research-article

Playful Reflection: Impact of Gamification on a Virtual Reality Simulation of Breastfeeding

Authors:

Kathrin Gerling,

Vero Vanden Abeele,

Maria AufheimerAuthors Info & Claims

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Article No.: 787, Pages 1 - 13

https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580751

Published: 19 April 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Gamification is a popular technique to improve task engagement, and has broadly been deployed in health and education to a point where many users now expect gameful experiences in these settings. However, gamification has been criticised for being a potential obstacle to the experience of reflection. Motivated by this tension, our work examines how the addition of gamification to a Virtual Reality simulation of breastfeeding impacts player experience and reflection. Using a within-subjects design, we invited 34 participants to take part in a mixed-methods evaluation of a gamified and non-gamified variant of the simulation that included questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Results show that gamification improved player experience and encouraged players to reflect on goal achievement and performance. However, it also diverted players’ attention from nuances within the act of nursing. Drawing on our findings, we contribute considerations for the application of gamification in personal and sensitive settings such as breastfeeding.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Materials (3544548.3580751-supplemental-materials.zip)

Download
112.88 KB

MP4 File (3544548.3580751-talk-video.mp4)

Pre-recorded Video Presentation

Download
110.39 MB

References

[1]

Vero Vanden Abeele, Katta Spiel, Lennart Nacke, Daniel Johnson, and Kathrin Gerling. 2020. Development and validation of the player experience inventory: A scale to measure player experiences at the level of functional and psychosocial consequences. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 135 (2020), 102370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.102370

Digital Library

[2]

Sojung Bahng, Ryan M. Kelly, and Jon McCormack. 2020. Reflexive VR Storytelling Design Beyond Immersion: Facilitating Self-Reflection on Death and Loneliness. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376582

Digital Library

[3]

Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies of Reflection. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702234

Digital Library

[4]

Eric P.S. Baumer, Vera Khovanskaya, Mark Matthews, Lindsay Reynolds, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Geri Gay. 2014. Reviewing Reflection: On the Use of Reflection in Interactive System Design. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598598

Digital Library

[5]

Vítor Belim, Olga Lyra, Pedro Teixeira, Ana Caraban, Maria José Ferreira, Rúben Gouveia, Andrés Lucero, and Evangelos Karapanos. 2014. Beyond Gamification: Sociometric Technologies That Encourage Reflection before Behavior Change. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (Funchal, Portugal) (ACE ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 27, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663806.2663828

Digital Library

[6]

Marit Bentvelzen, Jasmin Niess, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2021. The Technology-Mediated Reflection Model: Barriers and Assistance in Data-Driven Reflection. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 246, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445505

Digital Library

[7]

Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W. Woźniak, Pia S.F. Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies That Support Reflection. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 1, Article 2 (mar 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233

Digital Library

[8]

Max V. Birk, Regan L. Mandryk, and Cheralyn Atkins. 2016. The Motivational Push of Games: The Interplay of Intrinsic Motivation and External Rewards in Games for Training. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI PLAY ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968091

Digital Library

[9]

James Brown, Kathrin Gerling, Patrick Dickinson, and Ben Kirman. 2015. Dead Fun: Uncomfortable Interactions in a Virtual Reality Game for Coffins. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (London, United Kingdom) (CHI PLAY ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810307

Digital Library

[10]

Jaehee Cho, Atit Kothari, Zixu Ding, Yeongmin Won, Stephanie Fawaz, and Xu Cheng. 2016. Injustice: Interactive Live Action Virtual Reality Experience. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 VR Village(Anaheim, California) (SIGGRAPH ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2929490.2929493

Digital Library

[11]

Carlos Cruz, Michael D. Hanus, and Jesse Fox. 2017. The need to achieve: Players’ perceptions and uses of extrinsic meta-game reward systems for video game consoles. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.017

Digital Library

[12]

Robin De Croon, Jonas Geuens, Katrien Verbert, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2021. A Systematic Review of the Effect of Gamification on Adherence Across Disciplines. In HCI in Games: Experience Design and Game Mechanics, Xiaowen Fang (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 168–184.

[13]

Sebastian Deterding. 2014. Eudaimonic Design, or: Six Invitations to Rethink Gamification. meson press, Lüneburg, Germany, 305–331.

