Beat Rossmy
Tanja Döring
Daniel Buschek
ABSTRACT
Despite irreversibility being omnipresent in the lifeworld, research on interactions making use of irreversibility in computing systems is still in the early stages. User freedom – provided by the undo functionality – is considered to be a pillar of “usable” computer systems, overcoming irreversibility. Within this paper, we set up a thought experiment, challenging the “undo feature” and instead take advantage of irreversibility in the interaction with physical computing systems (tangibles, robots, etc). First, we present three material speculations, each inherently utilizing irreversibility. Second, we elaborate on the concept of irreversible interactions by contextualizing our work with critical HCI discourses and deducing three design strategies. Finally, we discuss irreversibility as a design element for self-reflection, meaningful acting, and a sustainable relationship with technology. While previously individual aspects of irreversibility have been explored, we contribute a comprehensive discussion of irreversible interactions in HCI presenting artifacts, a conceptualization, design strategies, and application purposes.
Footnotes
1 In the following, we will refer to the human in interaction as actant to differentiate from study (participant) and usability (user) contexts.
Footnote2 www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics
Footnote3 All participants of the system evaluations agreed that their data may be used for scientific publication in anonymized form and were compensated fairly. All participants’ quotes have been translated into English.
Footnote4 As is usual for studies within the scope of smaller research projects and university theses.
Footnote5 https://artelectronicmedia.com/en/artwork/helena-by-marco-evaristti/
Footnote
Supplemental Material
- Gregory D. Abowd and Alan J. Dix. 1992. Giving undo attention. Interacting with Computers 4, 3 (12 1992), 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0953-5438(92)90021-7 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/4/3/317/2175174/iwc4-0317.pdfGoogle Scholar
Digital Library
- David Akers, Matthew Simpson, Robin Jeffries, and Terry Winograd. 2009. Undo and Erase Events as Indicators of Usability Problems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518804Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saleema Amershi, Maya Cakmak, William Bradley Knox, and Todd Kulesza. 2014. Power to the People: The Role of Humans in Interactive Machine Learning. AI Magazine 35, 4 (2014), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v35i4.2513Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ross C. Anderson, Michele Haney, Christine Pitts, Lorna Porter, and Tracy Bousselot. 2020. “Mistakes Can be Beautiful”: Creative Engagement in Arts Integration for Early Adolescent Learners. The Journal of Creative Behavior 54, 3 (2020), 662–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.401 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/jocb.401Google ScholarCross Ref
- James E Archer Jr, Richard Conway, and Fred B Schneider. 1984. User recovery and reversal in interactive systems. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS) 6, 1(1984), 1–19.Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (2013), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.767276Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "Critical" about Critical Design?Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell, Jodi Forlizzi, John Zimmerman, and John Antanitis. 2012. Critical Design and Critical Theory: The Challenge of Designing for Provocation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 288–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318001Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christoph Bartneck, Marcel Verbunt, Omar Mubin, and Abdullah Al Mahmud. 2007. To Kill a Mockingbird Robot. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Arlington, Virginia, USA) (HRI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1145/1228716.1228728Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ernst Benda. 2000. The protection of human dignity (article 1 of the Basic Law). SMUL Rev. 53(2000), 443.Google Scholar
- Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2005–2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208347Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nigel Bevan. 2009. Extending Quality in Use to Provide a Framework for Usability Measurement. In Human Centered Design, Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 13–22.Google Scholar
- Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paula Bourges-Waldegg and Stephen A.R. Scrivener. 1998. Meaning, the central issue in cross-cultural HCI design. Interacting with Computers 9, 3 (1998), 287 – 309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(97)00032-5 Shared Values and Shared Interfaces: The Role of Culture in the Globalisation of Human-Computer Systems.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative Research in Psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Braungart and William McDonough. 2009. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
- Cynthia Breazeal. 2002. Regulation and Entrainment in Human—Robot Interaction. The International Journal of Robotics Research 21, 10-11(2002), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364902021010096 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364902021010096Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karin Breuer. 2008. Competing Masculinities: Fraternities, Gender and Nationality in the German Confederation, 181530. Gender & History 20, 2 (Aug. 2008), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0424.2008.00521.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Ben Bridgens and Debra Lilley. 2017. Design for Next… Year. The Challenge of Designing for Material Change. The Design Journal 20, sup1 (2017), S160–S171. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352715 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352715Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Brown, Kathrin Gerling, Patrick Dickinson, and Ben Kirman. 2015. Dead Fun: Uncomfortable Interactions in a Virtual Reality Game for Coffins. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (London, United Kingdom) (CHI PLAY ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2810307Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marion Buchenau and Jane Fulton Suri. 2000. Experience Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (New York City, New York, USA) (DIS ’00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/347642.347802Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vanessa Julia Carpenter, Amanda Willis, Nikolaj “Dzl” Møbius, and Dan Overholt. 2019. Electronic Kintsugi. In Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2018, Kohei Arai, Rahul Bhatia, and Supriya Kapoor (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 104–121.Google Scholar
- Nazli Cila, Elisa Giaccardi, Fionn Tynan-O’Mahony, Chris Speed, and Melissa Caldwell. 2015. Thing-centered narratives: A study of object personas. In Proceedings of the 3rd Seminar International Research Network for Design Anthropology. 1–17. The 3rd Seminar International Research Network for Design Anthropology ; Conference date: 22-01-2015 Through 23-01-2015.Google Scholar
- Ashley Colley, Antti-Jussi Yliharju, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2018. Ice as an Interactive Visualization Material: A Design Space. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (Munich, Germany) (PerDis ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 14, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3205873.3205895Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denis Constales, Gregory S. Yablonsky, Dagmar R. D’hooge, Joris W. Thybaut, and Guy B. Marin. 2017. Chapter 4 - Physicochemical Principles of Simplification of Complex Models. In Advanced Data Analysis & Modelling in Chemical Engineering, Denis Constales, Gregory S. Yablonsky, Dagmar R. D’hooge, Joris W. Thybaut, and Guy B. Marin (Eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 83 – 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59485-3.00004-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Denis Constales, Gregory S. Yablonsky, Dagmar R. D’hooge, Joris W. Thybaut, and Guy B. Marin. 2017. Chapter 6 - Thermodynamics. In Advanced Data Analysis & Modelling in Chemical Engineering, Denis Constales, Gregory S. Yablonsky, Dagmar R. D’hooge, Joris W. Thybaut, and Guy B. Marin (Eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 159 – 220. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59485-3.00006-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ben Cowley, Darryl Charles, Michaela Black, and Ray Hickey. 2008. Toward an Understanding of Flow in Video Games. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 20 (July 2008), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371223Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna L Cox, Jon Bird, and Rowanne Fleck. 2013. Digital Epiphanies: how self-knowledge can change habits and our attitudes towards them. (2013). https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1416686Google Scholar
- Anna L. Cox, Sandy J.J. Gould, Marta E. Cecchinato, Ioanna Iacovides, and Ian Renfree. 2016. Design Frictions for Mindful Interactions: The Case for Microboundaries. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(San Jose, California, USA) (CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892410Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Mihaly Csikzentmihaly. 1990. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Vol. 1990. Harper & Row New York.Google Scholar
- Adam Darlow and Gideon Goldin. 2011. Causal Temporal Order in HCI. In CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI EA ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2389–2394. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979914Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adam Darlow, Gideon Goldin, and Steven Sloman. 2014. Causal Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557216Google ScholarDigital Library
- Claudia Daudén Roquet and Corina Sas. 2018. Evaluating Mindfulness Meditation Apps. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188616Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wellington Gomes de Medeiros. 2014. Meaningful Interaction with Products. Design Issues 30, 3 (2014), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00275Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kathleen M. Dillon. 1992. Popping Sealed Air-Capsules to Reduce Stress. Psychological Reports 71, 1 (Aug. 1992), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1992.71.1.243Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the Landscape of Sustainable HCI. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1975–1984. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753625Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kevin Doherty and Gavin Doherty. 2018. Engagement in HCI: Conception, Theory and Measurement. ACM Comput. Surv. 51, 5, Article 99 (Nov. 2018), 39 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234149Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanja Döring, Axel Sylvester, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2013. A Design Space for Ephemeral User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (Barcelona, Spain) (TEI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460625.2460637Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and Environmental Sustainability: The Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858173Google ScholarDigital Library
- John J. Dudley and Per Ola Kristensson. 2018. A Review of User Interface Design for Interactive Machine Learning. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 8, 2(2018), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1145/3185517Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rasmus Dyring 2018. The provocation of freedom. Moral engines: Exploring the ethical drives in human life (2018), 116–36.Google Scholar
- Pelle Ehn and Jonas Löwgren. 2003. Searching voices: Towards a canon for interaction design. Malmö University, School of Arts and Communication. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Amau%3Adiva-8385Google Scholar
- David Eickhoff, Stefanie Mueller, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Destructive Games: Creating Value by Destroying Valuable Physical Objects. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3970–3974. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858113Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Frauenberger. 2019. Entanglement HCI The Next Wave?ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 1, Article 2 (Nov. 2019), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3364998Google ScholarDigital Library
- Verena Fuchsberger, Martin Murer, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Human-Computer Non-Interaction: The Activity of Non-Use. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS Companion ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598784.2602781Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roland Garve, Miriam Garve, Jens C Türp, Julius N Fobil, and Christian G Meyer. 2017. Scarification in sub-Saharan Africa: social skin, remedy and medical import. Tropical Medicine & International Health 22, 6 (2017), 708–715.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert P Gauthier, Mary Jean Costello, and James R Wallace. 2022. “I Will Not Drink With You Today”: A Topic-Guided Thematic Analysis of Addiction Recovery on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502076Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa Giaccardi and Elvin Karana. 2015. Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2447–2456. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702337Google ScholarDigital Library
- Antonio Ginart, Melody Guan, Gregory Valiant, and James Y Zou. 2019. Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learning. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett (Eds.). Curran Associates, Inc., 3518–3531. http://papers.nips.cc/paper/8611-making-ai-forget-you-data-deletion-in-machine-learning.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Edwin E Gordon. 1989. Audiation, Music Learning Theory, Music Aptitude, and Creativity.. In Suncoast Music Education Forum on Creativity, Vol. 75. ERIC, 81.Google Scholar
- Colin M. Gray, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, and Ahreum Lee. 2020. What Kind of Work Do "Asshole Designers" Create? Describing Properties of Ethical Concern on Reddit. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395486Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shad Gross, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2014. Structures, forms, and stuff: the materiality and medium of interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (2014), 637–649.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tina A Grotzer. 2012. Learning causality in a complex world: Understandings of consequence. R&L Education.Google Scholar
- Maurice Halbwachs. 2013. Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Albin Michel.Google Scholar
- Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 5, 3 (Jan. 2001), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000019Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005 Feminism and HCI: New Perspectives.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl. 2008. User Experience (UX): Towards an Experiential Perspective on Product Quality. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l’Interaction Homme-Machine (Metz, France) (IHM ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1512714.1512717Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sabrina Hauser, Doenja Oogjes, Ron Wakkary, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2018. An Annotated Portfolio on Doing Postphenomenology Through Research Products. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196745Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith Herrin. 2016. Book Burning as Purification. In Transformations of Late Antiquity. Routledge, 225–242.Google Scholar
- William C. Hill, James D. Hollan, Dave Wroblewski, and Tim McCandless. 1992. Edit Wear and Read Wear. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Monterey, California, USA) (CHI ’92). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142751Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda Hirsch, Beat Rossmy, Florian Bemmann, and Andreas Butz. 2020. Affordances Based on Traces of Use in Urban Environments. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Sydney NSW, Australia) (TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3375007Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miwa Ikemiya and Daniela K. Rosner. 2013. Broken probes: toward the design of worn media. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 18, 3 (July 2013), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-013-0690-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Hiroshi Ishii, Craig Wisneski, Scott Brave, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 98 conference summary on Human factors in computing systems, Vol. 18. Citeseer, 173–174. Issue 23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steven J. Jackson and Laewoo Kang. 2014. Breakdown, Obsolescence and Reuse: HCI and the Art of Repair. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557332Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert J.K. Jacob, Audrey Girouard, Leanne M. Hirshfield, Michael S. Horn, Orit Shaer, Erin Treacy Solovey, and Jamie Zigelbaum. 2008. Reality-Based Interaction: A Framework for Post-WIMP Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357089Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, Naveen Ramani, and Kristina Höök. 2016. The Aesthetics of Heat: Guiding Awareness with Thermal Stimuli. In Proceedings of the TEI ’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (TEI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839462.2839487Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoona Kang, June Gruber, and Jeremy R. Gray. 2013. Mindfulness and De-Automatization. Emotion Review 5, 2 (2013), 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451629 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451629Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gopinaath Kannabiran and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2010. Politics at the Interface: A Foucauldian Power Analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (Reykjavik, Iceland) (NordiCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 695–698. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868914.1869007Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuichiro Katsumoto, Erika Kanai, Nadya Kirillova, Kaori Higashi, Hokuto Miura, Takashi Matsumoto, Reiko Sasaki, and Masa Inakage. 2006. InScene: A Communication Device Which Uses Incenses. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology(Hollywood, California, USA) (ACE ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 34–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178865Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rohit Ashok Khot and Florian Mueller. 2019. Human-Food Interaction. Foundations and Trends® in Human–Computer Interaction 12, 4(2019), 238–415. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000074Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyung Jin Kim, Sangsu Jang, Bomin Kim, Hyosun Kwon, and Young-Woo Park. 2019. MuRedder: Shredding Speaker for Ephemeral Musical Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322362Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kyung Jin Kim, Sangsu Jang, Bomin Kim, Hyosun Kwon, and Young-Woo Park. 2019. MuRedder: Shredding Speaker for Ephemeral Musical Experience. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322362Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott R. Klemmer, Björn Hartmann, and Leila Takayama. 2006. How Bodies Matter: Five Themes for Interaction Design. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (University Park, PA, USA) (DIS ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142429Google ScholarDigital Library
- Spyros Kokolakis. 2017. Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security 64(2017), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Satoshi Kuribayashi and Akira Wakita. 2006. PlantDisplay: Turning Houseplants into Ambient Display. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology(Hollywood, California, USA) (ACE ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 40–es. https://doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178871Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pau Waelder Laso. 2007. Games of Pain: Pain as Haptic Stimulation in Computer-Game—Based Media Art. Leonardo 40, 3 (2007), 238–242. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2007.40.3.238 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2007.40.3.238Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruno Latour. 1994. On Technical Mediation. Common Knowledge 3, 2 (1994), 29 – 64. https://hal-sciencespo.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02057233Google Scholar
- Jingyi Li, Sonia Hashim, and Jennifer Jacobs. 2021. What We Can Learn From Visual Artists About Software Development. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 314, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445682Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristina Lindström and Åsa Ståhl. 2020. Un/Making in the Aftermath of Design. In Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1 (Manizales, Colombia) (PDC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385010.3385012Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zachary C. Lipton. 2018. The Mythos of Model Interpretability. Commun. ACM 61, 10 (Sept. 2018), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233231Google ScholarDigital Library
- Szu-Yu (Cyn) Liu, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2019. Decomposition as Design: Co-Creating (with) Natureculture. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295653Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nick Logler, Caroline Pitt, Xin Gao, Allison Marie Hishikawa, Jason Yip, and Batya Friedman. 2020. "I Feel Like This is a Bad Thing": Investigating Disassembly in Action for Novices. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376337Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pedro Lopes. 2018. The next Generation of Interactive Devices. Human Computer Interaction Lab, Hasso Plattner Institute. XRDS 24, 3 (April 2018), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3186701Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michal Luria, Ophir Sheriff, Marian Boo, Jodi Forlizzi, and Amit Zoran. 2020. Destruction, Catharsis, and Emotional Release in Human-Robot Interaction. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 9, 4, Article 22 (June 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385007Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roberta Mancini, Alan Dix, and Stefano Levialdi. 2001. Reflections on Undo. (05 2001).Google Scholar
