skip to main content
10.1145/3551504.3551530acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesceeegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How Citizens have Informed themselves about Covid-19 during the Pandemic

Published:25 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Fake news is defined as “false stories that appear to be news, spread on the Internet or using other media, usually created to influence political views or as a joke”, thus, it is not necessary false information, although often refers to false information [1]. COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the generation as well as consumption of fake news. Afraid of the unknown virus, people started to consume all possible information they found on internet, while various parties with specific opinions or ideas started to generate and circulate false information and fake news. Fake news have impacted even to the health of people [2]. The paper analyses the five on-line surveys conducted by the author and her research team between December 2020 and March 2022. There are differences among the answers, mostly due to the COVID-19 situation as well as the differences in government measures. From these surveys, it emerged that the personality strongly impacts one's perception as well as behaviour changes. The paper discusses about the findings from the surveys in comparison to the literature to identify the limitation and future research topics.

References

  1. Molina M.D., Sundar S.S., Le T. and D. Lee (2021), ““Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content”, American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2): 180–212Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rocha Y.M., de Moura G.A., Desidério G.A., de Oliveira C.H., Lourenço F.D. and L.D. de Figueiredo Nicolete (2021), The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review”, Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice, 29(5)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim B., Aiping Xiong A., Lee D. and K. Han (2021), “A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions”, PLoS One, 16(12)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Ruffo G., Semeraro A., Giachanou A., and P. Rosso (2021), “Surveying the research on fake news in social media: A tale of networks and language”, PreprintGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhou, X. and R. Zafarani (2020) “A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunities”, ACM Computing Surveys, 53(5)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pennycook G. and D. G. Rand (2021), “The Psychology of Fake News”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Olan F., Jayawickrama U., Arakpogun E.O., Suklan J. and S. Liu (2022) “Fake news on Social Media: the Impact on Society”, Information Systems Frontiers, 24(1)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Yin R. (2014), Case study research (5th ed.) London: Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Talwar S., Dhir A., Singh D., Virk G.S. and J. Salo (2020) “Sharing of fake news on social media: application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Bermes A. (2021), “Information overload and fake news sharing: A transactional stress perspective exploring the mitigating role of consumers’ resilience during COVID-19”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Allcott H. and M. Gentzkow (2017) “Social media and fake news in the 2016 election”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2): 211–236Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Sharma K., Qian F., Jiang H., Ruchansky N., Zhang M. and Y. Liu (2019) “Combating fake news: A survey on identification and mitigation techniques”, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10(3): 1–42Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shu K., Cui L., Wang S., Lee D., and H. Liu (2019), “dEFEND: Explainable fake news detection”, in Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (KDD), 395–405Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Vosoughi S., Roy D., and S. Aral (2018) “The spread of true and false news online”, Science, 359, 6380, 1146–1151Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rubin V.L., Chen Y., and N.J. Conroy (2015) “Deception detection for news: three types of fakes”, in Proceedings of the 78th ASIS&T Annual Meeting: Information Science with Impact: Research in and for the Community, American Society for Information Science, 83Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kshetri N. and J. Voas (2017) “The economics of “fake news””, IT Professional, 6: 8–12Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kucharski A. (2016) “Post-truth: Study epidemiology of fake news”, Nature, 540, 7634, 525Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Buntain C. and J. Golbeck (2017) “Automatically Identifying Fake News in Popular Twitter Threads”, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Cloud (SmartCloud)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tandoc Jr E.C., Lim Z.W. and R. Ling (2018) “Defining fake news: A typology of scholarly definitions”, Digital Journalism, 6(2): 137-153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wardle C. (2017) “Fake news. It's complicated”, First Draft News, 16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Golbeck J., Mauriello M., Auxier B., Bhanushali K.H., Bonk C., Bouzaghrane M.A., Buntain C., Chanduka R., Cheakalos P. and J.B. Everett (2018) “Fake news vs satire: A dataset and analysis” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science. ACM, 17–21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Campbell W. J. (2001) Yellow journalism: Puncturing the myths, defining the legacies, Westport, CT, PraegerGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Crain R. (2017) “Fake news could make advertising more believable”, Advertising AgeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Samuel A. (2016) “To fix fake news, look to yellow journalism”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sundar S. S. and C. Nass (2001) “Conceptualizing sources in online news”, Journal of Communication, 51, 52-72Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Conroy N. J., Rubin V. L. and Y. Chen (2015) “Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news”, in Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Downie