skip to main content
10.1145/3550356.3561541acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodelsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Model-checking of space systems designed with TASTE/SDL

Published:09 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Model-Based Software Engineering (MBSE) is a development approach aiming to build correct-by-construction systems, provided the use of clear, unambiguous and complete models to describe them along the design process. The approach is supported by several engineering tools, such as the TASTE toolset. TASTE is a pragmatic and mature open-source toolset supported by European Space Agency that enables and provides automation for most of the phases of software system development: (i) heterogeneous system design through several modelling and programming languages, (ii) code generation, build and deployment of the binary application(s), and (iii) validation through static analysis and simulation. One topic left open in TASTE is the formal verification of a system design with respect to specified properties. In this paper we describe our approach based on the IF model-checker to enable the formal verification of properties on TASTE designs, as well as the results obtained and lessons learned.

References

  1. M. Bozga, S. Graf, Il. Ober, Iu. Ober, and J. Sifakis. 2004. The IF Toolset. In Formal Methods for the Design of Real-Time Systems, International School on Formal Methods for the Design of Computer, Communication and Software Systems, SFM-RT 2004, Bertinoro, Italy, September 13-18, 2004, Revised Lectures (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3185), Marco Bernardo and Flavio Corradini (Eds.). Springer, 237--267. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Bozzano, H. Bruintjes, A. Cimatti, J. P. Katoen, T. Noll, and S. Tonetta. 2019. COMPASS 3.0. In Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems, Tomáš Vojnar and Lijun Zhang (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 379--385.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. E. M. Clarke, E. A. Emerson, and A. P. Sistla. 1986. Automatic Verification of Finite-State Concurrent Systems Using Temporal Logic Specifications. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 8, 2 (apr 1986), 244--263. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. MoC4Space Consortium. 2022. TASTE model-checking with IF - Git repository. Available at https://gitrepos.estec.esa.int/taste/if-model-checking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. MoC4Space Consortium. 2022. TASTE model-checking with IF - Technical Documentation. Available at https://taste.tuxfamily.org/wiki/index.php?title=IF_model-checking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. I. Dragomir, M. Bozga, I. Ober, D. Silveira, T. Jorge, E. Alana, and M Perrotin. 2021. Formal Verification of Space Systems Designed with TASTE. In Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Model Based Space Systems and Software Engineering. European Space Agency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. I. Dragomir, C. Redondo, T. Jorge, L. Gouveia, M. Bozga, I. Ober, and M Perrotin. 2022. Model-Checking for TASTE designed Space Software Systems: Results and Lessons Learned. In Proceedings of 3nd Workshop on Model Based Space Systems and Software Engineering. European Space Agency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ITU-T. 2010. Specification and Description Language (SDL). Available at https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Z.100/en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. ITU-T. 2021. Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1): Specification of basic notation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Kurowki, R. Babski, S. Duncan, M Perrotin, and M. Webster. 2021. Model-Checking for Formal Verification of Space Systems. In Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on Model Based Space Systems and Software Engineering. European Space Agency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Ocon, F. Colmenero, I. Dragomir, E. Heredia, M. Alonso, J. Estremera, R. Marc, P. Weclewski, T. Keller, M. Woods, and S. Karachalios. 2019. Testing Autonomous Robots: A Discussion on Performances Obtained During the ERGO Field Tests. In Proceedings of 15th Symposium on Advanced Space Technologies in Robotics and Automation. European Space Agency.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J.P. Queille and J. Sifakis. 1982. Specification and verification of concurrent systems in CESAR. In International Symposium on Programming, 5th Colloquium, Torino, Italy, April 6-8, 1982, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 137), Mariangiola Dezani-Ciancaglini and Ugo Montanari (Eds.). Springer, 337--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. SAE. 2022. Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL). Available at https://www.sae.org/standards/content/as5506d/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. TASTE. 2022. The Assert Set of Tools for Engineering. Available at https://taste.tools/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MODELS '22: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings
    October 2022
    1003 pages
    ISBN:9781450394673
    DOI:10.1145/3550356
    • Conference Chairs:
    • Thomas Kühn,
    • Vasco Sousa

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 November 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate118of382submissions,31%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader