Ran Zhou
Zachary Schwemler
Daniel Leithinger
ABSTRACT
Emerging research has demonstrated the viability of emotional communication through haptic technology inspired by interpersonal touch. However, the meaning-making of artificial touch remains ambiguous and contextual. We see this ambiguity caused by robotic touch’s "otherness" as an opportunity for exploring alternatives. To empower designers to explore emotional robotic touch, we devise TactorBots. It contains eight plug-and-play wearable tactor modules that render a series of social gestures driven by servo motors. Our specialized web GUI allows easy control, modification, and storage of tactile patterns to support fast prototyping. Taking emotional haptics as a "design canvas" with broad opportunities, TactorBots is the first "playground" for designers to try out various tactile sensations, feel around the nuanced connection between touches and emotions, and come up with creative imaginations.
Footnotes
Supplemental Material
- Patrícia Alves-Oliveira, Maria Luce Lupetti, Michal Luria, Diana Löffler, Mafalda Gamboa, Lea Albaugh, Waki Kamino, Anastasia K. Ostrowski, David Puljiz, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Marcus Scheunemann, Michael Suguitan, and Dan Lockton. 2021. Collection of Metaphors for Human-Robot Interaction. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, USA) (DIS ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1366–1379. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462060Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Lucy Anderson-Bashan, Benny Megidish, Hadas Erel, Iddo Wald, Guy Hoffman, Oren Zuckerman, and Andrey Grishko. 2018. The Greeting Machine: An Abstract Robotic Object for Opening Encounters. In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 595–602. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2018.8525516Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher C Berger, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, and Ken Hinckley. 2018. The uncanny valley of haptics. Science Robotics 3, 17 (2018), eaar7010.Google Scholar
- Harvey Bewley and Laurens Boer. 2018. Designing Blo-Nut: Design Principles, Choreography and Otherness in an Expressive Social Robot. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196817Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew J Bremner, David J Lewkowicz, and Charles Spence. 2012. Multisensory development. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- John T Cacioppo, Wendi L Gardner, and Gary G Berntson. 1999. The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function.Journal of personality and Social Psychology 76, 5(1999), 839.Google Scholar
- Esther W. Foo, Lucy E. Dunne, and Brad Holschuh. 2021. User Expectations and Mental Models for Communicating Emotions through Compressive & Warm Affective Garment Actuation. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 1 (March 2021), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448097Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: Cultural Probes. Interactions 6, 1 (jan 1999), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/291224.291235Google ScholarDigital Library
- William W. Gaver, Jacob Beaver, and Steve Benford. 2003. Ambiguity as a Resource for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642653Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marc Hassenzahl, Jan Borchers, Susanne Boll, Astrid Rosenthal-von der Pütten, and Volker Wulf. 2020. Otherware: How to Best Interact with Autonomous Systems. Interactions 28, 1 (dec 2020), 54–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3436942Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew J. Hertenstein, Rachel Holmes, Margaret McCullough, and Dacher Keltner. 2009. The communication of emotion via touch.Emotion 9, 4 (2009), 566–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016108Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew J. Hertenstein, Dacher Keltner, Betsy App, Brittany A. Bulleit, and Ariane R. Jaskolka. 2006. Touch communicates distinct emotions.Emotion 6, 3 (2006), 528–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.528Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gijs Huisman. 2017. Social Touch Technology: A Survey of Haptic Technology for Social Touch. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 10, 3 (July 2017), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2017.2650221 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Haptics.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carey Jewitt, Sara Price, Jürgen Steimle, Gijs Huisman, Lili Golmohammadi, Narges Pourjafarian, William Frier, Thomas Howard, Sima Ipakchian Askari, Michela Ornati, 2021. Manifesto for digital social touch in crisis. Frontiers in Computer Science(2021), 97.Google Scholar
- Lawrence H. Kim and Sean Follmer. 2019. SwarmHaptics: Haptic Display with Swarm Robots. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’19. ACM Press, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300918Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Ledo, Steven Houben, Jo Vermeulen, Nicolai Marquardt, Lora Oehlberg, and Saul Greenberg. 2018. Evaluation Strategies for HCI Toolkit Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173610Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuxuan Lei, Qi Lu, and Yingqing Xu. 2022. O&O: A DIY Toolkit for Designing and Rapid Prototyping Olfactory Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 637, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502033Google ScholarDigital Library
- Masahiro Mori, Karl F MacDorman, and Norri Kageki. 2012. The uncanny valley [from the field]. IEEE Robotics & automation magazine 19, 2 (2012), 98–100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sara Price, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, Carey Jewitt, Nikoleta Yiannoutsou, Katerina Fotopoulou, Svetlana Dajic, Juspreet Virdee, Yixin Zhao, Douglas Atkinson, and Frederik Brudy. 2022. The Making of Meaning through Dyadic Haptic Affective Touch. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 3, Article 21 (jan 2022), 42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490494Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kimiko Ryokai, Nicole Marie Bulalacao, Sandra Jacobo, Prasad Boradkar, and Kelly Dobson. 2022. Shifting Design Perspectives: Touch, Co-Location, and Sharing Objects during the Pandemic. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 6, 9 (2022), 74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eleanor Sandry. 2015. Re-evaluating the form and communication of social robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 7, 3 (2015), 335–346.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juulia T. Suvilehto, Enrico Glerean, Robin I. M. Dunbar, Riitta Hari, and Lauri Nummenmaa. 2015. Topography of social touching depends on emotional bonds between humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 45 (Nov. 2015), 13811–13816. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1519231112Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ran Zhou, Harpreet Sareen, Yufei Zhang, and Daniel Leithinger. 2022. EmotiTactor: Exploring How Designers Approach Emotional Robotic Touch. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533487Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ran Zhou, Zackary Schwemler, Akshay Baweja, Harpreet Sareen, Casey Lee Hunt, and Daniel Leithinger. 2023. TactorBots: A Haptic Design Toolkit for Out-of-lab Exploration of Emotional Robotic Touch. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580799Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Demonstrating TactorBots: A Haptic Design Toolkit for Exploration of Emotional Robotic Touch
Recommendations
TactorBots: A Haptic Design Toolkit for Out-of-lab Exploration of Emotional Robotic Touch
CHI '23: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsEmerging research has demonstrated the viability of emotional communication through haptic technology inspired by interpersonal touch. However, the meaning-making of artificial touch remains ambiguous and contextual. We see this ambiguity caused by ...
EmotiTactor: Exploring How Designers Approach Emotional Robotic Touch
DIS '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceIn this work, we bring designers into the exploration of emotional robotic touch, discuss their design decisions and reflect on their insights. Prior psychology findings show humans can communicate distinct emotions solely through touch. We hypothesize ...
Touch&Fold: A Foldable Haptic Actuator for Rendering Touch in Mixed Reality
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe propose a nail-mounted foldable haptic device that provides tactile feedback to mixed reality (MR) environments by pressing against the user's fingerpad when a user touches a virtual object. What is novel in our device is that it quickly tucks away ...
Comments