Hasti Sharifi
Debaleena Chattopadhyay
ABSTRACT
In day-to-day life, older adults prefer getting tech support from loved ones, rather than relying on instruction manuals or institutional support. But asking for help, frequently or repeatedly for similar issues, can strain relations between older adults and their helpers. This paper examines how relationships are maintained when younger helpers give and older adults get tech support—across three different cultures: North American, South Asian, and Middle Eastern. Our deductive application of the relational maintenance strategies framework to 40 in-depth, semi-structured, and cross-cultural interviews identify challenges in tech caregiving, like avoiding the topic or interaction, and mitigation efforts, like directly or indirectly assuring each other of their skills and abilities. We discuss how social interactions are managed around tech support, how individual constraints, like time, place, or abilities are respected, and how self-conscious emotions, like guilt, embarrassment, or empathy are handled.
Supplemental Material
- Amber Aftab, Ruipu Hu, and Sang Won Lee. 2020. Remo: Generating Interactive Tutorials by Demonstration for Online Tasks. In Adjunct Publication of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 87–89.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Yvonne Barnard, Mike D Bradley, Frances Hodgson, and Ashley D Lloyd. 2013. Learning to use new technologies by older adults: Perceived difficulties, experimentation behaviour and usability. Computers in human behavior 29, 4 (2013), 1715–1724.Google Scholar
- Judith Bom, Pieter Bakx, Frederik Schut, and Eddy Van Doorslaer. 2019. The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: a systematic review. The Gerontologist 59, 5 (2019), e629–e642.Google Scholar
- Eva Brandt, Thomas Binder, Lone Malmborg, and Tomas Sokoler. 2010. Communities of everyday practice and situated elderliness as an approach to co-design for senior interaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction. 400–403.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reed WR Bratches, Paige N Scudder, and Paul J Barr. 2021. Supporting communication of visit information to informal caregivers: a systematic review. PloS one 16, 7 (2021), e0254896.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis. (2012).Google Scholar
- Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2021. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?Qualitative research in psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328–352.Google Scholar
- Werner BF Brouwer, N Job A van Exel, Bernard Van De Berg, Huib J Dinant, Marc A Koopmanschap, and Geertrudis AM Van Den Bos. 2004. Burden of caregiving: evidence of objective burden, subjective burden, and quality of life impacts on informal caregivers of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research 51, 4 (2004), 570–577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel J Canary, Laura Stafford, Kimberley S Hause, and Lisa A Wallace. 1993. An inductive analysis of relational maintenance strategies: Comparisons among lovers, relatives, friends, and others. Communication Research Reports 10, 1 (1993), 3–14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- National Research Council 2010. The role of human factors in home health care: Workshop summary. (2010).Google Scholar
- Sara J Czaja and Chin Chin Lee. 2007. The impact of aging on access to technology. Universal access in the information society 5, 4 (2007), 341–349.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiamin Dai, Karyn Moffatt, Jinglan Lin, and Khai Truong. 2022. Designing for Relational Maintenance: New Directions for AAC Research. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.Google Scholar
- Kieren J Egan, Patricia Clark, Zahid Deen, Carmen Paputa Dutu, Graham Wilson, Lisa McCann, Marilyn Lennon, and Roma Maguire. 2022. Understanding current needs and future expectations of informal caregivers for technology to support health and well-being: national survey study. JMIR aging 5, 1 (2022), e15413.Google Scholar
- Ortal Cohen Elimelech, Simona Ferrante, Naomi Josman, Sonya Meyer, Francesca Lunardini, Jonathan Gómez-Raja, Carmen Galán, Pilar Cáceres, Piera Sciama, Marianne Gros, 2022. Technology use characteristics among older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-cultural survey. Technology in Society 71 (2022), 102080.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lynn Etters, Debbie Goodall, and Barbara E Harrison. 2008. Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners 20, 8 (2008), 423–428.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amir Goren, William Montgomery, Kristin Kahle-Wrobleski, Tomomi Nakamura, and Kaname Ueda. 2016. Impact of caring for persons with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia on caregivers’ health outcomes: findings from a community based survey in Japan. BMC geriatrics 16, 1 (2016), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Hill, Paul Beynon-Davies, and Michael D Williams. 2008. Older people and internet engagement: Acknowledging social moderators of internet adoption, access and use. Information Technology & People (2008).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Xiaofu Jin, Xiaozhu Hu, Xiaoying Wei, and Mingming Fan. 2022. Synapse: Interactive Guidance by Demonstration with Trial-and-Error Support for Older Adults to Use Smartphone Apps. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 3 (2022), 1–24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brittne Kakulla. 2021. 2021 Tech Trends and the 50-Plus: Top 10 Biggest Trends.Retrieved December 12, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00420.011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brittne Kakulla. 2021. 2022 Tech Trends and Adults 50-Plus.Retrieved December 12, 2022 from https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00493.001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sunyoung Kim, Abhishek Choudhury, 2020. Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes toward the adoption and use of activity trackers. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8, 10 (2020), e18312.Google Scholar
- Bran Knowles and Vicki L Hanson. 2018. The wisdom of older technology (non) users. Commun. ACM 61, 3 (2018), 72–77.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bran Knowles, Vicki L Hanson, Yvonne Rogers, Anne Marie Piper, Jenny Waycott, Nigel Davies, Aloha Hufana Ambe, Robin N Brewer, Debaleena Chattopadhyay, Marianne Dee, 2021. The harm in conflating aging with accessibility. Commun. ACM 64, 7 (2021), 66–71.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jess Kropczynski, Reza Ghaiumy Anaraky, Mamtaj Akter, Amy J. Godfrey, Heather Lipford, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2021. Examining Collaborative Support for Privacy and Security in the Broader Context of Tech Caregiving. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 396 (oct 2021), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479540Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rock Leung, Charlotte Tang, Shathel Haddad, Joanna Mcgrenere, Peter Graf, and Vilia Ingriany. 2012. How older adults learn to use mobile devices: Survey and field investigations. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 4, 3 (2012), 1–33.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Qingchuan Li and Yan Luximon. 2020. Older adults’ use of mobile device: usability challenges while navigating various interfaces. Behaviour & Information Technology 39, 8 (2020), 837–861.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qingchuan Li, Yan Luximon, 2018. Understanding older adults’ post-adoption usage behavior and perceptions of mobile technology. (2018).Google Scholar
- Kevin A Look and Jamie A Stone. 2018. Medication management activities performed by informal caregivers of older adults. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 14, 5 (2018), 418–426.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Keshini Madara Marasinghe. 2016. Assistive technologies in reducing caregiver burden among informal caregivers of older adults: a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 11, 5 (2016), 353–360.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shareen Mahmud, Jessalyn Alvina, Parmit K Chilana, Andrea Bunt, and Joanna McGrenere. 2020. Learning through exploration: how children, adults, and older adults interact with a new feature-rich application. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J de Almeida Mello, Jean Macq, Thérèse Van Durme, Sophie Cès, Nele Spruytte, Chantal Van Audenhove, and Anja Declercq. 2017. The determinants of informal caregivers’ burden in the care of frail older persons: a dynamic and role-related perspective. Aging & mental health 21, 8 (2017), 838–843.Google Scholar
- Helena M. Mentis, Galina Madjaroff, Aaron Massey, and Zoya Trendafilova. 2020. The Illusion of Choice in Discussing Cybersecurity Safeguards Between Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW2, Article 164 (oct 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415235Google ScholarDigital Library
- W Ben Mortenson, Louise Demers, Marcus J Fuhrer, Jeffrey W Jutai, James Lenker, and Frank DeRuyter. 2013. Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: An exploratory randomized control trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 92, 4 (2013), 297.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Savanthi Murthy, Karthik S. Bhat, Sauvik Das, and Neha Kumar. 2021. Individually Vulnerable, Collectively Safe: The Security and Privacy Practices of Households with Older Adults. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 138 (apr 2021), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449212Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alberto Palloni. 2000. Living arrangements of older persons. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Madison-Wisconsin.Google Scholar
- Carolyn Pang, Zhiqin Collin Wang, Joanna McGrenere, Rock Leung, Jiamin Dai, and Karyn Moffatt. 2021. Technology Adoption and learning preferences for older adults: Evolving perceptions, ongoing challenges, and emerging design opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andraž Petrovčič, Walter R Boot, Tomaž Burnik, and Vesna Vesna Dolničar. 2019. Improving the Measurement of Older Adults’ Mobile Device Proficiency: Results and Implications from a Study of Older Adult Smartphone Users. IEEE Access 7 (2019), 150412–150422.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Research Center Pew. 2021. Mobile Fact Sheet. Retrieved October, 2021 from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.Google Scholar
