skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585859acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Can Cross-Reality Help Nonspeaking Autistic People Transition to AR Typing?

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

About 30% of autistic people are nonspeakers; they cannot use speech to communicate effectively. Pointing to letters on a letterboard held by a Communication and Regulation Partner (CRP) is one alternative method of expressive communication that some members of this population use. In the training of this method, a CRP delivers engaging and customized lessons. Additionally, the CRP provides regulatory, sensory, and attentional support and also works to strengthen the subject’s pointing skills. The goal of this training is to equip individuals with the required skills to be able to type independently. Recent studies have proposed using AR to provide opportunities for nonspeakers to practice the motor skills involved in typing. To use such systems, however, there needs to be a transition phase where a CRP teaches their subject how to interact with a virtual letterboard. In this paper, we explore the feasibility of using cross-reality, in which a CRP and nonspeaker can interact with the same virtual objects simultaneously, as a possible means of fostering this transition. We report a study involving 5 nonspeaking autistic subjects with diverse motor skills interacting using a virtual HoloLens 2 letterboard system we developed called HoloBoard. All subjects succeeded in pointing to letters correctly or spelling on the virtual board. We report process and design recommendations based on feedback obtained from subjects and their CRPs.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585859-talk-video.mp4

mp4

296.9 MB

References

  1. Lorans Alabood, Zahra Aminolroaya, Dianna Yim, Omar Addam, and Frank Maurer. 2022. A systematic literature review of the Design Critique method. Information and Software Technology (2022), 107081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Lorans Alabood, Evan Krul, Ali Shahidi, Vikram K Jaswal, Diwakar Krishnamurthy, and Mea Wang. 2022. HoloType-CR: Cross Reality Communication Training for Minimally Verbal Autistic Persons. In 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 187–190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lorans Alabood and Frank Maurer. 2022. An iot-based immersive smart home system for seniors with neurocognitive disorders. In Proceedings of the 3d In-ternational Workshop on Empowering People in Dealing with Internet of Things Ecosystems, co-located with AVI, Rome, Italy, Vol. 3172. 10–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmen Berenguer, Inmaculada Baixauli, Soledad Gómez, María de El Puig Andrés, and Simona De Stasio. 2020. Exploring the Impact of Augmented Reality in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 17, Article 6143 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. David R Beukelman, Pat Mirenda, 1998. Augmentative and alternative communication. Paul H. Brookes Baltimore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eli Blevis, Youn-kyung Lim, David Roedl, and Erik Stolterman. 2007. Using design critique as research to link sustainability and interactive technologies. In International Conference on Online Communities and Social Computing. Springer, 22–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chad Cardin. 2021. A nonspeaking valedictorian with autism gives her college’s commencement speech. Canadian Broadcasting Corporation News (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Bill Chappell. 2022. A nonspeaking valedictorian with autism gives her college’s commencement speech. National Public Radio NPR (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlotte DiStefano, Wendy Shih, Ann Kaiser, Rebecca Landa, and Connie Kasari. 2016. Communication growth in minimally verbal children with ASD: The importance of interaction. Autism Research 9, 10 (2016), 1093–1102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Travis Dow, Lorans Alabood, and Diwakar Krishnamurthy. 2023. SimpleShare unity package. https://github.com/Krishnamurthy-AR-Project/SimpleShare.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, Alyssa Alcorn, and Helen Pain. 2013. Conversing through and about technologies: Design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research (er) perspectives. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 2 (2013), 38–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Jennifer B Ganz, Theresa L Earles-Vollrath, Amy K Heath, Richard I Parker, Mandy J Rispoli, and Jaime B Duran. 2012. A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 42, 1 (2012), 60–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Naoki Higashida. 2013. The reason I jump: The inner voice of a thirteen-year-old boy with autism. Knopf Canada.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vikram K Jaswal, Allison Wayne, and Hudson Golino. 2020. Eye-tracking reveals agency in assisted autistic communication. Scientific reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kamran Khowaja, Bilikis Banire, Dena Al-Thani, Mohammed Tahri Sqalli, Aboubakr Aqle, Asadullah Shah, and Siti Salwah Salim. 2020. Augmented Reality for Learning of Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A Systematic Review. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 78779–78807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Diwakar Krishnamurthy, Vikram Jaswal, Ahmadreza Nazari, Ali Shahidi, Pranav Subbaraman, and Mea Wang. 2022. HoloType: Lived Experience Based Communication Training for Nonspeaking Autistic People. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Elizabeth R Lorah, Christine Holyfield, Jessica Miller, Brenna Griffen, and Cody Lindbloom. 2022. A systematic review of research comparing mobile technology speech-generating devices to other AAC modes with individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 34, 2 (2022), 187–210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Edlyn Vallejo Peña. 2019. Communication Alternatives in Autism: Perspectives on Typing and Spelling Approaches for the Nonspeaking. McFarland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Edlyn Vallejo Peña. 2019. Leaders Around Me: Autobiographies of Autistics who type, point, & spell to communicate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. David James Savarese. 2019. Coming to my senses. Autism in Adulthood 1, 2 (2019), 90–92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Monica Tentori, Lizbeth Escobedo, and Gabriela Balderas. 2015. A Smart Environment for Children with Autism. IEEE Pervasive Computing 14, 2 (2015), 42–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Janna Van Grunsven and Sabine Roeser. 2022. AAC technology, autism, and the empathic turn. Social Epistemology 36, 1 (2022), 95–110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Can Cross-Reality Help Nonspeaking Autistic People Transition to AR Typing?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2023
      3914 pages
      ISBN:9781450394222
      DOI:10.1145/3544549

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 April 2023

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Work in Progress
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format