Rubén Alcaraz-Martínez
ABSTRACT
A remote user test was performed with two versions (one accessible and another one non-accessible) of three types of web-based charts (horizontal bar chart, vertical stacked bar chart, and line chart). The objectives of the test were a) to validate a set of heuristic indicators for the evaluation of the accessibility of statistical charts presented in a previous work [7]; b) to identify new barriers and preferences for users with low vision in the access and use of this content not previously contemplated. 12 users were tested, with a variety of conditions associated with low vision: low visual acuity (6 users), reduced central vision (2 users), reduced peripheral vision (2 users), blurry vision (1 user), sensitivity to light (3 users), Nystagmus (2 users) and color vision deficiency (CVD) (4 users). From a quantitative standpoint, accessible versions of charts were more efficient, effective, and satisfactory. From a qualitative point of view, results verify the relevance of heuristics H2, Legend; H3, Axes; H6, Data source (as data table); H10, Safe colors; H11, Contrast; H12, Legibility; H13, Image quality; H14, Resize; H16, Focus visible; H17, Independent navigation; related to the proposed tasks. As new observations, tooltips were highly valued by all users, but their implementation must be improved to avoid covering up significant parts of the charts when displayed. The data table has also been frequently used by all users, especially in the non-accessible versions, allowing them to carry out tasks more efficiently. The position and size of the legend can be a significant barrier if it is too small or appears in an unusual position. Finally, despite the limitations related to color perception, users prefer color graphics to black and white, so, to target all profiles, it is necessary to redundantly encode categories with colors and patterns as well.
- GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. 2021. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. The lancet global health 9, 2, e130-e143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30425-3.Google Scholar
- WebAIM. 2013. Visual disabilities. Page 3. Low vision. https://webaim.org/articles/visual/lowvision.Google Scholar
- Hyung Nam Kim, 2013. Elicitation of haptic user interface needs of people with low vision. International journal of human-computer interaction 29, 7, 488-500.Google Scholar
- Lourdes Moreno, Xabier Valencia, J. Eduardo Pérez and Myrriam Arrue. 2020. An exploratory study of web adaptation techniques for people with low vision. Universal access in the information society 20, 223–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00727-6Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarit-Felicia-Anais Szpiro, Shafeka Hashash, Yuhang Zhao and Shiri Azenkot, 2016. How People with low vision access computing devices: understanding challenges and opportunities. In ASSETS '16 Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, 171-180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982168.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yevgen Borodin, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Glenn Dausch and I.V. Ramakrishnan. 2010. More than meets the eye: a survey of screen-reader browsing strategies. In W4A '10: Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility. Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1805986.1806005.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rubén Alcaraz-Martínez, Mireia Ribera and Toni Granollers. 2021. Methodology for heuristic evaluation of the accessibility of statistical charts for people with low vision and color vision deficiency. Universal access in the information society. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-021-00816-0.Google ScholarDigital Library
- W3C. 2018. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21.Google Scholar
- Rubén Alcaraz-Martínez, Mireia Ribera, Toni Granollers and Afra Pascual. 2020. Accesibilidad para personas con baja visión de los gráficos estadísticos en la prensa digital: una propuesta metodológica basada en indicadores heurísticos. El profesional de la información 29, 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.15.Google Scholar
- Rubén Alcaraz-Martínez and Mireia Ribera. 2020. An evaluation of accessibility of COVID-19 statistical charts of governments and health organisations for people with low vision. El profesional de la información 29, 5. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.sep.14.Google Scholar
- Rubén Alcaraz-Martínez, Mireia Ribera, Jordi Roig, Afra Pascual and Toni Granollers. 2022. Accessible charts are part of the equation of accessible papers: a heuristic evaluation of the highest impact LIS journals. Library hi tech 40, 3, 594-622. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2020-0188.Google Scholar
- Christopher Power, André Freire, Helen Petrie and David Swallow. 2012. Guidelines are only half of the story: accessibility problems encountered by blind users on the Web. In CHI '12: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 433-442. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2207736.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bettina Lechner, Ann Fruhling, Stacie Petter and Harvey Siy. 2013. The chicken and the pig: user involvement in developing usability heuristics. In 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2013 - Hyperconnected World: Anything, Anywhere, Anytime, 3263-3270.Google Scholar
- Giorgio Brajnik. 2009. Barrier walkthrough. https://users.dimi.uniud.it/∼giorgio.brajnik/projects/bw/bw.html.Google Scholar
- Shadi Abou Zahra. 2017. How people with disabilities use the Web. In Accessibility fundamentals. W3C. https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web.Google Scholar
- Rubén Alcaraz-Martínez, Mireia Ribera and Toni Granollers. 2020. Accessible statistical charts guidelines for people with low vision. In 2020 15th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 1-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI49556.2020.9140814.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William Albert and Eleri Dixon (2003). Is this what you expected?: the use of expectation measures in usability testing. In Proceedings of the Usability Professionals Association 2003 Conference.Google Scholar
- Alita Joyce. 2019. Tooltip Guidelines. NN/g Nielsen Norman Group. Articles. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/tooltip-guidelines.Google Scholar
- Mallory Van Achterberg. 2019. Designing and coding for low vision. In Technica11y: discussing challenges in technical accessibility. https://www.technica11y.org/designing-and-coding-for-low-vision.Google Scholar
- Stephanie Evergreen S. 2018. Presenting data effectively: communicating your findings for maximum impact. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, California.Google Scholar
- Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic. 2015. Storytelling with data: a data visualization guide for business professionals. Wiley, New Jersey.Google Scholar
- Colin Ware and John C. Beatty. 1985. Using color as a tool in discrete data analysis. Technical Report. CS-85-21, Computer Science Department University. of Waterloo, Waterloo. https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/research/tr/1985/CS-85-21.pdf.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2000. Accessibility features of SVG. https://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SVG-access-20000807.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2015. SVG Accessibility/ARIA roles for charts. https://www.w3.org/wiki/SVG_Accessibility/ARIA_roles_for_charts.Google Scholar
- W3C. 2018. WAI-ARIA graphics module. https://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0.Google Scholar
- S. Harland Gordon, G.E. Legge and A. Luebker. 1998. Psychophysics of reading – XVII Low-vision performance with four types of electronically magnified text. Optometry and vision science 75, 3, 183-190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199803000-00023.Google Scholar
- Guobei Xiao, Guotong Xu and Jianwei Lu. 2010. iBrowse: software for low vision to access Internet. In 2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, 2062–2066. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2010.5639642.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Myriam Arrue, Xabier Valencia, J. Eduardo Pérez, Lourdes Moreno and Julio Abascal. 2019. Inclusive web empirical studies in remote and in situ settings: a user evaluation of the RemoTest platform. International journal of human-computer interaction 35, 7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1473941.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Validation of a heuristic set to evaluate the accessibility of statistical charts
Recommendations
The Accessibility of Data Visualizations on the Web for Screen Reader Users: Practices and Experiences During COVID-19
Data visualization has become an increasingly important means of effective data communication and has played a vital role in broadcasting the progression of COVID-19. Accessible data representations, however, have lagged behind, leaving areas of ...
Impact of web accessibility barriers on users with hearing impairment
Interacción '14: Proceedings of the XV International Conference on Human Computer InteractionSeveral users tests were carried out with people with a hearing impairment to evaluate the impact of different web accessibility barriers on two similar web sites, one accessible and the other not accessible. The tests focus was to analyze user's mood ...
AUDiaL: A Natural Language Interface to Make Statistical Charts Accessible to Blind Persons
Computers Helping People with Special NeedsAbstractThis paper discusses the design and evaluation of AUDiaL (Accessible Universal Diagrams through Language). AUDiaL is a web-based, accessible natural language interface (NLI) prototype that allows blind persons to access statistical charts, such as ...
Comments