skip to main content
10.1145/3551504.3551544acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesceeegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Use of Moodle among public service students: pandemic effects

Published:25 October 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Digitalization of education has been emphasized of interest for decades. The COVID-19 pandemic created conditions that demanded rapid changes in teaching and learning methods. An adequate preparedness was often lacking, but we can take the situation as an experiment that offers the experience to promote effective e-learning. The study focuses on Moodle, the most popular system for supporting learning worldwide. Its applicability is beyond dispute, but several factors may influence the utilization level and satisfaction locally. The goal of the study is to compare the utilization and satisfaction with Moodle before and during the pandemic. The differences allow exploring the effects of the forced use of the system. The results in this paper are based on a voluntary survey among public service students. The survey includes evaluating the tools of acquiring a curriculum for exploring some aspects of the learning habits. Furthermore, the functions, design, supporting role, and utilization are investigated. The sample consists of 100 responses before and 100 responses during the pandemic situation, randomly selected. All respondents are students at the Ludovika University of Public Service. The results show a moderate change in most factors. Time spent in Moodle has remarkably increased, and its role has been appreciated in the communication between students and teachers. Satisfaction has increased about the usability of the system, but its design, speed, and customization options are judged worse. Moodle's appropriateness for learning support is confirmed by the study. Since the purpose of Moodle is to support effective learning, the supply-side of Moodle-based learning must be strengthened, including teachers’ competencies in exploiting the opportunities. Long-term benefits can be promoted by a higher level of integration with other educational systems.

References

  1. Balázs B. Budai, Balázs Kőnig, Gábor Törley and Anna Orbán, 2012: Elektronikus Közigazgatás szervezés, közigazgatási technológia. Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, Budapest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anna, Orbán, 2020. Measuring the development of the Hungarian electronic administration. In Proceedings of Central and Eastern European e|Dem and e|Gov Days 2020, Österreichische Computer Gesellschaft (ÖCG), Wien, 93-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v.338.7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Péter L. Sasvári, 2020. Informatikai rendszerek a közszolgálatban II. Ludovika Egyetemi Kiadó, Budapest.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. István Polónyi, 2021. Pandémiás oktatás. Educatio 30, 1, 3-21. DOI: 10.1556/2063.30.2021.1.1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Hassan M. Selim, 2007. Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers & Education 49, 2 (Sept, 2007), 396-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Valentina Arkorful and Nelly Abaidoo, 2014. The role of e-learning, the advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research 2, 12 (Dec, 2014), 397-410.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Nia Love and Nadine Fry, 2006. Accounting Students’ Perceptions of a Virtual Learning Environment: Springboard or Safety Net? Accounting Education: An International Journal 15, 2, 151-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/06939280600609201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Princely Ifinedo, Joanne Pyke and Amar Anwar, 2018. Business undergraduates’ perceived use outcomes of Moodle in a blended learning environment: The roles of usability factors and external support. Telematics and Informatics 35, 1 (April 2018), 93-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. I Gusti N. Triyana, Ni K. S. Ratmini, I Wayan Mandra and Ni W. Ruscitadewi, 2019. The use of Moodle-based e-learning in evaluating students’ learning. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu 5, 2 (Spet, 2019) 165-159. DOI: 10.25078/jpm.v5i2.1089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Robekka R. F. Sinaga and Reza Pustika, 2021. Exploring students’ attitude towards English online learning using Moodle during covid-19 pandemic at Smk Yadika Bandarlampung. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning 2, 1 (June 2021), 8-15. Available at: http://jim.teknokrat.ac.id/index.php/english-language-teaching/article/view/850 [Accessed: 04.01.2022]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Peter Jarvis, 2010. Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. Routledge, London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Miri Barak, Abeer Watted and Hossam Haick, 2016. Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement. Computers & Education 94 (March 2016), 49-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. James G. Mazoue, 2013. The MOOC model: challenging traditional education. Educause Review (Jan, 2013). Available at: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/1/the-mooc-model-challenging-traditional-education [Accessed: 04.01.2022]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cathy Sandeen, 2013. Integrating MOOCS into traditional higher education: The emerging “MOOC 3.0” era. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 45, 6, 34-39. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2013.842103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Diana Andone and Vlad Mihaescu, 2018. Integrating open education concepts in blended learning with MOOCs. In 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., Mumbai, 24-26, DOI: 10.1109/ICALT.2018.00019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Nurassyl Kerimbayev, Nurdaulet Nurym, Аliya Akramova and Saule Abdykarimova, 2020. Virtual educational environment: interactive communication using LMS Moodle. Education and Information Technologies 25,1965-1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10067-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. N. H. S. Simanullang and J. Rajagukguk, 2020. Learning Management System (LMS) based on Moodle to improve students learning activity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1462 (Feb, 2020), 012067. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1462/1/012067.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Hasan F. Hasan, Muesser Nat and Vanye Z. Vanduhe, 2019. Gamified collaborative environment in Moodle. IEEE Access 7, 89833-89844. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Thomas Dondorf, Roman Breuer and Heribert Nacken, 2016. Classroom vs. e-Learning: A case study on the performance of students in different learning scenarios. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN), World Research Society, Barcelona, 6507-6516. DOI: 10.21125/edulearn.2016.0410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Fred D. Davis, 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 3, 319-340. DOI: 10.2307/249008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gabrio M. Murillo, Pavel Novoa-Hernández and Rocío S. Rodríguez, 2021. Technology Acceptance Model and Moodle: A systematic mapping study. Information Development 37, 4, 617-632. DOI: 10.1177/0266666920959367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Heidi Schuhbauer, 2019. Evaluation of an e-learning course in Moodle in comparison to a traditional lesson. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information, Communication Technologies in Education (ICICTE 2019). The International Consortium for Educational Technology, Chania, Greece, 44-53. Available at: http://www.icicte.org/assets/icicte2019proceedings.pdf [Accessed: 04.01.2022]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Julio Cabero-Almenara, Maria L. Arancibia and Annachiara Del Prete, 2019. Technical and didactic knowledge of the Moodle LMS in higher education. Beyond functional use. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research 8, 1 (Jan, 2019), 25-33. DOI: 10.7821/naer.2019.1.327.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Use of Moodle among public service students: pandemic effects

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CEEeGov '22: Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days
          September 2022
          192 pages
          ISBN:9781450397667
          DOI:10.1145/3551504

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 25 October 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format