skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3574185acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
course

Statistics for HCI

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Many researchers and practitioners find statistics confusing. This course aims to give attendees an understanding of the meaning of the various statistics they see in papers or need to use in their own work. The course builds on the instructor’s previous tutorials and master classes including at CHI 2022, and on his recently book “Statistics for HCI: Making Sense of Quantitative Data”. The course will focus especially on material you will not find in a conventional textbook or statistics course including aspects of statistical ‘craft’ skill, and offer attendees an introduction to some of the instructor’s extensive online material.

References

  1. Monya Baker. 2016. Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values. Nature News 531, 7593 (March 2016), 151. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Andy Cockburn, Carl Gutwin, and Alan Dix. 2018. HARK No More: On the Preregistration of CHI Experiments. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Alan Dix. 2003. Mastery. SIGCHI Bull.: Suppl. Interactions 2003 (March 2003), 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/967199.967209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Alan Dix. 2020. Statistics for HCI: Making Sense of Quantitative Data. Morgan & Claypool. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00974ED1V01Y201912HCI044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. John P. A. Ioannidis. 2005. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med 2, 8 (08 2005), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maurits Kaptein and Judy Robertson. 2012. Rethinking Statistical Analysis Methods for CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208557Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Matthew Kay, Gregory L. Nelson, and Eric B. Hekler. 2016. Researcher-Centered Design of Statistics: Why Bayesian Statistics Better Fit the Culture and Incentives of HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 4521–4532. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858465Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Statistics for HCI

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2023
        3914 pages
        ISBN:9781450394222
        DOI:10.1145/3544549

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 April 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • course
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)85
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format