Carina Albrecht-Gansohr
ABSTRACT
Deeply engaging nurses in a participatory co-design process, especially in times of COVID-19, is challenging. In this case study, we shed light on the process of developing a prototype for AR-glasses in nursing. We show the challenges we faced, the methods we used and how they contribute to the core principles of participatory design. A special focus is laid on small-scale interventions with high-impact, that helped us to truly engage users. We introduce empathetic ways to connect contrasting work environments, establish mutual understanding, make the abstract more graspable with playful tools like PLAYMOBIL®, and support co-design development with online formats. Finally, we discuss the transferability to other projects.
Supplemental Material
- Canan Akoglu and Kathrina Dankl. 2021. Co-creation for empathy and mutual learning: a framework for design in health and social care. CoDesign 17, 3 (2021), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2019.1633358Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Jonathan Ball. 2019. The Double Diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. Design Council. Retrieved "13 October 2022" from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-universally-accepted-depiction-design-process/Google Scholar
- Liam Bannon, Jeffrey Bardzell, and Susanne Bødker. 2018. Reimagining participatory design. Interactions 26, 1 (dec 2018), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3292015Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tim Brown. 2008. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review 86, 6 (2008), 84–92. https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinkingGoogle Scholar
- Alan Cooper. 1999. The Inmates are Running the Asylum. SAMS, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
- Robert F Eberle. 1972. Developing imagination through scamper.Journal of Creative Behavior 6, 3 (1972), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00929.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Anja Endmann and Daniela Keßner. 2016. User Journey Mapping – a method in User Experience Design. i-com 15, 1 (2016), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2016-0010Google ScholarCross Ref
- Konstanze Fendrich and Wolfgang Hoffmann. 2007. More than just aging societies: the demographic change has an impact on actual numbers of patients. Journal of Public Health 15, 5 (2007), 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-007-0142-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruna Ferreira, Williamson Silva, Edson Oliveira, and Tayana Conte. 2015. Designing Personas with Empathy Map. In 27th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE 2015), Vol. 1. KSI Research Inc. and Knowledge Systems Institute Graduate School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 501–506. https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2015-152Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriel Freitas, Marcio Sarroglia Pinho, Milene Selbach Silveira, and Frank Maurer. 2020. A systematic review of rapid prototyping tools for Augmented Reality. In 2020 22nd Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR). IEEE, Porto de Galinhas, Brazil, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1109/SVR51698.2020.00041Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carina Gansohr. 2021. Nachtdienst auf der peripheren kardiologischen Station. Hochschule Ruhr West University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved December 15, 2022 from https://parcura.de/pdf/2021-08-23_HRW_Gansohr_Hospitationsbericht.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Carina Gansohr, Miriam B Thelen, Stefan Geisler, and Sabrina C Eimler. 2022. Supporting hospital nurses during medication dispensation with Augmented Reality – a participatory approach. In HCI International 2022 Posters. Springer, Cham, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_6Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joan Greenbaum and Daria Loi. 2012. Participation, the camel and the elephant of design: an introduction. CoDesign 8, 2-3 (2012), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.690232Google ScholarCross Ref
- IBM. 2022. Toolkit. IBM. Retrieved October 07, 2022 from https://www.ibm.com/design/thinking/page/toolkitGoogle Scholar
- IDEO.ORG. 2022. Design Kit. IDEO.ORG. Retrieved October 07, 2022 from https://www.designkit.org/Google Scholar
- IDEO.ORG. 2022. Extremes and Mainstreams. IDEO.ORG. Retrieved October 04, 2022 from https://www.designkit.org/methods/45Google Scholar
- Nicholas Ind and Nick Coates. 2013. The meanings of co-creation. European business review 25, 1 (2013), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341311287754Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Janßen and Michael Prilla. 2022. Investigating the use of Head Mounted Devices for remote cooperation and guidance during the treatment of wounds. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, GROUP, Article 3 (jan 2022), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492822Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sam Kaner. 2014. Facilitator’s Guide to Participatory Decision-Making. Wiley, San Francisco, CA, USA.Google Scholar
- Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky, and Braden Kowitz. 2016. Sprint: how to solve big problems and test new ideas in just five days. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Per Kristiansen and Robert Rasmussen. 2014. Building a better business using the Lego serious play method. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Microsoft Design Labs. 2020. MRTK Examples Hub. Microsoft Design Labs. Retrieved December 13, 2022 from https://www.microsoft.com/de-de/p/mrtk-examples-hub/9mv8c39l2sj4?rtc=1&activetab=pivot:overviewtabGoogle Scholar
- Keith Mc Candless and Henri Lipmanowicz. 2022. Conversation Café. Liberating Structures. Retrieved October 04, 2022 from https://www.liberatingstructures.com/17-conversation-cafe/Google Scholar
- Keith McCandless and Henri Lipmanowicz. 2014. The surprising power of liberating structures. Liberating Structures Press, United States.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 2022. Welcome to MRTK. Microsoft. Retrieved December 13, 2022 from https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/mixed-reality/mrtk-unity/mrtk2/?view=mrtkunity-2022-05Google Scholar
- Miro. 2022. Miro - The Visual Colaboration Platform for Every Team. Miro. Retrieved December 13, 2022 from https://miro.com/Google Scholar
- Gaye Moore, Helen Wilding, Kathleen Gray, and David Castle. 2019. Participatory methods to engage health service users in the development of electronic health resources: systematic review. J Participat Med 11, 1 (22 Feb 2019), e11474. https://doi.org/10.2196/11474Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kija Lin Østergaard, Jesper Simonsen, and Helena Karasti. 2018. Examining situated design practices: nurses’ transformations towards genuine participation. Design Studies 59(2018), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.12.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sebeom Park, Shokhrukh Bokijonov, and Yosoon Choi. 2021. Review of Microsoft HoloLens applications over the past five years. Applied Sciences 11, 16 (2021), 7259. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167259Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coimbatore K Prahalad and Venkat Ramaswamy. 2004. Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of interactive marketing 18, 3 (2004), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Prilla, Heinrich Recken, Marc Janßen, and Alexander Schmidt. 2022. Die Pflegebrille als Instrument der Digitalisierung in der Pflege: Nutzenpotentiale. In Assistive Technologien im Sozial- und Gesundheitssektor, Ernst-Wilhelm Luthe, Sandra Verena Müller, and Ina Schiering (Eds.). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34027-8_29Google ScholarCross Ref
- Toni Robertson and Jesper Simonsen. 2012. Participatory Design: an introduction. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Jesper Simonsenand Toni Robertson (Eds.). Routledge, New York, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108543.ch1Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wulf Rössler. 2012. Stress, burnout, and job dissatisfaction in mental health workers. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 262, 2(2012), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-012-0353-4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mette J. Rothmann, Dorthe. B. Danbjørg, Charlotte M. Jensen, and Jane Clemensen. 2016. Participatory Design in health care: participation, power and knowledge. In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2 (Aarhus, Denmark) (PDC ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 127–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948106Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helen Southall, Maeve Marmion, and Andrew Davies. 2019. Adapting Jake Knapp’s design sprint approach for AR/VR applications in digital heritage. In Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality: The Power of AR and VR for Business, M. Claudia tom Dieck and Timothy Jung (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06246-0_5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Case Western Reserve University. 2020. HoloAnatomy DEMO. Case Western Reserve University. Retrieved December 13, 2022 from https://www.microsoft.com/de-de/p/holoanatomy-demo/9p51d9mb58bh?activetab=pivot:overviewtabGoogle Scholar
- Pieter Vandekerckhove, Marleen de Mul, Wichor M Bramer, Antoinette A de Bont, 2020. Generative participatory design methodology to develop electronic health interventions: systematic literature review. Journal of medical Internet research 22, 4 (2020), e13780. https://doi.org/10.2196/13780Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanna Wüller, Jonathan Behrens, Marcus Garthaus, Sara Marquard, and Hartmut Remmers. 2019. A scoping review of augmented reality in nursing. BMC nursing 18, 1 (2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0342-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Britta Zander, Lydia Dobler, and Reinhard Busse. 2013. The introduction of DRG funding and hospital nurses’ changing perceptions of their practice environment, quality of care and satisfaction: comparison of cross-sectional surveys over a 10-year period. International Journal of Nursing Studies 50, 2 (2013), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.07.008Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Playful Co-Design: Creating an AR-Prototype with Nurses in Interlocking Remote and On-Site Workshops
Recommendations
Co-creating Persona Scenarios with Diverse Users Enriching Inclusive Design
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design Approaches and Supporting TechnologiesAbstractIn this article, we will examine personas as methodological approach and review some critiques about how its use may omit or stereotype users with disabilities or even restrict user involvement. We review previous persona creation methods and ...
Designerly Tele-Experiences: A New Approach to Remote Yet Still Situated Co-Design
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted processes interaction designers took for granted, challenging some of our most commonplace design practices. Participatory and situated approaches have been impacted the most: where we engaged stakeholders in-person and in-...
HCD mobile health project: post collaboration reflection of researcher and designer
APCHIUX '15: Proceedings of the Asia Pacific HCI and UX Design SymposiumThis paper constitutes a single case study documenting the design of a mobile health application relying on human-centred design approaches. The project required collaboration between a group of medical health researchers and a human-centred design ...
Comments