Abdul Wahi Nur Syuhaini
ABSTRACT
Governments have adopted e-government worldwide to improve efficiency and effectiveness in their organization. However, the public sector employee's non-adaptive behavior is hampering the digitalization effort. Therefore, this paper aims to present a conceptual model for measuring factors of e-government adoption among government employees and determining the relationship between use and user satisfaction with the job performance of employees. For measuring the adoption of e-government systems, eleven dimensions of this proposed model are identified from the review of the state-of-the-art literature in this field. Eleven dimensions of the proposed model are derived from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and Delone and Mclean IS Success Model, including system quality, information quality, service quality, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating condition, intention to use, use, user satisfaction, and net benefits. The outcome of this paper will provide future opportunities for governmental agencies, private sectors, or other related parties to assist government and employees in improving the e-government system and adoption. Subsequently, enable the public sector to improve the performance and efficiency of service delivery to citizens. In return, this leads to a more sustainable and resilient e-government effort for the future.
- Sitti Aminah and Herie Saksono. 2021. Digital transformation of the government: A case study in Indonesia. J. Komun. Malaysian J. Commun. 37,2, 272–288. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3702-17Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Marijn Janssen and Elsa Estevez. 2013. Lean government and platform-based governance - Doing more with less. Gov. Inf. Q. 30, SUPPL. 1, S1–S8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anna Urbanovics and Peter Sasvari. 2021. The status of e-government research from a bibliometric aspect. In Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2021. Budapest, Hungary, 75–88. https:/doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v341.5Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohammed A. Almaiah and Yacoub Nasereddin. 2020. Factors influencing the adoption of e-government services among Jordanian citizens. Electron. Gov. 16,3, 236–259. https:/doi.org/10.1504/EG.2020.108453Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoai T. Nguyen, Thanh V. Dang, Vien V. Nguyen, and Tung T. Nguyen. 2020. Determinants of e-government service adoption: An empirical study for business registration in Southeast Vietnam. J. Asian Public Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2020.1805396Google ScholarCross Ref
- Razlini M. Ramli. 2017. E-government implementation challenges in Malaysia and South Korea: A comparative study. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries. 80, 1, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00591.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Chiara Panari, Giorgio Lorenzi, and Marco G. Mariani. 2021. The predictive factors of new technology adoption, workers’ well-being and absenteeism: The case of a public maritime company in Venice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 12358, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijerph182312358Google Scholar
- Roya Gholami, Neetu Singh, Pranav Agrawal, Karina Espinosa, and Dalal Bamufleh. 2021. Information technology/systems adoption in the public sector: Evidence from the Illinois Department of Transportation. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 29, 4, 172–194. https:/doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.20210701.oa8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joyce D. Jackson, Mun Y. Yi, and Jae S. Park. 2013. An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Inf. Manag. 50, 4, 154–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.006Google ScholarDigital Library
- Preeti Bhaskar, Muddu Vinay, and Amit Joshi. 2020. E-government adoption among employees. Advances in Human Resources Management and Organization Development (AHRMOD). IGI Global, Hershey PA, USA. https:/doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4180-7.ch002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julia Kaesmayr, Michael Schorn, and Anna Steidle. 2021. Acceleration factor pandemic: A synthesis of e-government maturity models and public administration employees’ perspective. In Proceedings of the Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2021. Budapest, Hungary. 19-32. https:/doi.org/10.24989/ocg.v341.1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicolae Urs. 2018. E-government development in Romanian local municipalities: A complicated story of success and hardships. Transylvanian Rev. Adm. Sci. 14, 55, 118-129. https:/doi.org/10.24193/tras.55E.8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mariem B. Rehouma and Sara Hofmann. 2018. Government employees’ adoption of information technology - A literature review. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser. https:/doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209311Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mitja Dečman. 2015. Understanding technology acceptance of government information systems from employees’ perspective. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 11, 4, 69–88. https:/doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2015100104Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ainhoa Year, Olatz Arbelaitz, Oier Jauregui, and Javier Muguerza. 2020. Characterization of e-Government adoption in Europe. PLoS One 15, 4, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231585Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anele Apleni and Hanlie Smuts. 2020. An e-government implementation framework: A developing country case study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 12067 LNCS. Springer Nature, Switzerland. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_2Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sinawong Sang, Jeong-Dong Lee, and Jongsu Lee. 2009. Adoption of E-Government Services: The Case of Electronic Approval System. Int. J. E-Adoption 1, 2, 1–22. https:/doi.org/10.4018/jea.2009040101Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wong M. Seng, Stephen Jackson, and George Philip. 2010. Cultural issues in developing E-government in Malaysia. Behav. Inf. Technol. 29, 4, 423–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903300931Google ScholarCross Ref
- Iman Sudirman, Atya N. Aisha, Joe Monang, and Ilham R. Prasetyo. 2019. Civil servant's e-government adoption levels: Are age and context matters?. Int. Conf. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. Informatics, 235–240. https:/doi.org/10.23919/EECSI48112.2019.8976952Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mansour N. Alraja, Samir Hammami, Billal Chikhi, and Samia Fekir. 2016. The influence of effort and performance expectancy on employees to adopt E-government: Evidence from Oman. Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 6, 4, 930–934.Google Scholar
- Pathamanathan P. Muthu Chelliah, Ramayah Thurasamy, Ahmed I. Alzahrani, Osama Alfarraj, and Nasser Alalwan. 2016. E-Government service delivery by a local government agency: The case of E-Licensing. Telemat. Informatics 33, 4, 925–935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.02.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khalid Alminshid and Mohd Omar. 2021. Factors affecting employees’ adoption of e-government in the Iraqi public education sector. Electron. Gov. 17, 2, 237–252. https:/doi.org/10.1504/EG.2021.114569.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wassan A. A. Al-Khowaiter, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, and Michael D. Williams. 2015. Examining the role of social influence, usefulness and ease of use for determining the mandatory use of a human resource information system in the context of Saudi ministries. Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res. 11, 3, 24–42. https:/doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2015070102.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dua'a Sawalha and Emad Abu-shanab. 2015. Financial information systems in governments: Is it accepted by public employees?. Int. Arab J. e-Technology 4, 2, 57–66.Google Scholar
- Isaac K. Mensah and Jianing Mi. 2019. Computer self-efficacy and e-government service adoption: The moderating role of age as a demographic factor. Int. J. Public Adm., 42, 2, 158–167. https:/doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1405980Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carlos Tam and Tiago Oliveira. 2016. Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Comput. Human Behav. 61, 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.016Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ahmed I. Alzahrani, Imran Mahmud, Ramayah Thurasamy, Osama Alfarraj, and Nasser Alalwan. 2017. Modelling digital library success using the DeLone and McLean information system success model. J. Lib. Inf. Sc. 51, 2, 291-306. https:/doi.org/10.1177/0961000617726123Google ScholarCross Ref
- William H. DeLone and Ephraim R. McLean. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19, 4, 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anak A. I. K. Gangga Dewi, and Ahmad N. Fajar. 2021. Assessing the success of Kominfo mail handling system based on employee perspective. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 99, 11, 2595–2604.Google Scholar
- Darko Stefanovic, Ugljesa Marjanovic, Milan Delić, Dubravko Culibrk, and Bojan Lalic. 2016. Assessing the success of e-government systems: An employee perspective. Inf. Manag. 53, 6, 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.02.007Google ScholarDigital Library
- Majdi Mellouli, Fatma Bouaziz, and Omar Bentahar. 2020. E-government success assessment from a public value perspective. Int. Rev. Public Adm. 25, 3, 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2020.1799517Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yung-Cheng Shen, Chun Y. Huang, Chia H. Chu, and Chih T. Hsu. 2010. A benefit-cost perspective of the consumer adoption of the mobile banking system. Behav. Inf. Technol. 29, 5, 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290903490658Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stacie Petter, William DeLone, and Ephraim McLean. 2008. Measuring information systems success: Models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 3, 236–263. https:/doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.15Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zainab A. Al-Sulami and Hayder S. Hashim. 2018. Measuring the success of e-government systems: Applying the success model of the Delone and Mclean information system. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 96, 22, 7654–7670Google Scholar
- Isyaku U. Haruna, Maslinda M. Nadzir, Hapina Awang, and Latifah Mohamed. 2021. A conceptual model of E-taxation satisfaction: How can taxpayers be tickled pink with the smart web-based taxation application?,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1997,1. https:/doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1997/1/012041Google ScholarCross Ref
- Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis, and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 3 (September 2003), 425–478.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dedy Afrizal and Muslimin Wallang. 2021. Attitude on intention to use e-government in Indonesia. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 22, 1 (April 2021), 435–441. https:/doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v22.i1.pp435-441Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ittipat Chinangkulpiwat, Singha Chaveesuk, and Wornchanok Chaiyasoonthorn. 2021. Developing an Acceptance Model for Use with Online Video-Sharing Platforms. 2021 3rd Int. Conf. Comput. Commun. Internet, ICCCI 2021, 194–198. https:/doi.org/10.1109/ICCCI51764.2021.9486788Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A Proposed Model for Assessing E-Government Adoption Among Civil Servants
Recommendations
Government employees' adoption of information technology: a literature review
dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data AgeGovernment employees' adoption of IT is a critical factor for the success of IT implementation in the public sector. However, research has neglected the internal perspective in this field. This literature review examines 28 articles dealing with factors ...
Citizens' E-Government Services Adoption: An Extension of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model
This study investigates the factors that influencing citizens' intention to use e-government services and its causal relationships using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model (UTAUT). Data relating to the constructs were collected ...
Investigating Factors Inhibiting e-Government Adoption in Developing Countries: The Context of Pakistan
Researchers in the discipline of electronic government e-Government have historically presented several factors impeding the adoption and implementation of these systems. This paper is uniquely aimed at investigating the factors inhibiting e-Government ...
Comments