Katharina Maitz
ABSTRACT
Social-emotional skills and computational thinking are related to problem-solving skills. Even though these are crucial areas in today’s world, they are only rarely taught in school and interventions that target these areas simultaneously are still very rare. We therefore developed a four-day workshop with the aim of fostering computational thinking and social-emotional skills in Grade 4 students. To do so, we used the child-friendly programming language Scratch. In the present paper, we investigate the feasibility of such a workshop. In total, 18 students participated. Data was collected via observation and interviews and analysed by qualitative content analysis. Results showed that students liked working with Scratch and liked working on social-emotional challenges. The workshop was found to work well and students worked independently. Pair work activity was found to be particularly beneficial. Although some issues initially proved challenging (mostly relating to “how to” issues in Scratch), these may easily be addressed by making suitable adaptations to the introduction of the program provided on Day 1 of the workshop.
- Ioanna Anyfanti, Mira Zeit Konstantinos Vasileiadis, Andriana Vgenopoulou, 2015. Computer supported collaborative learning in small teams for scratch: Programming skills for year 4 students at the 6th primary school of patras greece. In Transforming Schools into Innovative Learning Organisations. European Distance and E-Learning Network, Budapest, Hungary, 305–312.Google Scholar
- Marina Umaschi Bers and Michael S Horn. 2010. Tangible programming in early childhood: revisiting developmental assumptions through new technologies. In High-tech tots: Childhood in a digital world, Ilene R. Berson and Michael J. Berson (Eds.). Vol. 49. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, USA, 49–70.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Bond and Elizabeth Castagnera. 2006. Peer supports and inclusive education: An underutilized resource. Theory into practice 45, 3 (2006), 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4503_4Google Scholar
- Karen Brennan and Mitchel Resnick. 2012. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American educational research association, Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 1. academic press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 25.Google Scholar
- Silvana Faja. 2014. Evaluating effectiveness of pair programming as a teaching tool in programming courses. Information Systems Education Journal 12, 6 (2014), 36.Google Scholar
- Garry Falloon. 2016. An analysis of young students’ thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. On the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 32, 6 (2016), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12155Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosella Gennari, Alessandra Melonio, Mehdi Rizvi, and Andrea Bonani. 2017. Design of IoT Tangibles for Primary Schools: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter (Cagliari, Italy) (CHItaly ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3125571.3125591Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danielle Boyd Harlow and Anne Emerson Leak. 2014. Mapping students’ ideas to understand learning in a collaborative programming environment. Computer Science Education 24, 2-3 (2014), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2014.963360Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Hattie and Klaus Zierer. 2019. Visible learning insights. Routledge, London, UK.Google Scholar
- David W Johnson and Roger T Johnson. 1999. Making cooperative learning work. Theory into practice 38, 2 (1999), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849909543834Google Scholar
- Filiz Kalelioglu and Yasemin Gülbahar. 2014. The Effects of Teaching Programming via Scratch on Problem Solving Skills: A Discussion from Learners’ Perspective.Informatics in Education 13, 1 (2014), 33–50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Udo Kuckartz. 2018. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung.Google Scholar
- Jesús Moreno-León, Gregorio Robles, and Marcos Román-González. 2015. Dr. Scratch: Automatic analysis of scratch projects to assess and foster computational thinking. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia -, 46 (2015), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.6018/red/46/10Google Scholar
- Lisa Paleczek, Katharina Maitz, Claudia Danielowitz, and Maximilian Husny. 2021. Scratch Options! Using programming to Approach Social-Emotionally Challenging Situations in Grade 4 Classrooms. In European Conference on e-Learning. Academic Conferences International Limited, Academic Conferences International Limited, Reading, UK, 658–661. https://doi.org/10.34190/EEL.21.033Google Scholar
- Lisa Paleczek, Susanne Seifert, and Martin Schöfl. 2021. Comparing digital to print assessment of receptive vocabulary with GraWo-KiGa in Austrian kindergarten. British Journal of Educational Technology 52, 6 (2021), 2145–2161. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13163Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erik Pasternak, Rachel Fenichel, and Andrew N. Marshall. 2017. Tips for creating a block language with blockly. In 2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120404Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shahira Popat and Louise Starkey. 2019. Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review. Computers & Education 128 (2019), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Richter and Mary L Courage. 2017. Comparing electronic and paper storybooks for preschoolers: Attention, engagement, and recall. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 48 (2017), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2017.01.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- José-Manuel Sáez-López, Marcos Román-González, and Esteban Vázquez-Cano. 2016. Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education 97 (2016), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larissa Schwarzwälder and Hendrik Lohse-Bossenz. 2021. Professionelle Beziehungswahrnehmung als zentrale Voraussetzung für die Entstehung und Gestaltung von sozialen Beziehungen im Kontext von Schule und Unterricht. In Soziale Eingebundenheit: Sozialbeziehungen im Fokus von Schule und LehrerInnenbildung, Gerda Hagenauer and Diana Raufelder (Eds.). Waxmann, Münster, New York, 85–98.Google Scholar
- Susanne Seifert and Lisa Paleczek. 2022. Comparing tablet and print mode of a german reading comprehension test in grade 3: Influence of test order, gender and language. International Journal of Educational Research 113 (2022), 101948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101948Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ian Utting, Stephen Cooper, Michael Kölling, John Maloney, and Mitchel Resnick. 2010. Alice, greenfoot, and scratch–a discussion. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 10, 4 (2010), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868364Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gabriela Walker and Jeni Venker Weidenbenner. 2019. Social and Emotional Learning in the age of virtual play: Technology, empathy, and learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning 12, 2 (2019), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03-2019-0046Google ScholarCross Ref
- Torben Wallbaum, Swamy Ananthanarayan, Andrii Matviienko, and Susanne Boll. 2020. A Real-Time Distributed Toolkit to Ease Children’s Exploration of IoT. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420179Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda Werner and Jill Denning. 2009. Pair programming in middle school: What does it look like?Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42, 1 (2009), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782540Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeannette M Wing. 2006. Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49, 3 (2006), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215Google ScholarDigital Library
- LeChen Zhang and Jalal Nouri. 2019. A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. Computers & Education 141 (2019), 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcy Zipke. 2017. Preschoolers explore interactive storybook apps: The effect on word recognition and story comprehension. Education and Information Technologies 22, 4 (2017), 1695–1712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9513-xGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Oren Zuckerman, Saeed Arida, and Mitchel Resnick. 2005. Extending tangible interfaces for education: digital montessori-inspired manipulatives. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 859–868. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055093Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Simultaneously Fostering Computational Thinking and Social-Emotional Competencies in 4th Graders Using Scratch: A Feasibility Study
Recommendations
Implementation of Unplugged Teaching Activities to Foster Computational Thinking Skills in Primary School from a Gender Perspective
TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThe participation of girls and women is fundamental in solving problems that the society demands. Currently, the figures indicate a deficit of female presence in the STEM context, which implies the loss of the talent of the female collective. The school,...
Gender Differences in Scratch Programs of Primary School Children
WiPSCE '17: Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing EducationIt is commonly believed that the attitudes towards programming are strongly dependent on gender among adolescents or adults. Regarding younger children, these differences in the attitudes might be less relevant. To investigate this, we have analyzed the ...
Gender Characteristics and Computational Thinking in Scratch
SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2This study investigates the Computational Thinking skill differences among novice programmers in relation to gender. Block-based visual programming languages such as Scratch particularly benefit K-12 programmers because they learn how to code ...
Comments