skip to main content
10.1145/3550469.3555427acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Realistic Luminance in VR

Published:30 November 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

As virtual reality (VR) headsets continue to achieve ever more immersive visuals along the axes of resolution, field of view, focal cues, distortion mitigation, and so on, the luminance and dynamic range of these devices falls far short of widely available consumer televisions. While work remains to be done on the display architecture side, power and weight limitations in head-mounted displays pose a challenge for designs aiming for high luminance. In this paper, we seek to gain a basic understanding of VR user preferences for display luminance values in relation to known, real-world luminances for immersive, natural scenes. To do so, we analyze the luminance characteristics of an existing high-dynamic-range (HDR) panoramic image dataset, build an HDR VR headset capable of reproducing over 20,000 nits peak luminance, and conduct a first-of-its-kind study on user brightness preferences in VR. We conclude that current commercial VR headsets do not meet user preferences for display luminance, even for indoor scenes.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3550469.3555427.mp4

mp4

394.2 MB

References

  1. Wendy J Adams, James H Elder, Erich W Graf, Julian Leyland, Arthur J Lugtigheid, and Alexander Muryy. 2016. The southampton-york natural scenes (SYNS) dataset: Statistics of surface attitude. Scientific Reports 6, 1 (2016), 1–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Kynthia Chamilothori, Jan Wienold, and Marilyne Andersen. 2019. Adequacy of immersive virtual reality for the perception of daylit spaces: comparison of real and virtual environments. Leukos 15, 2-3 (2019), 203–226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alexandre Chapiro, Timo Kunkel, Robin Atkins, and Scott Daly. 2018. Influence of screen size and field of view on perceived brightness. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 15, 3 (2018), 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Jacob Cohen. 1992. A power primer. Psychological bulletin 112, 1 (1992), 155.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Scott Daly, Timo Kunkel, Xing Sun, Suzanne Farrell, and Poppy Crum. 2013. Preference limits of the visual dynamic range for ultra high quality and aesthetic conveyance. 86510J. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2013161Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hugh Davson. 1990. Physiology of the Eye. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Paul E Debevec and Jitendra Malik. 2008. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 classes. 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dolby. 2016. Dolby Vision™ for the Home. Technical Report. Dolby Laboratories, Inc.https://connect.avid.com/rs/149-WFZ-676/images/Avid_HDRSeminar_dolby-vision-white-paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mark D Fairchild. 2013. Color appearance models. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fufu Fang, Han Gong, Michal Mackiewicz, and Graham Finlayson. 2017. Colour correction toolbox. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham D Finlayson and Mark S Drew. 1996. The maximum ignorance assumption with positivity. In Color and Imaging Conference. Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 202–205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Jan Froehlich, Stefan Grandinetti, Bernd Eberhardt, Simon Walter, Andreas Schilling, and Harald Brendel. 2014. Creating cinematic wide gamut HDR-video for the evaluation of tone mapping operators and HDR-displays. In Digital photography X, Vol. 9023. SPIE, 279–288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Alan Gilchrist, Christos Kossyfidis, Frederick Bonato, Tiziano Agostini, Joseph Cataliotti, Xiaojun Li, Branka Spehar, Vidal Annan, and Elias Economou. 1999. An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological review 106, 4 (1999), 795.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ralph Jacobson, Sidney Ray, Geoffrey G Attridge, and Norman Axford. 2013. Manual of Photography. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kil Joong Kim, Rafal Mantiuk, and Kyoung Ho Lee. 2013. Measurements of achromatic and chromatic contrast sensitivity functions for an extended range of adaptation luminance. In Human vision and electronic imaging XVIII. SPIE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Timo Kunkel and Erik Reinhard. 2010. A reassessment of the simultaneous dynamic range of the human visual system. In Proceedings of the 7th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Patrick Ledda, Alan Chalmers, and Helge Seetzen. 2004. HDR displays: a validation against reality. In 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37583), Vol. 3. IEEE, 2777–2782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Laura R Luidolt, Michael Wimmer, and Katharina Krösl. 2020. Gaze-dependent simulation of light perception in virtual reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 12(2020), 3557–3567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Steve Mann and Rosalind W. Picard. 1995. On being ‘undigital’ with digital cameras: Extending Dynamic Range by Combining Differently Exposed Pictures. In Proceedings of IS&T. 442–448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Arian Mehrfard, Javad Fotouhi, Giacomo Taylor, Tess Forster, Nassir Navab, and Bernhard Fuerst. 2019. A comparative analysis of virtual reality head-mounted display systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02913(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Hossein Najaf-Zadeh, Madhukar Budagavi, and Esmaeil Faramarzi. 2017. VR+ HDR: A system for view-dependent rendering of HDR video in virtual reality. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 1032–1036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Sumanta N Pattanaik, Jack Tumblin, Hector Yee, and Donald P Greenberg. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display. In Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 47–54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Clotilde Pierson, Coralie Cauwerts, Magali Bodart, and Jan Wienold. 2021. Tutorial: luminance maps for daylighting studies from high dynamic range photography. Leukos 17, 2 (2021), 140–169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Josiane McGinn Proulx. 2020. A Comparative Study of Lighting Perceptions between Tone-Mapped Virtual Reality Environments and Physical Environments. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Colorado at Boulder.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ana Radonjić, Sarah R. Allred, Alan L. Gilchrist, and David H. Brainard. 2011. The Dynamic Range of Human Lightness Perception. Current Biology 21, 22 (Nov. 2011), 1931–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Alessio Regalbuto. 2019. Remote Visual Observation of Real Places through Virtual Reality Headsets. (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Erik Reinhard, Wolfgang Heidrich, Paul Debevec, Sumanta Pattanaik, Greg Ward, and Karol Myszkowski. 2010. High dynamic range imaging: acquisition, display, and image-based lighting. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. TJ Rhodes, Gavin Miller, Qi Sun, Daichi Ito, and Li-Yi Wei. 2019. A transparent display with per-pixel color and opacity control. In ACM SIGGRAPH Emerging Technologies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S Rockcastle, M Danell, E Calabrese, G Sollom-Brotherton, A Mahic, K Van Den Wymelenberg, and R Davis. 2021. Comparing perceptions of a dimmable LED lighting system between a real space and a virtual reality display. Lighting Research & Technology 53, 8 (2021), 701–725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Helge Seetzen, Wolfgang Heidrich, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, Greg Ward, Lorne Whitehead, Matthew Trentacoste, Abhijeet Ghosh, and Andrejs Vorozcovs. 2004. High dynamic range display systems. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)(2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Helge Seetzen, Hiroe Li, Linton Ye, Wolfgang Heidrich, Lorne Whitehead, and Greg Ward. 2006. Observations of Luminance, Contrast and Amplitude Resolution of Displays. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers 37, 1 (2006), 1229. https://doi.org/10.1889/1.2433199Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Helge Seetzen, Lorne A. Whitehead, and Greg Ward. 2003. A High Dynamic Range Display Using Low and High Resolution Modulators. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers 34, 1 (2003), 1450. https://doi.org/10.1889/1.1832558Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Gunter Wyszecki and Walter Stanley Stiles. 1982. Color science. Vol. 8. Wiley New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Fangcheng Zhong, Akshay Jindal, Ali Özgür Yöntem, Param Hanji, Simon J. Watt, and Rafał K. Mantiuk. 2021. Reproducing reality with a high-dynamic-range multi-focal stereo display. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) 40, 6 (Dec. 2021), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478513.3480513Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Realistic Luminance in VR

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SA '22: SIGGRAPH Asia 2022 Conference Papers
      November 2022
      482 pages
      ISBN:9781450394703
      DOI:10.1145/3550469

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format