skip to main content
10.1145/3545945.3569778acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Measuring the Impact of a Computational Linear Algebra Course on Students' Exam Performance in a Subsequent Numerical Methods Course

Published:03 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

A new computational linear algebra course was developed and offered at a large public university in the Midwest. This new course traded off some of the lecture time in the pre-existing traditional linear algebra course for applied computational materials taught in a flipped-classroom lab setting. We compare exam performance in a subsequent numerical methods course from students having taken either the new computational or traditional course, while controlling for student performance in prerequisite computer science and mathematics courses. We find that for students with less mathematics background (i.e., those who needed to take Calculus 2 at the university), taking the new computational linear algebra course has significant positive impact on their average exam performance in the subsequent course. The performance of students with more initial mathematics background (i.e., those who already had credit for Calculus 2) is not significantly affected by the computational vs. traditional course backgrounds.

References

  1. [n. d.]. CS 357 Grading Policies Fall 2021. https://courses.grainger.illinois.edu/ cs357/fa2021/pages/syllabus.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n. d.]. CS 357 Grading Policies Spring 2021. https://courses.grainger.illinois. edu/cs357/sp2021/pages/syllabus.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sanja Jagesic and Jeff Wyatt. 2022. Postsecondary Course Performance of AP Exam Takers in Subsequent Coursework: AP Calculus AB, AP Calculus BC, AP Computer Science Principles, AP European History, AP German Language and Culture, AP Physics 1, AP Physics 2, AP Physics C: Mechan- ics, AP Physics C: Electricity & Magnetism, AP Psychology, AP Art History. Technical Report. College Board. https://www.proquest.com/reports/ postsecondary-course-performance-ap-exam-takers/docview/2674156362/se-2 Last updated - 2022-06-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sophia Krause-Levy, Sander Valstar, Leo Porter, and William G. Griswold. 2020. Exploring the Link Between Prerequisites and Performance in Advanced Data Structures. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 386--392. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366867Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Silva M., Hieronymi P., West M., Nytko N., Deshpande A., Chuang J., and Hilgen- feldt S. 2022. Innovating and modernizing a Linear Algebra class through teaching computational skills. In Proceedings of the 2022 American Society for Engineering Education Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jane Simpson and Eugenia Fernandez. 2014. Student performance in first year, mathematics, and physics courses: Implications for success in the study of electrical and computer engineering. In 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings. 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2014.7044368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nicholas Alan Smith, Roy Y Myose, Syed J Raza, and Elizabeth Rollins. 2020. Correlating mechanics of materials student performance with scores of a test over prerequisite material. (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Marla A. Sole. [n. d.]. Streamlining Time Spent in Alternative Developmental Mathematics Pathways: Increasing Access to College-Level Mathematics Courses by Altering Placement Procedures. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College 11, 1 ([n. d.]), 43--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nathan B. Terry, Kimberly de La Harpe, and Frederick J. Kontur. 2016. The Development of a Learning Gap Between Students With Strong Prerequisite Skills and Students With Weak Prerequisite Skills. Journal of College Science Teaching 45, 3 (2016), 34--40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43748441Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sander Valstar, William G. Griswold, and Leo Porter. 2019. The Relationship between Prerequisite Proficiency and Student Performance in an Upper-Division Computing Course. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 794--800. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287419Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Henry M. Walker. 2010. Prerequisites: Shaping the Computing Curriculum. ACM Inroads 1, 4 (dec 2010), 14--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1869746.1869751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. West, C. Zilles, and G. Herman. 2015. PrairieLearn: Mastery-based Online Problem Solving with Adaptive Scoring and Recommendations Driven by Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2015 Annual Conference. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Robin Wright, Sehoya Cotner, and Amy Winkel. 2009. Minimal Impact of Organic Chemistry Prerequisite on Student Performance in Introductory Biochemistry. CBE-Life Sciences Education 8, 1 (2009), 44--54. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe. 07-10-0093 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-10-0093 PMID: 19255135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Measuring the Impact of a Computational Linear Algebra Course on Students' Exam Performance in a Subsequent Numerical Methods Course
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
          March 2023
          1481 pages
          ISBN:9781450394314
          DOI:10.1145/3545945

          Copyright © 2023 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 3 March 2023

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE Virtual 2024
          SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
          November 30 - December 1, 2024
          Virtual Event , USA
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)63
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader