skip to main content
10.1145/3543873.3587364acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Violentometer: measuring violence on the Web in real time

Published:30 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a system for monitoring in real time the level of violence on Web platforms through the use of an artificial intelligence model to classify textual data according to their content. The system was successfully implemented and tested during the electoral campaign period of the Brazilian 2022 elections by using it to monitor the attacks directed to thousands of candidates on Twitter. We show that, despite an accurate and absolute quantification of violence is not feasible, the system yields differential measures of violence levels that can be useful for understanding human behavior online.

References

  1. Revista AzMina and Internetlab. 2021. MonitorA: relatório sobre violência política online em páginas e perfis de candidatas(os) nas eleições municipais de 2020. https://internetlab.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/5P_Relatorio_MonitorA-PT.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Felipe Borba. 2022. Julho–Setembro 2022. Boletim Trimestral do Observatório da violência política e eleitoral no Brasil 11 (2022). http://giel.uniriotec.br/files/Boletim Trimestral nž11-Julho-Agosto-Setembro2022.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rogers P. de Pelle and Viviane P. Moreira. 2017. Offensive Comments in the Brazilian Web: a dataset and baseline results. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Paula Fortuna, João Rocha da Silva, Juan Soler-Company, Leo Wanner, and Sérgio Nunes. 2019. A Hierarchically-Labeled Portuguese Hate Speech Dataset. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW3).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Alessandra Gomes, Dennys Antonialli, and Thiago Oliva. 2019. Drag queens e Inteligência Artificial: computadores devem decidir o que é ‘tóxico’ na internet?https://internetlab.org.br/pt/noticias/drag-queens-e-inteligencia-artificial-computadores-devem-decidir-o-que-e-toxico-na-internet/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Alice Maciel, Anna Beatriz Anjos, Caroline Farah, Ciro Barros, Ethel Rudnitzki, José Cícero da Silva, Julia Dolce, Laura Scofield, Mariama Correia, Rafael Oliveira, Raphaela Ribeiro, Rute Pina, Gabriella Soares, Rogerio Galindo, Inara Fonseca, Paula Guimarães, Vitória Régia, Débora Britto, Paulo Eduardo Dias, Liana Melo, Mirella Lopes, and Rafael Duarte. 2020. Eleições municipais provocaram cinco casos de violência política por dia em novembro. Agência Pública (2020). https://apublica.org/2020/12/eleicoes-municipais-provocaram-cinco-casos-de-violencia-politica-por-dia-em-novembro/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marzieh Mozafari, Reza Farahbakhsh, and Noël Crespi. 2020. A BERT-Based Transfer Learning Approach for Hate Speech Detection in Online Social Media. In Complex Networks and Their Applications VIII, Hocine Cherifi, Sabrina Gaito, José Fernendo Mendes, Esteban Moro, and Luis Mateus Rocha (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 928–940.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Rishab Nithyanand, Brian Schaffner, and Phillipa Gill. 2017. Measuring Offensive Speech in Online Political Discourse. In 7th USENIX Workshop on Free and Open Communications on the Internet (FOCI 17). USENIX Association, Vancouver, BC. https://www.usenix.org/conference/foci17/workshop-program/presentation/nithyanandGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Alexsandro Ribeiro, Carolina Zanatta, Caroline Farah, Gabriele Roza, José Lázaro Jr., Mariana Simões, and Thays Lavor. 2018. Violência eleitoral recrudesceu no segundo turno. Agência Pública (2018). https://apublica.org/2018/11/violencia-eleitoral-recrudesceu-no-segundo-turno/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pratik S. Sachdeva, Renata Barreto, Claudia von Vacano, and Chris J. Kennedy. 2022. Assessing Annotator Identity Sensitivity via Item Response Theory: A Case Study in a Hate Speech Corpus. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1585–1603. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533216Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yisi Sang and Jeffrey Stanton. 2022. The Origin and Value of Disagreement Among Data Labelers: A Case Study of Individual Differences in Hate Speech Annotation. In Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future, Malte Smits (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 425–444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alexandra A. Siegel, Evgenii Nikitin, Pablo Barberá, Joanna Sterling, Bethany Pullen, Richard Bonneau, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2021. Trumping hate on Twitter? Online hate speech in the 2016 U.S. Election campaign and its aftermath. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 16, 1 (2021), 71–104. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00019045Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Félix Silva and Larissa Freitas. 2022. Brazilian Portuguese Hate Speech Classification using BERTimbau. The International FLAIRS Conference Proceedings 35 (May 2022). https://doi.org/10.32473/flairs.v35i.130594Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fábio Souza, Rodrigo Nogueira, and Roberto Lotufo. 2020. BERTimbau: Pretrained BERT Models for Brazilian Portuguese. In Intelligent Systems, Ricardo Cerri and Ronaldo C. Prati (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 403–417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alexander T. Vazsonyi, Daniel J. Flannery, and Matt DeLisi. 2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Violent Behavior and Aggression (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316847992Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jorge A. Wagner Filho, Rodrigo Wilkens, Marco Idiart, and Aline Villavicencio. 2018. The brWaC Corpus: A New Open Resource for Brazilian Portuguese. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Miyazaki, Japan. https://aclanthology.org/L18-1686Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Violentometer: measuring violence on the Web in real time

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            WWW '23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
            April 2023
            1567 pages
            ISBN:9781450394192
            DOI:10.1145/3543873

            Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 30 April 2023

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • demonstration
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)49
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format