skip to main content
10.1145/3548636.3548639acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesitccConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improvement in Land Cover Classification Using Multitemporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery

Published:23 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

For improving the performance of multitemporal Sentinel-1 (S1) SAR and Sentinel-2 (S2) optical imagery for land cover classification, a framework based on Rotating Kernel Transformation (RKT) denoising algorithm and the stratified sampling method based on the Crop Data Layer (CDL) is proposed. Random Forest classifications based on different denoising algorithms and sampling methods are carried out to compare their accuracy and applicability for land cover classification. The results show that the RKT algorithm and the stratified sampling method can significantly improve the classification accuracy. The classification accuracy by S1 data alone without denoising (overall accuracy: 0.873, Kappa: 0.796) is significantly lower than that of S2 (overall accuracy: 0.979, Kappa: 0.970) resulting from effects of serious salt-and-pepper noise. After RKT filtering, the speckle noise of the S1 classification result is significantly reduced and the accuracy is significantly improved (overall accuracy: 0.944, Kappa: 0.912). RKT filter outperforms the Lee and Median filters in improving the classification accuracy of SAR imagery. Feature-level fusion of S1 and S2 achieves the highest classification accuracy (overall accuracy: 0.983, Kappa: 0.972) which is significantly higher than that of S1 and slightly higher than that of S2 data alone. It proves that the fusion of the optical and SAR data can weaken the speckle noises on classification maps and improve the classification accuracy. The stratified sampling method applied in this study significantly improves the classification accuracy of each experimental group, with the overall accuracy increasing by about 10% and the Kappa coefficient increasing by more than 15% on average.

References

  1. I. Abou EL-Magd and T. Tanton, Improvements in land use mapping for irrigated agriculture from satellite sensor data using a multi-stage maximum likelihood classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, vol. 24, pp. 4197-4206, June 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000139791.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. You, Z. Pei, F. Wang, Q. Wu, and L. Guo, Area extraction of winter wheat at county scale based on modified multivariate texture and GF1 satellite images, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, vol. 32, pp. 131-139, July 2016. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.13.019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Yan and D. Roy, Improved time series land cover classification by missing-observation-adaptive nonlinear dimensionality reduction, Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 158, pp. 478-491, March 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.11.024.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Yan, L. Wang, W. Song, Y. Chen, X. Chen, and Z. Deng, A time-series classification approach based on change detection for rapid land cover mapping, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 158, pp. 249-262, December 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.10.003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G Jin, Q Xu, H Zhang, Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry, Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G Jin, H Zhang, Q Xu, Radargrammetry, Beijing:Surveying and Mapping Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. N. F. Nafari, S. Homayouni, A. Safari, and V. Akbari, Assessment of full and compact polarimetric SAR observations for land-cover and crop classification, in Living Planet Symposium, pp. 85, 2016./Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Q Zhao, K Xie, G Wang and Y Li, Land cover classification of polarimetric SAR with fully convolution network and conditional Random Forest, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, vol. 49, pp. 69-82, 2020. https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:CHXB.0.2020-01-007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. X. Blaes, L. Vanhalle, and P. Defourny, Efficiency of crop identification based on optical and SAR image time series, Remote sensing of environment, vol. 96, pp. 352-365, June 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.03.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. S. Banerjee, S. Sinha Chaudhuri, R. Mehra, and A. Misra, A survey on Lee filter and its improved variants, in Advances in Smart Communication Technology and Information Processing: OPTRONIX 2020, pp. 371-383, February 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. Jiao, X. Zhang, B. Hou, S. Wang, and F. Liu, Intelligent SAR image processing and interpretation, Science Press, January 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Cai, X. Luo, and J. Yang, Characteristic analysis of SAR noise based on wavelet transform, in 2012 2nd International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, pp. 1-7, June 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Y.-K. Lee and W. T. Rhodes, Rotating-kernel min-max algorithms for straight-line feature enhancement, Applied Optics, vol. 34, pp. 290, January 1995. https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.34.000290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Q. Guo, F. Dong, S. Sun, X. Ren, S. Feng, and B. Z. Gao, Improved rotating kernel transformation based contourlet domain image denoising framework, in Pacific-Rim Conference on Multimedia, pp. 146-157, December 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03731-8_14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. W Huang, J Wu, H Ren, Rotating kernel transformation denoising algorithm based on wavelet transform in photo thermal optical coherence tomography, Laser and Optoelectronics Progress, vol. 57(22), pp. 1-11, January 2020. https://doi.org/10.3788/LOP57.221005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C Wang, Research on imbalanced data classification based on the distribution of near neighbors, Xidian University, 2020. https://doi.org/10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2019.002749.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Chen, J. Chen, A. Liao, X. Cao, L. Chen, X. Chen, , Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: A POK-based operational approach, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 103, pp. 7-27, May 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Peng Gong, Han Liu, Meinan Zhang, Congcong Li, Jie Wang, Huabing Huang, Nicholas Clinton, , Stable classification with limited sample: Transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017, Sci. Bull, vol. 64, pp. 370-373, February 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.03.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C. Boryan, Z. Yang, R. Mueller, and M. Craig, Monitoring US agriculture: the US department of agriculture, national agricultural statistics service, cropland data layer program, Geocarto International, vol. 26, pp. 341-358, April 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2011.562309.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improvement in Land Cover Classification Using Multitemporal Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ITCC '22: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Communications
      June 2022
      138 pages
      ISBN:9781450396820
      DOI:10.1145/3548636

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 August 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format