skip to main content
10.1145/3543873.3587587acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesthewebconfConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graph-Based Hierarchical Attention Network for Suicide Risk Detection on Social Media

Published: 30 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The widespread use of social media for expressing personal thoughts and emotions makes it a valuable resource for identifying individuals at risk of suicide. Existing sequential learning-based methods have shown promising results. However, these methods may fail to capture global features. Due to its inherent ability to learn interconnected data, graph-based methods can address this gap. In this paper, we present a new graph-based hierarchical attention network (GHAN) that uses a graph convolutional neural network with an ordinal loss to improve suicide risk identification on social media. Specifically, GHAN first captures global features by constructing three graphs to capture semantic, syntactic, and sequential contextual information. Then encoded textual features are fed to attentive transformers’ encoder and optimized to factor in the increasing suicide risk levels using an ordinal classification layer hierarchically for suicide risk detection. Experimental results show that the proposed GHAN outperformed state-of-the-art methods on a public Reddit dataset.

References

[1]
Payam Amini, Hasan Ahmadinia, Jalal Poorolajal, and Mohammad Moqaddasi Amiri. 2016. Evaluating the high risk groups for suicide: a comparison of logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree and artificial neural network. Iranian journal of public health 45, 9 (2016), 1179.
[2]
Peter W Battaglia, Jessica B Hamrick, Victor Bapst, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Vinicius Zambaldi, Mateusz Malinowski, Andrea Tacchetti, David Raposo, Adam Santoro, Ryan Faulkner, 2018. Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.01261 (2018).
[3]
Adrian Benton, Glen Coppersmith, and Mark Dredze. 2017. Ethical research protocols for social media health research. In Proceedings of the first ACL workshop on ethics in natural language processing. 94–102.
[4]
Lei Cao, Huijun Zhang, Ling Feng, Zihan Wei, Xin Wang, Ningyun Li, and Xiaohao He. 2019. Latent Suicide Risk Detection on Microblog via Suicide-Oriented Word Embeddings and Layered Attention. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 1718–1728.
[5]
Yixin Cao, Zhiyuan Liu, Chengjiang Li, Juanzi Li, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Multi-channel graph neural network for entity alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.09898 (2019).
[6]
Stevie Chancellor, Michael L Birnbaum, Eric D Caine, Vincent MB Silenzio, and Munmun De Choudhury. 2019. A taxonomy of ethical tensions in inferring mental health states from social media. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 79–88.
[7]
Vijil Chenthamarakshan, Prem Melville, Vikas Sindhwani, and Richard D Lawrence. 2011. Concept labeling: Building text classifiers with minimal supervision. In Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[8]
Glen Coppersmith, Ryan Leary, Patrick Crutchley, and Alex Fine. 2018. Natural language processing of social media as screening for suicide risk. Biomedical informatics insights 10 (2018), 1178222618792860.
[9]
Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting depression via social media. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 7.
[10]
Munmun De Choudhury, Emre Kiciman, Mark Dredze, Glen Coppersmith, and Mrinal Kumar. 2016. Discovering shifts to suicidal ideation from mental health content in social media. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2098–2110.
[11]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers). Association for Computational Linguistics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
[12]
Jacob Eisenstein, Amr Ahmed, and Eric P Xing. 2011. Sparse additive generative models of text. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning (ICML-11). Citeseer, 1041–1048.
[13]
Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media+ Society 4, 1 (2018), 2056305118763366.
[14]
Joseph C Franklin, Jessica D Ribeiro, Kathryn R Fox, Kate H Bentley, Evan M Kleiman, Xieyining Huang, Katherine M Musacchio, Adam C Jaroszewski, Bernard P Chang, and Matthew K Nock. 2017. Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.Psychological bulletin 143, 2 (2017), 187.
[15]
Manas Gaur, Amanuel Alambo, Joy Prakash Sain, Ugur Kursuncu, Krishnaprasad Thirunarayan, Ramakanth Kavuluru, Amit Sheth, Randy Welton, and Jyotishman Pathak. 2019. Knowledge-aware assessment of severity of suicide risk for early intervention. In The World Wide Web Conference. 514–525.
[16]
Keith Hawton, Katrina G Witt, Tatiana L Taylor Salisbury, Ella Arensman, David Gunnell, Philip Hazell, Ellen Townsend, and Kees van Heeringen. 2016. Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry 3, 8 (2016), 740–750.
[17]
Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation 9, 8 (1997), 1735–1780.
[18]
Dirk Hovy and Shannon L Spruit. 2016. The social impact of natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 591–598.
[19]
Shaoxiong Ji, Shirui Pan, Xue Li, Erik Cambria, Guodong Long, and Zi Huang. 2020. Suicidal ideation detection: A review of machine learning methods and applications. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems (2020).
[20]
Y Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification., arXiv. preprint (2014).
[21]
Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016).
[22]
Zhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel, Piyush Sharma, and Radu Soricut. 2019. ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representations. arxiv:1909.11942 [cs.CL]
[23]
Kathryn P Linthicum, Katherine Musacchio Schafer, and Jessica D Ribeiro. 2019. Machine learning in suicide science: Applications and ethics. Behavioral sciences & the law 37, 3 (2019), 214–222.
[24]
Xien Liu, Xinxin You, Xiao Zhang, Ji Wu, and Ping Lv. 2020. Tensor graph convolutional networks for text classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 8409–8416.
[25]
Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach. arxiv:1907.11692 [cs.CL]
[26]
Naoki Masuda, Issei Kurahashi, and Hiroko Onari. 2013. Suicide ideation of individuals in online social networks. PloS one 8, 4 (2013), e62262.
[27]
Matthew Matero, Akash Idnani, Youngseo Son, Salvatore Giorgi, Huy Vu, Mohammad Zamani, Parth Limbachiya, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, and H Andrew Schwartz. 2019. Suicide risk assessment with multi-level dual-context language and BERT. In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology. 39–44.
[28]
Alexis M May and E David Klonsky. 2016. What distinguishes suicide attempters from suicide ideators? A meta-analysis of potential factors.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 23, 1 (2016), 5.
[29]
Rohan Mishra, Pradyumn Prakhar Sinha, Ramit Sawhney, Debanjan Mahata, Puneet Mathur, and Rajiv Ratn Shah. 2019. SNAP-BATNET: Cascading author profiling and social network graphs for suicide ideation detection on social media. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop. 147–156.
[30]
Usman Naseem, Adam G Dunn, Jinman Kim, and Matloob Khushi. 2022. Early Identification of Depression Severity Levels on Reddit Using Ordinal Classification. (2022).
[31]
Usman Naseem, Matloob Khushi, Jinman Kim, and Adam G Dunn. 2022. Hybrid text representation for explainable suicide risk identification on social media. IEEE transactions on computational social systems (2022).
[32]
Usman Naseem, Imran Razzak, Shah Khalid Khan, and Mukesh Prasad. 2021. A comprehensive survey on word representation models: From classical to state-of-the-art word representation language models. Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing 20, 5 (2021), 1–35.
[33]
Matthew K Nock, Guilherme Borges, and Yutaka Ono. 2012. Suicide: Global perspectives from the WHO world mental health surveys. Cambridge University Press.
[34]
World Health Organization 2014. Preventing suicide: A global imperative. World Health Organization.
[35]
Hao Peng, Jianxin Li, Yu He, Yaopeng Liu, Mengjiao Bao, Lihong Wang, Yangqiu Song, and Qiang Yang. 2018. Large-scale hierarchical text classification with recursively regularized deep graph-cnn. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 1063–1072.
[36]
John Pestian, Henry Nasrallah, Pawel Matykiewicz, Aurora Bennett, and Antoon Leenaars. 2010. Suicide note classification using natural language processing: A content analysis. Biomedical informatics insights 3 (2010), BII–S4706.
[37]
Kelly Posner, Gregory K Brown, Barbara Stanley, David A Brent, Kseniya V Yershova, Maria A Oquendo, Glenn W Currier, Glenn A Melvin, Laurence Greenhill, Sa Shen, 2011. The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. American journal of psychiatry 168, 12 (2011), 1266–1277.
[38]
Junaid Rashid, Jungeun Kim, Usman Naseem, and Amir Hussain. 2022. A DistilBERTopic Model for Short Text Documents. In Proceedings of the The 20th Annual Workshop of the Australasian Language Technology Association. 84–89.
[39]
Gerard Salton and Michael J McGill. 1983. Introduction to modern information retrieval. mcgraw-hill.
[40]
Ramit Sawhney, Harshit Joshi, Saumya Gandhi, and Rajiv Ratn Shah. 2021. Towards Ordinal Suicide Ideation Detection on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 22–30.
[41]
Ramit Sawhney, Prachi Manchanda, Raj Singh, and Swati Aggarwal. 2018. A computational approach to feature extraction for identification of suicidal ideation in tweets. In Proceedings of ACL 2018, Student Research Workshop. 91–98.
[42]
Han-Chin Shing, Suraj Nair, Ayah Zirikly, Meir Friedenberg, Hal Daumé III, and Philip Resnik. 2018. Expert, crowdsourced, and machine assessment of suicide risk via online postings. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Keyboard to Clinic. 25–36.
[43]
Pradyumna Prakhar Sinha, Rohan Mishra, Ramit Sawhney, Debanjan Mahata, Rajiv Ratn Shah, and Huan Liu. 2019. # suicidal-A multipronged approach to identify and explore suicidal ideation in twitter. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 941–950.
[44]
Hajime Sueki. 2015. The association of suicide-related Twitter use with suicidal behaviour: a cross-sectional study of young internet users in Japan. Journal of affective disorders 170 (2015), 155–160.
[45]
Truyen Tran, Dinh Phung, Wei Luo, Richard Harvey, Michael Berk, and Svetha Venkatesh. 2013. An integrated framework for suicide risk prediction. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 1410–1418.
[46]
Shikhar Vashishth, Manik Bhandari, Prateek Yadav, Piyush Rai, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, and Partha Talukdar. 2018. Incorporating syntactic and semantic information in word embeddings using graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04283 (2018).
[47]
Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention Is All You Need. arxiv:1706.03762 [cs.CL]
[48]
Sida I Wang and Christopher D Manning. 2012. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers). 90–94.
[49]
Zichao Yang, Diyi Yang, Chris Dyer, Xiaodong He, Alexander J. Smola, and Eduard H. Hovy. 2016. Hierarchical Attention Networks for Document Classification. In HLT-NAACL.
[50]
Liang Yao, Chengsheng Mao, and Yuan Luo. 2019. Graph convolutional networks for text classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 33. 7370–7377.
[51]
Xujuan Zhou, Enrico Coiera, Guy Tsafnat, Diana Arachi, Mei-Sing Ong, Adam G Dunn, 2015. Using social connection information to improve opinion mining: Identifying negative sentiment about HPV vaccines on Twitter. (2015).
[52]
Ayah Zirikly, Philip Resnik, Ozlem Uzuner, and Kristy Hollingshead. 2019. CLPsych 2019 shared task: Predicting the degree of suicide risk in Reddit posts. In Proceedings of the sixth workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology. 24–33.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Machine Learning–Based Suicide Risk Prediction Model for Suicidal Trajectory on Social Media Following Suicidal Mentions: Independent Algorithm ValidationJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4992726(e49927)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Incorporating historical information by disentangling hidden representations for mental health surveillance on social mediaSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-023-01167-914:1Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WWW '23 Companion: Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023
April 2023
1567 pages
ISBN:9781450394192
DOI:10.1145/3543873
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 30 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Graph Neural Network
  2. Social Media
  3. Suicide Detection

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

WWW '23
Sponsor:
WWW '23: The ACM Web Conference 2023
April 30 - May 4, 2023
TX, Austin, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,899 of 8,196 submissions, 23%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)117
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)15
Reflects downloads up to 28 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Machine Learning–Based Suicide Risk Prediction Model for Suicidal Trajectory on Social Media Following Suicidal Mentions: Independent Algorithm ValidationJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4992726(e49927)Online publication date: 5-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Incorporating historical information by disentangling hidden representations for mental health surveillance on social mediaSocial Network Analysis and Mining10.1007/s13278-023-01167-914:1Online publication date: 10-Dec-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media