skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3585868acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

VRisbee: How Hand Visibility Impacts Throwing Accuracy and Experience in Virtual Reality

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Hand interaction plays a key role in virtual reality (VR) sports. While in reality, athletes mostly rely on haptic perception when holding and throwing objects, these sensational cues can be missing or differ in virtual environments. In this work, we investigated how the visibility of a virtual hand can support players when throwing and what impact it has on the overall experience. We developed a Frisbee simulation in VR and asked 29 study participants to hit a target. We measured the throwing accuracy and self-reports of presence, disc control, and body ownership. The results show a subtle advantage of hand visibility in terms of accuracy. Visible hands further improved the subjective impression of realism, body ownership and subjective control over the disc.

Footnotes

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3544549.3585868-video-preview.mp4

mp4

18 MB

3544549.3585868-talk-video.mp4

mp4

37.7 MB

References

  1. F. Argelaguet, L. Hoyet, M. Trico, and A. Lecuyer. 2016. The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: Effects of the virtual hand representation. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504682Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Arnold Baca, Peter Dabnichki, Mario Heller, and Philipp Kornfeind. 2009. Ubiquitous computing in sports: A review and analysis. Journal of sports sciences 27 (09 2009), 1335–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410903277427Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Michael Bonfert, Stella Lemke, Robert Porzel, and Rainer Malaka. 2022. Kicking in Virtual Reality: The Influence of Foot Visibility on the Shooting Experience and Accuracy. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE Computer Society, Virtual. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR51125.2022.00092Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Karolis Butkus and Tautvydas Ceponis. 2019. Accuracy of throwing distance perception in virtual reality. In IVUS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ryan Canales, Aline Normoyle, Yu Sun, Yuting Ye, Massimiliano Di Luca, and Sophie Jörg. 2019. Virtual Grasping Feedback and Virtual Hand Ownership. In ACM Symposium on Applied Perception 2019 (Barcelona, Spain) (SAP ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343036.3343132Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Stefanie A. Drew, Madeline F. Awad, Jazlyn A. Armendariz, Bar Gabay, Isaiah J. Lachica, and Jacob W. Hinkel-Lipsker. 2020. The Trade-Off of Virtual Reality Training for Dart Throwing: A Facilitation of Perceptual-Motor Learning With a Detriment to Performance. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2020.00059Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Shaun Gallagher. 2000. Gallagher, S. 2000. Philosophical Conceptions of the Self: Implications for Cognitive Science. Trends in cognitive sciences 4 (02 2000), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jens Grubert, Lukas Witzani, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, Matthias Kranz, and Per Kristensson. 2018. Effects of Hand Representations for Typing in Virtual Reality. 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446250Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. David J Harris, Gavin Buckingham, Mark R Wilson, Jack Brookes, Faisal Mushtaq, Mark Mon-Williams, and Samuel J Vine. 2020. Exploring sensorimotor performance and user experience within a virtual reality golf putting simulator. Virtual Reality (2020), 1–8. Publisher: Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mont Hubbard and S. Hummel. 2000. Simulation of Frisbee Flight. (01 2000).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sarah Ann Hummel. 2003. Frisbee Flight Simulation and Throw Biomechanics. (2003). https://morleyfielddgc.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/hummelthesis.pdf last access: 02.08.2022, Master Thesis, University of California, Davis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Konstantina Kilteni, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 21 (11 2012). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Martin Kocur, Sarah Graf, and Valentin Schwind. 2020. The Impact of Missing Fingers in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology (Virtual Event, Canada) (VRST ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3385956.3418973Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Felix Kosmalla, André Zenner, Corinna Tasch, Florian Daiber, and Antonio Krüger. 2020. The Importance of Virtual Hands and Feet for Virtual Reality Climbing. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383067 event-place: Honolulu, HI, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ke Ma and Bernhard Hommel. 2015. The role of agency for perceived ownership in the virtual hand illusion. Consciousness and Cognition 36 (2015), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Seyyed Ahmad Mousavi, Mehdi Shahbazi, Elahe Arabameri, and Elham Shirzad. 2018. The Effect of Virtual Reality Training on Learning and Kinematics Characteristics of Dart Throwing. International Journal of School Health (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. David Neumann, Robyn Moffitt, Patrick Thomas, Kylie Loveday, David Watling, Chantal Lombard, Simona Antonova, and Michael Tremeer. 2018. A systematic review of the application of interactive virtual reality to sport. Virtual Reality 22 (09 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-017-0320-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nicolas Nostadt, David A. Abbink, Oliver Christ, and Philipp Beckerle. 2020. Embodiment, Presence, and Their Intersections: Teleoperation and Beyond. J. Hum.-Robot Interact. 9, 4, Article 28 (may 2020), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3389210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Stefan Pastel, Chien-Hsi Chen, Katharina Petri, and Kerstin Witte. 2020. Effects of body visualization on performance in head-mounted display virtual reality. http://dx.doi.org/10.25673/36147Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Richard Skarbez, Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., and Mary C. Whitton. 2017. A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. Comput. Surveys 50, 6 (Nov. 2017), 96:1–96:39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134301Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Judith Tirp, Christina Steingröver, Nick Wattie, Joe Baker, and Jörg Schorer. 2015. Virtual realities as optimal learning environments in sport – A transfer study of virtual and real dart throwing. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling 57 (01 2015), 57–69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3 (06 1998), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/pvar/article-pdf/7/3/225/1836425/105474698565686.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Tim Zindulka, Miroslav Bachinski, and Jörg Müller. 2020. Performance and Experience of Throwing in Virtual Reality. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376639Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VRisbee: How Hand Visibility Impacts Throwing Accuracy and Experience in Virtual Reality

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '23: Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2023
        3914 pages
        ISBN:9781450394222
        DOI:10.1145/3544549

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 April 2023

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Work in Progress
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)239
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)53

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format