui Wang, Yue Yu, and Xin Zhao. 2020. Voice Conversion from Tibetan Amdo Dialect to Tibetan U-tsang Dialect Based on StarGAN-VC2. In 2020 International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information Management (BDEIM). IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 184–187. https://doi.org/10.1109/BDEIM52318.2020.00049Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Asma Ghandeharioun, Daniel McDuff, Mary Czerwinski, and Kael Rowan. 2019. Towards Understanding Emotional Intelligence for Behavior Change Chatbots. In 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2019.8925433Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Javier Hernandez, Daniel McDuff, Xavier Benavides, Judith Amores, Pattie Maes, and Rosalind Picard. 2014. AutoEmotive: Bringing Empathy to the Driving Experience to Manage Stress. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS Companion ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Morten Hertzum, Torkil Clemmensen, Kasper Hornbæk, Jyoti Kumar, Qingxin Shi, and Pradeep Yammiyavar. 2007. Usability constructs: a cross-cultural study of how users and developers experience their use of information systems. In International Conference on Usability and Internationalization. Springer, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73287-7_39Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Geert Hofstede. 2010. The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business Studies 41, 8 (2010), 1339–1346. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2010.31Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Adrian Holliday. 2010. Complexity in cultural identity. Language and Intercultural Communication 10, 2 (2010), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708470903267384Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Matthew B Hoy. 2018. Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and more: an introduction to voice assistants. Medical reference services quarterly 37, 1 (2018), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2018.1404391Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellen Isaacs, Artie Konrad, Alan Walendowski, Thomas Lennig, Victoria Hollis, and Steve Whittaker. 2013. Echoes from the Past: How Technology Mediated Reflection Improves Well-Being. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466137Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Anil K Jain. 2010. Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means. Pattern recognition letters 31, 8 (2010), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Xin Jin and Jiawei Han. 2010. K-Medoids Clustering. Springer US, Boston, MA, 564–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30164-8_426Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. P. Juslin, P. Laukka, and T. Bänziger. 2018. The Mirror to Our Soul? Comparisons of Spontaneous and Posed Vocal Expression of Emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 42 (2018), 1 – 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-017-0268-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Minna Kamppuri, Roman Bednarik, and Markku Tukiainen. 2006. The Expanding Focus of HCI: Case Culture. In Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles (Oslo, Norway) (NordiCHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 405–408. https://doi.org/10.1145/1182475.1182523Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Leonard Kaufman and Peter J. Rousseeuw. 2008. Partitioning Around Medoids (Program PAM). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, U.S., 68–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470316801.ch2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruhul Amin Khalil, Edward Jones, Mohammad Inayatullah Babar, Tariqullah Jan, Mohammad Haseeb Zafar, and Thamer Alhussain. 2019. Speech emotion recognition using deep learning techniques: A review. IEEE Access 7(2019), 117327–117345. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Andreas M Klein, Andreas Hinderks, Maria Rauschenberger, and Jörg Thomaschewski. 2020. Exploring Voice Assistant Risks and Potential with Technology-based Users.. In WEBIST. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010150101470154Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Jong-Eun Roselyn Lee and Clifford I Nass. 2010. Trust in computers: The computers-are-social-actors (CASA) paradigm and trustworthiness perception in human-computer communication. In Trust and technology in a ubiquitous modern environment: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-901-9.ch001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yaniv Leviathan and Yossi Matias. 2018. Google Duplex: An AI System for Accomplishing Real-World Tasks Over the Phone. https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jingyi Li, Yong Ma, and Changkun Ou. 2019. Cultivation and Incentivization of HCI Research and Community in China: Taxonomy and Social Endorsements. In CHI ’19 Workshop: HCI in China. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Kok Cheng Lim, Ali Selamat, Mohd Hazli Mohamed Zabil, Yunus Yusoff, Md Hafiz Selamat, Rose Alinda Alias, Fatimah Puteh, Farhan Mohamed, and Ondrej Krejcar. 2019. A Comparative Usability Study Using Hierarchical Agglomerative and K-Means Clustering on Mobile Augmented Reality Interaction Data. In Advancing Technology Industrialization Through Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBDA47563.2019.8987044Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Sebastian Linxen, Christian Sturm, Florian Brühlmann, Vincent Cassau, Klaus Opwis, and Katharina Reinecke. 2021. How WEIRD is CHI?. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 143, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Zhen-Tao Liu, Abdul Rehman, Min Wu, Weihua Cao, and Man Hao. 2020. Speech personality recognition based on annotation classification using log-likelihood distance and extraction of essential audio features. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 23 (2020), 3414–3426. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2020.3025108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Yong Ma, Heiko Drewes, and Andreas Butz. 2021. Fake Moods: Can Users Trick an Emotion-Aware VoiceBot?. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451744Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Daniel McDuff, Amy Karlson, Ashish Kapoor, Asta Roseway, and Mary Czerwinski. 2012. AffectAura: An Intelligent System for Emotional Memory. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208525Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Margaret McRorie, Ian Sneddon, Gary McKeown, Elisabetta Bevacqua, Etienne de Sevin, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2012. Evaluation of Four Designed Virtual Agent Personalities. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 3, 3 (2012), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/T-AFFC.2011.38Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Batja Mesquita and Nico H Frijda. 1992. Cultural variations in emotions: a review. Psychological bulletin 112, 2 (1992), 179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Catherine Michalopoulou and Maria Symeonaki. 2017. Improving Likert scale raw scores interpretability with K-means clustering. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 135, 1(2017), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/0759106317710863Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues 56 (03 2000), 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00153Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Clifford Nass, Jonathan Steuer, and Ellen R Tauber. 1994. Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191703Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Behrooz Omidvar-Tehrani, Sihem Amer-Yahia, and Alexandre Termier. 2015. Interactive User Group Analysis. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Melbourne, Australia) (CIKM ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1145/2806416.2806519Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Daphna Oyserman. 2017. Culture three ways: Culture and subcultures within countries. Annual Review of Psychology 68, 1 (01 2017), 435–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033617Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Malay K Pakhira, Sanghamitra Bandyopadhyay, and Ujjwal Maulik. 2004. Validity index for crisp and fuzzy clusters. Pattern recognition 37, 3 (2004), 487–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2003.06.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. M. Pell, S. Paulmann, Chinar Dara, Areej Alasseri, and S. Kotz. 2009. Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. J. Phonetics 37(2009), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.07.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Tim Polzehl, Sebastian Möller, and Florian Metze. 2010. Automatically assessing personality from speech. In 2010 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Semantic Computing. IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2010.41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Martin Porcheron, Joel E. Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Georgios Rizos, Alice Baird, Max Elliott, and Björn Schuller. 2020. Stargan for emotional speech conversion: Validated by data augmentation of end-to-end emotion recognition. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 3502–3506. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9054579Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Björn W Schuller. 2018. Speech emotion recognition: Two decades in a nutshell, benchmarks, and ongoing trends. Commun. ACM 61, 5 (2018), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3129340Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Katie Seaborn and Jacqueline Urakami. 2021. Measuring Voice UX Quantitatively: A Rapid Review. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451712Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Norin Shamsuddin and Nor Mahat. 2019. Comparison Between k-Means and k-Medoids for Mixed Variables Clustering. Springer, Singapore, 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7279-7_37Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Andy Smith and Fahri Yetim. 2004. Global human–computer systems: cultural determinants of usability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2003.11.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Huatong Sun. 2002. Exploring cultural usability. In Proceedings. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference. IEEE, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049114Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Lee Taber and Steve Whittaker. 2018. Personality Depends on The Medium: Differences in Self-Perception on Snapchat, Facebook and Offline. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Feng Tian, Xiangshi Ren, Xiangmin Fan, Wei Li, Haipeng Mi, Tun Lu, Chun Yu, and Dakuo Wang. 2019. HCI in China: Research Agenda, Education Curriculum, Industry Partnership, and Communities Building. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Peter Tonn, Yoav Degani, Shani Hershko, Amit Klein, Lea Seule, and Nina Schulze. 2020. Development of a Digital Content-Free Speech Analysis Tool for the Measurement of Mental Health and Follow-Up for Mental Disorders: Protocol for a Case-Control Study. JMIR research protocols 9, 5 (2020), e13852. https://doi.org/10.2196/13852Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarah Theres Völkel, Daniel Buschek, Malin Eiband, Benajmin R. Cowan, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2021. Eliciting and Analysing Users’ Envisioned Dialogues with Perfect Voice Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445536Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Sarah Theres Völkel, Penelope Kempf, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2020. Personalised Chats with Voice Assistants: The User Perspective. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Bilbao, Spain) (CUI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 53, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Sarah Theres Völkel, Ramona Schödel, Daniel Buschek, Clemens Stachl, Verena Winterhalter, Markus Bühner, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2020. Developing a Personality Model for Speech-Based Conversational Agents Using the Psycholexical Approach. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Sarah Theres Völkel, Ramona Schödel, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2018. Designing for Personality in Autonomous Vehicles: Considering Individual’s Trust Attitude and Interaction Behavior. In Workshop ”Interacting with Autonomous Vehicles: Learning from other Domains” at CHI 2018. ACM, New York, NY, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Joseph Weizenbaum. 1966. ELIZA—a Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication between Man and Machine. Commun. ACM 9, 1 (Jan. 1966), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1145/365153.365168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Pamela J. Wisniewski, Bart P. Knijnenburg, and Heather Richter Lipford. 2017. Making privacy personal: Profiling social network users to inform privacy education and nudging. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 98 (2017), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Chunhui Yuan and Haitao Yang. 2019. Research on K-value selection method of K-means clustering algorithm. J 2, 2(2019), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.3390/j2020016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Guanlong Zhao, Shaojin Ding, and Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna. 2019. Foreign Accent Conversion by Synthesizing Speech from Phonetic Posteriorgrams. In INTERSPEECH. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2843–2847. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2019-1778Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Michelle X. Zhou, Gloria Mark, Jingyi Li, and Huahai Yang. 2019. Trusting Virtual Agents: The Effect of Personality. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 9, 2–3, Article 10 (March 2019), 36 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3232077Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Enthusiasts, Pragmatists, and Skeptics: Investigating Users’ Attitudes Towards Emotion- and Personality-Aware Voice Assistants across Cultures

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format