skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585646acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

ARephotography: Revisiting Historical Photographs using Augmented Reality

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Augmented Reality (AR) opens up new possibilities for interactive experiences which can be used in a variety of circumstances. Rephotography is a photo technique commonly presented on dedicated internet pages that align a past view with a current photo, allowing you to have a comparative view of the past with the present. This project aims to combine these two concepts to create AR experiences where you can view buildings and street views from historical photography seamlessly embedded in the present environment. We report on our automated pipeline that can take a historical photograph of a building and produces a textured 3D model that can be placed in AR over the current view of the building using techniques from machine learning while also reporting on first feedback from a preliminary user study.

Footnotes

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585646-video-preview.mp4

mp4

18.5 MB

3544549.3585646-talk-video.mp4

mp4

32.4 MB

3544549.3585646-video-figure.mp4

mp4

66.6 MB

References

  1. Soonmin Bae, Aseem Agarwala, and Fredo Durand. 2010. Computational rephotography. ACM Transactions on Graphics 29, 3 (July 2010), 24:1–24:15. https://doi.org/10.1145/1805964.1805968Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. George Caridakis and John Aliprantis. 2019. A Survey of Augmented Reality Applications in Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Comput. Methods Herit. Sci. 3, 2 (jul 2019), 118 – 147. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCMHS.2019070107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Marco Cavallo, Geoffrey Alan Rhodes, and Angus Graeme Forbes. 2016. Riverwalk: Incorporating Historical Photographs in Public Outdoor Augmented Reality Experiences. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR-Adjunct). 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2016.0068Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. A. Criminisi, I. Reid, and A. Zisserman. 2000. Single View Metrology. International Journal of Computer Vision 40, 2 (Nov. 2000), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026598000963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Paul E. Debevec, Camillo J. Taylor, and Jitendra Malik. 1996. Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: a hybrid geometry- and image-based approach. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques(SIGGRAPH ’96). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/237170.237191Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman. 2004. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811685Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Derek Hoiem, Alexei A. Efros, and Martial Hebert. 2005. Automatic Photo Pop-Up. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers (Los Angeles, California) (SIGGRAPH ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 577 – 584. https://doi.org/10.1145/1186822.1073232Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. BKP Horn. 1987. Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. JOSA A 4, April (1987), 629–642. http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?&id=2711http://www.opticsinfobase.org/abstract.cfm?&id=2711Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Youichi Horry, Ken Anjyo, and Kiyoshi Arai. 1997. Tour Into the Picture: Using Spidery Mesh Interface to Make Animation from a Single Image”. 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/258734.258854Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Ibrahim Ilhan and Evrim Celtek. 2016. Mobile Marketing: Usage of Augmented Reality in Tourism. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 15, 2 (Dec. 2016), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.256721Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gun A. Lee, Andreas Dünser, Seungwon Kim, and Mark Billinghurst. 2012. CityViewAR: A mobile outdoor AR application for city visualization. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH). 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-AMH.2012.6483989 ISSN: 2381-8360.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bruce MacEvoy. 2015. Two Point Perspective. In Handprint Watercolors. https://www.handprint.com/HP/WCL/perspect3.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Andrii Matviienko, Sebastian Günther, Sebastian Ritzenhofen, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2022. AR Sightseeing: Comparing Information Placements at Outdoor Historical Heritage Sites Using Augmented Reality. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, MHCI, Article 194 (sep 2022), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3546729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Thomas Müller, Alex Evans, Christoph Schied, and Alexander Keller. 2022. Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encoding. ACM Trans. Graph. 41, 4, Article 102 (July 2022), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3528223.3530127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Gen Nishida, Adrien Bousseau, and Daniel Aliaga. 2018. Procedural Modeling of a Building from a Single Image. Computer Graphics Forum 37 (05 2018), 415–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13372Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kari Rainio, Petri Honkamaa, and Kaisa Spilling. 2015. Presenting Historical Photos using Augmented Reality. Technical Report. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Rusinkiewicz and M. Levoy. 2001. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In Proceedings Third International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling. 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/IM.2001.924423Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ashutosh Saxena, Min Sun, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2009. Make3D: Learning 3D Scene Structure from a Single Still Image. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 31, 5 (May 2009), 824–840. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2008.132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Roman Suvorov, Elizaveta Logacheva, Anton Mashikhin, Anastasia Remizova, Arsenii Ashukha, Aleksei Silvestrov, Naejin Kong, Harshith Goka, Kiwoong Park, and Victor Lempitsky. 2021. Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.07161 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Daniel Wagner, Gerhard Reitmayr, Alessandro Mulloni, Tom Drummond, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2008. Pose tracking from natural features on mobile phones. In 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2008.4637338Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Yuxin Wu, Alexander Kirillov, Francisco Massa, Wan-Yen Lo, and Ross Girshick. 2019. Detectron2. https://github.com/facebookresearch/detectron2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alex Yu, Vickie Ye, Matthew Tancik, and Angjoo Kanazawa. 2021. pixelNeRF: Neural Radiance Fields From One or Few Images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 4578–4587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. ARephotography: Revisiting Historical Photographs using Augmented Reality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2023
          3914 pages
          ISBN:9781450394222
          DOI:10.1145/3544549

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 April 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Work in Progress
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)283
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)19

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format