skip to main content
10.1145/3545862.3545876acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicfetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Factors That Need Changing to Improve Student Motivation in Online Learning

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to identify factors that need to be changed to increase student motivation in an online course in a college in Vietnam. In this study, students were asked to give their opinions about the modifiable factors in the online course they are taking to help increase their motivation in online learning. Research results show that the factors that need to be changed belong to the teaching and learning process, the capacity of lecturers, the attention of learners, the online learning environment, the technical and administrative infrastructure, and time management. These factors are said to increase motivation in online courses, helping students find online courses more useful, valuable, and enjoyable, and to gain more success and interest to increase online course participation. Data were collected via an online survey developed by Google Form with 117 students in a business course at the studied context and simple descriptive statistics was used to process the data. The results show that students would like to see changes in the interaction between teachers and students. They want their lecturers to share online lesson recordings with them and pay more attention to problem students. The data can be used by instructors and course designers to make improvements to teaching techniques, learning materials, and ways of communicating with students.

References

  1. Heather Kauffman (2015). A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.26507Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Gedera, D. S. P, & Williams, P. J. (2013). Using Activity Theory to understand contradictions in an online university course facilitated by Moodle. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS), 10(1), 32–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, I. E. & Seaman, J. (2011) Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States, 2011 [online]. Sloane Consortium website. Available at: http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/ survey/going_distance_2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Dilani Gedera, John Williams and Noeline Wright (2015). Identifying Factors Influencing Students’ Motivation and Engagement in Online CoursesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D Bransford, AL Brown, RR Cocking (2000). How people learn.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. LJ Fyans Jr, ML Maehr (1987). Sources of Student Achievement: Student Motivation, School Context and Family Background.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Bossu , R. Smyth and S. Stein (2007). Academic Professional Development for Effective E-learning : A Possible Framework for BrazilGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shank, P., & Sitze, A. (2004). Making sense of on line learning : A guide for beginners and the truly skeptical . San Francisco: Pfeiffer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Ally, M. (2008). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed., pp. 3–31). Retrieved from http://www. aupress.ca/index.php/books/120146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Merriam Webster. (2013). Merriam Webster. Merriam-Webster. http://www.merriam-webster. com/dictionary/motivation. Accessed 3 Jan. 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonk, C. J., & Khoo, E. (2014). Adding some TEC-VARIETY: 100 + activities for motivating and retaining learners online. Bloomington, IN: Open World Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabrielle, D. M. (2003). The effects of technology - mediated instructional strategies on motivation, performance, and self - directed learning . Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Florida State University, Florida.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Keller, J. M. (1999). Motivation in cyber learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology , 1 (1), 7–30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hodges, C. B. (2004). Designing to motivate: Motivational techniques to incorporate in elearning experiences. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2 (3), 1-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory and motivation. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 13–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Irvin, J. L., Meltzer, J., & Dukes, M. S. (2007). Taking action on adolescent literacy: An implementation guide for school leaders. http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/107034/chapters/ Student-Motivation,-Engagement,-and-Achievement.aspx. Accessed 20 Oct. 2011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Selvi, K. (2006). Learning and creativity. In A.T. Tymienecka (Ed.), Analecta husserliana: The yearbook of phenomenological research (351369), Dordecth: SpringerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Beer, C., Clark, K., & Jones, D. (2010). Indicators of engagement. Proceedings of Ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp. 75–86). Sydney: AsciliteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiong, Y., Li, H., Kornhaber, M. L., Suen, H. K., Pursel, B., & Goins, D. D. (2015). Examining the relations among student motivation, engagement, and retention in a MOOC: A structural equation modeling approach. Global Education Review, 2(3). Retrieved from https://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/124Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Brett D. Jones, Joan Monahan Watson, Lee Rakes, and Sehmuz Akalin (2012). Factors that impact students’ motivation in an online course: Using the MUSIC model of academic motivationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Factors That Need Changing to Improve Student Motivation in Online Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICFET '22: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Frontiers of Educational Technologies
      June 2022
      209 pages
      ISBN:9781450396400
      DOI:10.1145/3545862

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format