skip to main content
10.1145/3545729.3545757acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmhiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Regression and classification methods for predicting the length of hospital stay after cesarean section: a bicentric study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, the use of caesarean sections (CS) has grown, leading more women, especially in developed countries, to choose it as a preferential modality, even without clear clinical needs. Although Caesarean sections are effective in reducing maternal and infant mortality, they can cause significant and sometimes permanent complications. The increase in the CS rate, increases hospital stay and therefore hospital costs. Being able to analyze and even predict the length of stay (LOS) for a rapidly growing procedure becomes a valuable information resource for healthcare managers. The purpose of this study is to study LOS for all patients undergoing CS both in the "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona" University Hospital of Salerno and in the A.O.R.N. "Antonio Cardarelli" of Naples. With multiple linear regression analysis and machine learning algorithms we can create a model for LOS prediction.

References

  1. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health (UK). Caesarean Section. London: RCOG Press; 2004 Apr. PMID: 21089237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Grivell R M, Barreto M P and Dodd J M 2011 The influence of intrapartum factors on risk of uterine rupture and successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery Clin. Perinatol. 38 265–75Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse D Y, Barros A J D, Barros F C, Juan L, Moller A-B, Say L, Hosseinpoor A R, Yi M, de Lyra Rabello Neto D and Temmerman M 2018 Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections The Lancet 392 1341–8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eufrásio L S, Souza D E de, Fonsêca A M C da, Viana E de S R, Eufrásio L S, Souza D E de, Fonsêca A M C da and Viana E de S R 2018 Brazilian regional differences and factors associated with the prevalence of cesarean sections Fisioter. Em Mov. 31Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pertile R, Pavanello L, Soffiati M, Manica L and Piffer S 2018 Length of stay for childbirth in Trentino (North-East of Italy): the impact of maternal characteristics and organizational features of the maternity unit on the probability of early discharge of healthy, term infants Eur. J. Pediatr. 177 155–9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S and Matinnia N 2020 Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review J. Matern.Fetal Neonatal Med. 33 3867–72Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Patel B, Kedia N, Shah S, Agrawal S, Patel V B and Patel A B 2020 Changing trends in cesarean section: from 1950 to 2020Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Franz M B and Husslein P W 2010 Obstetrical management of the older gravida Womens Health Lond. Engl. 6 463–8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Murray S F 2000 Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study BMJ 321 1501–5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Wiklund I, Edman G and Andolf E 2007 Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 86 451–6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sahlin M, Carlander-Klint A-K, Hildingsson I and Wiklund I 2013 First-time mothers’ wish for a planned caesarean section: deeply rooted emotions Midwifery 29 447–52Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofberg K and Ward M R 2004 Fear of childbirth, tocophobia, and mental health in mothers: the obstetric-psychiatric interface Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 47 527–34Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Liu S, Liston R M, Joseph K S, Heaman M, Sauve R, Kramer M S, and Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System 2007 Mater- nal mortality and severe morbidity associated with low-risk planned cesarean delivery versus planned vaginal delivery at term CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. J. Assoc. Medicale Can. 176 455–60Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Lapinsky S E 2013 Obstetric infections Crit. Care Clin. 29 509–20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Clark S L, Christmas J T, Frye D R, Meyers J A and Perlin J B 2014 Maternal mortality in the United States: predictability and the impact of protocols on fatal postcesarean pulmonary embolism and hypertension-related intracranial hemorrhage Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 211 32.e1-9Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lyell D J 2011 Adhesions and perioperative complications of repeat cesarean delivery Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205 S11-18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Schindl M, Birner P, Reingrabner M, Joura E, Husslein P and Langer M 2003 Elective cesarean section vs. spontaneous delivery: a comparative study of birth experience Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 82 834–40Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Grivell R M, Barreto M P and Dodd J M 2011 The influence of intrapartum factors on risk of uterine rupture and successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery Clin. Perinatol. 