skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3573848acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

TOFI: Designing Intraoral Computer Interfaces for Gamified Myofunctional Therapy

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the last two decades, there have been several proposals for Intraoral Computer Interfaces (ICI), with demonstrations of novel technologies mostly aimed at assistive devices or in hand-free scenarios. This paper demonstrates a case study for wearable ICIs that allows users to train their tongue muscles with gamified myofunctional therapy: a method that can reduce snoring and mild sleep apnea. This demonstrates a novel application of ICIs together with new design and technological solutions for fabricating such devices. We also discuss the various challenges associated with the design of ICIs and ICI based interactions to lay the groundwork for future research, prototypes and a broader exploration of ICI application areas.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3573848-talk-video.mp4

mp4

206.6 MB

References

  1. Aiken, C.A. and Becker, K.A. 2022. Utilising an internal focus of attention during preparation and an external focus during execution may facilitate motor learning. European journal of sport science: EJSS: official journal of the European College of Sport Science. (Mar. 2022), 1–8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2022.2042604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. AlGhanim, N., Comondore, V.R., Fleetham, J., Marra, C.A. and Ayas, N.T. 2008. The economic impact of obstructive sleep apnea. Lung. 186, 1 (Jan. 2008), 7–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-007-9055-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bach-y-Rita and Kaczmarek. 2003. A tongue-based tactile display for portrayal of environmental characteristics. Virtual and adaptive environmentsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bach-y-Rita, Kaczmarek and Meier. 1998. The tongue as a man-machine interface: Proceeding of the 1998 international symposium on information theory and its applications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bach-y-Rita, P., Collins, C.C., Saunders, F.A., White, B. and Scadden, L. 1969. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature. 221, 5184 (Mar. 1969), 963–964. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/221963a0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bach-y-Rita, P., Kaczmarek, K.A., Tyler, M.E. and Garcia-Lara, J. 1998. Form perception with a 49-point electrotactile stimulus array on the tongue: a technical note. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 35, 4 (Oct. 1998), 427–430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bach-y-Rita, P. and Tyler, M.E. 2000. Tongue man-machine interface. Studies in health technology and informatics. 70, (2000), 17–19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Baltzan, M.A., Elkholi, O. and Wolkove, N. 2009. Evidence of interrelated side effects with reduced compliance in patients treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep medicine. 10, 2 (Feb. 2009), 198–205. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2007.12.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Borsoi, L., Armeni, P., Donin, G., Costa, F. and Ferini-Strambi, L. 2022. The invisible costs of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA): Systematic review and cost-of-illness analysis. PloS one. 17, 5 (May 2022), e0268677. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268677.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Caltenco, H.A., Breidegard, B. and Struijk, L.N.S.A. 2014. On the tip of the tongue: learning typing and pointing with an intra-oral computer interface. Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology. 9, 4 (Jul. 2014), 307–317. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.823629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) 2010. Oral appliances for treatment of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea: a review of clinical effectiveness. CADTH technology overviews. 1, 1 (Mar. 2010), e0107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cascón, P. 2019. ChewIt: An Intraoral Interface for Discreet Interactions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chacin, A.C. 2012. Play-A-Grill: Music To Your Teeth. NIME.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, V., Xu, X., Li, R., Shi, Y., Patel, S. and Wang, Y. 2021. Understanding the Design Space of Mouth Microgestures. Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2021), 1068–1081.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Coleman, J. A. 2003. Pathophisiology of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. Snoring and obstructive sleep apnea. 3th ed.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, A. 1996. Goal-directed Design. InContext Enterprises Incorporated.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Djajadiningrat, T., Overbeeke, K. and Wensveen, S. 2002. But how, Donald, tell us how? Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems processes, practices, methods, and techniques - DIS ’02.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. de Felício, C.M., da Silva Dias, F.V. and Trawitzki, L.V.V. 2018. Obstructive sleep apnea: focus on myofunctional therapy. Nature and science of sleep. 10, (Sep. 2018), 271–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S141132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Feng, Y. and Wang, X. 2019. Ultrasound Tongue Image Classification using Transfer Learning. Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Digital Medicine and Image Processing (New York, NY, USA, Nov. 2019), 38–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Georgalas, C. 2011. The role of the nose in snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea: an update. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 268, 9 (Sep. 2011), 1365–1373. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-010-1469-7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Google trends: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=sleep%20quality. Accessed: 2022-10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hori, K., Ono, T., Tamine, K.-I., Kondo, J., Hamanaka, S., Maeda, Y., Dong, J. and Hatsuda, M. 2009. Newly developed sensor sheet for measuring tongue pressure during swallowing. Journal of prosthodontic research. 53, 1 (Jan. 2009), 28–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2008.08.008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Huo, X., Park, H. and Ghovanloo, M. 2012. Dual-mode tongue drive system: using speech and tongue motion to improve computer access for people with disabilities. Proceedings of the conference on Wireless Health (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2012), 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ieto, V., Kayamori, F., Montes, M.I., Hirata, R.P., Gregório, M.G., Alencar, A.M., Drager, L.F., Genta, P.R. and Lorenzi-Filho, G. 2015. Effects of Oropharyngeal Exercises on Snoring: A Randomized Trial. Chest. 148, 3 (Sep. 2015), 683–691. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-2953.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kaczmarek, K.A. 2011. The tongue display unit (TDU) for electrotactile spatiotemporal pattern presentation. Scientia Iranica. Transactions D, Computer science & engineering, electrical engineering. 18, 6 (Dec. 2011), 1476–1485. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.08.020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Kencana, A.P. and Heng, J. 2007. Experiment on a novel user input for computer interface utilizing tongue input for severely disabled. Proceedings of the 1st international convention on Rehabilitation engineering & assistive technology: in conjunction with 1st Tan Tock Seng Hospital Neurorehabilitation Meeting (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2007), 114–117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kielhofner, G., Marotzki, U. and Mentrup, C. 2005. Model of Human Occupation (MOHO): Grundlagen für die Praxis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, J., Hegland, K., Vann, W., Berry, R. and Davenport, P.W. 2019. Measurement of maximum tongue protrusion force (MTPF) in healthy young adults. Physiological reports. 7, 13 (Jul. 2019), e14175. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lauga, E., Pipe, C.J. and Le Révérend, B. 2016. Sensing in the Mouth: A Model for Filiform Papillae as Strain Amplifiers. Frontiers in Physics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee Electropalatography. Manual of clinical phonetics. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429320903-25/electropalatography-alice-lee.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Li, Z., Robucci, R., Banerjee, N. and Patel, C. 2015. Tongue-n-cheek: non-contact tongue gesture recognition. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2015), 95–105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lontis, E.R., Bentsen, B., Gaihede, M. and Andreasen Struijk, L.N.S. 2016. Sensor Activation for Wheelchair Driving in Confined Spaces with a Tongue Controlled Oral Interface. Proceedings of the international Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology (Midview City, SGP, Jul. 2016), 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Maeyama, T. and Plattig, K.-H. 1989. Minimal two-point discrimination in human tongue and palate. American Journal of Otolaryngology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Maia, A.V., Furlan, R.M.M.M., Moraes, K.O., Amaral, M.S., Medeiros, A.M. de and Motta, A.R. 2019. Tongue strength rehabilitation using biofeedback: a case report. CoDAS. 31, 5 (Oct. 2019), e20180163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20182018163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Miyashita, H. 2020. Norimaki Synthesizer: Taste Display Using Ion Electrophoresis in Five Gels. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Nam, H.Y. and DiSalvo, C. 2010. Tongue music: the sound of a kiss. CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2010), 4805–4808.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Narumi, T. 2016. Multi-sensorial virtual reality and augmented human food interaction. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Multi-sensorial Approaches to Human-Food Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ono, T., Hori, K., Tamine, K.-I. and Maeda, Y. 2009. Evaluation of tongue motor biomechanics during swallowing—From oral feeding models to quantitative sensing methods. The Japanese dental science review. 45, 2 (Sep. 2009), 65–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2009.03.005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Gimpel, H., Nissen, M., & Görlitz, R. 2013. Quantifying the Quantified Self: A study on the motivation of patients to track their own health: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/301361222.pdf. Accessed: 2022-10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ranasinghe, N. and Do, E.Y.-L. 2016. Virtual Sweet. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ranasinghe, N., Jain, P., Karwita, S. and Do, E.Y.-L. 2017. Virtual Lemonade. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson, M.L., Lloyd-Esenkaya, T., Petrini, K. and Proulx, M.J. 2020. Reading with the Tongue: Individual Differences Affect the Perception of Ambiguous Stimuli with the BrainPort. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2020), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Sakurai, S., Aoyama, K., Miyamoto, N., Mizukami, M., Furukawa, M., Maeda, T. and Ando, H. 2016. Mechanism of inhibitory effect of cathodal current tongue stimulation on five basic tastes. 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Salem, C. and Zhai, S. 1997. An isometric tongue pointing device. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (New York, NY, USA, Mar. 1997), 538–539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Saponas, T.S., Kelly, D., Parviz, B.A. and Tan, D.S. 2009. Optically sensing tongue gestures for computer input. Proceedings of the 22nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2009), 177–180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Shao, Y., Hayward, V. and Visell, Y. 2016. Spatial patterns of cutaneous vibration during whole-hand haptic interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 113, 15 (Apr. 2016), 4188–4193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520866113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Shen, V., Shultz, C. and Harrison, C. 2022. Mouth Haptics in VR using a Headset Ultrasound Phased Array. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2022), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Shepherd, G.M. 2015. Neuroenology: how the brain creates the taste of wine. Flavour. 4, 1 (Mar. 2015), 1–5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13411-014-0030-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Slyper, R., Lehman, J., Forlizzi, J. and Hodgins, J. 2011. A tongue input device for creating conversations. Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (New York, NY, USA, Oct. 2011), 117–126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Van Boven, R.W. and Johnson, K.O. 1994. The limit of tactile spatial resolution in humans: grating orientation discrimination at the lip, tongue, and finger. Neurology. 44, 12 (Dec. 1994), 2361–2366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.44.12.2361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Website: https://snoregym.com/about-snoregym/". Accessed: 2022-10-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Young, T., Palta, M., Dempsey, J., Peppard, P.E., Nieto, F.J. and Hla, K.M. 2009. Burden of sleep apnea: rationale, design, and major findings of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort study. WMJ: official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin. 108, 5 (Aug. 2009), 246–249.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang, Q., Gollakota, S., Taskar, B. and Rao, R.P.N. 2014. Non-intrusive tongue machine interface. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2014), 2555–2558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. TOFI: Designing Intraoral Computer Interfaces for Gamified Myofunctional Therapy

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      3914 pages
      ISBN:9781450394222
      DOI:10.1145/3544549

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)135
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)28

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format