skip to main content
10.1145/3543873.3587568acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Querying Container Provenance

Published:30 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Containers are lightweight mechanisms for the isolation of operating system resources. They are realized by activating a set of namespaces. Given the use of containers in scientific computing, tracking and managing provenance within and across containers is becoming essential for debugging and reproducibility. In this work, we examine the properties of container provenance graphs that result from auditing containerized applications. We observe that the generated container provenance graphs are hypergraphs because one resource may belong to one or more namespaces. We examine the hierarchical behavior of PID, mount, and user namespaces, that are more commonly activated and show that even when represented as hypergraphs, the resulting container provenance graphs are acyclic. We experiment with recently published container logs and identify hypergraph properties.

References

  1. [n. d.]. Apache Mesos. https://mesos.apache.org/. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n. d.]. Binder. https://mybinder.org/. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [n. d.]. Docker. https://www.docker.com/. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [n. d.]. Figshare. https://figshare.com/. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [n. d.]. Hydroshare. https://www.hydroshare.org/. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [n. d.]. Linux Audit. https://github.com/linux-audit. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [n. d.]. Linux Containers. https://linuxcontainers.org/. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [n. d.]. rkt. https://github.com/rkt. Accessed: 2023-02-05.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mashal Abbas, Shahpar Khan, and et. al.2022. PACED: Provenance-based Automated Container Escape Detection. In IC2E. IEEE, 261–272.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Paolo Bouquet, Fausto Giunchiglia, and et. al. 2003. C-owl: Contextualizing ontologies. In The Semantic Web-ISWC 2003. Springer, 164–179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Xutong Chen, Hassaan Irshad, and et. al.2021. { CLARION} : Sound and Clear Provenance Tracking for Microservice Deployments. In USENIX Security 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ashish Gehani and Dawood Tariq. 2012. SPADE: Support for Provenance Auditing in Distributed Environments. Middleware (2012). http://www.csl.sri.com/users/gehani/papers/MW-2012.SPADE.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jack S. Hale, Lizao Li, and et. al.2017. Containers for Portable, Productive, and Performant Scientific Computing. CiSE 19, 6 (2017), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2017.2421459Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Michael Kerrisk. 2010. The Linux programming interface: a Linux and UNIX system programming handbook. No Starch Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gregory M Kurtzer, Vanessa Sochat, and Michael W Bauer. 2017. Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute. PloS one 12, 5 (2017), e0177459.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Luc Moreau and Paul Groth. 2013. Provenance: an introduction to PROV. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology 3, 4 (2013), 1–129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Yuta Nakamura, Tanu Malik, and Ashish Gehani. 2020. Efficient Provenance Alignment in Reproduced Executions. In TaPP. 6–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas Pasquier, Xueyuan Han, and et. al.2017. Practical Whole-System Provenance Capture. In SoCC. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Satya S Sahoo, Olivier Bodenreider, and et. al.2010. Provenance Context Entity (PaCE): Scalable provenance tracking for scientific RDF data. In SSDBM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Blesson Varghese, Lawan Thamsuhang Subba, Long Thai, and Adam Barker. 2016. DocLite: A Docker-Based Lightweight Cloud Benchmarking Tool. In CCGrid. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGrid.2016.14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    WWW '23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
    April 2023
    1567 pages
    ISBN:9781450394192
    DOI:10.1145/3543873

    Copyright © 2023 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 30 April 2023

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

    Upcoming Conference

    WWW '24
    The ACM Web Conference 2024
    May 13 - 17, 2024
    Singapore , Singapore
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format