[14]

Sebastian Deterding, Dan Dixon, Rilla Khaled, and Lennart Nacke. 2011. From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining "Gamification". In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (Tampere, Finland) (MindTrek ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Digital Library

[15]

Rowanne Fleck and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on Reflection: Framing a Design Landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (Brisbane, Australia) (OZCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952269

Digital Library

[16]

Kathrin Gerling, Kieran Hicks, Laura Buttrick, Chris Headleand, Ben Williams, Jason Hall, Kymeng Tang, Luc Geurts, and Wei Chen. 2018. Potential and Limitations of Playful Technology to Support Infant Feeding. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts(CHI PLAY ’18 Extended Abstracts). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3271519

Digital Library

[17]

Chad Phoenix Rose Gowler and Ioanna Iacovides. 2019. "Horror, Guilt and Shame" – Uncomfortable Experiences in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347179

Digital Library

[18]

Jonathan Gutman. 1982. A Means-End Chain Model Based on Consumer Categorization Processes. Journal of Marketing 46, 2 (Apr 1982), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600207

[19]

Lasse Hakulinen, Tapio Auvinen, and Ari Korhonen. 2013. Empirical Study on the Effect of Achievement Badges in TRAKLA2 Online Learning Environment. In 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, Danvers, MA, USA, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.34

Digital Library

[20]

Juho Hamari. 2017. Do Badges Increase User Activity? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Gamification. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, C (jun 2017), 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.036

Digital Library

[21]

Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does Gamification Work? – A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, Danvers, MA, USA, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377

Digital Library

[22]

Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 139–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

[23]

Kieran Hicks, Kathrin Gerling, Patrick Dickinson, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2019. Juicy Game Design: Understanding the Impact of Visual Embellishments on Player Experience. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347171

Digital Library

[24]

Kieran Hicks, Kathrin Gerling, Patrick Dickinson, and Vero Vanden Abeele. 2019. Juicy Game Design: Understanding the Impact of Visual Embellishments on Player Experience. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (Barcelona, Spain) (CHI PLAY ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347171

Digital Library

[25]

Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, Robert Zubek, 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, Vol. 4. AAAI, San Jose, CA, 1722.

[26]

Kai Huotari and Juho Hamari. 2012. Defining gamification: a service marketing perspective. In Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference(MindTrek ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2393132.2393137

Digital Library

[27]

Ioanna Iacovides, Anna Cox, Richard Kennedy, Paul Cairns, and Charlene Jennett. 2015. Removing the HUD: The Impact of Non-Diegetic Game Elements and Expertise on Player Involvement. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (London, United Kingdom) (CHI PLAY ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793120

Digital Library

[28]

Ioanna Iacovides and Anna L. Cox. 2015. Moving Beyond Fun: Evaluating Serious Experience in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2245–2254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702204

Digital Library

[29]

Ioanna Iacovides, Joe Cutting, Jen Beeston, Marta E. Cecchinato, Elisa D. Mekler, and Paul Cairns. 2022. Close but Not Too Close: Distance and Relevance in Designing Games for Reflection. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CHI PLAY, Article 224 (oct 2022), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549487

Digital Library

[30]

Katherine Isbister, Mary Flanagan, and Chelsea Hash. 2010. Designing Games for Learning: Insights from Conversations with Designers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2041–2044. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753637

Digital Library

[31]

Daniel Johnson, Sebastian Deterding, Kerri-Ann Kuhn, Aleksandra Staneva, Stoyan Stoyanov, and Leanne Hides. 2016. Gamification for health and wellbeing: A systematic review of the literature. Internet Interventions 6 (Nov. 2016), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.10.002

[32]

Rilla Khaled. 2018. Questions Over Answers: Reflective Game Design. Springer, Singapore, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1891-6_1

[33]

Tae Wan Kim and Kevin Werbach. 2016. More than just a game: ethical issues in gamification. Ethics and Information Technology 18, 2 (Jun 2016), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9401-5

Digital Library

[34]

Janaki Kumar. 2013. Gamification at Work: Designing Engaging Business Software. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Health, Learning, Playing, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural User Experience, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 528–537.

[35]

Richard N. Landers, Kristina N. Bauer, and Rachel C. Callan. 2017. Gamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experiment. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 508–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.008

Digital Library

[36]

Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. Chapter 3 - Experimental design. Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, USA, 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805390-4.00003-0

[37]

Thomas W. Malone. 1980. What Makes Things Fun to Learn? Heuristics for Designing Instructional Computer Games. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems (Palo Alto, California, USA) (SIGSMALL ’80). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/800088.802839

Digital Library

[38]

Tim Marsh and Brigid Costello. 2013. Lingering Serious Experience as Trigger to Raise Awareness, Encourage Reflection and Change Behavior. In Persuasive Technology(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), Shlomo Berkovsky and JillEditors Freyne (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37157-8_15

Digital Library

[39]

Elisa D. Mekler, Julia Ayumi Bopp, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2014. A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies on the Enjoyment of Digital Entertainment Games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557078

Digital Library

[40]

Elisa D. Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Klaus Opwis, and Alexandre N. Tuch. 2013. Do Points, Levels and Leaderboards Harm Intrinsic Motivation? An Empirical Analysis of Common Gamification Elements. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (Gamification ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583017

Digital Library

[41]

Elisa D. Mekler, Florian Brühlmann, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Klaus Opwis. 2017. Towards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performance. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.048

Digital Library

[42]

Elisa D. Mekler, Ioanna Iacovides, and Julia Ayumi Bopp. 2018. “A Game that Makes You Question...”: Exploring the Role of Reflection for the Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242691

Digital Library

[43]

Sebastian Misztal and Jonas Schild. 2022. Visual Delegate Generalization Frame – Evaluating Impact of Visual Effects and Elements on Player and User Experiences in Video Games and Interactive Virtual Environments. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 191, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501885

Digital Library

[44]

Matt Kucic October 26 and 2005. 2005. How to Prototype a Game in Under 7 Days. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/disciplines/how-to-prototype-a-game-in-under-7-days

[45]

Margaree Peacocke, Robert J. Teather, Jacques Carette, I. Scott MacKenzie, and Victoria McArthur. 2018. An empirical comparison of first-person shooter information displays: HUDs, diegetic displays, and spatial representations. Entertainment Computing 26 (2018), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2018.01.003

[46]

S. Price, Y. Rogers, D. Stanton, and H. Smith. 2003. A New Conceptual Framework for CSCL. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0195-2_61

[47]

Richard M. Ryan and Edward L. Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 1 (2000), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

[48]

Richard M. Ryan, C. Scott Rigby, and Andrew Przybylski. 2006. The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach. Motivation and Emotion 30, 4 (Dec. 2006), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9051-8

[49]

Virginia Schmied, Sarah Beake, Athena Sheehan, Christine McCourt, and Fiona Dykes. 2011. Women’s Perceptions and Experiences of Breastfeeding Support: A Metasynthesis. Birth 38, 1 (Mar 2011), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00446.x

[50]

Katie Seaborn and Deborah I. Fels. 2015. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74 (Feb. 2015), 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006

Digital Library

[51]

Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment 3, 3 (Jul 2005), 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253

Digital Library

[52]

Kymeng Tang, Kathrin Gerling, and Luc Geurts. 2021. Virtual Feed: A Simulated Breastfeeding Experience in Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451575

Digital Library

[53]

Kymeng Tang, Kathrin Gerling, and Luc Geurts. 2022. Challenges and Opportunities for Playful Technology in Health Prevention: Using Virtual Reality to Supplement Breastfeeding Education. In 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW). IEEE, Danvers, MA, USA, 406–409. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW55335.2022.00088

[54]

Kymeng Tang, Kathrin Gerling, and Luc Geurts. 2022. Virtual Feed: Design and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation Addressing the Lived Experience of Breastfeeding. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 438, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517620

Digital Library

[55]

Kymeng Tang, Kathrin Gerling, Luc Geurts, and Katta Spiel. 2021. Understanding the Role of Technology to Support Breastfeeding. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Online - Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery; New York, NY, USA, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445247

Digital Library

[56]

Kymeng Tang, Kathrin Gerling, Marnix Lijnen, Marten Geets, Maria Aufheimer, Luc Geurts, and Joke Muyldermans. forthcoming. Supporting Partner Involvement in Breastfeeding Education Through a Gamified Mobile App: System Design and Mixed-Method Exploratory Study. (forthcoming).

[57]

Mattia Thibault and Juho Hamari. 2021. Seven Points to Reappropriate Gamification. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68207-1_2

[58]

Raphael Vallat. 2018. Pingouin: statistics in Python. Journal of Open Source Software 3, 31 (Nov 2018), 1026. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01026

[59]

Rob van Roy and Bieke Zaman. 2015-04-01. Moving Beyond the Effectiveness of Gamification.