38 265–75Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Maso G, Pozzo G D, Heymann W C, Ronfani L and Barbone F 2020 Determinants of length of stay after cesarean sections in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005–2015 Sci. Rep. 10 19238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Cantone D, Lombardi A, Assunto D A, Piccolo M, Rizzo N, Pelullo C P and Attena F 2018 A standardized antenatal class reduces the rate of cesarean section in southern Italy Medicine (Baltimore) 97Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cantone D, Pelullo C P, Cancellieri M and Attena F 2017 Can antenatal classes reduce the rate of cesarean section in southern Italy? Women Birth 30 e83–8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Betrán A P, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni M R, Zhang J, Musana O, Wanyonyi S Z, Gülmezoglu A M and Downe S 2018 Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies The Lancet 392 1358–68Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. M. Ponsiglione, G. Cesarelli, F. Amato and M. Romano, "Optimization of an artificial neural network to study accelerations of foetal heart rhythm," 2021 IEEE 6th International Forum on Research and Technology for Society and Industry (RTSI), 2021, pp. 159-164, doi: 10.1109/RTSI50628.2021.9597213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. M. Ponsiglione, M. Romano and F. Amato, "A Finite-State Machine Approach to Study Patients Dropout From Medical Examinations," 2021 IEEE 6th International Forum on Research and Technology for Society and Industry (RTSI), 2021, pp. 289-294, doi: 10.1109/RTSI50628.2021.9597264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Romano M, Bifulco P, Ponsiglione A M, Gargiulo G D, Amato F and Cesarelli M 2018 Evaluation of floatingline and foetal heart rate variability Biomed. Signal Process. Control 39 185–96Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Romano M, Iuppariello L, Ponsiglione A M, Improta G, Bifulco P and Cesarelli M 2016 Frequency and Time Domain Analysis of Foetal Heart Rate Variability with Traditional Indexes: A Critical Survey Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2016Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Romano M, Bifulco P, Ruffo M, Improta G, Clemente F and Cesarelli M 2016 Software for computerised analysis of cardiotocographic traces Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 124 121–37Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Cesarelli M, Romano M, Bifulco P, Improta G and D'Addio G 2013 Prognostic decision support using symbolic dynamics in CTG monitoring 13th EFMI Special Topic Conference: Data and Knowledge for Medical Decision Support, EFMI STC 2013 vol 186 pp 140–4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Cesarelli M, Romano M, Bifulco P, Improta G and D'Addio G 2012 An application of symbolic dynamics for FHRV assessment Studies in Health Technology and Informatics - 24th Medical Informatics in Europe Conference, MIE 2012 vol 180 pp 123–7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ponsiglione, A.M.; Cosentino, C.; Cesarelli, G.; Amato, F.; Romano, M. A Comprehensive Review of Techniques for Processing and Analyzing Fetal Heart Rate Signals. Sensors 2021, 21, 6136. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186136Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan J A, Hankins M E, Wang Y, Hutchinson D, Sams H L, Voltz J H, McCathran C E, Kaye A D and Lewis D F 2020 Prolonged Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations in Labor: Can We Reduce Unplanned Primary Cesarean Sections in This Group? Adv. Ther. 37 4325–35Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Eden R D, Evans M I, Evans S M and Schifrin B S 2018 Reengineering Electronic Fetal Monitoring Interpretation: Using the Fetal Reserve Index to Anticipate the Need for Emergent Operative Delivery Reprod. Sci. 25 487–97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Straface G, Scambia G and Zanardo V 2017 Does ST analysis of fetal ECG reduce cesarean section rate for fetal distress? J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 30 1799–802Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Cegolon L, Campbell O, Alberico S, Montico M, Mastrangelo G, Monasta L, Ronfani L and Barbone F 2019 Length of stay following vaginal deliveries: A population based study in the Friuli Venezia Giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015 PLOS ONE 14 e0204919Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Grullon K E and Grimes D A 1997 The safety of early postpartum discharge: a review and critique Obstet. Gynecol. 90 860–5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Bacchi S, Tan Y, Oakden-Rayner L, Jannes J, Kleinig T and Koblar S Machine Learning in the Prediction of Medical Inpatient Length of Stay Intern. Med. J. n/aGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Converso, G., Improta, G., Mignano, M., & Santillo, L. C. (2015). A Simulation Approach for Agile Production Logic Implementation in a Hospital Emergency Unit. In Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, 532, 623-634. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Santini, S., Pescapé, A., Valente, A. S., Abate, V., Improta, G., Triassi, M., ... & Filosa, A. (2017, July). Using fuzzy logic for improving clinical daily-care of β-thalassemia patients. In Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2017 IEEE International Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEEGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Raiola, Eliana & Triassi, Maria & Improta, Giovanni & Di Cicco, Maria Vincenza & Montella, Emma & Ferraro, Anna & Cerchione, Roberto & Centobelli, Piera. (2020). Implementation of lean practices to reduce healthcare associated infections. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management. 18. 51. 10.1504/IJHTM.2020.10039887.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Improta Giovanni, Natale Pasquale, Santillo Liberatina Carmela, Triassi Maria. Health worker monitoring: Kalman-based software design for fault isolation in human breathing. EMSS 2014 Proceedings.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Di Laura D, D'Angiolella L, Mantovani L, Efficiency measures of emergency departments: an Italian systematic literature review. BMJ Open Quality 2021;10:e001058. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001058Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Gruskay J A, Fu M, Basques B A, Bohl D D, Buerba R A, Webb M L and Grauer J N 2016 Factors Affecting Length of Stay and Complications After Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Study of 2164 Patients From The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Database (ACS NSQIP) Clin. Spine Surg. 29 E34-42Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Teresa Angela Trunfio, Arianna Scala, Anna Borrelli, Michele Sparano, Maria Triassi, and Giovanni Improta. 