skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585824acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Motivations for Collecting Digital NFT Fashion: A Uses and Gratifications Theory Approach for Understanding Digital NFT Fashion Collectors’ Behavior

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) allow individuals to demonstrate ownership of digital and physical assets. NFTs are scarce, unique, and authentic; three properties known to be key for determining perceived value. Whilst previous research has primarily focused on NFTs as a source of economic value, here we assess the psychological motivations of collectors of digital fashion NFTs. Specifically, NTFs related to digital fashion are particularly relevant to HCI researchers as they sit at the intersection between business, culture, and self-expression. Here, we survey 19 users of a digital avatar fashion company, Genies, to understand the gratifications users derive from collecting digital NFT fashion. Results demonstrate that the primary motivations for collecting fashion NFTs are self-expression and utility and that motivations associated with value are secondary. We make design recommendations based on these results, indicating that developers should distinguish between expression-based motivations and value-based motivations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585824-talk-video.mp4

mp4

24.3 MB

References

  1. David Y Aharon and Ender Demir. 2021. NFTs and asset class spillovers: Lessons from the period around the COVID-19 pandemic. Finance Research Letters (2021), 102515Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Javier Arcenegui, Rosario Arjona, and Iluminada Baturone. 2020. Secure Management of IoT Devices Based on Blockchain Non-fungible Tokens and Physical Unclonable Functions. In Applied Cryptography and Network Security Workshops, Jianying Zhou, Mauro Conti, Chuadhry Mujeeb Ahmed, Man Ho Au, Lejla Batina, Zhou Li, Jingqiang Lin, Eleonora Losiouk, Bo Luo, Suryadipta Majumdar, Weizhi Meng, Martín Ochoa, Stjepan Picek, Georgios Portokalidis, Cong Wang, and Kehuan Zhang (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61638-0_2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Laurie Simon Bagwell and B. Douglas Bernheim. 1996. Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. The American economic review, JSTOR, pp.349-373.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Charles R. Bantz. 1982. Exploring uses and gratifications: A comparison of reported uses of television and reported uses of favorite program type. Communication research, Vol 9(3). Wiley Online Library, pp.352-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365082009003002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mehmet Aydın Baytaş, Amos Cappellaro, and Ylva Fernaeus. 2022. Stakeholders and Value in the NFT Ecosystem: Towards a Multi-disciplinary Understanding of the NFT Phenomenon. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 211, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519694.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Mehmet Aydın Baytaş, Aykut Coşkun, Asim Evren Yantaç, and Morten Fjeld. 2018. Towards Materials for Computational Heirlooms: Blockchains and Wristwatches. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Sephora Bemba. Selling NFTs on fashion resale platforms: good or bad idea? - The Fashion Keynote #06. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/selling-nfts-fashion-resale-platforms-good-bad-idea-sephora-bemba/. Accessed 2023-01-10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Deepayan Bhowmik and Tian Feng. 2017. The multimedia blockchain: A distributed and tamper-proof media transaction framework. In 2017 22nd International conference on digital signal processing (DSP). IEEE, London UK, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.2017.8096051.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Stella Bruzzi and Pamela Church Gibson. 2013. Fashion cultures revisited: Theories, explorations and analysis. Routledge. London, UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203130544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Achilleas Boukis. 2019. Exploring the implications of blockchain technology for brand–consumer relationships: a future research agenda. Journal of Product & Brand Management. Vol 29(3), Emerald Insights, pp 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2018-1780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Bruce Damer. 1997. Interacting and designing in virtual worlds on the internet. In CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 174–175. https://doi.org/10.1145/1120212.1120329.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dolce and Gabbana. 2023. https://world.dolcegabbana.com/discover/dgfamily-nft-community/ Accessed 2023-01-09Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. John Dimmick, Susan Kline, and Laura Stafford. 2000. The gratification niches of personal e-mail and the telephone: Competition, displacement, and complementarity. Communication research, Vol 27(2), Sage Publishing, pp.227-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Nicolas Ducheneaut, Ming-Hui Wen, Nicholas Yee, and Greg Wadley. 2009. Body and mind: a study of avatar personalization in three virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1151–1160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518877.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Wayne Duggan. 2023. January Crypto Market Outlook. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/cryptocurrency/crypto-market-outlook-forecast/ Accessed 2023-01-14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin Evans. 1989. Consumer behaviour towards fashion. European Journal of marketing, 23(7). Emerald Insights. pp.7-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000000575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Richard Gilbert, Vandana Thadani, Caitlyn Handy, Haley Andrews, Tristan Sguigna, Alex Sasso and Stephanie Payne. 2014. The psychological functions of avatars and alt (s): A qualitative study. Computers in Human Behavior. Vol 32. Elsevier. pp.1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Frederich Godart. 2012. Unveiling fashion: business, culture, and identity in the most glamorous industry. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Alexis Hiniker, Shwetak N. Patel, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Why would you do that? predicting the uses and gratifications behind smartphone-usage behaviors. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 634–645. https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Daisuke Ichikawa, Makiko Kashiyama and Taro Ueno. 2017. Tamper-resistant mobile health using blockchain technology. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 5(7), p.e7938. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.7938.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Adam N. Joinson. 2008. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? motives and use of facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1027–1036. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Annamma Joy, Ying Zhu, Camilo Peña and Myriam Brouard. 2022. Digital future of luxury brands: Metaverse, digital fashion, and non‐fungible tokens. Strategic Change. Vol 31 (2022). Wiley Online Library, pp.337-343. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Indrek Ibrus and Ulrike Rohn. 2023. The Web of Value. Internet Policy Review, Vol 12 (11), https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.1.1679Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Steve Kaczynski and Scott Duke Kominers. 2021. How NFTs create value. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/11/how-nfts-create-value Accessed: 2023-01-14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Hyunjin Kang and Hye Kyung Kim. 2020. My avatar and the affirmed self: Psychological and persuasive implications of avatar customization. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 112, Elseveir. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jean-Noël Kapferer, and Pierre Valette-Florence. 2016. Beyond rarity: the paths of luxury desire. How luxury brands grow yet remain desirable. Journal of Product & Brand Management. Vol 25 (2016). Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2015-0988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Elihu Katz, Jay G. Blumler, and Michael Gurevitch. 1974. Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research Edited by: Jay G Blumler and Elihu Katz. pp19–32. Beverly Hills, CA: SageGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Barbara K. Kaye. 2010. Going to the blogs: Toward the development of a uses and gratifications measurement scale for blogs. Atlantic Journal of Communication, Vol 18(4), Taylor and Francis Online. pp.194-210, https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2010.505904Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Orhan Korhan and Metin Ersoy. 2016. Usability and functionality factors of the social network site application users from the perspective of uses and gratification theory. Quality & quantity, Vol 50(4), Wiley Online Library. pp.1799-1816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0236-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Logan Kugler. 2021. Non-fungible tokens and the future of art. Commun. ACM 64, 9 (September 2021), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Robert LaRose & Matthew S. Eastin. 2004. A social cognitive theory of Internet uses and gratifications: Toward a new model of media attendance. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, Vol 48(3). Taylor and Francis Online. pp.358-377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Dan Li. 2005. Why do you blog: A uses-and-gratifications inquiry into bloggers' motivations. Master's Thesis. Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiaodan Liu, Qingfei Min & Shengnan Han. 2020. Understanding users’ continuous content contribution behaviours on microblogs: An integrated perspective of uses and gratification theory and social influence theory. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol 39(5), Taylor and Francis Online, pp.525-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1603326Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Fabrice Lumineau , Wenqian Wang and Oliver Schilke. 2021. Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations?. Organization Science, Vol 32(2), pp. 500-521. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2020.1379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Simon Mackenzie and Diana Bērziņa. 2022. NFTs: Digital things and their criminal lives. Crime, Media, Culture, Vol 18(4), SAGE Publications, 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211039797.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Angela McRobbie. 2000. Fashion as a Culture Industry. In: Stella Bruzzi and Pamela Church Gibson, eds. Fashion Cultures: Theories, Explorations and Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 253-264. ISBN 978-0415206853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Armando Memushi. 2013. Conspicuous consumption of luxury goods: literature review of theoretical and empirical evidences. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Vol 4(12), SSRN, pp.250-255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Alex Murray, Dennie Kim and Jordan Combs. 2023. The promise of a decentralized internet: What is Web3 and how can firms prepare? Business Horizons, Vol 66(2), pp. 191-202, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.06.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ifeanyi E. Okonkwo. 2021. NFT, Copyright; and Intellectual Property Commercialisation. International Journal of Law and Information Technology (2021). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3856154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Cathy Applefeld Olson. 2021. Warner Music Group Dives Into NFT Fray With Genies Partnership To Create Artist Avatars. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/cathyolson/2021/04/30/warner-music-group-dives-into-nft-fray-with-genies-partnership-to-create-artist-avatars/ Accessed 2023-01-10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Zizi Papacharissi and Alan M. Rubin. 2000. Predictors of Internet use. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, Vol 44(2), Routledge, pp.175-196. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4402_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Derek Poppink. 2000. Evaluating international usability of virtual worlds. In CHI '00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '00). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 343–344. https://doi.org/10.1145/633292.633498Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ningwei Qin. 2022. Nike becomes highest-earning brand for NFT sales (August 2022). Yahoo Finance. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nike-becomes-highest-earning-brand-085014745.html Accessed 2023-01-04Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Roblox. 2022. 2022 Metaverse Fashion Trends Report. Roblox and Parsons (The New School). https://blog.roblox.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/FINAL_2022-Metaverse-Fashion-Trends-report_Roblox-x-Parsons.pdf Accessed 2023-02-28Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Madeleine Schulz. 2022. Gen Z wants digital fashion. How do different avatars stack up?.Vogue Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/technology/gen-z-wants-digital-fashion-how-do-different-avatars-stack-up Accessed 2023-01-10Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Andrea Sestino, Gianluigi Guido and Alessandro M. Peluso. 2022. Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs): Examining the Impact on Consumers and Marketing Strategies. Springer Nature.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Tanusree Sharma, Zhixuan Zhou, Yun Huang and Yang Wang. 2022. " It's A Blessing and A Curse": Unpacking Creators' Practices with Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) and Their Communities. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2201.13233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Thomas F. Stafford, Marla Royne Stafford and Lawrence L. Schkade. 2004. L.Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences, Vol 35, (2004), 259–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.00117315.2004.02524Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Statistica. 2022. Share of internet users in the United States who would be interested in creating an avatar for the metaverse as of March 2022, by generation. Statistica. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1302449/us-adults-creating-an-avatar-for-the-metaverse-generation/ Accessed 2023-10-01Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Lily Templeton. 2021. The Next Karl Lagerfeld NFT Comes With Real-Life Perks. Women's Wear Daily.https://wwd.com/fashion-news/fashion-scoops/karl-lagerfeld-nft-endless-performance-real-life-metaverse-hybrid-dematerialized-1235017003/ Accessed 2023-01-09Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Langston Thomas. 2021. Global Fashion House Coach Launches Debut NFT Collection. NFT now. https://nftnow.com/news/fashion-house-coach-debut-nft-collection/ Accessed 2022-12-13Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Horst Treiblmaier and Christian Sillaber. 2021. The impact of blockchain on e-commerce: a framework for salient research topics. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol 48, Elsevier, p.101054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101054.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Universal Music Group. 2021. Universal Music Group And Genies Announce Global Partnership to Develop Avatars and Digital Wearable NFTs For The Company's Iconic Roster of Artists. Universal Music Group. https://www.universalmusic.com/universal-music-group-and-genies-announce-global-partnership-to-develop-avatars-and-digital-wearable-nfts-for-the-companys-iconic-roster-of-artists/ Accessed 2023-01-14Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Thorsten Veblen. 1899. The Theory of the Leisure Class. An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Vogue Business Data & Insights Team. 2021. Resale, rental and NFTs: Vogue Business Index reveals top trends in innovation. Vogue Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/companies/resale-rental-nft-vogue-business-index-trends-innovation Accessed 2023-01-09Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Anita Whiting and David Williams. 2013. Why people use social media: a uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative market research: an international journal. Vol. 16, No. 4, Emerald Insights. pp. 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Klaus Peter Wiedmann, Nadine Hennigs, and Astrid Siebels. 2009. Value‐based segmentation of luxury consumption behavior. Psychology & Marketing. Vol 26, no. 7. Wiley Online Library, pp.625-651. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20292Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Laura Wood. 2023. Global Metaverse Market Size, Segments, Outlook and Revenue Forecast Report 2022-2030: Global Players Control Approx 10% of the Market, while Regional Players Hold the Second Largest Share. GlobeNewsWire (January. 2023). https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2023/01/17/2589731/0/en/Global-Metaverse-Market-Size-Segments-Outlook-and-Revenue-Forecast-Report-2022-2030-Global-Players-Control-Approx-10-of-the-Market-while-Regional-Players-Hold-the-Second-Largest-Sh.html Accessed: 2023-01-17Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Tsu-Yang Wu, Yuh-Min Tseng, Sen-Shan Huang and Yi-Chen Lai, "Non-Repudiable Provable Data Possession Scheme With Designated Verifier in Cloud Storage Systems," in IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 19333-19341, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2753243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Gunwoo Yoon and Patrick T. Vargas. 2014. Know thy avatar: The unintended effect of virtual-self representation on behavior. Psychological science, Vol 25(4), SAGE Publications, pp.1043-1045. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613519271Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Trevor Zaucha and Colin Agur. 2022. Newly minted: Non-fungible tokens and the commodification of fandom. New Media & Society, 0 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221080481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Motivations for Collecting Digital NFT Fashion: A Uses and Gratifications Theory Approach for Understanding Digital NFT Fashion Collectors’ Behavior

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2023
        3914 pages
        ISBN:9781450394222
        DOI:10.1145/3544549

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 April 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)396
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)24

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format