- Anne Marie Piper, Raymundo Cornejo, Lisa Hurwitz, and Caitlin Unumb. 2016. Technological caregiving: Supporting online activity for adults with cognitive impairments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 5311–5323.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Prosser and Steve Moss. 1996. Informal care networks of older adults with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 9, 1 (1996), 17–30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susanna Ray. 2022. An easier way to help people give tech support to loved ones wins Microsoft Hackathon top prize. https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/innovation/an-easier-way-to-help-people-give-tech-support-to-loved-ones-wins-microsoft-hackathon-top-prize/Google Scholar
- Karen Renaud and Judy Van Biljon. 2008. Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: a qualitative study. In Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: riding the wave of technology. 210–219.Google Scholar
- Nina Sakhnini and Debaleena Chattopadhyay. 2022. A Review of Smartphone Fact-Checking Apps and their (Non) Use Among Older Adults. In Adjunct Publication of the 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neil Selwyn, Stephen Gorard, John Furlong, and Louise Madden. 2003. Older adults’ use of information and communications technology in everyday life. Ageing & Society 23, 5 (2003), 561–582.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mehri Shams Ghahfarokhi. 2022. Rising living alone among the elderly in Iran: prevalence and associated factors. BMC geriatrics 22, 1 (2022), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Hsin-Yi Sandy Tsai, RV Rikard, Shelia R Cotten, and Ruth Shillair. 2019. Senior technology exploration, learning, and acceptance (STELA) model: from exploration to use–a longitudinal randomized controlled trial. Educational Gerontology 45, 12 (2019), 728–743.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar, Siow Ann Chong, Edimansyah Abdin, Louisa Picco, Anitha Jeyagurunathan, YunJue Zhang, Rajeswari Sambasivam, Boon Yiang Chua, Li Ling Ng, Martin Prince, 2016. Care participation and burden among informal caregivers of older adults with care needs and associations with dementia. International psychogeriatrics 28, 2 (2016), 221–231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Vines, Stephen Lindsay, Gary W Pritchard, Mabel Lie, David Greathead, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2013. Making family care work: dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. 607–616.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parjanya Vyas, Bhagyesh Patil, Shubham Singh, and Vinayak Naik. 2019. AppAmigo: An Efficient Middleware to Record and Control Remote Users’ Interactions with their Smartphone Apps. In Proceedings of the 12th Innovations on Software Engineering Conference (formerly known as India Software Engineering Conference). 1–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jenny Waycott, Frank Vetere, Sonja Pedell, Amee Morgans, Elizabeth Ozanne, and Lars Kulik. 2016. Not for me: Older adults choosing not to participate in a social isolation intervention. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 745–757.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ja Eun Yu and Debaleena Chattopadhyay. 2020. "Maps are hard for me": How Older Adults Struggle with Mobile Maps. In The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. in press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ja Eun Yu and Debaleena Chattopadhyay. 2020. Supporting Older Adults in Locating Mobile Interface Features with Voice Input. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ja Eun Yu, Natalie Parde, and Debaleena Chattopadhyay. 2023. “Where is history”: Toward Designing a Voice Assistant to help Older Adults locate Interface Features quickly. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- A Cross-Cultural Study of Relational Maintenance in Tech Caregiving
Recommendations
Reducing the Search Space on demand helps Older Adults find Mobile UI Features quickly, on par with Younger Adults
CHI '24: Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsAs mobile user interfaces (UI) become feature-rich, navigation gets more complex. Finding features quickly starts demanding information-intensive strategies for decision-making—which can be challenging for older adults. Older adults examine fewer details,...
A study on the acceptance of website interaction aids by older adults
The goal of the present work is to investigate the potential acceptance of a set of web interaction aids by older adults, in order to help them overcome difficulties associated with ageing and help them continue using the web as a source of information, ...
Understanding Barriers and Design Opportunities to Improve Healthcare and QOL for Older Adults through Voice Assistants
ASSETS '21: Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and AccessibilityVoice-based Intelligent Virtual Assistants (IVAs) promise to improve healthcare management and Quality of Life (QOL) by introducing the paradigm of hands-free and eye-free interactions. However, there has been little understanding regarding the ...
Comments