skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585787acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

BREATHTURES: A First Step Towards Breathing Gestures as Distinct Input Modality

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of breath as interaction modality has sparked some interest recently in HCI. Research in this field actively explored breathing interaction (e.g., guidance and feedback) in different contexts. So far, very little systems can be found that systematically use defined breathing gestures as distinct input modality. In this work, we describe the design, development and implementation of five distinct breathing gestures (BREATHTURES), that can be applied as defined input modality to interact with an application. We present a qualitative user study (n=7) focusing on usability and user experience of the developed BREATHTURES when applied in a game-like application. Results indicate an overall positive rating in terms of fun and usability. Some BREATHTURES were perceived harder to perform and to detect than others. Further iterations of our work will require refined BREATHTURE detection. Overall, our work demonstrates the design, implementation and application of pre-defined breathing gestures as distinct input modality.

Footnotes

  1. 1 For this research ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Salzburg University, reference number: GZ 12/2022

    Footnote
Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585787-talk-video.mp4

mp4

13.1 MB

References

  1. Fadel Adib, Zachary Kabelac, Hongzi Mao, Dina Katabi, and Robert C. Miller. 2014. Demo: Real-Time Breath Monitoring Using Wireless Signals. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (Maui, Hawaii, USA) (MobiCom ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1145/2639108.2641756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vasundhara Agrawal, Varnika Naik, Mayuri Duggirala, and Sandeep Athavale. 2020. Calm a mobile based deep breathing game with biofeedback. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 153–157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ahmet Baydur, Rodney H Adkins, and Joseph Milic-Emili. 2001. Lung mechanics in individuals with spinal cord injury: effects of injury level and posture. Journal of Applied Physiology 90, 2 (2001), 405–411.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Gila Benchetrit. 2000. Breathing pattern in humans: diversity and individuality. Respiration physiology 122, 2-3 (2000), 123–129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lisa Burr, Nick Betzlbacher, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2022. Breathing Training on the Run: Exploring Users Perception on a Gamified Breathing Training Application During Treadmill Running. In Persuasive Technology: 17th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2022, Virtual Event, March 29–31, 2022, Proceedings (Doha, Qatar). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98438-0_5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Wei-Hung Chen. 2015. Blowatch: Blowable and hands-free interaction for smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on human factors in computing systems. 103–108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yeqing Chen, Yulong Bian, Wei Gai, and Chenglei Yang. 2020. Adaptive Blowing Interaction Method Based on a Siamese Network. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 115486–115500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Youngjun Cho, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Simon J Julier. 2017. DeepBreath: Deep learning of breathing patterns for automatic stress recognition using low-cost thermal imaging in unconstrained settings. In 2017 seventh international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction (acii). IEEE, 456–463.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jérémy Frey, May Grabli, Ronit Slyper, and Jessica R Cauchard. 2018. Breeze: Sharing biofeedback through wearable technologies. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. N Garcia-Hernandez, I Muñoz-Pepi, F Villafranca-Martinez, and V Parra-Vega. 2022. Usability and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Game-Based Biofeedback System to Strengthen Respiratory Muscles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction (2022), 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Eric Harbour, Michael Lasshofer, Matteo Genitrini, and Hermann Schwameder. 2021. Enhanced breathing pattern detection during running using wearable sensors. Sensors 21, 16 (2021), 5606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Eric Harbour, Thomas Stöggl, Hermann Schwameder, and Thomas Finkenzeller. 2022. Breath Tools: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Breathing Strategies to Enhance Human Running. Frontiers in Physiology (2022), 233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oo Jin Heng and Quek Albert. 2020. Bubble Tower: Breathing Based Virtual Reality Action Game. In Proceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Things. 33–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Rohan Hundia and Aaron Quigley. 2019. BreathIn: A breath pattern sensing approach for user computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 31st Australian Conference on Human-Computer-Interaction. 581–584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Annkatrin Jung, Miquel Alfaras, Pavel Karpashevich, William Primett, and Kristina Höök. 2021. Exploring Awareness of Breathing through Deep Touch Pressure. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 263, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445533Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jong-Hyun Kim and Jung Lee. 2020. Controlling your contents with the breath: Interactive breath interface for VR, games, and animations. Plos one 15, 10 (2020), e0241498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Takahiro Kusabuka and Takuya Indo. 2020. IBUKI: Gesture Input Method Based on Breathing. In Adjunct Publication of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 102–104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. James R Lewis. 