skip to main content
10.1145/354666.354670acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Reflections on a candidate design of the user-interface for a wireless vital-signs monitor

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present a case study of our candidate design for the user-interface of a wireless vital-signs monitor. We reflect on our design of the user-interface, and relate our design experience to theories of artefact design, evaluating from this case study how the theories apply to the broader design context of design for AR. Theories of `good design' in artefact design literature do not unilaterally apply to the design for an augmented reality device. In many cases, design in AR fields requires the designer to create new cultural conventions by virtue of the fact that the designer is immersing the user in an unfamiliar environment. Thus, the designer is often unable to utilise affordances and existing cultural conventions because the functions and/or use of the object expands the environment in which affordances and cultural conventions currently have meaning.

References

  1. 1.Black, A., and Buur, J. Making solid user interfaces work, Information Design Journal 8, 2 (1996), 99-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Buur, J. and Bagger, K. Replacing Usability Testing With User Dialogue, Commun. ACM 42, 5, 63-66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Cross, N. Engineering Design Methods - Strategies for Product Design. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK. 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Flach, J.M. The ecology of human machine interfaces: A personal history. In Flach J., Hancock, P.A., Caird, J., and Vincente K.J., Global perspectives on the ecology of human machine systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 1995 1-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Gaver, W.W. Situating Action II: Affordances for Interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology 8, 2, 111-129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6.Mullet, K. and Sano, D. Designing Visual Interfaces, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Norman, D.A. Affordance, Conventions and Design. Interactions III, 3 (May and June, 1999), 38-42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Norman, D.A. The Design of Everyday Things. Doubleday, New York NY. 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Pahl G., and Beitz, W. Engineering Design - A systematic Approach. Springer Verlag, London. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Smyth, M.G., Anderson, B., Knott, R.P., and Alty, J.L. Reflections on the Design of Interface Metaphors, in Proceedings of Human-Computer Interaction (Interact '95), Chapman & Hall, 339-345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Wilson, L.S., Sharp, I.F., Gill, R.W., Heitmann, S.A., Chen, C.F., Dadd, M.J., Kajan, A., Gunaratnam, M., and Tam, E., The Hospital Without Walls - home telecare using vital signs monitoring, available at http://www.coh.uq.edu.au/research/homecare/pap99_Wil son_HWW.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reflections on a candidate design of the user-interface for a wireless vital-signs monitor

                  Recommendations

                  Comments

                  Login options

                  Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                  Sign in
                  • Published in

                    cover image ACM Conferences
                    DARE '00: Proceedings of DARE 2000 on Designing augmented reality environments
                    April 2000
                    171 pages
                    ISBN:9781450373265
                    DOI:10.1145/354666

                    Copyright © 2000 ACM

                    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                    Publisher

                    Association for Computing Machinery

                    New York, NY, United States

                    Publication History

                    • Published: 1 April 2000

                    Permissions

                    Request permissions about this article.

                    Request Permissions

                    Check for updates

                    Qualifiers

                    • Article

                    Acceptance Rates

                    Overall Acceptance Rate5of7submissions,71%

                  PDF Format

                  View or Download as a PDF file.

                  PDF

                  eReader

                  View online with eReader.

                  eReader