Anke Brocker
Simon Voelker
Jan Borchers
ABSTRACT
Soft robotics provides flexible structures and materials that move in natural and organic ways. They facilitate creating safe and tolerant mechanisms for human–machine interaction. This makes soft robotics attractive for tasks that rigid robots are unable to carry out. Users may also display a higher acceptance of soft robots compared to rigid robots because their natural way of movement helps users to relate to scenarios they know from everyday life, making the interaction with the soft robot feel more intuitive. However, the variety of soft robotics shape designs, and how to integrate them into applications, have not been explored fully yet. In a user study, we investigated users’ associations and ideas for application areas for 36 soft robotics shape designs, brainstormed with users beforehand. We derived first design recommendations for soft robotics designs such as clear signifiers indicating the possible motion.
Footnotes
Supplemental Material
- Jason Alexander, Anne Roudaut, Jürgen Steimle, Kasper Hornbæk, Miguel Bruns Alonso, Sean Follmer, and Timothy Merritt. 2018. Grand Challenges in Shape-Changing Interface Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Montreal QC Canada, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173873Google Scholar
Digital Library
- L. Awad, J. Bae, K. O’Donnell, S. D. De Rossi, Kathryn Hendron, L. Sloot, Pawel Kudzia, Stephen Allen, K. Holt, T. Ellis, and C. Walsh. 2017. A soft robotic exosuit improves walking in patients after stroke. Science Translational Medicine (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9084Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pinar Boyraz, Gundula Runge, and Annika Raatz. 2018. An Overview of Novel Actuators for Soft Robotics. Actuators 7 (Aug. 2018), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/act7030048Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anke Brocker, Jose A. Barreiros, Ali Shtarbanov, Kristian Gohlke, Ozgun Kilic Afsar, and Sören Schröder. 2022. Actuated Materials and Soft Robotics Strategies for Human-Computer Interaction Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 81, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503711Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anke Brocker, Jakob Strüver, Simon Voelker, and Jan Borchers. 2022. SoRoCAD: A Design Tool for the Building Blocks of Pneumatic Soft Robotics. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 330, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519770Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ang Chen, Ruixue Yin, Lin Cao, Chenwang Yuan, H.K. Ding, and W.J. Zhang. 2017. Soft robotics: Definition and research issues. In 2017 24th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP). 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1109/M2VIP.2017.8267170Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ang Chen, Ruixue Yin, Lin Cao, Chenwang Yuan, H.K. Ding, and W. Zhang. 2017. Soft robotics: Definition and research issues. 366–370. https://doi.org/10.1109/M2VIP.2017.8267170Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nick Cheney, Josh Bongard, and Hod Lipson. 2015. Evolving Soft Robots in Tight Spaces. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (Madrid, Spain) (GECCO ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 935–942. https://doi.org/10.1145/2739480.2754662Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiachun Du, Panos Markopoulos, Qi Wang, Marina Toeters, and Ting Gong. 2018. ShapeTex: Implementing Shape-Changing Structures in Fabric for Wearable Actuation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173245Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hyunyoung Kim, Celine Coutrix, and Anne Roudaut. 2018. Morphees+: Studying Everyday Reconfigurable Objects for the Design and Taxonomy of Reconfigurable UIs. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174193Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangbae Kim, Cecilia Laschi, and Barry Trimmer. 2013. Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends in Biotechnology 31, 5 (2013), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.03.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mirko Kovač. 2014. The Bioinspiration Design Paradigm: A Perspective for Soft Robotics. Soft Robotics 1, 1 (2014), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2013.0004 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2013.0004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rahul Kushwaha. 2015. Procedure of animation in 3d autodesk maya: Tools & techniques. International Journal of Computer Graphics & Animation 5, 4 (2015), 15–27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li-Ke Ma, Yizhonc Zhang, Yang Liu, Kun Zhou, and Xin Tong. 2017. Computational Design and Fabrication of Soft Pneumatic Objects with Desired Deformations. ACM Trans. Graph. 36, 6, Article 239 (nov 2017), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130800.3130850Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew D. Marchese and Daniela Rus. 2016. Design, kinematics, and control of a soft spatial fluidic elastomer manipulator. The International Journal of Robotics Research 35, 7 (June 2016), 840–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364915587925 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ali Maziz, Alessandro Concas, Alexandre Khaldi, Jonas Stålhand, Nils-Krister Persson, and Edwin W. H. Jager. 2017. Knitting and weaving artificial muscles. Science Advances 3, 1 (Jan. 2017), e1600327. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600327 Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science Section: Research Article.