2021. Application of the Lean Six Sigma approach to the study of the LOS of patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the San Giovanni di Dio and Ruggi d'Aragona University Hospital. In 2021 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 50–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3472813.3472823Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Arianna Scala, Ilaria Loperto, Rosa Carrano, Stefano Federico, Maria Triassi, and Giovanni Improta. 2021. Assessment of proteinuria level in nephrology patients using a machine learning approach. In 2021 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3472813.3472816Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Arianna Scala, Teresa Angela Trunfio, Anna Borrelli, Giuseppe Ferrucci, Maria Triassi, and Giovanni Improta. 2021. Modelling the hospital length of stay for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy through a multiple regression model. In 2021 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 68–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3472813.3472826Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Converso, G., Improta, G., Mignano, M., & Santillo, L. C. (2015). A Simulation Approach for Agile Production Logic Implementation in a Hospital Emergency Unit. In Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, 532, 623-634. Springer International Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Mekhaldi R N, Caulier P, Chaabane S, Chraibi A and Piechowiak S 2020 Using Machine Learning Models to Predict the Length of Stay in a Hospital Setting Trends and Innovations in Information Systems and Technologies Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ed Á Rocha, H Adeli, L P Reis, S Costanzo, I Orovic and F Moreira (Cham: Springer International Publishing) pp 202–11Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Teresa Angela Trunfio, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Antonietta Ferrara, Anna Borrelli, and Paolo Gargiulo. 2021. A comparison of different regression and classification methods for predicting the length of hospital stay after cesarean sections. In 2021 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics (ICMHI 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 63–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3472813.3472825Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Italian Ministry of Health - Direzione Generale della Programmazione sanitaria Ufficio VI 2015 Rapporto annuale sull'attività di ricovero ospedaliero - Dati SDO 2014 (Rome: Italian Ministry of Health)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Coates E, Fuller G, Hind D, Wrench I J, Wilson M J and Stephens T 2016 Enhanced recovery pathway for elective caesarean section Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 27 94–5Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Petrillo, A., Picariello, A., Santini, S., Scarciello, B., and Sperli, G. (2020). Model-based vehicular prognostics framework using Big Data architecture. Computers in Industry, 115, 103177, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.103177Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Han, Q., Molinaro, C., Picariello, A., Sperli, G., Subrahmanian, V. S., and Xiong, Y. (2021). Generating fake documents using probabilistic logic graphs. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, doi: 10.1109/TDSC.2021.3058994Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Amato, F., Castiglione, A., Moscato, V., Picariello, A., & Sperlì, G. (2018). Multimedia summarization using social media content. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77(14), 17803-17827, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5556-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Moscato, V., Picariello, A., and Sperlí, G. (2021). A benchmark of machine learning approaches for credit score prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 165, 113986, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113986Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Di Girolamo, R., Esposito, C., Moscato, V., and Sperlí, G. (2021). Evolutionary game theoretical on-line event detection over tweet streams. Knowledge-Based Systems, 211, 106563, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106563Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Sperlí, G. (2019, April). A deep learning based community detection approach. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1107-1110), doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297574Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. De Santo, A., Galli, A., Gravina, M., Moscato, V., and Sperlì, G. (2020). Deep Learning for HDD health assessment: An application based on LSTM. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 71(1), 69-80, doi: 10.1109/TC.2020.3042053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. La Gatta, V., Moscato, V., Pennone, M., Postiglione, M., and Sperlí, G. (2022). Music Recommendation via Hypergraph Embedding. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3146968Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Albanese, M., Erbacher, R. F., Jajodia, S., Molinaro, C., Persia, F., Picariello, A., Sperlì G. & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2014). Recognizing unexplained behavior in network traffic. In Network Science and Cybersecurity (pp. 39-62). Springer, New York, NY, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7597-2_3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Regression and classification methods for predicting the length of hospital stay after cesarean section: a bicentric study

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            ICMHI '22: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics
            May 2022
            329 pages
            ISBN:9781450396301
            DOI:10.1145/3545729

            Copyright © 2022 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 October 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format