skip to main content
10.1145/3544548.3581186acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Chart Reader: Accessible Visualization Experiences Designed with Screen Reader Users

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Even though screen readers are a core accessibility tool for blind and low vision individuals (BLVIs), most visualizations are incompatible with screen readers. To improve accessible visualization experiences, we partnered with 10 BLV screen reader users (SRUs) in an iterative co-design study to design and develop accessible visualization experiences that afford SRUs the autonomy to interactively read and understand visualizations and their underlying data. During the five-month study, we explored accessible visualization prototypes with our design partners for three one-hour sessions. Our results provide feedback on the synthesized design concepts we explored, why (or why not) they aid comprehension and exploration for SRUs, and how differing design concepts can fit into cohesive accessible visualization experiences. We contribute both Chart Reader, a web-based accessibility engine resulting from our design iterations, and our distilled study findings—organized by design dimensions—in the creation of comprehensive accessible visualization experiences.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544548.3581186-talk-video.mp4

mp4

166.3 MB

3544548.3581186-video-preview.mp4

mp4

9.7 MB

References

  1. Apple. 2022. Apple Audio Graphs. https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accessibility/audio_graphs. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alice Boxhall, James Craig, Dominic Mazzoni, and Alexander Surkov. 2022. The Accessibility Object Model (AOM). https://wicg.github.io/aom/. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephen Brewster. 2002. Visualization tools for blind people using multiple modalities. Disability and Rehabilitation 24, 11-12 (2002), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110111388Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Pramod Chundury, Biswaksen Patnaik, Yasmin Reyazuddin, Christine Tang, Jonathan Lazar, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2021. Towards Understanding Sensory Substitution for Accessible Visualization: An Interview Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1(2021), 1084–1094. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114829Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Frank Elavsky, Cynthia Bennett, and Dominik Moritz. 2022. How accessible is my visualization? Evaluating visualization accessibility with Chartability. Computer Graphics Forum 41, 3 (Jun 2022), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14522Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Danyang Fan, Alexa F. Siu, Hrishikesh V. Rao, Gene S-H Kim, Xavier Vazquez, Lucy Greco, Sile O’Modhrain, and Sean Follmer. 2022. The Accessibility of Data Visualizations on the Web for Screen Reader Users: Practices and Experiences During COVID-19. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (Aug 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3557899 Just Accepted.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sarah L. Fossheim. 2022. How (not) to make accessible data visualizations, illustrated by the US presidential election.https://fossheim.io/writing/posts/accessible-dataviz-us-elections/. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lars Grammel, Chris Bennett, Melanie Tory, and Margaret-Anne Storey. 2013. A Survey of Visualization Construction User Interfaces. In EuroVis - Short Papers, Mario Hlawitschka and Tino Weinkauf (Eds.). The Eurographics Association. https://doi.org/10.2312/PE.EuroVisShort.EuroVisShort2013.019-023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Sabine Hennig, Fritz Zobl, and Wolfgang W. Wasserburger. 2017. Accessible Web Maps for Visually Impaired Users: Recommendations and Example Solutions. Cartographic Perspectives 88 (Nov 2017), 6–27. https://doi.org/10.14714/CP88.1391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Highcharts. 2022. Accessibility module feature overview. https://www.highcharts.com/docs/accessibility/accessibility-module-feature-overview. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Leona M Holloway, Cagatay Goncu, Alon Ilsar, Matthew Butler, and Kim Marriott. 2022. Infosonics: Accessible Infographics for People Who Are Blind Using Sonification and Voice. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 480, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Shakila Cherise S Joyner, Amalia Riegelhuth, Kathleen Garrity, Yea-Seul Kim, and Nam Wook Kim. 2022. Visualization Accessibility in the Wild: Challenges Faced by Visualization Designers. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 83, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517630Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Crescentia Jung, Shubham Mehta, Atharva Kulkarni, Yuhang Zhao, and Yea-Seul Kim. 2022. Communicating Visualizations without Visuals: Investigation of Visualization Alternative Text for People with Visual Impairments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1(2022), 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. N. W. Kim, S. C. Joyner, A. Riegelhuth, and Y. Kim. 2021. Accessible Visualization: Design Space, Opportunities, and Challenges. Computer Graphics Forum 40, 3 (2021), 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Richard E. Ladner. 2015. Design for User Empowerment. Interactions 22, 2 (feb 2015), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2723869Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Susie Lu. 2022. D3-Annotation. https://d3-annotation.susielu.com/. (Accessed on Dec. 7, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Alan Lundgard, Crystal Lee, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2019. Sociotechnical Considerations for Accessible Visualization Design. In 2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2019.8933762Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alan Lundgard and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2022. Accessible Visualization via Natural Language Descriptions: A Four-Level Model of Semantic Content. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 1(2022), 1073–1083. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114770Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability Studies as a Source of Critical Inquiry for the Field of Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Orlando, Florida, USA) (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Kim Marriott, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Butler, Ed Cutrell, Kirsten Ellis, Cagatay Goncu, Marti Hearst, Kathleen McCoy, and Danielle Albers Szafir. 2021. Inclusive Data Visualization for People with Disabilities: A Call to Action. Interactions 28, 3 (apr 2021), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457875Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Microsoft. 2022. Overview of accessibility in Power BI. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/create-reports/desktop-accessibility-overview. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Microsoft. 2022. Screen reader support for Excel. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/screen-reader-support-for-excel-0976b140-7033-4e2d-8887-187280701bf8. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Priscilla Moraes, Gabriel Sina, Kathleen McCoy, and Sandra Carberry. 2014. Evaluating the Accessibility of Line Graphs through Textual Summaries for Visually Impaired Users. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Rochester, New York, USA) (ASSETS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661334.2661368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Alan F. Newell and Peter Gregor. 2000. “User Sensitive Inclusive Design”– in Search of a New Paradigm. In Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability (Arlington, Virginia, USA) (CUU ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/355460.355470Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. SAS. 2022. SAS Graphics Accelerator. https://support.sas.com/software/products/graphics-accelerator/index.html. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Arvind Satyanarayan, Dominik Moritz, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, and Jeffrey Heer. 2017. Vega-Lite: A Grammar of Interactive Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1(2017), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ather Sharif, Sanjana Shivani Chintalapati, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Katharina Reinecke. 2021. Understanding Screen-Reader Users’ Experiences with Online Data Visualizations. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, USA) (ASSETS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3441852.3471202Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ather Sharif, Olivia H. Wang, and Alida T. Muongchan. 2022. “What Makes Sonification User-Friendly?” Exploring Usability and User-Friendliness of Sonified Responses. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Athens, Greece) (ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 45, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3550360Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ather Sharif, Olivia H. Wang, Alida T. Muongchan, Katharina Reinecke, and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2022. VoxLens: Making Online Data Visualizations Accessible with an Interactive JavaScript Plug-In. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 478, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517431Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Alexa Siu, Gene S-H Kim, Sile O’Modhrain, and Sean Follmer. 2022. Supporting Accessible Data Visualization Through Audio Data Narratives. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 476, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517678Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Desmos Studio. 2022. Graphing Calculator. https://www.desmos.com/calculator. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tableau. 2022. Accessibility: Putting the power of the Tableau Platform into the hands of everyone. https://www.tableau.com/products/accessibility. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. VISA. 2022. VISA Chart Components. https://developer.visa.com/pages/chart-components. (Accessed on Sept. 12, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. W3C. 2022. WAI-ARIA 1.1 spec. https://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. W3C. 2022. WAI-ARIA "Complex Images" tutorial. https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/complex/. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. W3C. 2022. WAI-ARIA Graphics spec. https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. W3C. 2022. Web Audio API. https://www.w3.org/TR/webaudio/. (Accessed on Sept. 4, 2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Jonathan Zong, Crystal Lee, Alan Lundgard, JiWoong Jang, Daniel Hajas, and Arvind Satyanarayan. 2022. Rich Screen Reader Experiences for Accessible Data Visualization. Computer Graphics Forum 41, 3 (2022), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14519Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Chart Reader: Accessible Visualization Experiences Designed with Screen Reader Users

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format