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tiana Miller-Jackson, Rainier F. Natividad, and Chen-Hua Yeow. 2019. Simplifying Soft Robots Through Adhesive-backed Fabrics. In 2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft). 834–839. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOSOFT.2019.8722725Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura Perovich, Philippa Mothersill, and Jennifer Broutin Farah. 2013. Awakened apparel: embedded soft actuators for expressive fashion and functional garments. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction - TEI ’14. ACM Press, Munich, Germany, 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/2540930.2540958Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ratnadeep Pramanik, Patrick R. Onck, and Roel W. C. P. Verstappen. 2022. Bi-Directional Locomotion of a Magnetically-Actuated Jellyfish-Inspired Soft Robot. In Advances in Robotics - 5th International Conference of The Robotics Society (Kanpur, India) (AIR2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478586.3478591Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isabel P. S. Qamar, Rainer Groh, David Holman, and Anne Roudaut. 2018. HCI Meets Material Science: A Literature Review of Morphing Materials for the Design of Shape-Changing Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173948Google ScholarDigital Library
- Majken K. Rasmussen, Giovanni M. Troiano, Marianne G. Petersen, Jakob G. Simonsen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Sketching Shape-changing Interfaces: Exploring Vocabulary, Metaphors Use, and Affordances. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2740–2751. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858183Google ScholarDigital Library
- François Schmitt, Olivier Piccin, Laurent Barbé, and Bernard Bayle. 2018. Soft Robots Manufacturing: A Review. Frontiers Robotics AI 5 (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00084Google ScholarCross Ref
- Patchanok Srisuradetchai and Nantapath Trakultraipruk. 2016. Skillings-Mack Statistic: Computer-Intensive Methods. Journal of Applied Statistics and Information Technology 1, 2 (Dec. 2016), 33–45. https://ph02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/asit-journal/article/view/164759Google Scholar
- Paul Strohmeier, Juan Carrascal, Bernard Cheng, Margaret Meban, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. An Evaluation of Shape Changes for Conveying Emotions. 3781–3792. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858537Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi Sun, Yun Seong Song, and Jamie Paik. 2013. Characterization of silicone rubber based soft pneumatic actuators. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 4446–4453. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2013.6696995Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luisa von Radziewsky, Antonio Krüger, and Markus Löchtefeld. 2015. Scarfy: Augmenting Human Fashion Behaviour with Self-Actuated Clothes. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stanford, California, USA) (TEI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 313–316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680568Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering and School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, C.J Payne, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, I Wamala, C Abah, T Thalhofer, M Saeed, D Bautista-Salinas, M.A Horvath, N.V Vasilyev, E.T Roche, F.A Pigula, and C.J Walsh. 2017. Wearable Soft Robotic Device Supports the Failing Heart in vivo. In 10th Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics 2017. The Hamlyn Centre, Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, 37–38. https://doi.org/10.31256/HSMR2017.19Google ScholarCross Ref
- Takaichi Yanagida, Kazunori Adachi, Masato Yokojima, and Taro Nakamura. 2012. Development of a peristaltic crawling robot attached to a large intestine endoscope using bellows - type artificial rubber muscles. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. 2935–2940. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2012.6385918 ISSN: 2153-0866.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hong Kai Yap, Jeong Hoon Lim, Fatima Nasrallah, and Chen-Hua Yeow. 2017. Design and Preliminary Feasibility Study of a Soft Robotic Glove for Hand Function Assistance in Stroke Survivors. Frontiers in Neuroscience 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00547 Publisher: Frontiers.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Exploring Shape Designs for Soft Robotics and Users’ Associations with Them
Recommendations
Towards a Soft Science of Soft Robots. A Call for a Place for Aesthetics in Soft Robotics Research
Special Issue on Designing the Robot Body: Critical Perspectives on Affective Embodied InteractionThe position paper presents an argument that aesthetic theory and practice are pertinent to the rapidly expanding field of soft robotics. Soft robotics as an aesthetic phenomenon is introduced and contextualized drawing on the author's own research and ...
SoRoCAD: A Design Tool for the Building Blocks of Pneumatic Soft Robotics
CHI EA '22: Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSoft robotics uses soft, flexible materials and elastic actuation mechanisms to create systems that are more adaptable and tolerant to unknown environments, and safer for human-machine interaction, than rigid robots. Pneumatic soft robots can be ...
Soft robotics: the route to true robotic organisms
AbstractSoft Robotics has come to the fore in the last decade as a new way of conceptualising, designing and fabricating robots. Soft materials empower robots with locomotion, manipulation, and adaptability capabilities beyond those possible with ...
Comments