skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3577058acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Designing Interactive Experiences For Gut Health Engagement and Reflection

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human gut health is the epicentre of human health and well-being. We engage in microscopic interactions in our day-to-day lives that influence our gut health, however, our understanding of this relationship is scarce. Current approaches to engage people on gut-related factors are heavily jargonised, lacking real-world application and focus on disease-causing aspects, thus limiting motivation to engage with gut health. Research suggests that games can act as powerful tools for engagement and reflection on this topic. This PhD research explores the design of two games to understand the key game design features that enable engagement with gut health. The results from testing these games will be generalised to inform the design of physical and digital games for engagement and reflection on health.

References

  1. [1] 2016. https://www.amnh.org/explore/ology/microbiology/human-microbiome-minecraft-mapGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] 2017. https://www.newhope.com/health-and-nutrition-research/consumers-interested-gut-microbiome-lack-understandingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] 2017. https://www.amnh.org/explore/ology/microbiology/gutsy-the-gut-microbiome-card-gameGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] 2019. https://bowelle.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] 2020. https://interactions.acm.org/archive/view/march-april-2020/toward-growable-computer-gamesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] 2021. https://store.steampowered.com/app/1676620/Kelloggs_Gut_Bacteria_Reef/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Riga Anggarendra and Margot Brereton. 2016. Engaging children with nature through environmental HCI. In Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction(OzCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 310–315. https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010981Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Emeka G. Anyanwu. 2014. Anatomy adventure: a board game for enhancing understanding of anatomy. Anatomical sciences education 7, 2 (Mar 2014), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1389Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Eshita Sri Arza, Harshitha Kurra, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Florian “floyd” Mueller. 2018. Feed the Food Monsters! Helping Co-diners Chew their Food Better with Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts(CHI PLAY ’18 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 391–397. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3271520Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lance Baily and HealthySimulation.com Writing Team. 2021. Top Healthcare Simulation Serious Games to Engage Clinical Learners. https://www.healthysimulation.com/35309/top-serious-games/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Annalisa Baronetto, Luisa S. Graf, Sarah Fischer, Markus F. Neurath, and Oliver Amft. 2020. GastroDigitalShirt: a smart shirt for digestion acoustics monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Wearable Computers(ISWC ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3410531.3414297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W. Woźniak, Pia S. F. Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting Reflection in HCI: Four Design Resources for Technologies that Support Reflection. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 1 (Mar 2022), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Laurens Boer, Harvey Bewley, Tom Jenkins, Sarah Homewood, Teresa Almeida, and Anna Vallgårda. 2020. Gut-Tracking as Cultivation. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395588Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jennifer Boothroyd. 2017. What’s on My Plate?: Choosing from the Five Food Groups. Lerner Digital TM. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=HtsiEAAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Julio Cesar Queiroz de Cavalho, Leila Maria Beltramini, and Nelma Regina Segnini Bossolan. 2019. Using a board game to teach protein synthesis to high school students. Journal of biological education 53, 2 (Mar 2019), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1469532Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. David A. Coil, Cassandra L. Ettinger, and Jonathan A. Eisen. 2017. Gut Check: The evolution of an educational board game. PLoS biology 15, 4 (Apr 2017), e2001984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001984Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alma Leora Culén and Katie Coughlin. 2022. Growing Up in a Complex World: Engaging Children in Socio-Cultural Matters Through Speculative Installations. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov. 2012. Reflective design documentation. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 428–437. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Joshua A. Danish, Noel Enyedy, Asmalina Saleh, Christine Lee, and Alejandro Andrade. 2015. Science through Technology Enhanced Play: Designing to support reflection through play and embodiment. (Jul 2015). https://repository.isls.org//handle/1/425Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Rafael Paschoal de Campos, Victória Pereira Viero, Natascha Monteiro Medeiros, Fernanda Klein Marcondes, Luís Henrique Montrezor, Marilene Porawski, and Lucila Ludmila Paula Gutierrez. 2020. The “Gut Game”: an active methodology to teach digestive physiology. Advances in physiology education 44, 3 (Sep 2020), 444–447. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00007.2020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Jéssica David Dias, Marcelo Shinyu Mekaro, Jennifer Kaon Cheng Lu, Joice Lee Otsuka, Luciana Mara Monti Fonseca, and Silvia Helena Zem-Mascarenhas. 2016. Serious game development as a strategy for health promotion and tackling childhood obesity. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 24 (Aug 2016), e2759. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1015.2759Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Markéta Dolejšová, Danielle Wilde, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, and Hilary Davis. 2020. Disrupting (More-than-) Human-Food Interaction: Experimental Design, Tangibles and Food-Tech Futures. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395437Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tao Dong, Mark W. Newman, Mark S. Ackerman, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Supporting reflection through play: field testing the home trivia system. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing(UbiComp ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804294Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Daniel A. Epstein, Felicia Cordeiro, James Fogarty, Gary Hsieh, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Crumbs: Lightweight Daily Food Challenges to Promote Engagement and Mindfulness. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16, Vol. 2016). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5632–5644. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642652Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. David Farrell, Patty Kostkova, Julius Weinberg, Lisa Lazareck, Dasun Weerasinghe, Donna M. Lecky, and Cliodna A. M. McNulty. 2011. Computer games to teach hygiene: an evaluation of the e-Bug junior game. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 66 Suppl 5 (Jun 2011), v39–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Rowanne Fleck and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2010. Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction(OZCHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952269Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jose M. Font, Alexander Hedvall, and Emil Svensson. 2017. Towards Teaching Maternal Healthcare and Nutrition in Rural Ethiopia through a Serious Game. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’17 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3131291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bill Gaver and John Bowers. 2012. Annotated portfolios. Interactions 19, 4 (Jul 2012), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212889Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. William Gaver. 2012. What should we expect from research through design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Grünvogel. 2005. Formal Models and Game Design. Game Stud. (2005). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ebfc1a30f41ab5d0601b0cd2470dcef0f1258f4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Victor Guana, Tracy Xiang, Hannah Zhang, Ella Schepens, and Eleni Stroulia. 2014. UnderControl an educational serious-game for reproductive health. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play(CHI PLAY ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 339–342. https://doi.org/10.1145/2658537.2662983Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lars Hallnäs and Johan Redström. 2001. Slow Technology – Designing for Reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5, 3 (Jan 2001), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00000019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Taylor Hatmaker. 2020. Borderlands 3 bridges the gap between citizen science and blockbuster games. TechCrunch (Apr 2020). http://techcrunch.com/2020/04/07/borderlands-3-science-research-gut-microbiome/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek. 2004. MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, Vol. 4. 1722. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/2004/WS-04-04/WS04-04-001.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Rilla Khaled. 2018. Questions Over Answers: Reflective Game Design. Springer Singapore, Singapore, 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1891-6_1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Rohit Ashok Khot, Jason Ng, and Deepti Aggarwal. 2022. Crafting Tangible Interfaces for Human Digestion: Unpacking the Research through Design Prototyping Journey. In Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’22, Article 28). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3502252Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Rohit Ashok Khot, Jung-Ying (lois) Yi, and Deepti Aggarwal. 2020. SWAN: Designing a Companion Spoon for Mindful Eating. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3375009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Honesty Kim, Lukas C. Gerber, and Ingmar H. Riedel-Kruse. 2016. Interactive Biotechnology: Building your own Biotic Game Setup to Play with Living Microorganisms. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1000–1002. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Raphael Kim, Siobhan Thomas, Roland van Dierendonck, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Stefan Poslad. 2020. Working with Nature’s Lag: Initial Design Lessons for Slow Biotic Games. In International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games(FDG ’20, Article 29). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402942.3409790Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Johanna Kleinen. 2018. Using Games and Play to Foster Collaboration and Innovation in a Cross-Organizational Working Environment. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts(CHI PLAY ’18 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3270602Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redstrom, and Stephan Wensveen. 2013. Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 56, 3(2013), 262–263. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2013.2274109Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Peter Gall Krogh, Thomas Markussen, and Anne Louise Bang. 2015. Ways of Drifting—Five Methods of Experimentation in Research Through Design. In ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 1. Springer India, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2232-3_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Bernhard Maurer. 2017. Embodied Interaction in Play: Social and Physical Qualities as a Design Material for Digital Play. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’17 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3133223Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Elisa D. Mekler, Ioanna Iacovides, and Julia Ayumi Bopp. 2018. “A Game that Makes You Question...”: Exploring the Role of Reflection for the Player Experience. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2016. Informing Design for Reflection: an Overview of Current Everyday Practices. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(NordiCHI ’16, Article 21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Ine Mols, Elise van den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2017. Balance, Cogito and Dott: Exploring Media Modalities for Everyday-life Reflection. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction(TEI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1145/3024969.3025069Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Elena Márquez Segura, Annika Waern, Jin Moen, and Carolina Johansson. 2013. The design space of body games: technological, physical, and social design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3365–3374. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Samantha Olinsky, Pooja M. Desai, Selen Turkay, Elizabeth M. Heitkemper, Elliot G. Mitchell, Lena Mamykina, and Maria L. Hwang. 2021. Meals for Monsters: a Mobile Application for the Feasibility of Gaming and Social Mechanisms. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3451789Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Katie O’Leary, Leslie Liu, Jennifer B. McClure, James Ralston, and Wanda Pratt. 