skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585705acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

PianoHandSync: An Alignment-based Hand Pose Discrepancy Visualization System for Piano Learning

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Video-based lessons are becoming a popular way for distance piano education. However, limited by the fixed camera angle, a video is difficult to tell precise 3D hand posture, which is one of the most essential factors for learning piano. This paper presents a visualization system providing the intuitive discrepancy of hand postures in two piano performance videos. Through a motion capture system, the estimated 3D postures are visualized and discrepancies based on distinct metrics are displayed, integrated with modular functions assisting skill acquisition. A pilot study proves that the proposed visualization can be a supplementary means for only video-based lessons in terms of correcting hand postures and fingering.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585705-talk-video.mp4

mp4

280.7 MB

3544549.3585705-video-preview.mp4

mp4

44.9 MB

References

  1. John Brooke. 2013. SUS: A Retrospective. J. Usability Studies 8, 2 (feb 2013), 29–40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Debidatta Dwibedi, Yusuf Aytar, Jonathan Tompson, Pierre Sermanet, and Andrew Zisserman. 2019. Temporal Cycle-Consistency Learning. In The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen L Edwards. 1951. Balanced latin-square designs in psychological research. The American journal of psychology 64, 4 (1951), 598–603.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Adrian Freed and Rimas Avizienis. 2000. A New Music Keyboard with Continuous Key-position Sensing and High-speed Communication. (01 2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Natsuki Hamanishi and Jun Rekimoto. 2019. TTT: Time Synchronization Method by Time Distortion for VR Training Including Rapidly Moving Objects. In 25th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Parramatta, NSW, Australia) (VRST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 95, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364745Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Kevin Huang, Thad Starner, Ellen Do, Gil Weinberg, Daniel Kohlsdorf, Claas Ahlrichs, and Ruediger Leibrandt. 2010. Mobile Music Touch: Mobile Tactile Stimulation for Passive Learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 791–800. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hitoshi Kawasaki, Sohei Wakisaka, Hiroto Saito, Atsushi Hiyama, and Masahiko Inami. 2022. A System for Augmenting Humans’ Ability to Learn Kendama Tricks through Virtual Reality Training. In Augmented Humans 2022 (Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan) (AHs 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1145/3519391.3519404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ruofan Liu, Erwin Wu, Chen-Chieh Liao, Hayato Nishioka, Shinichi Furuya, and Hideki Koike. 2022. Synchronized Hand Difference Visualization for Piano Learning. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Posters (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (SIGGRAPH ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532719.3543196Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Markus Löchtefeld, Antonio Krüger, and Hans Gellersen. 2016. DeceptiBike: Assessing the Perception of Speed Deception in a Virtual Reality Training Bike System. In Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (Gothenburg, Sweden) (NordiCHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 40, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2971513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Megan Lorains, Kevin Ball, and Clare MacMahon. 2013. An above real time training intervention for sport decision making. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 14, 5 (2013), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.05.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Andrew P. McPherson and Youngmoo E. Kim. 2011. Multidimensional Gesture Sensing at the Piano Keyboard. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2789–2798. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979355Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Robert A. Moog and Thomas L. Rhea. 1990. Evolution of the Keyboard Interface: The Bosendorfer 290 SE Recording Piano and the Moog Multiply-Touch-Sensitive Keyboards. Computer Music Journal 14 (1990), 52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Gyeongsik Moon, Shoou-I Yu, He Wen, Takaaki Shiratori, and Kyoung Mu Lee. 2020. Interhand2. 6m: A dataset and baseline for 3d interacting hand pose estimation from a single rgb image. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 548–564.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Takayuki Nozawa, Erwin Wu, and Hideki Koike. 2019. VR Ski Coach: Indoor Ski Training System Visualizing Difference from Leading Skier. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 1341–1342. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797717Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Linsey Raymaekers, Jo Vermeulen, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. 2014. Game of Tones: Learning to Play Songs on a Piano Using Projected Instructions and Games. (04 2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2574799Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Katja Rogers, Amrei Röhlig, Matthias Weing, Jan Gugenheimer, Bastian Könings, Melina Klepsch, Florian Schaub, Enrico Rukzio, Tina Seufert, and Michael Weber. 2014. P.I.A.N.O.: Faster Piano Learning with Interactive Projection. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (Dresden, Germany) (ITS ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1145/2669485.2669514Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Austin Jerald Stanbury, Ines Said, and Hyo Jeong Kang. 2021. HoloKeys: Interactive Piano Education Using Augmented Reality and IoT. Proceedings of the 27th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nobuhiro Takahashi, Shinichi Furuya, and Hideki Koike. 2020. Soft Exoskeleton Glove with Human Anatomical Architecture: Production of Dexterous Finger Movements and Skillful Piano Performance. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 13, 4 (2020), 679–690. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2020.2993445Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Yoshinari Takegawa, Tsutomu Terada, and Masahiko Tsukamoto. 2012. A piano learning support system considering rhythm. (01 2012), 325–332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Xizi Wang. 2020. PPVR: Teaching and Learning to Play the Piano in Virtual Reality. Master’s thesis. School of Information, University of Michigan. https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/162561Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Erwin Wu, Mitski Piekenbrock, Takuto Nakumura, and Hideki Koike. 2021. SPinPong - Virtual Reality Table Tennis Skill Acquisition using Visual, Haptic and Temporal Cues. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 5 (2021), 2566–2576. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3067761Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. PianoHandSync: An Alignment-based Hand Pose Discrepancy Visualization System for Piano Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      3914 pages
      ISBN:9781450394222
      DOI:10.1145/3544549

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format