Laura-Bianca Bilius
Radu-Daniel Vatavu
ABSTRACT
We present findings from an examination of older adults’ perceptions of and preferences for smart rings, a unique class of interactive wearables gaining traction in the consumer market. To this end, we conducted semi-structured interviews with nine older adults, aged between 61 and 69 years old, to understand their perceptions regarding several smart ring models representative of rings, ring-like, and ring-ready finger-augmentation devices. We also elicited our participants’ preferences for using smart rings in their everyday life, such as for controlling various home appliances and electronic devices. Our results show an overall positive experience and openness toward adopting smart rings, which were perceived useful to assist with various activities. Based on our findings and following the aging research agenda in HCI, we propose future work opportunities for designing smart ring technology tailored to the needs and preferences of older adults.
Footnotes
Supplemental Material
- Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining What Individual SUS Scores Mean: Adding an Adjective Rating Scale. J. Usability Studies 4, 3 (may 2009), 114–123. https://uxpajournal.org/determining-what-individual-sus-scores-mean-adding-an-adjective-rating-scaleGoogle Scholar
Digital Library
- Sandra Bardot, Surya Rawat, Duy Thai Nguyen, Sawyer Rempel, Huizhe Zheng, Bradley Rey, Jun Li, Kevin Fan, Da-Yuan Huang, Wei Li, and Pourang Irani. 2021. ARO: Exploring the Design of Smart-Ring Interactions for Encumbered Hands. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction(MobileHCI ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447526.3472037Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra Bardot, Bradley Rey, Lucas Audette, Kevin Fan, Da-Yuan Huang, Jun Li, Wei Li, and Pourang Irani. 2022. One Ring to Rule Them All: An Empirical Understanding of Day-to-Day Smartring Usage Through In-Situ Diary Study. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 6, 3, Article 100 (sep 2022), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3550315Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrea Bianchi and Seungwoo Je. 2017. Disambiguating Touch with a Smart-Ring. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference(AH ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 27, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041164.3041196Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laura-Bianca Bilius and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2021. Demonstration of GestuRING, a Web Tool for Ring Gesture Input. In The Adjunct Publication of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 124–125. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474349.3480199Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roger Boldu, Alexandru Dancu, Denys J.C. Matthies, Thisum Buddhika, Shamane Siriwardhana, and Suranga Nanayakkara. 2018. FingerReader2.0: Designing and Evaluating a Wearable Finger-Worn Camera to Assist People with Visual Impairments While Shopping. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 3, Article 94 (2018), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264904Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 189 (1996), 189–194. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781498710411-35/sus-quick-dirty-usability-scale-john-brookeGoogle Scholar
- Clara Caldeira, Novia Nurain, and Kay Connelly. 2022. “I Hope I Never Need One”: Unpacking Stigma in Aging in Place Technology. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 264, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517586Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zixue Cheng and Yinghui Zhou. 2018. Finger-Worn Device Based Hand Gesture Recognition Using Long Short-Term Memory. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics(SMC ’18). IEEE, USA, 2067–2072. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2018.00356Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3 (1989), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pieter Desmet and Paul Hekkert. 2007. Framework of Product Experience. International Journal of Design 1, 1 (2007), 57–66. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/66/15Google Scholar
- Michela Ferron, Nadia Mana, and Ornella Mich. 2015. Mobile for Older Adults: Towards Designing Multimodal Interaction. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia(MUM ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/2836041.2841211Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogdan-Florin Gheran, Jean Vanderdonckt, and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2018. Gestures for Smart Rings: Empirical Results, Insights, and Design Implications. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems(DIS ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 623–635. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196741Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogdan-Florin Gheran and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2020. From Controls on the Steering Wheel to Controls on the Finger: Using Smart Rings for In-Vehicle Interactions. In Companion Publication of the ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(DIS’ 20 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 299–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395851Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bogdan-Florin Gheran, Radu-Daniel Vatavu, and Jean Vanderdonckt. 2023. New Insights into User-Defined Smart Ring Gestures with Implications for Gesture Elicitation Studies. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’23). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585590Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dimitrios Iakovakis and Leontios Hadjileontiadis. 2016. Standing Hypotension Prediction Based on Smartwatch Heart Rate Variability Data: A Novel Approach. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct(MobileHCI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1109–1112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2970370Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seungwoo Je, Minkyeong Lee, Yoonji Kim, Liwei Chan, Xing-Dong Yang, and Andrea Bianchi. 2018. PokeRing: Notifications by Poking Around the Finger. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 542, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174116Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ben Jelen, Susan Monsey, and Katie A. Siek. 2019. Older Adults as Makers of Custom Electronics: Iterating on Craftec. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article LBW0227, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3312755Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dimitri Kraft, Karthik Srinivasan, and Gerald Bieber. 2020. Wrist-Worn Accelerometer Based Fall Detection for Embedded Systems and IoT Devices Using Deep Learning Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments(PETRA ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 48, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3389189.3397983Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chaiwoo Lee. 2022. Technology and Aging: The Jigsaw Puzzle of Design, Development and Distribution. Nature Aging 2 (2022), 1077–1079. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-022-00325-6Google ScholarCross Ref
- James R. Lewis. 2019. Comparison of Four TAM Item Formats: Effect of Response Option Labels and Order. Journal of Usability Studies 14, 4 (2019), 224–236. https://uxpajournal.org/tam-formats-effect-response-labels-orderGoogle ScholarDigital Library
- Hyunchul Lim, Jungmin Chung, Changhoon Oh, SoHyun Park, and Bongwon Suh. 2016. OctaRing: Examining Pressure-Sensitive Multi-Touch Input on a Finger Ring Device. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 223–224. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984751.2984780Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chuan Ma, Olivia Guerra-Santin, and Masi Mohammadi. 2022. Smart Home Modification Design Strategies for Ageing in Place: A Systematic Review. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 37 (2022), 625–651. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10901-021-09888-zGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- MarketResearch. 2022. Smart Rings. Global Smart Rings Market to Reach $12.6 Million by 2027. https://www.marketresearch.com/Global-Industry-Analysts-v1039/Smart-Rings-32479203Google Scholar
- Denys J.C. Matthies, Marian Haescher, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Gerald Bieber. 2018. Step Detection for Rollator Users with Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Spatial User Interaction(SUI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1145/3267782.3267784Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tracy L. Mitzner, Julie B. Boron, Cara Bailey Fausset, Anne E. Adams, Neil Charness, Sara J. Czaja, Katinka Dijkstra, Arthur D. Fisk, Wendy A. Rogers, and Joseph Sharit. 2010. Older Adults Talk Technology: Technology Usage and Attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 6 (2010), 1710–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ob-orm Muangmoon, Mongkhol Rattanakhum, and Pradorn Sureephong. 2016. Game Menu Navigation for the Elderly Using Non-Tactile Gesture Interaction: A Pilot Study. In Proceedings of the International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology(i-CREATe ’16). START Centre, Midview City, SGP, Article 2, 4 pages. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/3014393.3014396Google Scholar
- Hugo Nicolau and Joaquim Jorge. 2012. Elderly Text-Entry Performance on Touchscreens. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(ASSETS ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384939Google ScholarDigital Library
- Don Norman. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, USA. https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/don-norman/emotional-design/9780465004171Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laurie M. Orlov. 2021. The Future of Wearables and Older Adults 2021. https://sullivanmaine.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Aging-in-Place-Tech-.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Thijs Roumen, Simon T. Perrault, and Shengdong Zhao. 2015. NotiRing: A Comparative Study of Notification Channels for Wearable Interactive Rings. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2497–2500. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702350Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Schlögl, G. Chollet, M. Garschall, M. Tscheligi, and G. Legouverneur. 2013. Exploring Voice User Interfaces for Seniors. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments(PETRA ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 52, 2 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2504335.2504391Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andrew Sears and Vicki L. Hanson. 2012. Representing Users in Accessibility Research. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 4, 2, Article 7 (mar 2012), 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141943.2141945Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roy Shilkrot, Jochen Huber, Jürgen Steimle, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Pattie Maes. 2015. Digital Digits: A Comprehensive Survey of Finger Augmentation Devices. ACM Comput. Surv. 48, 2, Article 30 (2015), 29 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2828993Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lee Stearns, Uran Oh, Leah Findlater, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2018. TouchCam: Realtime Recognition of Location-Specific On-Body Gestures to Support Users with Visual Impairments. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 4, Article 164 (2018), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161416Google ScholarDigital Library
- Technavio. 2022. Smart Rings Market by Application, Technology, and Geography - Forecast and Analysis 2022-2026. https://www.technavio.com/report/smart-rings-market-industry-analysisGoogle Scholar
