ABSTRACT
This workshop aims to help individuals expand their engagement with the computer science education research community as inclusive and equitable peer reviewers. Peer reviewers are liaisons between a journal or funding organization and members of their professional community, and thus are crucial for incorporating equity as part of the culture of computer science and engineering education. Prior research has shown that being a peer reviewer has benefits for the reviewer as well as the journal. Peer reviewing journal articles and proposals is a good way to stay current with what is happening in the field and acquire insights that can improve one's own writing and research. Peer reviewing is also a way to promote equity in our community through inclusive practices. Inclusive reviewing practices provide respectful, constructive feedback to authors on aspects of their manuscripts and proposals such as bias-free language, treatment of vulnerable populations, and positionality of authors and reviewers. This workshop (supported by NSF grants EEC-2037807, 2037788, and 2037797) prompts participants to consider their own positionality as reviewers and scholars. From this perspective, they then consider important aspects of an article or proposal such as whether underserved communities are impacted by the work, if participant identities are referred to appropriately, if authors of color working in this space are being cited appropriately, and if authors are being accountable to do the challenging work of addressing issues related to diversity and equity.
Index Terms
- Peer Reviewing: Cultivating an Equitable and Inclusive Scholarly Community
Recommendations
A Picture of the Growing ICER Community
ICER '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education ResearchThis bibliometric study examines the authorship of the papers presented at ICER since the conference began in 2005. It finds that the pattern of authorship complies well with Lotka's law, an accepted model of author distribution within a discipline. ...
Mentoring a Women in Computing Student Club: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2Initiatives addressing issues of Women in Computing (WiC) at FSC has been inconsistent in the last decade. As a response, two faculty have worked with student leaders to reinstantiate the WiC student club during the COVID19 pandemic. Re-instituting the ...
Encouraging faculty & student involvement in humanitarian free and open source software (HFOSS)(abstract only)
SIGCSE '13: Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science educationHumanitarian Free and Open Source Software (HFOSS) projects provide a real-world application with an approachable and welcoming community for both faculty and students. Many faculty members are excited by the prospect of their students contributing to ...
Comments