Yuldashbay Kurambayev
ABSTRACT
There is no institution that can stay outside these ongoing educational reforms. Every higher education institution is experiencing fundamental changes on its instructional methods and technologies used for teaching students. Hence, Oguz han Engineering and Technology University of Turkmenistan (ETUT), as a leading university in engineering education in the country has considered a need to design its teaching instruction with creative solutions to make future engineers more competent in their desired majors. The research team member of "Computer Linguistics" has developed a MathCient platform - an online learning platform which provides teaching materials and quizzes to make students become a self, active online learner and come to class better prepared. Currently, the platform covers over 100 topics of Mathematics, Geometry, Physics and Chemistry courses and supported with unlimited upon-on-demand generatable questions to make engineering education more engaging and enjoyable pre-class activity. This paper introduces MathCient as a flipped learning tool for higher education and examines the students' experience on the program using the learning evaluation framework based on Bloom's revised taxonomy, adopted for assessing flipped learning platforms.
- Buil-Fabrega, M., Martínez Casanovas, M., & Ruiz-Munzón, N. (2019). Flipped classroom as an active learning methodology in sustainable development curricula. Sustainability, 11(17), 4577.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Su, Y. S., & Wu, S. Y. (2021). Applying data mining techniques to explore user behaviors and watching video patterns in converged IT environments. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 1-8.Google Scholar
- Lombardini, C., Lakkala, M., and Muukkonen, H. (2018). The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs. Int. Rev. Econ. Educ. 29, 14–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ireeGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Chetcuti, S. C., Thomas, H. J., & Pafford, B. J. (2014, June). Flipping the engineering classroom: Results and observations with non-engineering students. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24-620).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lopes, A. P., & Torres, C. (2015). The impact of an online mathematics education project (MATACTIVA) on higher education students. INTED2015, 2921-2927.Google Scholar
- Pereira, A. I., Fernandes, F., Pacheco, M. F., Barros, P. M., Silva, F., Cordeiro, E., ... & Pires, M. V. (2020). Developing tools for the e-learning platform mathe. In Conference proceedings of the 10th international conference the future of education (pp. 327-332).Google Scholar
- Karabulut‐Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398-411.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793-824.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Alten, D. C., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of flipping the classroom on learning outcomes and satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100281.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Divjak, B., Rienties, B., Iniesto, F., Vondra, P., & Žižak, M. (2022). Flipped classrooms in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings and future research recommendations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1-24.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2015). NMC horizon report: 2015 library edition (pp. 1-54). The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
- Kazanidis, I., Pellas, N., Fotaris, P., & Tsinakos, A. (2019). Can the flipped classroom model improve students’ academic performance and training satisfaction in Higher Education instructional media design courses?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(4), 2014-2027.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lundin, M., Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., Hillman, T., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Peterson, L. (2018). Higher education dominance and siloed knowledge: a systematic review of flipped classroom research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1-30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dapper, H., Wijnen-Meijer, M., Rathfelder, S., Mosene, K., von Kirchbauer, I., Bernhardt, D., ... & Combs, S. E. (2021). Radiation oncology as part of medical education—current status and possible digital future prospects. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, 197(6), 528-536.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nazarov, S., & Jumayev, B. (2021, June). Programming-based laboratory assignments for undergraduate students of power engineering fields. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies' 21 (pp. 187-190).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ghadiri, K. (2014, June). Developing and Implementing Effective Instructional Strategems in STEM. In 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 24-391).Google Scholar
- Lombardi, M. M., & Oblinger, D. G. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007), 1-12.Google Scholar
- Lavelle, J. P., Stimpson, M. T., & Brill, E. D. (2013). Flipped out engineering economy: Converting a traditional class to an inverted model. In IIE Annual Conference. Proceedings (p. 397). Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Google Scholar
- Zhao, L., He, W., & Su, Y. S. (2021). Innovative pedagogy and design-based research on flipped learning in higher education. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 230.Google Scholar
- Shetu, S. F., Rahman, M. M., Ahmed, A., Mahin, M. F., Akib, M. A. U., & Saifuzzaman, M. (2021). Impactful e-learning framework: A new hybrid form of education. Current Research in Behavioral Sciences, 2, 100038.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharples, M., de Roock, R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., ... & Wong, L. H. (2016). Innovating pedagogy 2016: Open University innovation report 5. Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University.Google Scholar
- Bloom, B. (1956). Bloom's taxonomy.Google Scholar
- Wilson, L. O. (2016). The Three Domains of Learning: Cognitive, Affective, and Psycomotor/Kinesthetic.Google Scholar
- Shi, Y., Ma, Y., MacLeod, J., & Yang, H. H. (2020). College students’ cognitive learning outcomes in flipped classroom instruction: a meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(1), 79-103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MathCient - An Innovative Solution for Flipped Learning in Higher Education
Recommendations
Flipped learning enhance technical and professional skills facilitating employability: a review of the evidence
The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of knowledge and practice, and the impact flipped learning - intertwined with education technology has on engineering education. Result of the study indicates that flipped ...
Efficacy of Flipped Learning in Engineering Education of India
Computer Information Systems and Industrial ManagementAbstractThis fast proliferation of interactive technology has enabled creative techniques in higher education that foster collaborative learning, exploration, inquiry in interactive learning environments. Flipped learning turns the classroom into an ...
Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms
This study surveyed 84 undergraduate students, majoring in education, in order to gather their perspectives regarding flipped classrooms and investigate their readiness levels for flipped learning. After the implementation of flipped learning for an ...
Comments