2006. Usability testing. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics 12 (2006), e30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ryoma Ogawa, Kyosuke Futami, and Kazuya Murao. 2021. NasalBreathInput: A Hands-Free Input Method by Nasal Breath Gestures using a Glasses Type Device. In The 23rd International Conference on Information Integration and Web Intelligence. 620–624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ryoya Onishi, Tao Morisaki, Shun Suzuki, Saya Mizutani, Takaaki Kamigaki, Masahiro Fujiwara, Yasutoshi Makino, and Hiroyuki Shinoda. 2021. DualBreath: Input Method Using Nasal and Mouth Breathing. In Augmented Humans Conference 2021. 283–285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pablo E Paredes, Yijun Zhou, Nur Al-Huda Hamdan, Stephanie Balters, Elizabeth Murnane, Wendy Ju, and James A Landay. 2018. Just breathe: In-car interventions for guided slow breathing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 1–23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Shwetak N Patel and Gregory D Abowd. 2007. Blui: low-cost localized blowable user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. 217–220.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Rakesh Patibanda, Florian’Floyd’ Mueller, Matevz Leskovsek, and Jonathan Duckworth. 2017. Life tree: understanding the design of breathing exercise games. In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play. 19–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Michael Brent Phillips, Jason Beach, Michael Cathey, Jake Lockert, and William Satterfield. 2017. Reliability and validity of the Hexoskin wearable body metrics telemetry shirt. Journal of Sport and Human Performance 5, 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Mirjana Prpa, Ekaterina R. Stepanova, Thecla Schiphorst, Bernhard E. Riecke, and Philippe Pasquier. 2020. Inhaling and Exhaling: How Technologies Can Perceptually Extend Our Breath Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gabriel Reyes, Dingtian Zhang, Sarthak Ghosh, Pratik Shah, Jason Wu, Aman Parnami, Bailey Bercik, Thad Starner, Gregory D Abowd, and W Keith Edwards. 2016. Whoosh: non-voice acoustics for low-cost, hands-free, and rapid input on smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 120–127.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Daniela Roditi and Michael E Robinson. 2011. The role of psychological interventions in the management of patients with chronic pain. Psychology research and behavior management 4 (2011), 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeff Sauro. 2012. things to know about the Single Ease Question (SEQ). Measuring U 2012 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Misha Sra, Xuhai Xu, and Pattie Maes. 2018. Breathvr: Leveraging breathing as a directly controlled interface for virtual reality games. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Markus Tatzgern, Michael Domhardt, Martin Wolf, Michael Cenger, Gerlinde Emsenhuber, Radomir Dinic, Nathalie Gerner, and Arnulf Hartl. 2022. AirRes Mask: A Precise and Robust Virtual Reality Breathing Interface Utilizing Breathing Resistance as Output Modality. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Paul Tennent, Duncan Rowland, Joe Marshall, Stefan Rennick Egglestone, Alexander Harrison, Zachary Jaime, Brendan Walker, and Steve Benford. 2011. Breathalising games: understanding the potential of breath control in game interfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on advances in computer entertainment technology. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Robby van Delden, Danny Plass-Oude Bos, Antje Jacoba Vivian de With, Koen Vogel, Randy Klaassen, Nynke Zwart, Joyce Faber, Boony Thio, and Mattienne van der Kamp. 2020. SpiroPlay, a Suite of Breathing Games for Spirometry by Kids & Experts. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 400–413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Vincent Van Rheden, Eric Harbour, Thomas Finkenzeller, Lisa Anneke Burr, Alexander Meschtscherjakov, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2021. Run, Beep, Breathe: Exploring the Effects on Adherence and User Experience of 5 Breathing Instruction Sounds while Running. In Proceedings of the 16th International Audio Mostly Conference, AM 2021(ACM International Conference Proceeding Series). Association for Computing Machinery, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478384.3478412 Publisher Copyright: © 2021 ACM.; 16th International Audio Mostly Conference, AM 2021 ; Conference date: 01-09-2021 Through 03-09-2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. X Rosalind Wang, Joseph T Lizier, Amalia Z Berna, Florence G Bravo, and Stephen C Trowell. 2015. Human breath-print identification by E-nose, using information-theoretic feature selection prior to classification. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 217 (2015), 165–174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Motoji Yamamoto, Takeshi Ikeda, and Yoshinobu Sasaki. 2008. Real-time analog input device using breath pressure for the operation of powered wheelchair. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 3914–3919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Andrea Zaccaro, Andrea Piarulli, Marco Laurino, Erika Garbella, Danilo Menicucci, Bruno Neri, and Angelo Gemignani. 2018. How Breath-Control Can Change Your Life: A Systematic Review on Psycho-Physiological Correlates of Slow Breathing. Frontiers in human neuroscience 12 (2018), 353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00353Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. BREATHTURES: A First Step Towards Breathing Gestures as Distinct Input Modality

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2023
          3914 pages
          ISBN:9781450394222
          DOI:10.1145/3544549

          Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 April 2023

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Work in Progress
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        Full Text

        View this article in Full Text.

        View Full Text

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format