skip to main content
10.1145/3545945.3569783acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reaching for "All":: Understanding the Challenges and Needs of Schools Lagging in CS for All Efforts

Published:03 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, substantial strides have been made in the CS for All movement, with the widespread the enactment of policies that promote the implementation of CS education in K-12 schools. Despite this progress, at the current rate of growth, it is estimated that it will take four decades to actually reach CS for all students. This sobering finding highlights the urgent need to understand why so many schools are lagging in implementation, and to identify solutions that could address this gap.

Using school-level survey data and administrative school records, we investigate the barriers to scaling up CS education in New York City. Common to many school reform initiatives, some schools were early adopters and eagerly embraced the call to provide CS to all students. Others, despite years of effort and support, have yet to offer CS or serve a small percentage of their enrollment. Our findings suggest that while "normative'' perceptions of CS (e.g., beliefs about it's value) are similar among lower- and higher-implementing schools, some "technical'' challenges-such as lacking an implementation plan and shared school-wide vision for CS-and "political'' challenges-such as the lack of support from administrators, are greater for schools struggling to offer CS. Though these findings focus on one district, they are relevant to the many others engaged in CS for all efforts. This study builds on previous research by shedding light on the distinct challenges and needs of "lagging'' schools, and provides insight into effective strategies for bringing CS education to all.

References

  1. Cynthia E. Coburn. 2003. Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change. Educational Researcher 32, 6 (Aug. 2003), 3--12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032006003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. CSTA and ECEP Alliance Code.org. 2021. 2020 State of CS Report. https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L Delyser, J Goode, M Guzdial, Y Kafai, and A Yadav. 2018. Priming the computer science teacher pump: Integrating computer science education into schools of education. Technical Report. CSforAll, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Leigh Ann DeLyser, Lauren Wright, Stephanie Wortel-London, and Anisa Bora. 2020. Evaluating A Systems Approach to District CS Education Implementation. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1120--1126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366898Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cheri Fancsali, Janice Lee, Alexandra Adair, Kathryn Hill, Edgar Rivera-Cash, and Symantha Clough. 2022. CS4All: Examining Equity in Computer Science Access and Participation in NYC Schools. (2022).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheri Fancsali, June Mark, and Leigh Ann DeLyser. 2020. NYC CS4All: An Early Look at Teacher Implementation in One Districtwide Initiative. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, Portland, OR, USA, 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272418Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Edward Fergus. 2016. Solving disproportionality and achieving equity: A leader's guide to using data to change hearts and minds. Corwin Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Julie Flapan, Jean J. Ryoo, Roxana Hadad, and Joel Knudson. 2021. Preparing School Leaders to Advance Equity in Computer Science Education. Journal of Computer Science Integration 4, 1 (Oct. 2021), 2. https://doi.org/10.26716/jcsi. 2021.10.8.33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Scott R. Garrigan. 2019. Frameworks for Integration of Future-Oriented Computational Thinking in K-12 Schools:. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, Jared Keengwe and Patrick Wachira (Eds.). IGI Global, 30--44. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1479-5.ch003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Thomas Glennan, Susan Bodilly, Jolene Galegher, and Kerri Kerr. 2004. Expanding the Reach of Education Reforms: What Have We Learned About Scaling Up Educational Interventions? RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RB9078Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Joanna Goode, Max Skorodinsky, Jill Hubbard, and James Hook. 2020. Computer Science for Equity: Teacher Education, Agency, and Statewide Reform. Frontiers in Education 4 (Jan. 2020), 162. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00162Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Inc Google, Inc. & Gallup. 2016. Trends in the state of computer science in U.S. K-12 schools. Technical Report. http://goo.gl/j291E0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mark Guzdial. 2021. Finding a Path to CS for All: How Many U.S. High School Stu- dents Have Taken CS? https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/257531-finding-a-path-to-cs-for-all-how-many-us-high-school-students-have-taken-cs/fulltextGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Allison Ivey, Stephany RunningHawk Johnson, Max Skorodinsky, and Jimmy Snyder. 2021. Abolitionist Computer Science Teaching: Moving from Access to Justice. (2021), 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. E Johnston, P D'Andrea Montalbano, and David E Kirkland. 2017. Culturally responsive education: A primer for policy and practice. Metropolitan Center for Research on Equity and the Transformation of Schools, New York University (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeannie Oakes. 1992. Can Tracking Research Inform Practice? Technical, Nor- mative, and Political Considerations. Educational Researcher 21, 4 (May 1992), 12--21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X021004012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Adriana Villavicencio, Cheri Fancsali, Wendy Martin, June Mark, and Rachel Cole. 2018. Computer science in New York City: An early look at teacher training opportunities and the landscape of CS implementation in schools. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Aman Yadav, Sarah Gretter, Susanne Hambrusch, and Phil Sands. 2016. Expanding computer science education in schools: understanding teacher experiences and challenges. Computer Science Education 26, 4 (Dec. 2016), 235--254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2016.1257418Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Reaching for "All":: Understanding the Challenges and Needs of Schools Lagging in CS for All Efforts

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
        March 2023
        1481 pages
        ISBN:9781450394314
        DOI:10.1145/3545945

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 March 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)39
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader