skip to main content
10.1145/3543758.3543782acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Tangible Interfaces Support Young Children’s Goal Interdependence

Published: 15 September 2022 Publication History

Abstract

Understanding how to contribute to group work is challenging, especially for young children. To have a productive group process, we need to know the mechanism of positive interdependence, which is a fundamental element of successful collaboration. Unfortunately, although there are many suggestions for promoting positive interdependence with tangible technologies, there are few guidelines for structuring children’s interdependent collaboration. Therefore, we designed two tangible games, UnitRry and CollabMaze, using weak and strong goal interdependent designs. We conducted two user studies with 32 children. Our investigation revealed three main findings. First, weak and strong goal interdependent interfaces had high enjoyment and interdependence. Second, tangible interfaces help young children have more idea communication and need less time to solve the tasks. Finally, young children using tangible interfaces were more engaged in the tasks. In the long run, our results can improve the design of tangible interfaces for young children’s collaboration and help them have a better collaborative experience. Furthermore, our findings showed the value of tangible technologies compared with tablet applications in facilitating children’s collaboration.

References

[1]
Diana Africano, Sara Berg, Kent Lindbergh, Peter Lundholm, Fredrik Nilbrink, and Anna Persson. 2004. Designing Tangible Interfaces for Children’s Collaboration. In CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI EA ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 853–868. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.985945
[2]
Abrar Almjally, Kate Howland, and Judith Good. 2020. Comparing TUIs and GUIs for Primary School Programming. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 521–527. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366851
[3]
Alissa Antle and Alyssa Wise. 2013. Getting down to details: Using learning theory to inform tangibles research and design for children. Interacting with Computers 25 (01 2013), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iws007
[4]
Lim Kok Cheng, Chen Soong Der, Manjit Singh Sidhu, and Ridha Omar. 2011. GUI vs. TUI: Engagement for Children with No Prior Computing Experience. electronic Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology 3, 1 (July 2011).
[5]
César A Collazos, Luis A Guerrero, José A Pino, and Sergio F Ochoa. 2003. Collaborative scenarios to promote positive interdependence among group members. In International Conference on Collaboration and Technology. Springer, 356–370.
[6]
Pierre Dillenbourg and Michael Evans. 2011. Interactive tabletops in education. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 6, 4 (01 Dec 2011), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9127-7
[7]
Min Fan, Alissa N. Antle, Carman Neustaedter, and Alyssa F. Wise. 2014. Exploring How a Co-Dependent Tangible Tool Design Supports Collaboration in a Tabletop Activity. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Supporting Group Work (Sanibel Island, Florida, USA) (GROUP ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660398.2660402
[8]
Michael S. Horn, Erin Treacy Solovey, R. Jordan Crouser, and Robert J.K. Jacob. 2009. Comparing the Use of Tangible and Graphical Programming Languages for Informal Science Education. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518851
[9]
Eva Hornecker. 2005. A Design Theme for Tangible Interaction: Embodied Facilitation. In ECSCW 2005, Hans Gellersen, Kjeld Schmidt, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy Mackay (Eds.). Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 23–43.
[10]
Hiroshi Ishii. 2008. Tangible Bits: Beyond Pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Bonn, Germany) (TEI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, xv–xxv. https://doi.org/10.1145/1347390.1347392
[11]
David Johnson, Roger Johnson, and Karl Smith. 1998. Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan 47 (Jan. 1998). https://doi.org/10.5926/arepj1962.47.0_29
[12]
David W. Johnson and Roger T. Johnson. 2009. An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher 38, 5 (2009), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
[13]
David W. Johnson and Ardyth A. Norem-Hebeisen. 1979. A Measure of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Attitudes. The Journal of Social Psychology 109, 2 (1979), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1979.9924201
[14]
Roger T Johnson and David W Johnson. 2008. Active learning: Cooperation in the classroom. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan 47 (2008), 29–30.
[15]
Karel Kreijns, Paul Kirschner, and Wim Jochems. 2003. Identifying the Pitfalls for Social Interaction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Review of the Research. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (05 2003), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
[16]
Marjan Laal. 2013. Positive Interdependence in Collaborative Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 (2013), 1433–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.058 3rd World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Educational Leadership.
[17]
Marjan Laal and Seyed Mohammad Ghodsi. 2012. Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31 (2012), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091 World Conference on Learning, Teaching & Administration - 2011.
[18]
Marjan Laal and Mozhgan Laal. 2012. Collaborative learning: what is it?Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 31 (2012), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092 World Conference on Learning, Teaching and Administration - 2011.
[19]
Yanhong Li, Meng Liang, Julian Preissing, Nadine Bachl, Michelle Melina Dutoit, Thomas Weber, Sven Mayer, and Heinrich Hussmann. 2022. A Meta-Analysis of Tangible Learning Studies from the TEI Conference. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (TEI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3501313
[20]
Anna Loparev, Lauren Westendorf, Margaret Flemings, Jennifer Cho, Romie Littrell, Anja Scholze, and Orit Shaer. 2017. BacPack: Exploring the Role of Tangibles in a Museum Exhibit for Bio-Design. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Yokohama, Japan) (TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025000
[21]
Paul Marshall. 2007. Do Tangible Interfaces Enhance Learning?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Baton Rouge, Louisiana) (TEI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227004
[22]
Heracles Michailidis, Eleni Michailidi, Stavroula Tavoultzidou, and George Fragulis. 2021. Teaching young learners a foreign language via tangible and graphical user interfaces. SHS Web of Conferences 102 (01 2021), 01014. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202110201014
[23]
Claire O’Malley and Danae Fraser. 2004. Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies. NESTA Futurelab Rep. 12 (01 2004), 1–48.
[24]
Christina Pollalis, Elizabeth Joanna Minor, Lauren Westendorf, Whitney Fahnbulleh, Isabella Virgilio, Andrew L. Kun, and Orit Shaer. 2018. Evaluating Learning with Tangible and Virtual Representations of Archaeological Artifacts. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173260
[25]
Joshua Premo, Andy Cavagnetto, and William B. Davis. 2018. Promoting Collaborative Classrooms: The Impacts of Interdependent Cooperative Learning on Undergraduate Interactions and Achievement. CBE—Life Sciences Education 17, 2 (2018), ar32. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0176
[26]
Janet C. Read and Stuart MacFarlane. 2006. Using the Fun Toolkit and Other Survey Methods to Gather Opinions in Child Computer Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Tampere, Finland) (IDC ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/1139073.1139096
[27]
Glenda Revelle, Oren Zuckerman, Allison Druin, and Mark Bolas. 2005. Tangible User Interfaces for Children. In CHI ’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, USA) (CHI EA ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2051–2052. https://doi.org/10.1145/1056808.1057095
[28]
Theodosios Sapounidis and Stavros Demetriadis. 2013. Tangible versus Graphical User Interfaces for Robot Programming: Exploring Cross-Age Children’s Preferences. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 17, 8 (dec 2013), 1775–1786. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0641-7
[29]
Florian Scharf, Thomas Winkler, and Michael Herczeg. 2008. Tangicons: Algorithmic Reasoning in a Collaborative Game for Children in Kindergarten and First Class. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Chicago, Illinois) (IDC ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463689.1463762
[30]
Bertrand Schneider, Patrick Jermann, Guillaume Zufferey, and Pierre Dillenbourg. 2011. Benefits of a Tangible Interface for Collaborative Learning and Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 3 (2011), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2010.36
[31]
Orit Shaer and Eva Hornecker. 2010. Tangible user interfaces: past, present, and future directions. Now Publishers Inc.
[32]
Ehud Sharlin, Benjamin Watson, Yoshifumi Kitamura, Fumio Kishino, and Yuichi Itoh. 2004. On tangible user interfaces, humans and spatiality. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8 (09 2004), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0296-5
[33]
Barbara Smith and Jean MacGregor. 1993. What is Collaborative Learning?Wash Cent News 7 (01 1993).
[34]
Karl A. Smith. 1989. Craft of teaching cooperative learning: An active learning strategy. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE (1989), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1109/fie.1989.69400 1989 Frontiers in Education Conference ; Conference date: 15-10-1989 Through 17-10-1989.
[35]
Tess Speelpenning, Alissa N. Antle, Tanja Doering, and Elise van den Hoven. 2011. Exploring How Tangible Tools Enable Collaboration in a Multi-touch Tabletop Game. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2011, Pedro Campos, Nicholas Graham, Joaquim Jorge, Nuno Nunes, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 605–621.
[36]
Francisco Zamorano Urrutia, Catalina Cortés Loyola, and Mauricio Herrera Marín. 2019. A Tangible User Interface to Facilitate Learning of Trigonometry. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 14, 23 (December 2019), 152–164. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217244
[37]
Elisabeth MAG Van Dijk, Andreas Lingnau, and Hub Kockelkorn. 2012. Measuring enjoyment of an interactive museum experience. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Multimodal interaction. 249–256.
[38]
J. Verhaegh. 2012. Assessment and development of cognitive skills using tangible electronic board games : serious games on the TUI TagTiles. Ph.D. Dissertation. Industrial Design. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR739271
[39]
Alyssa Friend Wise, Alissa Nicole Antle, Jillian Warren, Aaron May, Min Fan, and Anna Macaranas. 2015. What kind of world do you want to live in? Positive interdependence and collaborative processes in the tangible tabletop land-use planning game Youtopia. In Exploring the Material Conditions of Learning(Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL), Oskar Lindwall, Paivi Hakkinen, Timothy Koschmann, Pierre Tchounikine, and Sten Ludvigsen (Eds.). International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS), 236–243.
[40]
Lesley Xie, Alissa N. Antle, and Nima Motamedi. 2008. Are Tangibles More Fun? Comparing Children’s Enjoyment and Engagement Using Physical, Graphical and Tangible User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (Bonn, Germany) (TEI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1347390.1347433
[41]
Diana Xu. 2005. Tangible User Interface for Children - An Overview. In in Proceedings of the SIXTH Conference in the Department of Computing. 579–584.
[42]
Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending Tangible Interfaces for Education: Digital Montessori-Inspired Manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093
[43]
Oren Zuckerman and Ayelet Gal-Oz. 2013. To TUI or not to TUI: Evaluating performance and preference in tangible vs. graphical user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies Volume 71 (04 2013), Pages 803–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2013.04.003

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Understanding user experience, task performance, and task interdependence in symmetric and asymmetric VR collaborationsVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-01072-229:1Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Tangible digital storytelling and phygital reality: benefits for inclusion and cooperation in young childrenResearch on Education and Media10.2478/rem-2023-002315:2(41-50)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023

Index Terms

  1. Tangible Interfaces Support Young Children’s Goal Interdependence

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MuC '22: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2022
    September 2022
    624 pages
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 15 September 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. TUI
    2. collaborative learning
    3. goal interdependence
    4. tangible interaction
    5. tangible learning
    6. tangible user interface
    7. young children

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    MuC '22
    MuC '22: Mensch und Computer 2022
    September 4 - 7, 2022
    Darmstadt, Germany

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)19
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 17 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Understanding user experience, task performance, and task interdependence in symmetric and asymmetric VR collaborationsVirtual Reality10.1007/s10055-024-01072-229:1Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
    • (2023)Tangible digital storytelling and phygital reality: benefits for inclusion and cooperation in young childrenResearch on Education and Media10.2478/rem-2023-002315:2(41-50)Online publication date: 14-Dec-2023

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media