skip to main content
10.1145/3546155.3547283acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnordichiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sustainable Technological Futures: Moving beyond a One-World-World perspective

Published: 08 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

In this critique, we problematize the framing of technological futures in design and computing discourse through rhetorical devices such as the Futures Cone which we contend promotes a one-world-world perspective, in that it assumes a collective (western) acceptance of a particular historicity and notions of time and progress. This perspective currently dominates the practical design and implementation of many new technological devices and systems. To counter such orthodoxies, we instead adopt an alternate perspective which primarily draws from the work of Brazilian philosopher Alvaro Vieira Pinto who considered the past and the future as shaped by the present – a present that is open and creative due to constant change. Our perspective also draws upon Object-Oriented Ontology, Alien Phenomenology and Defuturing to reconsider the privileging of ‘human’ as part of complex assemblages of human and non-human actants which have interdependent relationships but operate within independent perspectives. Our novel framing enables us to develop and promote design practices for More-than-Human sustainable technological futures that go beyond purely human considerations and begin to accommodate futures for non-human entities, both technological and ecological (flora, fauna and climate). To concretise our argument, we present a series of Internet of Things related examples that apply Speculative Design techniques to illustrate how More-than-Human sustainable technological futures may be put into actionable design practice.

References

[1]
Paul Dourish, and Genevieve Bell. 2011. Divining A Digital Future: Mess and Mythology In Ubiquitous Computing. MIT Press.
[2]
Joseph Lindley, Paul Coulton, and Miriam Sturdee. 2017. Implications for Adoption. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, (CHI 2017). May 6-11, Denver, Colorado, USA. 265-277.
[3]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "critical" about critical design? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3297–3306.
[4]
Richmond Y Wong, and Vera Khovanskaya. Speculative Design in HCI: From Corporate Imaginations to Critical Orientations. In: Filimowicz, M., Tzankova, V. (eds) New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2 - Methodologies . Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73374-6_10
[5]
Carl DiSalvo. 2015. Adversarial design. MIT Press.
[6]
Paul Coulton; Joseph Galen Lindley, Miriam Sturdee, and Michael Stead. 2017. Design Fiction as World Building. In Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Research Through Design Conference. Edinburgh, UK, pp. 1–16.
[7]
Joseph Voros. 2003. A Generic Foresight Process Framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10-21.
[8]
Trevor Hancock and Clement Bezold. 1994. Possible futures, Preferable Futures. The Healthcare Forum Journal. Vol. 37. No. 2.
[9]
John Law. 2015. What's Wrong With A One-World World?. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 16, no. 1): 126-139.
[10]
Paul Coulton, and Joseph Galen Lindley. More-than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things. The Design Journal, 22(4), 463-481.
[11]
Tony Fry. 2009. Defuturing: A New Design Philosophy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[12]
Arturo Escobar. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
[13]
Marisol De la Cadena, and Mario Blaser, eds. 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Duke University Press.
[14]
Luiza Prado de O. Martins and Pedro Oliveira. 2014. Questioning the “Critical” in Speculative & Critical Design. https://medium.com/a-parede/questioning-the-critical-in-speculative- critical-design-5a355cac2ca4, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[15]
Ivica Mitrović. 2018. Western Melancholy / How to Imagine Different Futures in the ‘Real World’? http://interakcije.net/en/2018/08/27/western-melancholy-how-to- imagine-different-futures-in-the-real-world/ last accessed 01/04/2022.
[16]
Paul Coulton and Joseph Galen Lindley. 2017. Vapourworlds & Design Fiction: The Role of Intentionality. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4632-S4642.
[17]
Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything. MIT Press.
[18]
Paul Coulton, Daniel Burnett and Adrian Gradinar. 2016. Games as Speculative Design: Allowing Players to Consider Alternate Presents and Plausible Features, in Lloyd, P. and Bohemia, E. (eds.), Future Focused Thinking - DRS International Conference 2016, 27 - 30 June, Brighton, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.21606/ drs.2016.15.
[19]
Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto, Frederick MC van Amstel, Luiz Ernesto Merkle, and Timo Hartmann. 2013. The Ideology of the Future in Design Fictions. Digital creativity 24, no. 1: 36-45.
[20]
Frederick MC van Amstel and Rodrigo Freese Gonzatto. 2021. Existential Time and Historicity in Interaction Design. Human–Computer Interaction: 1-40.
[21]
Carl DiSalvo and Jonathan Lukens. 2011. Nonanthropocentrism and the nonhuman in design: possibilities for designing new forms of engagement with and through technology. In From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement, Marcus Foth, Laura Forlano, Christine Satchell and Martin Gibbs (eds.), MIT Press, 421–437.
