skip to main content
10.1145/3544548.3581012acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Memory-Oriented Interactions with Digital Photos In and Across Time: A Field Study of Chronoscope

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe a field study of Chronoscope, a tangible photo viewer that lets people revisit and explore their digital photos with the support of temporal metadata. Chronoscope offers different temporal modalities for organizing one's personal digital photo archive, and for exploring possible connections in and across time, and among photos and memories. We deployed four Chronoscopes in four households for three months to understand participants’ experiences over time. Our goals are to investigate the reflective potential of temporal modalities as an alternative design approach for supporting memory-oriented photo exploration, and empirically explore conceptual propositions related to slow technology. Findings revealed that Chronoscope catalyzed a range of reflective experiences on their respective life histories and life stories. It opened up alternative ways of considering time and the potential longevity of personal photo archives. We conclude with implications to present opportunities for future HCI research and practice.

Footnotes

  1. 1 A ‘satellite family’ is a form of distributed family organization where the primary income earner does not live in the same geographic place where most family members are located at.

    Footnote
Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544548.3581012-video-figure.mp4

mp4

251 MB

3544548.3581012-talk-video.mp4

mp4

222.4 MB

3544548.3581012-video-preview.mp4

mp4

69.6 MB

References

  1. Morgan Ames, Dean Eckles, Mor Naaman, Mirjana Spasojevic, and Nancy Van House. 2010. Requirements for mobile photoware. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 14, 2 (February 2010), 95–109. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0237-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Frederick M.C. van Amstel and Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto. 2022. Existential time and historicity in interaction design. Human–Computer Interact. 37, 1 (January 2022), 29–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1912607Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Benett Axtell, Raheleh Saryazdi, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2022. Design is Worth a Thousand Words: The Effect of Digital Interaction Design on Picture-Prompted Reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Benett Axtell, Raheleh Saryazdi, and Cosmin Munteanu. 2022. Design is Worth a Thousand Words: The Effect of Digital Interaction Design on Picture-Prompted Reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Anna N. Baglione, Maxine M. Girard, Meagan Price, James Clawson, and Patrick C. Shih. 2018. Modern Bereavement: A Model for Complicated Grief in the Digital Age. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173990Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard Banks, David Kirk, and Abigail Sellen. 2012. A design perspective on three technology heirlooms. Human–Computer Interact. 27, 1–2 (2012), 63–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Richard Banks and Abigail Sellen. 2009. Shoebox: Mixing Storage and Display of Digital Images in the Home. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI ’09), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35–40. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1517664.1517678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Frederic Charles Bartlett. 1995. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge university press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Russell W. Belk. 1988. Possessions and the Extended Self. J. Consum. Res. 15, 2 (September 1988), 139–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/209154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ofer Bergman, Diana Gutman, and Steve Whittaker. 2022. It's too much for us to handle—The effect of smartphone use on long-term retrieval of family photos. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. (May 2022). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-022-01677-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dorthe Berntsen. 2009. Involuntary Autobiographical Memories: An Introduction to the Unbidden Past. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Dorthe Berntsen and David C. Rubin (Eds.). 2012. Understanding Autobiographical Memory: Theories and Approaches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139021937Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ryan David Bowler, Benjamin Bach, and Larissa Pschetz. 2022. Exploring Uncertainty in Digital Scheduling, and The Wider Implications of Unrepresented Temporalities in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Mendel Broekhuijsen, Elise van den Hoven, and Panos Markopoulos. 2017. Design Directions for Media-Supported Collocated Remembering Practices. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 21–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mendel Broekhuijsen, Elise van den Hoven, and Panos Markopoulos. 2017. From PhotoWork to PhotoUse: exploring personal digital photo activities. Behav. Inf. Technol. 36, 7 (July 2017), 754–767. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1288266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matic Broz. 2022. How Many Photos Are There? 50+ Photos Statistics. Retrieved May 10, 2022 from https://photutorial.com/photos-statistics/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Han Joo Chae, Youli Chang, Minji Kim, Gwanmo Park, and Jinwook Seo. 2020. ARphy: Managing Photo Collections Using Physical Objects in AR. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382885Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. David Chatting, David S. Kirk, Abigail C. Durrant, Chris Elsden, Paulina Yurman, and Jo-Anne Bichard. 2017. Making Ritual Machines: The Mobile Phone As a Networked Material for Research Products. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 435–447. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Amy Yo Sue Chen, William Odom, Ce Zhong, Henry Lin, and Tal Amram. 2019. Chronoscope: Designing Temporally Diverse Interactions with Personal Digital Photo Collections. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 799–812. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Martin A. Conway and David C. Rubin. 1993. The Structure of Autobiographical Memory. In Theories Of Memory. Psychology Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Dan Cosley, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, Johnathon Schultz, S. Tejaswi Peesapati, and Soyoung Lee. 2012. Experiences With Designing Tools for Everyday Reminiscing. Human–Computer Interact. 27, 1–2 (April 2012), 175–198. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2012.656047Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Andy Crabtree and Richard Mortier. 2015. Human Data Interaction: Historical Lessons from Social Studies and CSCW. In ECSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19-23 September 2015, Oslo, Norway, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–21. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20499-4_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Eugene Halton. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Amber Cushing. 2011. Self extension and the desire to preserve digital possessions. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 48, 1 (2011), 1–3. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Amber L. Cushing. 2013. “It's stuff that speaks to me”: Exploring the characteristics of digital possessions. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64, 8 (2013), 1723–1734. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Amber L. Cushing. 2014. A Balance of Primary and Secondary Values: Exploring a Digital Legacy. Int. J. Knowl. Content Dev. Technol. 3, 2 (2014), 67–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2013.3.2.067Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. José van Dijck. 2011. Flickr and the culture of connectivity: Sharing views, experiences, memories. Mem. Stud. 4, 4 (October 2011), 401–415. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698010385215Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. José van Dijck. 2014. Flickr: Photo Sharing Sites between Collective and Connective Memory. In Double Exposure. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Emanuel Felipe Duarte, Yusseli Lizeth Méndez Mendoza, and M. Cecília C. Baranauskas. 2020. InsTime: A Case Study on the Co-Design of Interactive Installations on Deep Time. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 231–242. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395554Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Abigail Durrant, Alex S. Taylor, David Frohlich, Abigail Sellen, and David Uzzell. 2009. Photo displays and intergenerational relationships in the family home. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCS-HCI ’09), BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, 10–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Abigail Durrant, Alex S. Taylor, Stuart Taylor, Mike Molloy, Abigail Sellen, David Frohlich, Phil Gosset, and Laurel Swan. 2008. Speculative devices for photo display. In CHI ’08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’08), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2297–2302. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1358628.1358673Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, David Chatting, and David S. Kirk. 2017. Designing Documentary Informatics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM, 649–661. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3064714Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Chris Elsden, David S. Kirk, and Abigail C. Durrant. 2016. A Quantified Past: Toward Design for Remembering With Personal Informatics. Human–Computer Interact. 31, 6 (November 2016), 518–557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2015.1093422Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chris Elsden, David Kirk, Mark Selby, and Chris Speed. 2015. Beyond Personal Informatics: Designing for Experiences with Data. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2341–2344. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Chris Elsden, Mark Selby, Abigail Durrant, and David Kirk. 2016. Fitter, Happier, More Productive: What to Ask of a Data-driven Life. interactions 23, 5 (August 2016), 45–45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2975388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. David Frohlich, Allan Kuchinsky, Celine Pering, Abbe Don, and Steven Ariss. 2002. Requirements for photoware. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ’02), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 166–175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/587078.587102Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. David M. Frohlich. 2004. Audiophotography: Bringing Photos to Life with Sounds. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. David Frohlich and Rachel Murphy. 2000. The Memory Box. Pers. Technol. 4, 4 (December 2000), 238–240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02391566Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. A. Galani and R. Clarke. 2018. Configuring slow technology through social and embodied interaction: making time for reflection in augmenter reality museum experiences with young visitors. Int. Handb. New Digit. Pract. Galleries Libr. Arch. Mus. Herit. Sites (2018), 257–269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. William Gaver, John Bowers, Andy Boucher, Andy Law, Sarah Pennington, and Nicholas Villar. 2006. The History Tablecloth: Illuminating Domestic Activity. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’06), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142437Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. William W. Gaver, John Bowers, Kirsten Boehner, Andy Boucher, David WT Cameron, Mark Hauenstein, Nadine Jarvis, and Sarah Pennington. 2013. Indoor weather stations: investigating a ludic approach to environmental HCI through batch prototyping. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3451–3460. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2466474Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Barney G. Glaser, Anselm L. Strauss, and Anselm L. Strauss. 2017. Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Routledge. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Barbara Grosse-Hering, Jon Mason, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Conny Bakker, and Pieter Desmet. 2013. Slow design for meaningful interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 3431–3440. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2466472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Florian Güldenpfennig, Roman Ganhör, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. How to Look at Two-sided Photos?: Exploring Novel Perspectives on Digital Images. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI ’17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 91:1-91:8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3122134Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Rebecca Gulotta, Alex Sciuto, Aisling Kelliher, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2015. Curatorial Agents: How Systems Shape Our Understanding of Personal and Familial Digital Information. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3453–3462. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Aakar Gupta, Bo Rui Lin, Siyi Ji, Arjav Patel, and Daniel Vogel. 2020. Replicate and Reuse: Tangible Interaction Design for Digitally-Augmented Physical Media Objects. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. Retrieved July 7, 2022 from http://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376139Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Lars Hallnäs, Patricija Jaksetic, Peter Ljungstrand, Johan Redström, and Tobias Skog. 2001. Expressions: towards a design practice of slow technology. In Proceedings of the human–computer interaction conference (Interact ‘01), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 447–454. Retrieved September 26, 2016 from https://books.google.ca/books?hl=en&lr=&id=LoR_qZGX8IgC&oi=fnd&pg=PA447&dq=Expressions:+Towards+a+Design+Practice+of+Slow+Technology&ots=PeMyZdOlDJ&sig=P-0xOY5yh_OclO-vFN-zwvNrxskGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput 5, 3 (January 2001), 201–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Sabrina Hauser, Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Peter-Paul Verbeek, Audrey Desjardins, Henry Lin, Matthew Dalton, Markus Schilling, and Gijs de Boer. 2018. Deployments of the Table-non-table: A Reflection on the Relation Between Theory and Things in the Practice of Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201:1-201:13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173775Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Daniel Hawkins, Carman Neustaedter, and Jason Procyk. 2015. Postulater: the design and evaluation of a time-delayed media sharing system. In Proceedings of the 41st Graphics Interface Conference, Canadian Information Processing Society, 249–256.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Sabrina Helm, Victoria Ligon, Tony Stovall, and Silvia Riper. 2018. Consumer interpretations of digital ownership in the book market. Electron. Mark. 28, 2 (2018), 177–189. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0293-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. John Helmes, Alex S. Taylor, Xiang Cao, Kristina Höök, Peter Schmitt, and Nicolas Villar. 2011. Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: Design Speculations on Autonomy. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 145–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935730Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Luc Hermans, Mendel Broekhuijsen, and Panos Markopoulos. 2017. Memora: A Design for Teenagers to Connect Virtual and Physical Possessions. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017 (ECCE 2017), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 121–128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Daniel Herron, Wendy Moncur, and Elise van den Hoven. 2016. Digital Possessions After a Romantic Break Up. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI ’16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 36:1-36:10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Daniel Herron, Wendy Moncur, and Elise van den Hoven. 2017. Digital Decoupling and Disentangling: Towards Design for Romantic Break Up. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’17), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1175–1185. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064765Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Otmar Hilliges and David Stanley Kirk. 2009. Getting sidetracked: display design and occasioning photo-talk with the photohelix. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1733–1736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Otmar Hilliges and David Stanley Kirk. 2009. Getting sidetracked: display design and occasioning photo-talk with the photohelix. ACM, 1733–1736. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518967Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Nafeez Zawad Hossain, Tanjima Nasreen Jenia, Md. Samshad Rahman, Sofen Hoque Anonta, and Khandaker Tabin Hasan. 2020. A Context-Based Searching Technique by Extraction and Fusion of Metadata of Digital Photos. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing Advancements (ICCA 2020), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3377049.3377061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Elise van den Hoven. 2014. A future-proof past: Designing for remembering experiences. Mem. Stud. 7, 3 (July 2014), 370–384. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698014530625Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Elise van den Hoven and Berry Eggen. 2008. Informing augmented memory system design through autobiographical memory theory. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 12, 6 (August 2008), 433–443. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-007-0177-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Elise van den Hoven and Berry Eggen. 2014. The cue is key: Design for real-life remembering. Z. Für Psychol. 222, 2 (2014), 110–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000172Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Chung-Ching Huang and Erik Stolterman. 