skip to main content
10.1145/3546118.3546122acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Impacts of IT-related group tasks on capacity building of young scholars

Published:14 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Preparing, assessing group tasks and dividing them among students are challenging issues as efficiency of group-based learning may differ from one field of study to another. Therefore, managing group works in classes and assigning roles to each learner may be specific for each discipline. Moreover, as information-communication technology is being implemented and constructively used in almost all the areas of industry, teaching methods should include IT-based tasks to assure quality learning. In fact, group works should also target computer literacy of students. In this context, this paper presents implemented methodology and achieved results in introducing IT-related group works intended for students of Young Scholars’ Council of higher educational institution. Group tasks were prepared in a way that each task required technical background of each member. Because the main goal of the research was to analyze the effects of both computer-based group tasks and backgrounds of students on the IT-related capacity building, knowledge and skill development of each another. Young scholars were selected from various engineering disciplines among distinguished students.

References

  1. Serdar Nazarov and Bayram Jumayev. 2021. Programming-based laboratory assignments for undergraduate students of power engineering fields. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies ’21 (CompSysTech’21), June 18, 19, 2021, Ruse, Bulgaria. ACM, New York, USA, 4 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3472410.3472429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alison Burke. 2011. Group Work: How to Use Groups Effectively. In The Journal of Effective Teaching. Vol. 11, No. 2, 87-95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Johannes Strobel and Angela van Barneveld. 2009. When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms. In Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning. Vol. 3, No. 1. DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1046.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. David Johnson and Roger Johnson. 2002. Learning Together and Alone: Overview and Meta‐analysis. In Asia Pacific Journal of Education, January 2002. Vol. 22(1): 95-105. DOI: 10.1080/0218879020220110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Davidson Neil and Major Claire Howell. 2014. Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. In Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3&4), 7-55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Serdar Nazarov and Bayram Jumayev. 2021. Introducing innovative educational technologies into the undergraduate curricula to promote individual work of students: Case of Turkmenistan. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies ’21 (CompSysTech’21), June 18, 19, 2021, Ruse, Bulgaria. ACM, New York, USA, 5 pages. DOI: 10.1145/3472410.3472428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ruliah, Zulfiati Syahrial and Hartati Muchtar. 2019. The Computer Assisted Instruction Model Based on a Combination of Tutorial Model and Drill and Practice Model in the Instructional Design of Database Systems in Information Technology Colleges. In Universal Journal of Educational Research. Vol. 7(9A): 117-124. DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.071614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yavuz Erdoğan and Dinçer Dede. 2015. Computer Assisted Project-Based Instruction: The effects on Science Achievement, Computer Achievement and Portfolio Assessment. In International Journal of Instruction. Vol. 8, No. 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ernest Tolbert Jr. 2015. The Impact of Computer-Aided Instruction on Student Achievement. A Dissertation Submitted to the Gardner-Webb University School of Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education. In Education Dissertations and Projects.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Impacts of IT-related group tasks on capacity building of young scholars

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CompSysTech '22: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
      June 2022
      188 pages
      ISBN:9781450396448
      DOI:10.1145/3546118

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format