2016. Persuasive Reminders for Health Self-Management. AMIA... Annual Symposium proceedings / AMIA Symposium. AMIA Symposium 2016 (2016), 994–1003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28269896Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Nandini Pasumarthy, Rakesh Patibanda, Yi Ling (ellie) Tai, Elise van den Hoven, Jessica Danaher, and Rohit Ashok Khot. 2022. Gooey Gut Trail: Board Game Play to Understand Human-Microbial Interactions. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CHI PLAY (Oct 2022), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3549502Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Nandini Pasumarthy, Yi Ling (ellie) Tai, Rohit Ashok Khot, and Jessica Danaher. 2021. Gooey Gut Trail :Demystifying Human Gut Health Through a Board Game. In Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’21, Article 19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450741.3465390Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Daniel Pimentel. 2018. States of Mind, Body, and Planet: Improving the Human Condition through Virtual Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts(CHI PLAY ’18 Extended Abstracts). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/3270316.3270609Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Kim Raphael, Dierendonck Roland van, and Poslad Stefan. 2019. Moldy Ghosts and Yeasty Invasions: Glitches in Hybrid Bio-Digital Games. (2019). https://semanticscholar.org/paper/b08e4ad047fd1483974174a8cb26a9f54280677aGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim Raphael and Poslad Stefan. 2019. Growable, Invisible, Connected Toys: Twitching Towards Ubiquitous Bacterial Computing. (2019). https://semanticscholar.org/paper/ee23dab03ffcf1b699cce5124e9887bb3e4321baGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Pepijn Rijnbout, Mark de Graaf, Tilde Bekker, and Ben Schouten. 2016. The introduction of IMO, an integrated model for designing for open-ended play. Entertainment computing 16 (Jul 2016), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2016.06.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Emanuele Rinninella, Pauline Raoul, Marco Cintoni, Francesco Franceschi, Giacinto Abele Donato Miggiano, Antonio Gasbarrini, and Maria Cristina Mele. 2019. What is the Healthy Gut Microbiota Composition? A Changing Ecosystem across Age, Environment, Diet, and Diseases. Microorganisms 7, 1 (Jan 2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7010014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Yvonne Rogers and Paul Marshall. 2017. Research in the Wild. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 10, 3 (Apr 2017), i–97. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00764ED1V01Y201703HCI037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Margrete Lodahl Rolighed, Ester Marie Aagaard, Marcus Due Jensen, Raune Frankjaer, and Lone Koefoed Hansen. 2022. Plant Radio: Tuning in to plants by combining posthumanism and design. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 666–676. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533517Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Vanessa Santos and Roc Parés Burguès. 2018. Authoring a Serious Pervasive Game for Reflecting upon Urban Spaces. In Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. Springer International Publishing, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76908-0_8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Jesse Schell. 2008. The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. CRC Press. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=ZHfMBQAAQBAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph “jofish” Kaye. 2005. Reflective design. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility(CC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Anjuman Shaheen, Panagiotis Fotaris, and Sanaz Fallahkhair. 2021. A Systematic Review of Using Reflective Design Features in Game- Based Learning. In 15th European Conference on Game Based Learning ECGBL 2021. unknown. https://doi.org/10.34190/GBL.21.099Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Amanda C. R. Tavares, Rosilane Ribeiro da Mota, and Walter Melo. 2021. Self-reflection in Games - The Representation of the Individuation Process in Celeste and Persona 2: Innocent Sin. In Anais Estendidos do XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital. SBC, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbgames_estendido.2021.19640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Marije ten Brink, Tamara Witschge, Bert Bredeweg, and Ben Schouten. 2022. Designing for self-awareness: supporting students’ reflexive interactions based on photos. In Creativity and Cognition(C&C ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527927.3532807Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Rosy Tsopra, Mélanie Courtine, Karima Sedki, David Eap, Manon Cabal, Samuel Cohen, Olivier Bouchaud, Frédéric Mechaï, and Jean-Baptiste Lamy. 2020. AntibioGame®: A serious game for teaching medical students about antibiotic use. International journal of medical informatics 136 (Apr 2020), 104074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104074Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. McGill University. 2016. Gaming for gut research: New game advances research into microbes that play a role in our health. Science Daily (Aug 2016). https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160831162953.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2015. COVER STORY Beyond interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions 22, 3 (Apr 2015), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2751314Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. A. Vujic, C. Krause, G. Tso, J. Lin, B. Han, and P. Maes. 2019. Gut-Brain Computer Interfacing (GBCI) : Wearable Monitoring of Gastric Myoelectric Activity. In 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 5886–5889. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856568Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Angela Vujic, Stephanie Tong, Rosalind Picard, and Pattie Maes. 2020. Going with our Guts: Potentials of Wearable Electrogastrography (EGG) for Affect Detection. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction(ICMI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418882Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Justin D. Weisz, Maryam Ashoori, and Zahra Ashktorab. 2018. Entanglion: A Board Game for Teaching the Principles of Quantum Computing. In Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242671.3242696Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Matthew Alexander Whitby, Sebastian Deterding, and Ioanna Iacovides. 2019. “One of the baddies all along”: Moments that Challenge a Player’s Perspective. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play(CHI PLAY ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347192Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing Interactive Experiences For Gut Health Engagement and Reflection

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      3914 pages
      ISBN:9781450394222
      DOI:10.1145/3544549

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)138
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format