2011. Temporality in Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI ’11), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 62:1-62:8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2347504.2347572Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Xin Huang, Kazuki Takashima, Kazuyuki Fujita, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. 2018. Dynamic, Flexible and Multi-dimensional Visualization of Digital Photos and their Metadata. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS ’18), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 405–408. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3279778.3279923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’03), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Hyerin Im, Taewan Kim, Eunhee Jung, Bonhee Ku, Seungho Baek, and Tak Yeon Lee. 2022. Virfie: Virtual Group Selfie Station for Remote Togetherness. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Martijn Jansen, Elise Hoven, and David Frohlich. 2014. Pearl: Living Media Enabled by Interactive Photo Projection. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput 18, 5 (June 2014), 1259–1275. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0691-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Kyung Jin Kim, Sangsu Jang, Bomin Kim, Hyosun Kwon, and Young-Woo Park. 2019. muRedder: Shredding Speaker for Ephemeral Musical Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322362Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Subin Kim, Sangsu Jang, Jin-young Moon, Minjoo Han, and Young-Woo Park. 2022. Slide2Remember: an Interactive Wall Frame Enriching Reminiscence Experiences by Providing Re-encounters of Taken Photos and Heard Music in a Similar Period. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533456Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. David Kirk, Abigail Sellen, Carsten Rother, and Ken Wood. 2006. Understanding Photowork. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’06), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 761–770. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124885Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Alexandria M. Luxon, C. Elizabeth Hamilton, Sage Bates, and Gregory S. Chasson. 2019. Pinning our possessions: Associations between digital hoarding and symptoms of hoarding disorder. J. Obsessive-Compuls. Relat. Disord. 21, (2019), 60–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2018.12.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Ramia Mazé and Johan Redström. 2005. Form and the computational object. Digit. Creat. 16, 1 (January 2005), 7–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626260500147736Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Melissa Mazmanian, Ingrid Erickson, and Ellie Harmon. 2015. Circumscribed Time and Porous Time: Logics as a Way of Studying Temporality. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW ’15), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1453–1464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. David McGookin. 2019. Reveal: Investigating Proactive Location-Based Reminiscing with Personal Digital Photo Repositories. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. Retrieved January 7, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300665Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. 1985. Qualitative data analysis. Sage Newbury Park,, CA. Retrieved January 11, 2017 from http://researchtalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Miles-Huberman-Saldana-Drawing-and-Verifying-Conclusions.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2014. Making memories: a cultural probe study into the remembering of everyday life. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI ’14), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 256–265. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2020. Everyday Life Reflection: Exploring Media Interaction with Balance, Cogito & Dott. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–79. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Michael Nunes, Saul Greenberg, and Carman Neustaedter. 2008. Sharing Digital Photographs in the Home Through Physical Mementos, Souvenirs, and Keepsakes. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’08), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 250–260. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. Marianna Obrist, Rob Comber, Sriram Subramanian, Betina Piqueras-Fiszman, Carlos Velasco, and Charles Spence. 2014. Temporal, affective, and embodied characteristics of taste experiences: A framework for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2853–2862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Marianna Obrist, Alexandre N. Tuch, and Kasper Hornbaek. 2014. Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2843–2852. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. William Odom. 2015. Understanding long-term interactions with a slow technology: An investigation of experiences with FutureMe. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 575–584. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2702221Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. William Odom and Tijs Duel. 2018. On the Design of OLO Radio: Investigating Metadata As a Design Material. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 104:1-104:9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. William Odom, Siân Lindley, Larissa Pschetz, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Anna Vallgårda, Mikael Wiberg, and Daisy Yoo. 2018. Time, Temporality, and Slowness: Future Directions for Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’18 Companion), Association for Computing Machinery, Hong Kong, China, 383–386. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3197392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. William Odom, Abi Sellen, Richard Harper, and Eno Thereska. 2012. Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 781–790. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. William Odom, Abigail Sellen, Richard Banks, David Kirk, Tim Regan, Mark Selby, Jodi Forlizzi, and John Zimmerman. 2014. Designing for Slowness, Anticipation and Re-visitation: A Long Term Field Study of the Photobox. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1961–1970. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557178Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. William Odom, Erik Stolterman, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2022. Extending a Theory of Slow Technology for Design through Artifact Analysis. Human–Computer Interact. 37, 2 (2022), 150–179. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1913416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Jeroen Hol, Bram Naus, Pepijn Verburg, Tal Amram, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2019. Investigating Slowness As a Frame to Design Longer-Term Experiences with Personal Data: A Field Study of Olly. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’19), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 34:1-34:16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300264Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Youn-kyung Lim, Audrey Desjardins, Bart Hengeveld, and Richard Banks. 2016. From Research Prototype to Research Product. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2549–2561. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858447Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. William Odom, MinYoung Yoo, Henry Lin, Tijs Duel, Tal Amram, and Amy Yo Sue Chen. 2020. Exploring the Reflective Potentialities of Personal Data with Different Temporal Modalities: A Field Study of Olo Radio. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 283–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395438Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. William Odom, John Zimmerman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2014. Placelessness, Spacelessness, and Formlessness: Experiential Qualities of Virtual Possessions. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 985–994. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598577Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Daniel Orth, Clementine Thurgood, and Elise van den Hoven. 2020. Embodying Meaningful Digital Media: A Strategy to Design for Product Attachment in the Digital Age. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. S. Tejaswi Peesapati, Victoria Schwanda, Johnathon Schultz, Matt Lepage, So-yae Jeong, and Dan Cosley. 2010. Pensieve: Supporting Everyday Reminiscence. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2027–2036. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Daniela Petrelli, Nicolas Villar, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Lina Dib, and Steve Whittaker. 2010. FM Radio: Family Interplay with Sonic Mementos. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’10), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2371–2380. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753683Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Larissa Pschetz. 2015. Isn't it time to change the way we think about time? interactions 22, 5 (2015), 58–61.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Larissa Pschetz and Richard Banks. 2013. Long living chair. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2983–2986. Retrieved October 16, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2479590Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Larissa Pschetz and Michelle Bastian. 2018. Temporal Design: Rethinking time in design. Des. Stud. 56, (May 2018), 169–184. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.10.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Jörgen Rahm-Skågeby and Lina Rahm. 2022. HCI and deep time: toward deep time design thinking. Human–Computer Interact. 37, 1 (January 2022), 15–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1902328Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. Amon Rapp. 2022. How do people experience the temporality of everyday life changes? Towards the exploration of existential time in HCI. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 167, (November 2022), 102899. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102899Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. Johan Redström. 2017. Making Design Theory. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking As Lived Informatics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1163–1172. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  100. David C. Rubin and Dorthe Berntsen. 2009. The frequency of voluntary and involuntary autobiographical memories across the life span. Mem. Cognit. 37, 5 (July 2009), 679–688. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3758/37.5.679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  101. Pedro Sanches, Noura Howell, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Tom Jenkins, and Karey Helms. 2022. Diffraction-in-action: Designerly Explorations of Agential Realism Through Lived Data. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502029Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  102. Corina Sas, Scott Challioner, Christopher Clarke, Ross Wilson, Alina Coman, Sarah Clinch, Mike Harding, and Nigel Davies. 2015. Self-Defining Memory Cues: Creative Expression and Emotional Meaning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’15), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2013–2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  103. Corina Sas and Steve Whittaker. 2013. Design for Forgetting: Disposing of Digital Possessions After a Breakup. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1823–1832. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466241Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  104. Corina Sas, Steve Whittaker, and John Zimmerman. 2016. Design for Rituals of Letting Go: An Embodiment Perspective on Disposal Practices Informed by Grief Therapy. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 23, 4 (August 2016), 21:1-21:37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2926714Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  105. Abigail J. Sellen, Andrew Fogg, Mike Aitken, Steve Hodges, Carsten Rother, and Ken Wood. 2007. Do life-logging technologies support memory for the past? an experimental study using sensecam. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’07), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240636Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  106. Laurel Swan and Alex S. Taylor. 2008. Photo displays in the home. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS ’08), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 261–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394473Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  107. Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-place: Thinking through the relations between data and community. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 2863–2872. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2702558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  108. Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Alessandro Soro, Paul Roe, Anita Lee Hong, and Margot Brereton. 2017. Situational When: Designing for Time Across Cultures. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, 6461–6474. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3025936Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  109. Lisa Thomas and Pam Briggs. 2016. Reminiscence through the Lens of Social Media. Front. Psychol. 7, (2016). Retrieved January 24, 2022 from https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00870Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. Lisa Thomas, Elaine Farrow, Matthew Aylett, and Pam Briggs. 2018. A life story in three parts: the use of triptychs to make sense of personal digital data. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 22, 4 (August 2018), 691–705. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1110-0Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  111. Philipp Trenz, Sebastian Pasewaldt, Mandy Klingbeil, Jürgen Döllner, and Matthias Trapp. 2021. Forward Selfies. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2021 Appy Hour (SIGGRAPH ’21), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3450415.3464403Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  112. Wenn-Chieh Tsai, Amy Yo Sue Chen, Sheng-Yang Hsu, and Rung-Huei Liang. 2015. CrescendoMessage: interacting with slow messaging. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference (IASDR’15).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Wenn-Chieh Tsai, Po-Hao Wang, Hung-Chi Lee, Rung-Huei Liang, and Jane Hsu. 2014. The Reflexive Printer: Toward Making Sense of Perceived Drawbacks in Technology-mediated Reminiscence. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’14), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 995–1004. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598589Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  114. Daisuke Uriu and William Odom. 2016. Designing for Domestic Memorialization and Remembrance: A Field Study of Fenestra in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5945–5957. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  115. Daisuke Uriu, William Odom, Mei-Kei Lai, Sai Taoka, and Masahiko Inami. 2018. SenseCenser: An Interactive Device for Sensing Incense Smoke & Supporting Memorialization Rituals in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS ’18 Companion), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 315–318. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  116. Daisuke Uriu, Naruhiko Shiratori, Satoru Hashimoto, Shuichi Ishibashi, and Naohito Okude. 2009. CaraClock: An Interactive Photo Viewer Designed for Family Memories. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’09), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3205–3210. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520458Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  117. Nancy A. Van House. 2011. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Vis. Stud. 26, 2 (June 2011), 125–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. Nancy Van House and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2008. Technologies of memory: Key issues and critical perspectives. Mem. Stud. 1, 3 (September 2008), 295–310. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698008093795Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  119. Nancy Van House, Marc Davis, Yuri Takhteyev, Nathan Good, Anita Wilhelm, and Megan Finn. 2004. From “what?” to “why?”: the social uses of personal photos. In Proc. of CSCW 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. Ron Wakkary, Doenja Oogjes, Henry W. J. Lin, and Sabrina Hauser. 2018. Philosophers Living with the Tilting Bowl. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’18), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 94:1-94:12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  121. Jayne Wallace, Kyle Montague, Trevor Duncan, Luís P. Carvalho, Nantia Koulidou, Jamie Mahoney, Kellie Morrissey, Claire Craig, Linnea Iris Groot, Shaun Lawson, Patrick Olivier, Julie Trueman, and Helen Fisher. 2020. ReFind: Design, Lived Experience and Ongoingness in Bereavement. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376531Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  122. Steve Whittaker, Ofer Bergman, and Paul Clough. 2010. Easy on That Trigger Dad: A Study of Long Term Family Photo Retrieval. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput 14, 1 (January 2010), 31–43. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-009-0218-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  123. John Williamson and Lorna M Brown. 2008. Flutter: directed random browsing of photo collections with a tangible interface. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS ’08), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 147–155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1394445.1394461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  124. Xenia Zürn, Mendel Broekhuijsen, Doménique van Gennip, Saskia Bakker, Annemarie Zijlema, and Elise van den Hoven. 2019. Stimulating Photo Curation on Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’19), Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 255–259. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298947Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring Memory-Oriented Interactions with Digital Photos In and Across Time: A Field Study of Chronoscope

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2023
        14911 pages
        ISBN:9781450394215
        DOI:10.1145/3544548

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 April 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)442
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)77

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format