L. Jr and M. Schudson (2009) “The reconstruction of American journalism”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Howard P. N., Kollanyi B., Bradshaw, S. and L.M. Neudert (2017) “Social media, news and political information during the US election: Was polarizing content concentrated on swing states”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Adweek (2009) “Landmark moments in citizen journalism”Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou.X., Zafarani R., Shu K. and H. Liu (2019) “Fake news: Fundamental theories, detection strategies and challenges”, in Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, ACM, 836–837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Undeutsch U. (1967) “Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Aussagen”, Handbuch der Psychologie 11, 26–181Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. McCornack S.A., Morrison K., Paik J.E., Wisner A.M. and X. Zhu (2014) “Information manipulation theory: A propositional theory of deceptive discourse production”, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4): 348–377Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Zuckerman M., DePaulo B.M. and R. Rosenthal (1981) “Verbal and Nonverbal Communication of Deception”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14: 1–59Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Shao C., Ciampaglia G.L., Varol O., Yang K-C., Flammini A. and F. Menczer (2018) “The spread of low-credibility content by social bots”, Nature Communications, 9(1)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Ferrara E., Varol O., Davis C., Menczer F. and A. Flammini (2016) “The rise of social bots”, Communications of the ACM, 59(7): 96–104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Kahneman D. and A. Tversky (2013) “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decisionmaking: Part I, World Scientific, 99–127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Leibenstein H. (1950) “Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers’ demand”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(2): 183–207Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Deutsch M. and H.B. Gerard (1955) “A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment”, The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 51(3): 629Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Ashforth B.E. and F. Mael (1989) “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 20–39Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Boehm L.E. (1994) “The validity effect: A search for mediating variables”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(3): 285–293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Jamieson K.H. and J.N. Cappella (2008) Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment, Oxford University PressGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Nickerson R.S. (1998) “Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises”, Review of General Psychology, 2(2)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Freedman J.L. and D.O. Sears (1965), “Selective exposure”, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2: 57–97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Fisher R.J. (1993) “Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning”, Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2): 303–315Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Pronin E., Kruger J., Savtisky K. and L. Ross (2001) “You don't know me, but I know you: The illusion of asymmetric insight”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Bálint P. and G. Bálint (2009) “The Semmelweis-reflex”, Orvosi Hetilap 150(30)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Vo N. and K. Lee (2018) “The rise of guardians: Fact-checking URL recommendation to combat fake news”, PreprintGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Batailler C. , “A signal detection approach to understanding the identification of fake news”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, (in press)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmidt T., Cloete A., Davids A., Makola L., Zondi N. and M. Jantjies (2020) “Myths, misconceptions, othering and stigmatizing responses to Covid-19 in South Africa: a rapid qualitative assessment”, PLoS One, 15(12)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Fernández-Torres M.J., Almansa-Martínez A. and R. Chamizo-Sánchez (2021) “Infodemic and fake news in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Radwan E., Radwan A., and W. Radwan (2020) “The role of social media in spreading panic among primary and secondary school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online questionnaire study from the Gaza Strip, Palestine”, Heliyon, 6(12)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Islam A.K.M.N., Laato S., Talukder S., and E. Sutinen (2020) “Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: an affordance and cognitive load perspective”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Secosan I., Virga D., Crainiceanu Z.P., Bratu L.M. and T. Bratu (2020) “Infodemia: another enemy for Romanian frontline healthcare workers to fight during the COVID-19 outbreak”, Medicina, 56(12)Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Brennen, S.J., Simon, F.M., Howard, P.N. and R.K. Nielsen (2020) “Types, Sources, and Claims of Covid-19 Misinformation”, Reuters InstituteGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Liu, H., Liu, W., Yoganathan, V. and V.S. Osburg (2021), “COVID-19 information overload and generation Z's social media discontinuance intention during the pandemic lockdown”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Kudo H. (2018), “Digital Governance as Alternative Public Service Delivery: From e-government to government digital services”, in Nemec J., Potier V. and M.S. de Vries (eds.), Alternative Service Delivery, IASIA/IIAS, pp.45-51Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How Citizens have Informed themselves about Covid-19 during the Pandemic

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CEEeGov '22: Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days
      September 2022
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450397667
      DOI:10.1145/3551504

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 October 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format