- Aaron Marcus. 1998. Metaphor Design in User Interfaces. SIGDOC Asterisk J. Comput. Doc. 22, 2 (May 1998), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/291391.291397Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bernhard Maurer and Verena Fuchsberger. 2019. Dislocated Boardgames: Design Potentials for Remote Tangible Play. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 3, 4 (Nov 2019), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti3040072Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dan Maynes-Aminzade. 2005. Edible bits: Seamless interfaces between people, data and food. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’05)-Extended Abstracts. Citeseer, 2207–2210.Google Scholar
- John McCarthy and Peter Wright. 2017. Commentary: Making Interactivity Meaningful for Contemporary HCI. Human–Computer Interaction 32, 3 (2017), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1254048 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1254048Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas Mejtoft, Sarah Hale, and Ulrik Söderström. 2019. Design Friction. 41–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335106Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa D Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Momentary pleasure or lasting meaning? Distinguishing eudaimonic and hedonic user experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 4509–4520.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elisa D Mekler and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. A framework for the experience of meaning in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Montag, Bernd Lachmann, Marc Herrlich, and Katharina Zweig. 2019. Addictive Features of Social Media/Messenger Platforms and Freemium Games against the Background of Psychological and Economic Theories. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, 14(2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142612Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Stefan Agamanolis, Frank Vetere, and Martin Gibbs. 2007. Brute Force as Input for Networked Gaming. In Proceedings of the 19th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Entertaining User Interfaces (Adelaide, Australia) (OZCHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/1324892.1324922Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Stefan Agamanolis, Frank Vetere, and Martin Gibbs. 2009. Brute Force Interactions: Leveraging Intense Physical Actions in Gaming. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7 (Melbourne, Australia) (OZCHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1738826.1738836Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, Stefan Agamanolis, Frank Vetere, and Martin R. Gibbs. 2009. A Framework for Exertion Interactions over a Distance. In Proceedings of the 2009 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Video Games (New Orleans, Louisiana) (Sandbox ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1145/1581073.1581096Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stefanie Mueller, Martin Fritzsche, Jan Kossmann, Maximilian Schneider, Jonathan Striebel, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Scotty: Relocating Physical Objects Across Distances Using Destructive Scanning, Encryption, and 3D Printing. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680547Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Murer. 2018. Making Things Apart: Gaining Material Understanding. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196806Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Murer, Verena Fuchsberger, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2017. Un-Crafting: De-Constructive Engagements with Interactive Artifacts. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Yokohama, Japan) (TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3024993Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Murer, Mattias Jacobsson, Siri Skillgate, and Petra Sundström. 2014. Taking Things Apart: Reaching Common Ground and Shared Material Understanding. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 469–472. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557267Google ScholarDigital Library
- Martin Murer, Anna Vallgårda, Mattias Jacobsson, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2015. Un-Crafting: Exploring Tangible Practices for Deconstruction in Interactive System Design. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 469–472. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2683582Google ScholarDigital Library
