skip to main content
10.1145/3545945.3569792acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating Ethics into Computer Science Education: Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinary Approaches

Published:03 March 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

While calls to integrate ethics into computer science education go back decades, recent high-profile ethical failures related to computing technology by large technology companies, governments, and academic institutions have accelerated the adoption of computer ethics education at all levels of instruction. Discussions of how to integrate ethics into existing computer science programmes often focus on the structure of the intervention---embedded modules or dedicated courses, humanists or computer scientists as ethics instructors---or on the specific content to be included---lists of case studies and essential topics to cover. While proponents of computer ethics education often emphasize the importance of closely connecting ethical and technical content in these initiatives, most do not reflect in depth on the variety of ways in which the disciplines can be combined. In this paper, I deploy a framework from cross-disciplinary studies that categorizes academic projects that work across disciplines as multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, or transdisciplinary, depending on the degree of integration. When applied to computer ethics education, this framework is orthogonal to the structure and content of the initiative, as I illustrate using examples of dedicated ethics courses and embedded modules. It therefore highlights additional features of cross-disciplinary teaching that need to be considered when planning a computer ethics programme. I argue that computer ethics education should aim to be at least interdisciplinary-multidisciplinary initiatives are less aligned with the pedagogical aims of computer ethics-and that computer ethics educators should experiment with fully transdisciplinary education that could transform computer science as a whole for the better.

References

  1. Atila Abdulkadiroglu, Parag Pathak, Alvin E. Roth, and Tayfun Sonmez. 2006. Changing the Boston School Choice Mechanism. Technical Report. NBER Working Paper Series. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11965Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Léo Apostel, Guy Berger, Asa Briggs, and Guy Michaud (Eds.). 1972. Interdis- ciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Aristotle and Terence Irwin (Ed./Trans.). 1999. Nicomachean Ethics (2nd ed.). Hackett, Indianapolis, IN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Abeba Birhane and Vinay Uday Prabhu. 2021. Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?. In 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1536--1546. https://doi.org/10. 1109/WACV48630.2021.00158Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Margaret A. Boden. 1999. What is Interdisciplinarity?. In Interdisciplinarity and the Organisation of Knowledge in Europe, Richard Cunningham (Ed.). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 13--24. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/40ce830d-2e19-4af0-b521-863857b8b06cGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Veronica Boix Mansilla. 2005. Assessing Student Work at Disciplinary Crossroads. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 37 (2005), 14--21. Issue 1. https: //doi.org/10.3200/CHNG.37.1.14-21Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Herman Cappelen. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Herman Cappelen, David Plunkett, and Alexis Burgess (Eds.). 2019. Conceptual Engineering and Conceptual Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Harry Collins and Robert Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kate Crawford. 2021. Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Catherine D'Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein. 2020. Data Feminism. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. https://data-feminism.mitpress.mit.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jessica Elgot and Richard Adams. 2020. Ofqual exam results algorithm was unlawful, says Labour. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/aug/19/ofqual-exam-results-algorithm-was-unlawful-says-labourGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. M. David Ermann and Michele S. Shauf (Eds.). 2003. Computers, Ethics, and Society (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, NY, and Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kasia Chmielinski et al. 2021. Data Nutrition Project. https://datanutrition.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robert Frodeman (Ed.). 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780198733522.001.0001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Trystan S. Goetze. 2021. Embedded EthiCS Module: Compilers (CS 153) - Fall 2021. https://embeddedethics.seas.harvard.edu/classes/compilers-cs-153-fall-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Trystan S. Goetze. 2021. Syllabus Showcase: Social, Ethical, and Professional Issues in Computer Science. https://blog.apaonline.org/2021/08/18/syllabus-showcase-social-ethical-and-professional-issues-in-computer-science-trystan-goetze/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Trystan S. Goetze. 2022. Mind the Gap: Autonomous Systems, the Responsibility Gap, and Moral Entanglement. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea, and Online) (FAccT '22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 390--400. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3531146.3533106Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Barbara J. Grosz, David Gray Grant, Kate Vredenburgh, Jeff Behrends, Lily Hu, Alison Simmons, and Jim Waldo. 2019. Embedded EthiCS: Integrating Ethics across CS Education. Commun. ACM 62, 8 (July 2019), 54--61. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3330794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Sally Haslanger. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Carolyn Haynes (Ed.). 2002. Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching. American Council on Education and The Oryx Press, Westport, CT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Melissa Heikkilä. 2022. The viral AI avatar app Lensa undressed me-without my consent. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/12/12/1064751/the-viral-ai-avatar-app-lensa-undressed-me-without-my-consent/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. D. S. Hutchinson. 1995. Ethics. In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, Jonathan Barnes (Ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 195--232.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sheila Jasanoff. 2017. A Field of Its Own: The Emergence of Science and Technology Studies. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.), Robert Frodeman (Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 173--187. https: //doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.15,Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Frank Kessel and Patricia L. Rosenfield. 2008. Toward Transdisciplinary Research: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 35, 2S (2008), S225--S234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Julie Thompson Klein. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, MI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Julie Thompson Klein. 2017. Typologies of Interdisciplinarity: The Boundary Work of Definition. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.), Robert Frodeman (Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 21--34. https://doi.org/10. 1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ellie Lasater-Guttmann. 2021. Embedded EthiCS Module: Economics and Computation (CS 136) - Fall 2021. https://embeddedethics.seas.harvard.edu/classes/ economics-and-computation-cs-136-fall-2021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Keith Miller. 1988. Integrating Computer Ethics into the Computer Science Curriculum. Computer Science Education 1, 1 (1988), 37--52. https://doi.org/10. 1080/0899340880010104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar, Parker Barnes, Lucy Vasserman, Ben Hutchinson, Elena Spitzer, Inioluwa Deborah Raji, and Timnit Gebru. 2019. Model Cards for Model Reporting. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Atlanta, GA, USA) (FAT* '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 220--229. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3287560.3287596Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Rui Pereira, Marco Couto, Francisco Ribeiro, Rui Rua, Jácome Cunha, João Paulo Fernandes, and João Saraiva. 2017. Energy Efficiency across Programming Languages: How Do Energy, Time, and Memory Relate?. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Software Language Engineering (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (SLE 2017). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 256--267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3136014.3136031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Razvan Amironesei. 2021. ?You Can't Sit With Us": Exclusionary Pedagogy in AI Ethics Education. In ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT'21) (3--10). ACM, Virtual Event, Canada, 515--525. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Allen F. Repko and Rick Szostak. 2021. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory (4th ed.). SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Patricia L. Rosenfield. 1992. The Potential of Transdisciplinary Research for Sustaining and Extending Linkages Between the Health and Social Sciences. Social Science & Medicine 35, 11 (1992), 1343--1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-rGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Emma Strubell, Ananya Ganesh, and Andrew McCallum. 2019. Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 3645--3650. https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.1906.02243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Paul Thagard. 2017. Cognitive Science. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisci- plinarity (2nd ed.), Robert Frodeman (Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 188--200. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.16Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and the IEEE Computer Society. 2013. Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science. Technical Report. ACM and IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 2534860Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Eliza Wells. 2022. Embedded EthiCS Module: Programming Languages (CS152) - 2022 Spring. https://embeddedethics.seas.harvard.edu/cs-152-2022-springGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Nick Zufelt. 2019. Salutations Generator Assignment; Or, Refactoring for Inclu- sivity. https://github.com/nzufelt/salutations_generator_assignmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Integrating Ethics into Computer Science Education: Multi-, Inter-, and Transdisciplinary Approaches

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader