skip to main content
10.1145/3544109.3544180acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesipecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on AGV Cluster Scheduling Method Based on Parallel Search Algorithm

Published:18 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

With gradually popularity of the application of AGVs in automated factories, the rational and efficient path planning and scheduling of AGVs can improve the operational efficiency of factories. The search efficiency of the existing A* algorithm is not high and the adaptation of the genetic algorithm remains to be improved. Considering the above problems, this paper proposes a self-adaptive cluster scheduling strategy, adopts the parallel computing to improve the search efficiency of the A* algorithm, and puts forward an improved genetic algorithm based on the dynamic fitness function which does not need to modify the structure of the genetic algorithm according to the changes of the environment so that the adaptability of the algorithm can be improved. Simulation experiments of multi-AGV scheduling are also conducted. The results show that the method adopted in this study has obvious advantages in path solving speed and can adapt to different numbers of obstacles, which provides a reference for the development and application of AGV cluster scheduling methods in real operation scenarios.

References

  1. Tang Le. Research on the Key Technology of Multi-AGV Scheduling System for Intra-company Logistics. Guilin: Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang Yi, Quan Hao, Wen Jiafu. Mobile Robot Path Planning Based on the Wolf Ant Colony Hybrid Algorithm. Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(01):127-132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu Guodong, Qu Daokui, Zhang Lei. Two-stage Dynamic Path Planning for Multi-AGV Scheduling Systems. Robot, 2005,(03):210-214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu Erhui, Yao Xifan, Tao Tao Improved Flower Pollination Algorithm for Job Shop Scheduling Problems Integrated with AGVs. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2019, 25(09):2219-2236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ZOUW Q, PAN Q K, TASGETIREN M F. An effective iterated greedy algorithm for solving a multi-compartment AGV scheduling problem in a matrix manufacturing workshop. Applied Soft Computing, 2021, 99:106945.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. ZOU W Q,PAN Q K,WANG L.An effective multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for solving the AGV scheduling problem with pickup and delivery. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2021, 218:106881.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. He Lina, Lou Peihuang, Qian Xiaoming Conflict-free Automated Guided Vehicles Routing Based on Time Window. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16(12):2630-2634.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. MURAKAMI K.Time-space network model and MILP formulation of the conflict-free routing problem of a capacitated AGV system. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 141:106270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. ZHONG M, YANG Y, DESSOUKY Y. Multi-AGV scheduling for conflict-free path planning in automated container terminals. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 142:106371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zhang Xinyan, Zou Yasheng. Collision-free path planning for automated guided vehicles based on improved A* algorithm. Systems Engineering Theory and Practice, 2021, 41(01):240-246.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Li Pei, Li Xinde. AGV obstacle avoidance algorithm based on multi-sensor information fusion. Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2015, 43(S1):224-227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Draganjac I, Miklić D, Kovačić Z Decentralized control of multi-AGV systems in autonomous warehousing applications. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(4):1433-1447.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Meng Guanjun, Chen Xinhua, Tao Xipei, AGV Path Planning Based on Ant Colony Algorithms. Modular Machine Tool and Automatic Manufacturing Technique, 2021(01):70-73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Du Zuoying, Li Jinxi, Zhang Xianglai AGV Path Planning Based on Improved Q-Learning Algorithm. Logistics Technology, 2020, 39(12):88-92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Yang Jun, Zhan Jun, She Yong. A Multi-Objective Optimization Model-Based Scheduling Method for multi-load AGVs in Ports. Navigation of China, 2022(45):66-72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu Guodong, Qu Daokui, Zhang Lei. Two-stage dynamic path planning for Multiple AGV Scheduling Systems. Robot, 2005(03):210-214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiao Fuming. Research and Realization of AGV Scheduling in Automatic Storage and Retrieval System. Shandong: Shandong University, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Zhengfeng, Liu Yangyang. Job Shop Scheduling Problem for Multiple AGVs Considering Charging. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2021, 10(27):2972-2879.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Xixing, Yang Daoming, Li Xin Flexible Job Shop AGV Fusion Scheduling Method based on HGWOA. China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32(8):938-950.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao Ming, Tang Hong, Zhang Peng. Current Status of Research on Robot Cluster Path Planning Technology. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2021, 43(01):127-138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen Guangrong, Guo Sheng, Wang Junzheng A Path Avoidance Algorithm Combining Convex Optimization and A* Algorithm. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(12):2907-2914.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang Weimin, Fu Shixiong. Path Planning for Mobile Robots Based on Improved RRT* Algorithm. Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2021, 49(1):31-36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang Danhong, Chen Wenwen, Zhang Huajin A* Algorithm Combined with Ant Colony Algorithm for Unmanned Boat Patrol Path Planning. Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Natural Science Edition, 2020, 48(6):13-18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Research on AGV Cluster Scheduling Method Based on Parallel Search Algorithm

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IPEC '22: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers
      April 2022
      1065 pages
      ISBN:9781450395786
      DOI:10.1145/3544109

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 July 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format