- Mihail Terenti and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2022. Measuring the User Experience of Vibrotactile Feedback on the Finger, Wrist, and Forearm for Touch Input on Large Displays. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’22). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 286, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519704Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ovidiu-Ciprian Ungurean and Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2022. "I Gave up Wearing Rings:" Insights on the Perceptions and Preferences of Wheelchair Users for Interactions with Wearables. IEEE Pervasive Computing 21, 3 (2022), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2022.3155952Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eleftheria Vaportzis, Maria Clausen, and Alan Gow. 2017. Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Frontiers in Psychology 8 (10 2017), 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687Google ScholarCross Ref
- Radu-Daniel Vatavu. 2023. iFAD Gestures: Understanding Users’ Gesture Input Performance with Index-Finger Augmentation Devices. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’23). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580928Google ScholarDigital Library
- Radu-Daniel Vatavu and Laura-Bianca Bilius. 2021. GestuRING: A Web-Based Tool for Designing Gesture Input with Rings, Ring-Like, and Ring-Ready Devices. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(UIST ’21). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 710–723. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472749.3474780Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Vines, Gary Pritchard, Peter Wright, Patrick Olivier, and Katie Brittain. 2015. An Age-Old Problem: Examining the Discourses of Ageing in HCI and Strategies for Future Research. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 1, Article 2 (feb 2015), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2696867Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathias Wilhelm, Jan-Peter Lechler, Daniel Krakowczyk, and Sahin Albayrak. 2020. Ring-Based Finger Tracking Using Capacitive Sensors and Long Short-Term Memory. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 551–555. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377325.3377535Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob O. Wobbrock, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Andrew D. Wilson. 2009. User-Defined Gestures for Surface Computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1083–1092. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518866Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katrin Wolf, Sven Mayer, and Stephan Meyer. 2016. Microgesture Detection for Remote Interaction with Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct(MobileHCI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957265.2961865Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda Wulf, Markus Garschall, Julia Himmelsbach, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2014. Hands Free - Care Free: Elderly People Taking Advantage of Speech-Only Interaction. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational(NordiCHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 203–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639189.2639251Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chi Zhang and Hossain Shahriar. 2020. The Adoption, Issues, and Challenges of Wearable Healthcare Technology for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education(SIGITE ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 50–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368308.3415454Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cheng Zhang, Xiaoxuan Wang, Anandghan Waghmare, Sumeet Jain, Thomas Ploetz, Omer T. Inan, Thad E. Starner, and Gregory D. Abowd. 2017. FingOrbits: Interaction with Wearables Using Synchronized Thumb Movements. In Proceedings of the ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers(ISWC ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 62–65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123021.3123041Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tengxiang Zhang, Xin Zeng, Yinshuai Zhang, Ke Sun, Yuntao Wang, and Yiqiang Chen. 2020. ThermalRing: Gesture and Tag Inputs Enabled by a Thermal Imaging Smart Ring. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376323Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kening Zhu, Simon Perrault, Taizhou Chen, Shaoyu Cai, and Roshan Lalintha Peiris. 2019. A Sense of Ice and Fire: Exploring Thermal Feedback with Multiple Thermoelectric-Cooling Elements on a Smart Ring. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 130 (2019), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.07.003Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- “I Could Wear It All of the Time, Just Like My Wedding Ring:” Insights into Older People’s Perceptions of Smart Rings
Recommendations
The Safety Net of Aging in Place: Understanding How Older Adults Construct, Develop, and Maintain Their Social Circles
PervasiveHealth '18: Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for HealthcareActive engagement in social activities is important to maintain and promote healthy aging. In this study, we further investigate how older adults take the initiative role to support their health and well-being. To understand their active participation ...
Older adults and hackathons: a qualitative study
Globally observed trends in aging indicate that older adults constitute a growing share of the population and an increasing demographic in the modern technologies marketplace. Therefore, it has become important to address the issue of participation of ...
Understanding Older Adults' Perceptions of In-Home Sensors Using an Obtrusiveness Framework
Proceedings, Part II, of the 10th International Conference on Foundations of Augmented Cognition: Neuroergonomics and Operational Neuroscience - Volume 9744The aim of this study was to determine if dimensions and sub-categories of a previously-tested obtrusiveness framework were represented in interviews conducted with community-dwelling older adults at three- and six-month study visits during an in-home ...
Comments