skip to main content
10.1145/3546118.3546136acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Planning Orientation Change of the End-effector of State Space Constrained Redundant Robotic Manipulators

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays, robotic manipulators must operate in a dynamic environment and perform more and more complex and precise tasks. Therefore, robots that have more degrees of freedom than the desired task requires are used. These robots are called redundant robots and they can achieve an arbitrary point from their workspace with multiple sets of different joint configurations. Also, they have an extended range of orientations of their end-effectors. There are points in the workspace of the robot which require the end-effector of the robot to move from its current position to change its orientation. This research studies the zones in the workspace of the robot at which it can make orientation change of its end-effector without moving from the current position and these at which that is impossible. Therefore, the paper proposes an approach for trajectory planning for orientation change of the end-effector of a redundant robot with minimal displacement from its current position. Experiments are conducted to evaluate the applicability of this approach.

References

  1. Yang Lei, Yanhong Liu and Jinzu Peng. 2020. Advances techniques of the structured light sensing in intelligent welding robots: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/110. 10.1007/s00170-020-05524-2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hang Su, Hang Chenguang Yang, Giancarlo Ferrigno and Elena De Momi. 2019. Improved Human-Robot Collaborative Control of Redundant Robot for Teleoperated Minimally Invasive Surgery. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2019.2897145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Wada, T. Shibata, T. Saito and K. Tanie, 2004. Effects of robot-assisted activity for elderly people and nurses at a day service center. In Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 1780-1788. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.835378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yanlong Huang, Bernhard Scholkopf and Jan Peters. 2015. Learning optimal striking points for a ping-pong playing robot. 4587-4592. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2015.7354030.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Wen Yu and Adolfo Perrusquía. 2020. Simplified Stable Admittance Control Using End-Effector Orientations. Int. J. Soc. Robotics 12, 1061-1073.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stefano Chiaverini, Giuseppe Oriolo and Anthony Maciejewski. 2016. Redundant Robots, 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kevin M. Lynch and Frank C. Park. 2017. Modern Robotics Mechanics, Planning and Control. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yanlong Huang, Fares Abu-Dakka, João Silvério and Darwin Caldwell. 2019. Generalized Orientation Learning in Robot Task Space. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2019.8793540.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hongchao Fang, Ong and Andrew Nee. 2012. Orientation planning of robot end-effector using augmented reality. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4629-7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Caio Viturino, Ubiraton Junior, Conceicao Scolari, Andre and Leizer Schnitman. 2020. Adaptive Artificial Potential Fields with Orientation Control Applied to Robotic Manipulators. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 53. 9924-9929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.2706.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Stefan Gadringer, Hubert Gattringer, Andreas Mueller and Ronald Naderer. 2020. Robot Calibration combining Kinematic Model and Neural Network for enhanced Positioning and Orientation Accuracy. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 53. 8432-8437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. V. S. Siar and A. Fakharian. 2018. Energy efciency in the robot arm using genetic algorithm. In Proc. 8th Conf. AI Robot. 10th RoboCup Iranopen Int. Symp. (IRANOPEN), Qazvin, Iran, 14-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Kalra, P. B. Mahapatra, and D. K. Aggarwal. 2003. On the solution of multimodal robot inverse kinematic functions using real-coded genetic algorithms. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Syst., Man Cybern., Conf. Theme-Syst. Secur. Assurance, Washington, DC, USA, vol. 2, 1840-1845.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Anoush Sepehri and Moghaddam M. Amirreza. 2021. A Motion Planning Algorithm for Redundant Manipulators Using Rapidly Exploring Randomized Trees and Artificial Potential Fields. IEEE Access. 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Duguleana, F. G. Barbuceanu, A. Teirelbar, and G. Mogan. 2011. Obstacle avoidance of redundant manipulators using neural networks based reinforcement learning. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., vol. 28, no. 2, 132146.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang Wei and Wei Shimin. 2010. 3-D Path Planning Using Neural Networks for a Robot Manipulator. Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, International Conference on. 1, 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICTA.2010.838.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ciann-Dong Yang, Z. Lai. 1985. On the Dexterity of Robotic Manipulators—Service Angle. In Journal of Mechanisms Transmissions and Automation in Design, 107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Vinogradov, I.B., A.E. Kobrinski, Y.E. Stephenko, L.T. Tives. 1971. Details of Kinematics of Manipulators with the Method of Volumes. In Mekanika Mashin, Vol. 1, No.5, 5-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lyubomira Miteva, Galya Pavlova, Roumen Trifonov, and Kaloyan Yovchev. 2020. Manipulability Analysis of Redundant Robotic Manipulator. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies '20. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1145/3407982.3407987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Lyubomira Miteva, Ivan Chavdarov and Kaloyan Yovchev. 2020. Trajectory planning for redundant robotic manipulators with constrained joint space. In International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM), Split, Croatia, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.23919/SoftCOM50211.2020.9238296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. George Boiadjiev, Evgeniy Krastev, Ivan Chavdarov, and Lyubomira Miteva. 2021. A Novel, Oriented to Graphs Model of Robot Arm Dynamics. Robotics. 10, no. 4: 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics10040128Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Planning Orientation Change of the End-effector of State Space Constrained Redundant Robotic Manipulators

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CompSysTech '22: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
        June 2022
        188 pages
        ISBN:9781450396448
        DOI:10.1145/3546118

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 August 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format