- Molly Jane Nicholas, Sarah Sterman, and Eric Paulos. 2022. Creative and Motivational Strategies Used by Expert Creative Practitioners. In Creativity and Cognition (Venice, Italy) (C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532870Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Niedderer. 2007. Designing Mindful Interaction: The Category of Performative Object. Design Issues 23, 1 (2007), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2007.23.1.3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jakob Nielsen and Rolf Molich. 1990. Heuristic Evaluation of User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’90). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97281Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patricia A. Norberg, Daniel R. Horne, and David A. Horne. 2007. The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors. Journal of Consumer Affairs 41, 1 (March 2007), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2006.00070.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- William Odom, James Pierce, Erik Stolterman, and Eli Blevis. 2009. Understanding Why We Preserve Some Things and Discard Others in the Context of Interaction Design. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1053–1062. https://doi-org.emedien.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10.1145/1518701.1518862Google Scholar
- Doenja Oogjes, Ron Wakkary, Henry Lin, and Omid Alemi. 2020. Fragile! Handle with Care: The Morse Things. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2149–2162. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395584Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Parisi. 2013. Shocking grasps: An archaeology of electrotactile game mechanics. Game Studies 13, 2 (2013).Google Scholar
- James Pierce. 2012. Undesigning Technology: Considering the Negation of Design by Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 957–966. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208540Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2014. Counterfunctional Things: Exploring Possibilities in Designing Digital Limitations. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (DIS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598522Google ScholarDigital Library
- James Pierce and Eric Paulos. 2015. Making Multiple Uses of the Obscura 1C Digital Camera: Reflecting on the Design, Production, Packaging and Distribution of a Counterfunctional Device. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2103–2112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702405Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isabel P. S. Qamar, Rainer Groh, David Holman, and Anne Roudaut. 2018. HCI Meets Material Science: A Literature Review of Morphing Materials for the Design of Shape-Changing Interfaces. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173948Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Remy and Elaine M. Huang. 2015. Addressing the Obsolescence of End-User Devices: Approaches from the Field of Sustainable HCI. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability, Lorenz M. Hilty and Bernard Aebischer (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 257–267.Google Scholar
- Julia Ringler and Holger Reckter. 2012. DESU 100: About the Temptation to Destroy a Robot. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (Kingston, Ontario, Canada) (TEI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148164Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giuseppe Riva, John Waterworth, and Dianne Murray. 2014. Interacting with Presence: HCI and the Sense of Presence in Computer-mediated Environments. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.Google Scholar
- Holly Robbins, Elisa Giaccardi, and Elvin Karana. 2016. Traces as an Approach to Design for Focal Things and Practices. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971538Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniela K. Rosner, Miwa Ikemiya, Diana Kim, and Kristin Koch. 2013. Designing with Traces. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1649–1658. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466218Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beat Rossmy, Sarah Theres Völkel, Elias Naphausen, Patricia Kimm, Alexander Wiethoff, and Andreas Muxel. 2020. Punishable AI: Examining Users’ Attitude Towards Robot Punishment. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395542Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beat Rossmy and Alexander Wiethoff. 2019. COMB – Shape as a Meaningful Element of Interaction. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295646Google ScholarDigital Library
- Samar Sabie, Steven J. Jackson, Wendy Ju, and Tapan Parikh. 2022. Unmaking as Agonism: Using Participatory Design with Youth to Surface Difference in an Intergenerational Urban Context. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 324, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501930Google ScholarDigital Library
- Magdalena Schmid, Sonja Rümelin, and Hendrik Richter. 2013. Empowering Materiality: Inspiring the Design of Tangible Interactions. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(Barcelona, Spain) (TEI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/2460625.2460639Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hanna Schneider, Malin Eiband, Daniel Ullrich, and Andreas Butz. 2018. Empowerment in HCI - A Survey and Framework. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173818Google ScholarDigital Library
- Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (Aarhus, Denmark) (CC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarDigital Library
- Swapneel Sheth, Jonathan Bell, and Gail Kaiser. 2011. HALO (Highly Addictive, Socially Optimized) Software Engineering. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Games and Software Engineering (Waikiki, Honolulu, HI, USA) (GAS ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1984674.1984685Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine S Cohen, Steven Jacobs, Niklas Elmqvist, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2016. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson.Google Scholar
- M. Six Silberman, Lisa Nathan, Bran Knowles, Roy Bendor, Adrian Clear, Maria Håkansson, Tawanna Dillahunt, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2014. Next Steps for Sustainable HCI. Interactions 21, 5 (Sept. 2014), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2651820Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katherine W Song and Eric Paulos. 2021. Unmaking: Enabling and Celebrating the Creative Material of Failure, Destruction, Decay, and Deformation. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 429, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445529Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chairs Constantine Stephanidis, Gavriel Salvendy, Members of the Group Margherita Antona, Jessie Y. C. Chen, Jianming Dong, Vincent G. Duffy, Xiaowen Fang, Cali Fidopiastis, Gino Fragomeni, Limin Paul Fu, Yinni Guo, Don Harris, Andri Ioannou, Kyeong ah (Kate) Jeong, Shin’ichi Konomi, Heidi Krömker, Masaaki Kurosu, James R. Lewis, Aaron Marcus, Gabriele Meiselwitz, Abbas Moallem, Hirohiko Mori, Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah, Stavroula Ntoa, Pei-Luen Patrick Rau, Dylan Schmorrow, Keng Siau, Norbert Streitz, Wentao Wang, Sakae Yamamoto, Panayiotis Zaphiris, and Jia Zhou. 2019. Seven HCI Grand Challenges. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35, 14(2019), 1229–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul Strohmeier, Juan Pablo Carrascal, Bernard Cheng, Margaret Meban, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. An Evaluation of Shape Changes for Conveying Emotions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3781–3792. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858537Google ScholarDigital Library
- Axel Sylvester, Tanja Döring, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. Liquids, Smoke, and Soap Bubbles: Reflections on Materials for Ephemeral User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) (TEI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 269–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/1709886.1709941Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nazli Terzioglu. 2017. Do-fix: creating deeper relationships between users and products through visible repair. (June 2017). https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/2818/Google Scholar
- Harold Thimbleby. 1990. User interface design. ACM.Google Scholar
- Giovanni Maria Troiano, Esben Warming Pedersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2015. Deformable Interfaces for Performing Music. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702492Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wenn-Chieh Tsai and Elise Van Den Hoven. 2018. Memory probes: Exploring retrospective user experience through traces of use on cherished objects. International Journal of Design 12, 3 (2018), 57–72.Google Scholar
- Vasiliki Tsaknaki and Ylva Fernaeus. 2016. Expanding on Wabi-Sabi as a Design Resource in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5970–5983. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858459Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daisuke Uriu, William Odom, Mei-Kei Lai, Sai Taoka, and Masahiko Inami. 2018. SenseCenser: An Interactive Device for Sensing Incense Smoke & Supporting Memorialization Rituals in Japan. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3205394Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ron Wakkary, William Odom, Sabrina Hauser, Garnet Hertz, and Henry Lin. 2015. Material Speculation: Actual Artifacts for Critical Inquiry. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives (Aarhus, Denmark) (CA ’15). Aarhus University Press, Aarhus N, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21299Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shanel Wu and Laura Devendorf. 2020. Unfabricate: Designing Smart Textiles for Disassembly. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376227Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yiya Yang. 1988. Undo support models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 28, 5 (1988), 457–481.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clement Zheng, Peter Gyory, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2020. Tangible Interfaces with Printed Paper Markers. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 909–923. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395578Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through Design as a Method for Interaction Design Research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240704Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Point of no Undo: Irreversible Interactions as a Design Strategy
Recommendations
Towards a sensible integration of paper-based tangible user interfaces into creative work processes
CHI EA '09: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe live in a hybrid world where standard computers with graphical user interfaces (GUIs) have become an integral part of our daily life. Additionally, novel user interfaces like tangible user interfaces (TUIs) are among emerging interaction styles that ...
Design and evaluation of proxemics-aware environments to support navigation in large information spaces
CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn my research, I explore the use of proxemics in Human-Computer Interaction to design explicit and implicit interaction with knowledge work environments for literature review, reading & writing, or discussion. This paper proposes the employment of ...
Optimization of performance characteristics in a class of irreversible chemical pumps
A new irreversible cyclic model of a class of two-source chemical pumps, which are affected by not only finite-rate mass transfer and mass leak but also the internal dissipation resulting from friction, eddy currents and other irreversible effects ...
Comments