[22]
Laura Forlano. 2017. Posthumanism and design. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 3(1), 16-29.
[23]
Anne Galloway, A. 2017. More-than-Human Lab: Creative Ethnography After Human Exceptionalism. In The Routledge Companion to Digital Ethnography (pp. 496-503).
[24]
Sarah Whatmore. 2006. Materialist Returns: Practising Cultural Geography In & For A More-than-Human World. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600-609.
[25]
Martin Heidegger. 2010. Being & Time. Suny Press.
[26]
Donald A Norman. 1998. The Invisible Computer: Why Good Products Can Fail, The Personal Computer Is So Complex, & Information Appliances Are The Solution. MIT Press.
[27]
Graham Harman. 2018. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Penguin UK.
[28]
Timothy Morton. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy & Ecology after the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press.
[29]
Ian Bogost. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, Or, What It's Like To Be A Thing. University of Minnesota Press.
[30]
Joseph Galen Lindley, Haider Ali Akmal, and Paul Coulton. 2020. Design Research and Object-Oriented Ontology. Open Philosophy, 3(1), 11-41.
[31]
James Pierce and Carl DiSalvo. 2017. Dark Clouds, Io& #!+, and [Crystal Ball Emoji] Projecting Network Anxieties with Alternative Design Metaphors. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 1383-1393).
[32]
Sabrina Hauser, Johan Redström and Heather Wiltse. 2021. The Widening Rift Between Aesthetics & Ethics In The Design of Computational Things. In Journal of AI and Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01279-w
[33]
Michael Stead. 2020. Spimes: A Multidimensional Lens for Designing Future Sustainable Internet Connected Devices. PhD Thesis. Lancaster University. https://doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/thesis/997
[34]
Bruce Sterling. 2004. Subject: Viridian Note 00422: The Spime – ‘When Blobjects Rule The Earth. http://www.viridiandesign.org/notes/401-450/00422_the_spime.html, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[35]
Bruce Sterling. 2005. Shaping Things. MIT Press.
[36]
Julian Bleecker. 2009. Design Fiction: A Short Essay on Design, Science, Fact and Fiction. http://drbfw5wfjlx on.cloudfront.net/writing/DesignFiction_WebEdition.pdf, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[37]
James Auger. 2013. Speculative Design: Crafting The Speculation, Digital Creativity, 24;1, 11–35.
[38]
Zhibo Pang, Lirong Zheng, Junzhe Tian, Sharon Kao-Walter, Elena Dubrova & Qiang Chen. 2015. Design of A Terminal Solution for Integration of In-home Health Care Devices and Services Towards The Internet-of-Things. Enterprise Information Systems, 9(1), 86-116.
[39]
Adrian Smith and Anne Light. 2017. Cultivating Sustainable Developments With Makerspaces. Liinc EmRevista, 13;1, 162-174.
[40]
Cindy Kohtala and Sampsa Hyysalo. 2015. Anticipated Environmental Sustainability of Personal Fabrication. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 333–344.
[41]
Chris Anderson. 2012. Makers: The New Industrial Revolution. Random House Business Books.
[42]
Eric Von Hippel. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
[43]
Erin Buehler, Stacy Branham, Abdullah Ali, Jeremy J. Chang, Megan Kelly Hofmann, Amy Hurst, Shaun K. Kane. 2015. ‘Sharing Is Caring: Assistive Technology Designs On Thingiverse,’ in Proceedings of the 2015 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI’ 15. (pp. 525-534). ACM.
[44]
Joyce M. Lee, Emily Hirschfeld and James Wedding. 2016. A Patient-Designed Do-It-Yourself Mobile Technology System For Diabetes: Promise and Challenges For A New Era In Medicine, JAMA, 315(14), 1447-1448.
[45]
Michael Stead. 2016. A Toaster for Life: Using Design Fiction To Facilitate Discussion On The Creation Of A Sustainable Internet Of Things. Proceedings of Design Research Society Conference 2016. ed. / Peter Lloyd; Erik Bohemia. Vol. 8 Design Research Society, 2016. p. 3049-3068 (Proceedings of DRS 2016; Vol. 8).
[46]
Blocks. 2022. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/2106691934/blocks-the-worlds-first-modular-smartwatch, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[47]
Alzheimers.org.uk. 2019. Key Publications About Dementia. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/get-support/publications-factsheets/publications-dementia, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[48]
Justin McCurry. 2016. Japan Running Low on Workers as Proportion of Over-65s Hits Record Levels. Guardian Online. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/30/japan-census-over-65s-record-27-population-immigration, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[49]
Jonathan Soble. 2017. Japan's Falling Birth Rate Posing Serious Problems for Economy. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/japans-falling-birth-rate-posingserious-problems-for-economy-a7770596.html, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[50]
Wareable.com. 2019. The death of the Blocks modular smartwatch – burned backers have their say. https://www.wareable.com/smartwatches/blosk-backers-have-their-say-7770, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[51]
Bran Knowles, Oliver Bates, and Maria Håkansson. 2018. This Changes Sustainable HCI. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Paper 471, 1–12.
[52]
Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. CHI '07. ACM Press, New York, NY, 503-512.
[53]
EC.Europa.EU. (2021). Recycling Rate of E-waste. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/T2020_RT130/bookmark/table?lang=en&bookmarkId=a69be825-957e-473c-a81f-f02866dc9141, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[54]
IPCC. (2021). AR6 Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis: Sixth Assessment Report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[55]
Statista. (2021). Number of Internet of Things (IoT) Connected Devices Worldwide from 2019 to 2030, By Use Case. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1194701/iot-connected-devices-use-case/, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[56]
Michael Stead and Paul Coulton. 2022, A More-than-Human Right-to-Repair. in DRS2022 Bilbao: Design Research Society Conference 2022., 29, Design Research Society, DRS 2022 Bilbao, Bilbao, Spain, 25/06/22. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.718
[57]
Michael Standaert. 2019. China Wrestles with the Toxic Aftermath of Rare Earth Mining. https://e360.yale.edu/features/china-wrestles-with-the-toxic-aftermath-of-rare-earth-mining, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[58]
Hongqiao Liu. 2017. As China Adjusts for “True Cost” of Rare Earths, What Does It Mean for Decarbonization? https://www.newsecuritybeat.org/2017/03/china-begins-adjusting-true-cost-rare-earths-decarbonization/, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[59]
Nicolas Nova and Anaïs Boch. 2021. Dr. Smartphone: an ethnography of mobile phone repair shops. IDP Publishing.
[60]
Sucharita Beniwal, 2020. New Worlds With Some Tinkering. In R.M. Leitao, L.A. Noel, & L. Murphy (Eds.), Proceedings of PIVOT 2020: Designing a World of Many Centers (246-251), 4 June.
[61]
Kevin McElvaney. 2014. Agbogbloshie: the world's largest e-waste dump – in pictures. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2014/feb/27/agbogbloshie-worlds-largest-e-waste-dump-in-pictures, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[62]
Elisabeth Kolbert. 2021. Under A White Sky: The Future of Nature. Bodley Head.
[63]
Paul Coulton. 2016. Design Futures through Design Fiction. Talk for EINA Barcelona. https://www.slideshare.net/MysticMonkey/design-futures-through-design-fiction, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[64]
Stuart Walker. 2014. Designing Sustainability: Making Radical Changes In A Material World. Oxon: Routledge.
[65]
John Thackara. 2005. In The Bubble: Designing In A Complex World. London: MIT.
[66]
Bruno Latour. 2011. Love Your Monsters: Why We Must Care For Our Technologies As We Do Our Children. In M. Shellenberger, & T. Nordhaus (Eds.). Love Your Monsters: Post-environmentalism and the Anthropocene (pp. 19-26).
[67]
John Asafu-Adjaye, Linus Blomqvist, Stewart Brand, Barry Brook, Ruth DeFries, Erle Ellis, Chris Foreman, David Keith, Martin W. Lewis, Mark Lynas, Ted Nordhaus, Roger Pielke, Jr., Rachel Pritzker, Joyashree Roy, Mark Sagoff, Michael Shellenberger, Robert Stone, Peter Teague. (2015). ‘An Ecomodernist Manifesto.’ https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5515d9f9e4b04d5c3198b7bb/t/552d37bbe4b07a7dd69fcdbb/1429026747046/An+Ecomodernist+Manifesto.pdf, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[68]
Bill Gates, B. 2021. How to Avoid A Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need. Penguin Books.
[69]
William Gibson. 2020. William Gibson Interviewed on BBC Radio 4 Today Programme, Mon 20 Jan 2020, 06:00-09:00. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000dj9g
[70]
Jan De Vries, J. 1994. The Industrial Revolution and the Industrious Revolution. The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 54, No. 2, Papers presented at the Fifty-Third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association (Jun, 1994), pp. 249-270.
[71]
Horst. W.J. Rittel and Melvin. M. Webber. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning, Policy Sciences, 4:155, 155–169.
[72]
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). ‘Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.’ https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf, last accessed 01/04/2022.
[73]
Alex Steffen. 2016. Cited in Rinde, M. 2016. Imagining a Postcarbon Future. Distillations, 2:3, 24-33.
[74]
John. M. Culkin. 1967. A Schoolman's Guide to Marshall McLuhan. Saturday Review, pp. 51-53, 71-72.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)More-than-Human Perspectives in Human-Computer Interaction Research: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685408(1-18)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)New Perspectives for Phenomenology in Interaction DesignProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685404(1-7)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Collective Infrastructural Speculations: A Situated Understanding of Pasts, Presents & Futures of Resilient Community Networks.Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666111(159-172)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
NordiCHI '22: Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference
October 2022
1091 pages
ISBN:9781450396998
DOI:10.1145/3546155
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 October 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Design Futures
  2. More-Than-Human
  3. Pluriversal Thinking
  4. Sustainable Technologies

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

NordiCHI '22

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 379 of 1,572 submissions, 24%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)104
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8
Reflects downloads up to 18 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)More-than-Human Perspectives in Human-Computer Interaction Research: A Scoping ReviewProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685408(1-18)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)New Perspectives for Phenomenology in Interaction DesignProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685404(1-7)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Collective Infrastructural Speculations: A Situated Understanding of Pasts, Presents & Futures of Resilient Community Networks.Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666111(159-172)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Recovering lost futures of the past: Situating alternative futures within an indigenous Afrocentric orientation and past trajectoryProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Full Papers - Volume 110.1145/3666094.3666101(28-40)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Fostering IoT Repair Through Care: Learning from Emotional Durable Gaming Practices and CommunitiesCompanion Publication of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3656156.3663702(102-105)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Cosmovision Of Data: An Indigenous Approach to Technologies for Self-DeterminationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642598(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • (2024)In conversation with ghosts: towards a hauntological approach to decolonial design for/with AI practicesCoDesign10.1080/15710882.2024.2320269(1-22)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2024
  • (2024)Smarter Repair 2053The Design Journal10.1080/14606925.2024.2437597(1-20)Online publication date: 6-Dec-2024
  • (2023)Artificial Design Fiction: Using AI as a Material for Pastiche ScenariosProceedings of the 26th International Academic Mindtrek Conference10.1145/3616961.3616987(195-206)Online publication date: 3-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Ancestral and Cultural Futuring: Speculative Design in an Indigenous ovaHimba contextProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Communities and Technologies10.1145/3593743.3593761(85-95)Online publication date: 29-May-2023

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media