[60]

Rob van Roy and Bieke Zaman. 2017. Why Gamification Fails in Education and How to Make It Successful: Introducing Nine Gamification Heuristics Based on Self-Determination Theory. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 485–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51645-5_22

[61]

Erika Noll Webb. 2013. Gamification: When It Works, When It Doesn’t. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Health, Learning, Playing, Cultural, and Cross-Cultural User Experience(Lecture Notes in Computer Science), AaronEditor Marcus (Ed.). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 608–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39241-2_67

Digital Library

[62]

Becky K. White, Roslyn C. Giglia, Jane A. Scott, and Sharyn K. Burns. 2018. How New and Expecting Fathers Engage With an App-Based Online Forum: Qualitative Analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 6, 6 (June 2018), e144. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9999

[63]

Carolin Wiedemann and Soenke Zehle. 2012. Depletion design: a glossary of network ecologies. Institute of Network Cultures, Amsterdam.

[64]

Josef Wiemeyer, Lennart Nacke, Christiane Moser, and Florian ‘Floyd’ Mueller. 2016. Player Experience. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 243–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40612-1_9

[65]

Iain Williamson, Dawn Leeming, Steven Lyttle, and Sally Johnson. 2012. ‘It should be the most natural thing in the world’: exploring first-time mothers’ breastfeeding difficulties in the UK using audio-diaries and interviews. Maternal & Child Nutrition 8, 4 (2012), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2011.00328.x

[66]

World Health Organization. 2015. WHO European Region has lowest global breastfeeding rates. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Life-stages/maternal-and-newborn-health/news/news/2015/08/who-european-region-has-lowest-global-breastfeeding-rates

Cited By

De Souza JChamberlain KWang E(2024)LCBuddy: Towards a Smartphone-based Self-Assessment Tool for Postpartum Patients With Breast PainExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650944(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650944
Du WZhu ZXu XChe HChen S(2024)CareerSim: Gamification Design Leveraging LLMs For Career Development ReflectionExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650928(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650928
Allgaier MHuettl FHanke LHuber TPreim BSaalfeld SHansen C(2024)Gamification Concepts for a VR-based Visuospatial Training for Intraoperative Liver UltrasoundExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650736(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650736
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Playful Reflection: Impact of Gamification on a Virtual Reality Simulation of Breastfeeding
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

Virtual Feed: Design and Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Simulation Addressing the Lived Experience of Breastfeeding
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Breastfeeding can be challenging, but it is difficult for antenatal education to convey issues associated with the lived experience of breastfeeding. In our work, we explore the potential of interactive simulations to support antenatal education, and ...
Gamification, Serious Games, Ludic Simulation, and other Contentious Categories

This paper provides a conceptual framework for gamification, ludic simulations, and serious games. Central to this framework is the spectrum of design that differentiates work and play. Work and play help define software in purpose as games, ...
Poker in Virtual Reality

This study examines virtual reality (VR) poker and how the platform affects poker players' experience. Players use a self-customized avatar and other features of a computer platform that differs from in-person poker. Data were collected through ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 2023

14911 pages

ISBN:9781450394215

DOI:10.1145/3544548

Editors:
Albrecht Schmidt
LMU Munich, Germany60028717
,
Kaisa Väänänen
Tampere University, Finland60011170
,
Tesh Goyal
Google Research, USA60006191
,
Per Ola Kristensson
University of Cambridge, UK60031101
,
Anicia Peters
University of Namibia, Namibia60072704
,
Stefanie Mueller
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA60022195
,
Julie R. Williamson
University of Glasgow, UK60001490
,
Max L. Wilson
University of Nottingham, UK60015138

Copyright © 2023 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 19 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

CHI '23

Sponsor:

SIGCHI

CHI '23: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 23 - 28, 2023

Hamburg, Germany

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

Upcoming Conference

CHI 2025

Sponsor:
sigchi

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

April 26 - May 1, 2025

Yokohama , Japan

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
803
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)464
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)127

Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

De Souza JChamberlain KWang E(2024)LCBuddy: Towards a Smartphone-based Self-Assessment Tool for Postpartum Patients With Breast PainExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650944(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650944
Du WZhu ZXu XChe HChen S(2024)CareerSim: Gamification Design Leveraging LLMs For Career Development ReflectionExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650928(1-7)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650928
Allgaier MHuettl FHanke LHuber TPreim BSaalfeld SHansen C(2024)Gamification Concepts for a VR-based Visuospatial Training for Intraoperative Liver UltrasoundExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650736(1-8)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650736
Villegas-Ch WGovea JNaranjo Godoy LMera-Navarrete A(2024)Virtual Reality Simulations for Skills Training: Improving Learning Through Immersive Experiences in Educational EnvironmentsIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.345662812(130073-130090)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3456628

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Figures

Tables

Media

View full text|Download PDF

View Table of Conten