skip to main content
10.1145/3545945.3569784acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inter-institutional Resource Sharing in Undergraduate HPC Education: Interviews with University Administrators

Published:03 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

High performance computing (HPC), typically used only in research until recently, is being integrated more into undergraduate curricula across disciplines. HPC resources are expensive but lend themselves easily to sharing among institutions. However, in the context of undergraduate education, inter-institutional sharing of such resources is still relatively rare. The authors hold the belief that generating administrator support early in system-wide initiatives for sharing resources is crucial for long term success. Taking the case of a specific HPC cluster at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire, part of the University of Wisconsin System (UW-System) of higher educational institutions, the authors asked 15 administrators from the system about the barriers as well as the path forward for better cluster sharing in undergraduate education. The responses to the interview questions were analyzed qualitatively for themes and sentiments. Five themes arose from this analysis, related to awareness of and access to HPC, cost-sharing structures, industry needs, institutional factors, and variations in benefits depending on the field. The sentiments were overwhelmingly positive, but with variations depending on the questions asked and approaches taken by the interviewees. Overall, the responses indicated a positive attitude and willingness to incorporate HPC in undergraduate education as well as the importance of awareness of such resources. They also indicate that cost-sharing structures and institutional factors are both the biggest barriers and the keys to better sharing practices and industry partnerships. At the end, the authors make recommendations for anyone looking to establish a framework to share HPC resources across institutions.

References

  1. Fabio Banchelli and Filippo Mantovani. 2019. Filling the gap between education and industry: Evidence-based methods for introducing undergraduate students to HPC. Proceedings of EduHPC 2018: Workshop on Education for High-Performance Computing, Held in conjunction with SC 2018: The International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1109/EduHPC.2018.00008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology , Vol. 3 (2006), 77--101. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic analysis., 57--71 pages. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marcos D. Caballero, Norman Chonacky, Larry Engelhardt, Robert C. Hilborn, Marie Lopez del Puerto, and Kelly R. Roos. 2019. PICUP: A Community of Teachers Integrating Computation into Undergraduate Physics Courses. The Physics Teacher , Vol. 57 (9 2019), 397--399. Issue 6. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5124281Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mehmet Celepkolu and Kristy Elizabeth Boyer. 2018. Thematic analysis of students' reflections on pair programming in CS1. SIGCSE 2018 - Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education , Vol. 2018-January, 771--776. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Juan Chen, John Impagliazzo, and Li Shen. 2020. High-Performance Computing and Engineering Educational Development and Practice. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE , Vol. 2020-October. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE44824.2020.9274100Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bonnie R. Chivers, Rhonda M. Garad, Jacqueline A. Boyle, Helen Skouteris, Helena J. Teede, and Cheryce L. Harrison. 2020. Perinatal distress during COVID-19: Thematic analysis of an online parenting forum. Journal of Medical Internet Research , Vol. 22 (9 2020). Issue 9. https://doi.org/10.2196/22002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Brian A. Eiler, Patrick C. Doyle, Rosemary L. Al-Kire, and Heidi A. Wayment. 2020. Teaching Computational Social Science Skills to Psychology Students: An Undergraduate Research Lab Case Study. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research , Vol. 4 (11 2020), 5--14. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/4/1/5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ceryn Evans and Jamie Lewis. 2017. Analysing Semi-Structured Interviews Using Thematic Analysis: Exploring Voluntary Civic Participation Among Adults. SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526439284Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sahil Gupta, Jyotsna Sharma, Muhammad Najm, and Siddharth Sharma. 2020. MEDIA EXAGGERATION AND INFORMATION CREDIBILITY: QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEAR GENERATION FOR COVID- 19 USING NVIVO. Journal of Content, Community and Communication , Vol. 12 (12 2020), 14--20. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.20/03Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Sanchita Hati and Sudeep Bhattacharyya. 2016. Incorporating modeling and simulations in undergraduate biophysical chemistry course to promote understanding of structure-dynamics-function relationships in proteins. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education , Vol. 44 (3 2016), 140--159. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20942Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. Javadi and K. Zarea. 2016. Understanding Thematic Analysis and its Pitfall. Journal of Client Care , Vol. 1 (2016). Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.15412/j.jcc.02010107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Moira Maguire and Brid Delahunt. 2017. Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars. *. , 3351 pages.Issue 3. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W. Brett Mckenzie. 2013. Pragmatism and production: Introductory computing in an undergraduate business curriculum. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/2532333.2532336Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Tolulope Olagunju, Oladapo Oyebode, and Rita Orji. 2020. Exploring Key Issues Affecting African Mobile eCommerce Applications Using Sentiment and Thematic Analysis. IEEE Access , Vol. 8 (2020), 114475--114486. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000093Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Sameerchand Pudaruth, Sharmila Moheeputh, Narmeen Permessur, and Adeelah Chamroo. 2018. Sentiment Analysis from Facebook Comments using Automatic Coding in NVivo 11. ADCAIJ: Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal , Vol. 7 (2 2018), 41--48. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.14201/adcaij2018714148Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Claudia E. Vergara, Daina Briedis, Neeraj Buch, Abdol Hossein Esfahanian, Jon Sticklen, Mark Urban-Lurain, Louise Paquette, Cindee Dresen, and Kysha Frazier. 2012. Work in progress: Integrating computation across engineering curricula: Preliminary impact on students. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462286Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Cynthia Weston, Terry Gandell, Jacinthe Beauchamp, Lynn Mcalpine, Carol Wiseman, and Cathy Beauchamp. 2001. Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System. Issue 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Álvaro Fernández, Camino Fernández, José Ángel Miguel-Dávila, and Miguel Conde. 2021. Integrating supercomputing clusters into education: a case study in biotechnology. Journal of Supercomputing , Vol. 77 (3 2021), 2302--2325. Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-020-03360--5 ioGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Inter-institutional Resource Sharing in Undergraduate HPC Education: Interviews with University Administrators

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE 2023: Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1
        March 2023
        1481 pages
        ISBN:9781450394314
        DOI:10.1145/3545945

        Copyright © 2023 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 March 2023

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024
        SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
        November 30 - December 1, 2024
        Virtual Event , USA
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader